Buffalo signs Ville Leino to 6-year, 27m contract
#21
Posted 01 July 2011 - 03:55 PM
Technically, both deals are overpayments, but based on the Ericsson move, this actually makes financial sense.
#22
Posted 01 July 2011 - 04:07 PM
"Very few cities in the NHL have the history or the following of the Detroit Red Wings." - Steve Yzerman
"Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the American people’s liberty teeth and keystone under independence." - George Washington
"Suck my machine gun." - Ted Nugent responding to British pansy Piers Morgan whining for gun control
US Bill of non-rights
#23
Posted 01 July 2011 - 04:20 PM
Wonder how good they'll be without him. They pretty much got it going instantly when Leino was put on to that line.Wonder how good he'll be without Briere and Hartnell.
- Manoir and Zeowingsfan like this
#24
Posted 01 July 2011 - 06:11 PM
"For my game, I don't need to score the goal," Konstantinov once explained. "I need someone to start thinking about me and forgetting about scoring goals."
#25
Posted 01 July 2011 - 06:20 PM
- mjlegend 3/9/2011
#26
Posted 01 July 2011 - 06:33 PM
#27
Posted 01 July 2011 - 07:01 PM
I like Leino a lot, but To expect 70 PTA is a bit ridiculous. The kid has hands though, hope he surprises me...Apparently the plan is to have Leino as the #1 Centre playing with Vanek and Stafford, Sabres expect him to be a 70 pt guy.
#28
Posted 03 July 2011 - 02:39 PM
And for the record, Ehrhoff's contract is great unless the cap shrinks considerably; they get a high-end defenseman on the cheap, and can deal him later to a needy team if they have to.
- Drake_Marcus and Reds4Life like this
"I once devoured a monk's soul. It tasted like chocolate."
#29
Posted 04 July 2011 - 10:47 AM
This is the key here. They're taking a risk and paying for potential, but it could end up being a great deal. Leino is now for the first time really given a real big offensive role and not that big of a threat for getting benched if it doesn't work out immediately. He's only been in the league for one full season, so there are still things left to see. He's a 27-year-old late bloomer and is probably still improving at least slightly.Makes you wonder why they would get rid of a proven first-line NHL center in Connolly to pick up Leino, who has had one good season on the wing of a top-end center, and try and cram him into the center role which he hasn't played since juniors.
The last time Leino played center was in 06-07. He's a natural centerman. Of course there are question marks, but I see his style of play fitting better for the center role.
#30
Posted 04 July 2011 - 02:26 PM
"Mess up tomorrow, don't mess up now".
- Harry James Benson, CBE.
#31
Posted 05 July 2011 - 12:07 AM
This is the key here. They're taking a risk and paying for potential, but it could end up being a great deal. Leino is now for the first time really given a real big offensive role and not that big of a threat for getting benched if it doesn't work out immediately. He's only been in the league for one full season, so there are still things left to see. He's a 27-year-old late bloomer and is probably still improving at least slightly.
The last time Leino played center was in 06-07. He's a natural centerman. Of course there are question marks, but I see his style of play fitting better for the center role.
Hudler's a natural center too. Let's put him between Franzen and Cleary or Bertuzzi and see how it works.
As for the "paying for potential" part...
Tim Connolly is only three years older. Connolly is a proven commodity. Will Leino be providing 5 points for every 6 games over the first three years of his contract, and also be a reliable defensive center? I somehow don't see that happening; mainly due to Leino's defensive failings. So Leino will need to score more. But if they figure him to be around 70 points... that's 5 points every 6 games, which is what Connolly scored. Granted, Connolly had his health issues and was only playing 60 games (50 points) so that means Leino is expected to stay healthy, which he hasn't had any trouble doing so far. So, it's a matter of Leino staying healthy and scoring enough points above 50 per season to offset the difference between him and Connolly; liability vs reliability. How many points is that worth in a season. 10? 20? 30? That's how you can tell whether Buffalo improved at center. I would say they didn't.
- Zeowingsfan likes this
"I once devoured a monk's soul. It tasted like chocolate."
#32
Posted 05 July 2011 - 07:30 AM
"Mess up tomorrow, don't mess up now".
- Harry James Benson, CBE.
#33
Posted 05 July 2011 - 07:49 AM
They may now looking for another #1 centre instead.
Wow.
Which other teams out there don't have a quality #1 center? Toronto comes to mind unless they made a huge acquisition that slipped by me, which is fairly likely.
#34
Posted 05 July 2011 - 08:51 AM
Wow.
Which other teams out there don't have a quality #1 center? Toronto comes to mind unless they made a huge acquisition that slipped by me, which is fairly likely.
Tim Connolly.
"I once devoured a monk's soul. It tasted like chocolate."
#35
Posted 05 July 2011 - 09:04 AM
you're silly.Hudler's a natural center too. Let's put him between Franzen and Cleary or Bertuzzi and see how it works.
As for the "paying for potential" part...
Tim Connolly is only three years older. Connolly is a proven commodity. Will Leino be providing 5 points for every 6 games over the first three years of his contract, and also be a reliable defensive center? I somehow don't see that happening; mainly due to Leino's defensive failings. So Leino will need to score more. But if they figure him to be around 70 points... that's 5 points every 6 games, which is what Connolly scored. Granted, Connolly had his health issues and was only playing 60 games (50 points) so that means Leino is expected to stay healthy, which he hasn't had any trouble doing so far. So, it's a matter of Leino staying healthy and scoring enough points above 50 per season to offset the difference between him and Connolly; liability vs reliability. How many points is that worth in a season. 10? 20? 30? That's how you can tell whether Buffalo improved at center. I would say they didn't.
I'm thoroughly convinced that even you don't believe a lot of what you say about Hudler and just type it for a laugh... and this is coming from someone who has been a Hudler supporter and thought he always took too much heat on this board...
I feel like we should have a sound cut like a 1980's sitcom, where every time eva talks about Hudler, everyone else, in unison, goes "Oh eva!" and then he just shrugs his shoulders and the laugh track is signaled...
All I have to say about Holland and our off-season:
and finally
Holland is a damn good GM. period.
#36
Posted 05 July 2011 - 10:17 AM
I feel like we should have a sound cut like a 1980's sitcom, where every time eva talks about Hudler, everyone else, in unison, goes "Oh eva!" and then he just shrugs his shoulders and the laugh track is signaled...
I would prefer going with "whatcho talkin' 'bout eva?" personally.
#37
Posted 05 July 2011 - 10:22 AM
LGW photoshoppers... I think you've been queued...I would prefer going with "whatcho talkin' 'bout eva?" personally.
I'm not sure exactly what it would entail, but I'm imagining something with Gary Coleman's face on Hudler's body with one of eva's many comments captioned and, of course a word bubble coming out of Coleman's face, with said catch phrase...
and... commence!
Edited by stevkrause, 05 July 2011 - 10:24 AM.
All I have to say about Holland and our off-season:
and finally
Holland is a damn good GM. period.
#38
Posted 05 July 2011 - 10:30 AM
you're silly.
I'm thoroughly convinced that even you don't believe a lot of what you say about Hudler and just type it for a laugh... and this is coming from someone who has been a Hudler supporter and thought he always took too much heat on this board...
I feel like we should have a sound cut like a 1980's sitcom, where every time eva talks about Hudler, everyone else, in unison, goes "Oh eva!" and then he just shrugs his shoulders and the laugh track is signaled...
Silly about what, the Franzen-Hudler-Bertuzzi/Cleary thing? I'm serious there. I think it would work well. The "big wingers/small center" setup has worked many times to great success throughout history. Putting a skilled, small guy like Hudler with two big scorers isn't as crazy as you think. It wouldn't be my first choice given our current roster and the fact it would either: be the third line and force the move of Eaves, Mursak, or Miller (maybe even Tatar) onto the top two lines; or put Hudler in the second line slot with Flip on the third. One more big winger, a guy with a bit of speed, scoring skill, and grit, would fit perfectly on the wing instead.
But this is a thread about how Leino will thoroughly disappoint the Sabres brass. So let's stay on topic.
"I once devoured a monk's soul. It tasted like chocolate."
#39
Posted 05 July 2011 - 11:07 AM
Tim Connolly.
Tim Connolly is barely a 2nd liner. Sabres fans couldn't wait to get rid of him. He's hurt constantly and makes loads of dumb passes. He's a good positional player, good on the PK, but doesn't backcheck or put in much effort. I would say that at the message board for the Sabres I frequent, they were about 75/25 against him signing his last contract with the Sabres and have been counting the days for him to leave.
Off the ice he's got issues too. Ducks the media constantly... he won't take responsibility like many players do to the media. And there are quite a few interesting stories about his hi-jinx on Chippewa St. in Buffalo that I won't recount since they are just rumors.
I'm not defending the Leino contract though... I think he's about $1.5 - $2M overpaid and don't think he'll produce at a 2nd line center level.
#40
Posted 05 July 2011 - 11:21 AM
Apparently the plan is to have Leino as the #1 Centre playing with Vanek and Stafford, Sabres expect him to be a 70 pt guy.
Really? 70 points? Who knows? Maybe he'll have good chemistry with his new linemates. But expecting 70 points out of a guy that topped out at 53 and only scored 19 goals... I know its the NY way of thinking with all their sports teams, but paying a player more money doesn't make them better players.
Why am I a fan of the Detroit Red Wings?
The NHL tweeted my son and I at the 2012 NHL Draft!
Similar Topics
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The CapGeek Thread |
General Discussion | The Axe |
|
|
|
Brunner Contract Talks |
General Discussion | Ram |
|
|
|
Cap might be worse than expected.
|
General Discussion | Majsheppard |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users














