Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Third line players who suck


  • Please log in to reply
33 replies to this topic

#1 eva unit zero

eva unit zero

    Save the Princess...Save the World

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,734 posts

Posted 12 August 2011 - 01:12 AM

Given all of the Hudler hate on the board, and the fact that people think his performance last season was terrible, horrible, whatever description you like, I thought I would ask this question.

What third-line (based on ice time) players around the league do you think 'suck' who plays a scoring role, yet still put up around 40 points? I'd like to see the list of names this board comes up with just so we have an idea of who is having comparable seasons to what Hudler did last year. I'll start it off with a few names:

Mason Raymond, Vancouver
Tomas Kopecky, Chicago
Devin Setoguchi, San Jose
Anthony Stewart, Atlanta
Tomas Holmstrom, Detroit
James van Riemsdyk, Philadelphia
Brian Boyle, Rangers

There are a great deal more out there. Anyone care to list them? Who out there is a terrible player who played in a scoring role and put up similar numbers to Hudler?

How about notably worse numbers? We can bring up these guys:

Ruslan Fedotenko, Rangers
Marc Savard, Boston
Jason Arnott, Washington
Radek Dvorak, Atlanta

"I've never seen a warlock do that without his magic."
"I once devoured a monk's soul. It tasted like chocolate."

#2 ComradeWasabi

ComradeWasabi

    the abdelgator

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,461 posts

Posted 12 August 2011 - 01:30 AM

Sure, Hudler can put up 40+ points, but that's about it. No defensive responsibility, no checking of any kind, no speed, no net-front presence, no "grit". If someone whose only talent is to score is not scoring as much as he should, then he didn't perform very well. If he brought something else to the table - which he does not - a sub-par year numbers-wise may be forgiven. That's not the case with Happy.

edit: I realize I completely ignored the point of your thread, but this is part of my ongoing effort to make you understand why nobody likes Hudler here. It's not blind hate.

Edited by ComradeWasabi, 12 August 2011 - 01:30 AM.

QUOTE (thedisappearer @ December 13, 2008 - 10:13AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
So, we're dogpiling on the goalie sammy Hudler the defense the refs league bias against us coaching now? Ok.

Babcock is lazy and he sucks!

#3 luvmnger

luvmnger

    2nd Line Scorer

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 501 posts
  • Location:albuquerque NM

Posted 12 August 2011 - 02:27 AM

his lack of visual dedication is what gets on everybodys nerves.

i personally like happy...but i understand the hate and discontent.
Dino Ciccarelli will always be #1

#4 LidstromIsASuperhero

LidstromIsASuperhero

    3rd Line Checker

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 464 posts

Posted 12 August 2011 - 03:01 AM

Third line players generally don't do a lot of scoring on most teams. They might chip in a decent amout of points here and there, but their primary responsibility should be on defense and basically being a plug while the scoring lines take a rest. There are a lot of players that could put up similar points to other third liners in the NHL but don't make it because they don't provide the aforementioned grit or other intangibles.

#5 P. Marlowe

P. Marlowe

    4th Line Heel

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,538 posts
  • Location:Finland

Posted 12 August 2011 - 05:01 AM

You shouldn't be using words like "nobody" and "everybody". I don't have a problem with Hudler. I don't follow fashions. Although I understand that during the long hockeyless summer months the ancient God of LGW get restless and demands sacrifices.

"Finger-pointing is easy. In some cases, even therapeutic. Fans need to blame something,

because the outcome is so frustratingly out of their control."
-- Mitch Albom

| Terry Sawchuk & Johnny Bower | | Extra Protection | | "Luckies never cut my wind." | | Straight to the Goal | | Dodging Traffic |
| Tom Waits - Get Behind the Mule | | Mikael Samuelsson Forever | | Mike Grier? |


#6 LeftWinger

LeftWinger

    42 years in Detroit! Time to spend the rest in paradise!

  • Silver Booster
  • 8,608 posts
  • Location:HART - MI

Posted 12 August 2011 - 05:18 AM

Given all of the Hudler hate on the board, and the fact that people think his performance last season was terrible, horrible, whatever description you like, I thought I would ask this question.

What third-line (based on ice time) players around the league do you think 'suck' who plays a scoring role, yet still put up around 40 points? I'd like to see the list of names this board comes up with just so we have an idea of who is having comparable seasons to what Hudler did last year. I'll start it off with a few names:

Mason Raymond, Vancouver
Tomas Kopecky, Chicago
Devin Setoguchi, San Jose
Anthony Stewart, Atlanta
Tomas Holmstrom, Detroit
James van Riemsdyk, Philadelphia
Brian Boyle, Rangers

There are a great deal more out there. Anyone care to list them? Who out there is a terrible player who played in a scoring role and put up similar numbers to Hudler?

How about notably worse numbers? We can bring up these guys:

Ruslan Fedotenko, Rangers
Marc Savard, Boston
Jason Arnott, Washington
Radek Dvorak, Atlanta

:hysterical: You are so funny, first of all Holmstrom is 38 years old, and he is STILL out performing Hudler at 26. Same amount of points last year in the same amount of games, but Holmstrom's points are earned in a way that Hudler could NEVER understand NOR would he ever attempt. I'd take one Holmstrom over four Hudler's anytime and anyday. We aren't even going to mention Holmstrom's worth to this team over Hudler in the the playoffs... You are just taking your love for Hudler way too far now bud, just stop, please, stop.

Don't Be Jealous, But I Live Here...

www.thinkdunes.com

 

Aww You Mad Bro? Are You Butt Hurt?


#7 P. Marlowe

P. Marlowe

    4th Line Heel

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,538 posts
  • Location:Finland

Posted 12 August 2011 - 05:40 AM

:hysterical: You are so funny, first of all Holmstrom is 38 years old, and he is STILL out performing Hudler at 26. Same amount of points last year in the same amount of games, but Holmstrom's points are earned in a way that Hudler could NEVER understand NOR would he ever attempt. I'd take one Holmstrom over four Hudler's anytime and anyday. We aren't even going to mention Holmstrom's worth to this team over Hudler in the the playoffs... You are just taking your love for Hudler way too far now bud, just stop, please, stop.




Calm down. Eva's point was that Hudler's producing OK for a third liner.

"Finger-pointing is easy. In some cases, even therapeutic. Fans need to blame something,

because the outcome is so frustratingly out of their control."
-- Mitch Albom

| Terry Sawchuk & Johnny Bower | | Extra Protection | | "Luckies never cut my wind." | | Straight to the Goal | | Dodging Traffic |
| Tom Waits - Get Behind the Mule | | Mikael Samuelsson Forever | | Mike Grier? |


#8 LeftWinger

LeftWinger

    42 years in Detroit! Time to spend the rest in paradise!

  • Silver Booster
  • 8,608 posts
  • Location:HART - MI

Posted 12 August 2011 - 06:17 AM

Calm down. Eva's point was that Hudler's producing OK for a third liner.

...and that, according to his thread title, Holmstrom sucks. My point is Holmstrom at 37 points is 100,000,000 times better than Hudler, at any point in his career.... Hudler will never be anywhere near the player Holmstrom was/is/will be.

Don't Be Jealous, But I Live Here...

www.thinkdunes.com

 

Aww You Mad Bro? Are You Butt Hurt?


#9 P. Marlowe

P. Marlowe

    4th Line Heel

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,538 posts
  • Location:Finland

Posted 12 August 2011 - 07:33 AM

...and that, according to his thread title, Holmstrom sucks. My point is Holmstrom at 37 points is 100,000,000 times better than Hudler, at any point in his career.... Hudler will never be anywhere near the player Holmstrom was/is/will be.



The title was sarcasm of course. I do agree that Holmström is more useful player. Eva's comparison was based on numbers and numbers only and that's fine because numbers are concrete unlike for example defensive awareness. I think that there are better third liners in the league than Hudler, but he's fine. It would be nice if no-one attacked eva for defending him. Eva seems to be a bit number-crazy, but there have been wackier people here. Hudler's become too much of a scapegoat here and eva brings nice colour to the conversation.

"Finger-pointing is easy. In some cases, even therapeutic. Fans need to blame something,

because the outcome is so frustratingly out of their control."
-- Mitch Albom

| Terry Sawchuk & Johnny Bower | | Extra Protection | | "Luckies never cut my wind." | | Straight to the Goal | | Dodging Traffic |
| Tom Waits - Get Behind the Mule | | Mikael Samuelsson Forever | | Mike Grier? |


#10 cusimano_brothers

cusimano_brothers

    Legend

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,608 posts
  • Location:Niagara Falls, ON

Posted 12 August 2011 - 07:40 AM

Jiří Hudler: 24/7 ™.

"Mess up tomorrow, don't mess up now".

- Harry James Benson, CBE.


#11 nuts2u

nuts2u

    1st Line Sniper

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 901 posts

Posted 12 August 2011 - 08:54 AM

Hudler is what he is, a small OFFENSIVE player, with not a lot of defensive awareness. There are a s*** load of them around the league and used properly they SCORE POINTS and some have conracts that make Hudler's look like chicken feed. He needs to be used as a sniper (Brett Hull type) if the Wings are unable to create that invironment for him then they should have traded him a long time ago. I'm not saying he would ever be as good as Hull but on the right line I think he could become a 60/70 point producer. Defensively I don't think he is any worse than Fransen, and I sure as hell don't think Fransen is any more physical.

#12 LeftWinger

LeftWinger

    42 years in Detroit! Time to spend the rest in paradise!

  • Silver Booster
  • 8,608 posts
  • Location:HART - MI

Posted 12 August 2011 - 09:03 AM

Hudler is what he is, a small OFFENSIVE player, with not a lot of defensive awareness. There are a s*** load of them around the league and used properly they SCORE POINTS and some have conracts that make Hudler's look like chicken feed. He needs to be used as a sniper (Brett Hull type) if the Wings are unable to create that invironment for him then they should have traded him a long time ago. I'm not saying he would ever be as good as Hull but on the right line I think he could become a 60/70 point producer. Defensively I don't think he is any worse than Fransen, and I sure as hell don't think Fransen is any more physical.

As much as I dislike hudler as a player, I can agree with everything you said! I hope he becomes a 70+ point scorer, I really do, but next year so if he re-signs here it will be cheap. If he gets 70 pts this year, he get $5M.

Don't Be Jealous, But I Live Here...

www.thinkdunes.com

 

Aww You Mad Bro? Are You Butt Hurt?


#13 RedWingsExpert1988

RedWingsExpert1988

    Top Prospect

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 83 posts
  • Location:Macomb, MI

Posted 12 August 2011 - 09:41 AM

Strictly all and only offensively built teams don't win champions. You have to be a balanced team in many areas. Detroit is lacking a complete third and fourth line right now. I don't care who disagrees with me. The third liners should be more physical, defensive, and aggressive with some goal scoring being a secondary request. Hudler is not a third line player. He should be on a second line on a DIFFERENT team. He could fit in very nicely on teams that have big, physical, role type of players to give that extra offensive ability on teams who are lacking it. I agree many of u say we need a top 6 foward but we need a top 4, shanahan (or what mule use to play like; aggresive and sniper like), type of player on one of the top 2 lines who can also skate with zetterberg and datsyuk. That would help conserve dats and zetts energy from trying to do it all and make our top 2 lines a bigger threat.

Sorry I got carried away from Hudler for a second. But my point is that Hudler is a decent offensive player, that's right ONLY offensive, but just doesn't fit the needs of the Red Wings right now. We need different types of players that fit the roles of the third and fourth line.

#14 ElCapitan

ElCapitan

    4th Line Grinder

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 212 posts
  • Location:Colorado - 7400'

Posted 12 August 2011 - 10:13 AM


How about notably worse numbers? We can bring up these guys:

Ruslan Fedotenko, Rangers
Marc Savard, Boston
Jason Arnott, Washington
Radek Dvorak, Atlanta


Marc Savard? Really? A healthy Hudler (which he is) couldn't dream of putting up the numbers of a healthy, non-concussed Marc Savard...who wouldn't be on the 3rd line.

#15 eva unit zero

eva unit zero

    Save the Princess...Save the World

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,734 posts

Posted 12 August 2011 - 12:02 PM

Marc Savard? Really? A healthy Hudler (which he is) couldn't dream of putting up the numbers of a healthy, non-concussed Marc Savard...who wouldn't be on the 3rd line.


From Dec 2nd through Jan 22nd, Savard played 25 games and scored 2 goals and 8 assists. In that same time span, Hudler scored 3 goals and 8 assists in 24 games. Remarkably similar stats. You can go on about a non-concussed Savard, but what about a Hudler that hadn't gone to the KHL? Maybe he's an All-Star scorer and Selke contender. We don't have the "maybe what if" numbers. If you want those, we can get Jason Williams' injury history involved.

"I've never seen a warlock do that without his magic."
"I once devoured a monk's soul. It tasted like chocolate."

#16 GMRwings1983

GMRwings1983

    The Killer is Me

  • Silver Booster
  • 20,709 posts
  • Location:Jerkwater, USA

Posted 12 August 2011 - 12:12 PM

His infamous "100 point pace" happened when he was playing with Datsyuk and Cleary on the top line.

I wouldn't call him a true 3rd liner last season, with that fact and the powerplay time he got.

Calm down. Eva's point was that Hudler's producing OK for a third liner.


Except he wasn't always a third liner. See my post above. Hudler got time on the powerplay and played a while with Datsyuk.
According to my profile, my reputation is excellent. LOL.

#17 eva unit zero

eva unit zero

    Save the Princess...Save the World

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,734 posts

Posted 12 August 2011 - 12:14 PM

Sure, Hudler can put up 40+ points, but that's about it. No defensive responsibility, no checking of any kind, no speed, no net-front presence, no "grit". If someone whose only talent is to score is not scoring as much as he should, then he didn't perform very well. If he brought something else to the table - which he does not - a sub-par year numbers-wise may be forgiven. That's not the case with Happy.

edit: I realize I completely ignored the point of your thread, but this is part of my ongoing effort to make you understand why nobody likes Hudler here. It's not blind hate.


In terms of raw talent, Hudler is the third most talented forward on the team. He had a terrible start o last year, and followed it up with a stellar second half. What most people are ultimately upset about is the fact that he is so talented, yet hasn't brought a huge year because of his size and speed. I'm expecting Filppula to start getting the same kind of hate soon; we're already seeing the "trade Flip for a real top-six forward and give Helm his job" stuff, and Flip has yet to really prove he can really be a second line center, when he's been paid like one for years.

It's like Brian Rafalski. People loved the signing, until he got older and was not one of the top five or ten best defensemen in the league. Then he became an overpaid liability and the worst defenseman on the team, even though he was still getting Norris votes.

"I've never seen a warlock do that without his magic."
"I once devoured a monk's soul. It tasted like chocolate."

#18 hillbillywingsfan

hillbillywingsfan

    Awww poor butch

  • Gold Booster
  • 3,531 posts

Posted 12 August 2011 - 12:16 PM

I love these "SET UP" threads. Why start a whole thread to just have everyone say the same things to you and you argue their points...we have seen these over and over and over....and over. I'm sure all wings fans would love for Hudler to be better then he is...and yes sometimes he looks and feels better than a 3rd liner but to me in my eyes it happens less. He to me is just one of those cursed players on a stacked team that will never sniff the top line much where im sure he would excel more. On another team if he were getting top line play im sure he would be an above avg player but here he to me is avg to below.
msg-10491-1258682020.jpg


I LIVE IN TEXAS SO I DON'T DESERVE HOCKEY

#19 haroldsnepsts

haroldsnepsts

    "Classy"

  • HoF Booster Mod
  • 16,901 posts

Posted 12 August 2011 - 12:27 PM


From Dec 2nd through Jan 22nd, Savard played 25 games and scored 2 goals and 8 assists. In that same time span, Hudler scored 3 goals and 8 assists in 24 games. Remarkably similar stats. You can go on about a non-concussed Savard, but what about a Hudler that hadn't gone to the KHL? Maybe he's an All-Star scorer and Selke contender. We don't have the "maybe what if" numbers. If you want those, we can get Jason Williams' injury history involved.

So in his 13 season career, you're going to use 25 games where he was returning from a devastating concussion to call Savard a third line forward? Makes perfect sense. :rolleyes:

Hudler was playing professional hockey in the KHL, while Savard was hoping headaches and other concussion symptoms would go away so he could start working out again. It's not nearly the same thing. And unlike your example with Hudler maybe being an all-star scorer, Savard has actually been just that. Twice. It's not speculation. It's happened.

Before the 25 game sample you've cherrypicked between his concussions, Savard had 33 points in 41 games. Before that when he was playing pretty much full seasons his point totals were 88, 78, 96 and 97. In other words, take most of Hudler's stats and double them, and you'll be around Savard's totals.

If you're trying to make a case to people that Hudler isn't as bad as people say he is compared to other third line players in the league (which is a relatively sound argument) you only weaken your case and credibility with crazy ass things like including Savard in the mix.

And making threats about derailing this thread with your absurd Jason Williams argument doesn't exactly strengthen your case either. Unlike Williams, Savard has put up impressive points totals in one single season.


In terms of raw talent, Hudler is the third most talented forward on the team. He had a terrible start o last year, and followed it up with a stellar second half. What most people are ultimately upset about is the fact that he is so talented, yet hasn't brought a huge year because of his size and speed. I'm expecting Filppula to start getting the same kind of hate soon; we're already seeing the "trade Flip for a real top-six forward and give Helm his job" stuff, and Flip has yet to really prove he can really be a second line center, when he's been paid like one for years.

It's like Brian Rafalski. People loved the signing, until he got older and was not one of the top five or ten best defensemen in the league. Then he became an overpaid liability and the worst defenseman on the team, even though he was still getting Norris votes.

Third?

Who is he in front of? Zetterberg? Franzen? It's sure not Dats.

Flip does get hate here, but even when he's underperforming offensively year after year, he's a solid two way center who can handle the second line. Hudler has zero other positive attributes other than scoring. So when he's not doing that, he's dead weight in the lineup. Especially when you consider that Flip only makes $125k more than Hudler, and they put up virtually the same point totals.

Don't get me wrong, I think everyone is eagerly waiting for Flip to produce more offensively, but when he's not, he's at least still useful.

Edited by haroldsnepsts, 12 August 2011 - 12:32 PM.


#20 RedWingsExpert1988

RedWingsExpert1988

    Top Prospect

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 83 posts
  • Location:Macomb, MI

Posted 12 August 2011 - 12:30 PM


In terms of raw talent, Hudler is the third most talented forward on the team. He had a terrible start o last year, and followed it up with a stellar second half. What most people are ultimately upset about is the fact that he is so talented, yet hasn't brought a huge year because of his size and speed. I'm expecting Filppula to start getting the same kind of hate soon; we're already seeing the "trade Flip for a real top-six forward and give Helm his job" stuff, and Flip has yet to really prove he can really be a second line center, when he's been paid like one for years.

It's like Brian Rafalski. People loved the signing, until he got older and was not one of the top five or ten best defensemen in the league. Then he became an overpaid liability and the worst defenseman on the team, even though he was still getting Norris votes.


I don't hate hudler but I don't think he fits Detroit's needs right now. As far as filppula I would not trade him even if he never cracks 40 points. He is an all around player who does pp, pk, plays on different lines, stick handles well, and at times is aggressive. Fil is a hell of a lot better player than Hudler.

I would trade cleary, miller, bert, eaves, and even franzen over filppula anyday. You don't trade a player who can play all the different roles. I don't get why people want to use him for trade bait.

Note* I never said fil is a better player than frazen to those who will assume that is why I would trade franzen.

Edited by RedWingsExpert1988, 12 August 2011 - 12:31 PM.






Similar Topics Collapse

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users