• Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

Sign in to follow this  
unsaddleddonald

Wings Preview on HockeyBuzz

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

http://my.hockeybuzz.com/blog.php?post_id=11767&user_id=131735

Take this one with a grain of salt boys. I'm not too familiar with HockeyBuzz so I don't really know how credible they are. I find it weird that at the end of the article, with the prediction, this guy predicts that the Wings will deal with a bunch of injuries. I don't think I've ever seen someone predict a team (of any sport really) will have a lot of injuries....

On a side note, my buddy was talking to me about how "Eklund" predicted the Wings to finish 11th in the West. Anyone know of such an article?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://my.hockeybuzz.com/blog.php?post_id=11767&user_id=131735

Take this one with a grain of salt boys. I'm not too familiar with HockeyBuzz so I don't really know how credible they are. I find it weird that at the end of the article, with the prediction, this guy predicts that the Wings will deal with a bunch of injuries. I don't think I've ever seen someone predict a team (of any sport really) will have a lot of injuries....

On a side note, my buddy was talking to me about how "Eklund" predicted the Wings to finish 11th in the West. Anyone know of such an article?

That sounds like an e4 to me. Good news is that back here in reality land this prediction is enough for me to start planning the cup parade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://my.hockeybuzz.com/blog.php?post_id=11767&user_id=131735

Take this one with a grain of salt boys. I'm not too familiar with HockeyBuzz so I don't really know how credible they are. I find it weird that at the end of the article, with the prediction, this guy predicts that the Wings will deal with a bunch of injuries. I don't think I've ever seen someone predict a team (of any sport really) will have a lot of injuries....

On a side note, my buddy was talking to me about how "Eklund" predicted the Wings to finish 11th in the West. Anyone know of such an article?

That's his way of saying the Wings are old and slow. Gee, now where have I heard that before?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest 13GoWings40   
Guest 13GoWings40

The St. Louis Blues will win the division, the Wings will get a bunch of injuries, the Wings will lose to the Blues in Game 7... Sounds like this Deen person isn't a hockey analyst, just a Blues fan who hasn't stopped believing :rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whoa, when did we get Chris Pronger.... I mean Matt Cooke... I mean (enter name of cheap shot artist here) on our team... OHH, he's talking about Bertuzzi. What a dick. And while the Blues are a BETTER team than last year... they aren't better than us.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

oh man, at the top of the page it says that this kid is 18 years old.

You can tell from the writing, but I have to say that what he is doing is a pretty big undertaking for an 18 year old, so I won't try to rip on him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can tell from the writing, but I have to say that what he is doing is a pretty big undertaking for an 18 year old, so I won't try to rip on him.

I too can appreciate the effort. However, it's one thing to appreciate the effort while thinking the content is sub-par. I appreciate the effort that goes into making a movie but Boondock Saints 2 (All Saints Day) was still the biggest piece of crap I have seen. Sure, it took a lot of effort to make but I'll still rip it any chance I get.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Crymson   
Guest Crymson

I don't know if you guy's are aware of this but the Wing's are icing a very similar roster this year.

It's not "Wing's"; it's Wings. An apostrophe implies possession or a contraction, neither of which is in play here. The 's' in 'Wings' implies a plural--in this case, multiple Red Wings.

I really hate to do this to you, but I feel obligated. I figured you'd wish to know it anyway.

Edited by Crymson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not "Wing's"; it's Wings. An apostrophe implies possession or a contraction, neither of which is in play here. The 's' in 'Wings' implies a plural--in this case, multiple Red Wings.

I really hate to do this to you, but I feel obligated. I figured you'd wish to know it anyway.

That was a pointless post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That was a pointless post.

Just another pointless post in a pointless thread, if you ask me. How exactly does the opinion of some idiot at HockeyBuzz of all places have any importance whatsoever? I realize it's the off-season and that we're not going to get any interesting news for at least a few more weeks, but why not post something from a blog that isn't a complete joke?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this