Fabian Brunnstrom
#21
Posted 24 September 2011 - 01:13 PM
- 13dangledangle likes this
#22
Posted 24 September 2011 - 01:18 PM
Put him in Grand Rapids for this year where he can get top-6 minutes and continue to work on his consistency and work ethic. If he continues on the pace he's at, there will certainly be room for him on the Red Wing roster next year, and not as a grinder.
He's not waiver-exempt.
#23
Posted 24 September 2011 - 01:23 PM
In his time in Dallas, he didn't use his size or strength much. I need to be shown differently in the regular season to be a believer.
- 55fan likes this
"Hit em with your purse, ya *****!" - Random Wings fans shouting at Franziska
#24
Posted 24 September 2011 - 01:41 PM
- LidsFan and Red Wings Addict like this
#25
Posted 24 September 2011 - 02:17 PM
#27
Posted 24 September 2011 - 04:23 PM
- hillbillywingsfan, Mitchmac33 and stinky fish taco like this
#28
Posted 24 September 2011 - 04:25 PM
If we sign him to a 2-way contract, do we risk losing him on waivers?
#29
Posted 24 September 2011 - 07:19 PM
You really think someone will put a claim on him? He was a FA and didn't even get any bites, plus, they can designate him before the season starts and he won't have to clear (what is it, 7 or 10 days?) So, give him a contract and designate him before Oct and we're clear... that is, if he doesn't flat win the 14th roster spot... Babs seems pretty impressed with him...He's not waiver-exempt.
- 13dangledangle likes this
All I have to say about Holland and our off-season:
and finally
Holland is a damn good GM. period.
#30
Posted 24 September 2011 - 07:26 PM
1 way or 2 way, just dictates salary base, not waiver status... that is dictated by age, years in the league, games played... etc... capgeek has a pretty good waiver exemption calculator to clarify...Can someone explain his waiver situation? I've heard different things so far.
If we sign him to a 2-way contract, do we risk losing him on waivers?
All I have to say about Holland and our off-season:
and finally
Holland is a damn good GM. period.
#31
Posted 24 September 2011 - 07:51 PM
- LidsFan, Namingway and Get Rid of Mickey like this
Just cause you look like the gimp don't mean you play like the gimp!
#32
Posted 24 September 2011 - 10:45 PM
And according to that he is not exempt, also wiki. If the Wings sign him but they end up wanting him to go to GR for a year I think they will lose him.1 way or 2 way, just dictates salary base, not waiver status... that is dictated by age, years in the league, games played... etc... capgeek has a pretty good waiver exemption calculator to clarify...
#33
Posted 26 September 2011 - 12:39 PM
#34
Posted 26 September 2011 - 02:35 PM
Hudler- Datsyuk- Brunnstrom
Franzen- Zetterberg- Filpula
Cleary- Abdelkator- Bertuzzi
Homer- Helm- Eaves
Fabian and Hudler have been really good together thus far and have good chemestry, and I think both of them could have great years playing with Pavs; that could turn into a really solid line for the Wings.
- darkmanx likes this
#35
Posted 26 September 2011 - 06:11 PM
#36
Posted 26 September 2011 - 07:02 PM
Wow, just what I was thinking everytime I hear the words "Hudler" and "Potential" in the same sentence or everytime he is placed on the top line... I'll stop talking crap about him when people stop saying he has the potential to be a first line sniper...
So for now, Brunnstrom over Hudler everyday of the week and twice on Sunday...
- IILeiBlazeII and Mitchmac33 like this
#37
Posted 26 September 2011 - 07:19 PM
#38
Posted 26 September 2011 - 08:02 PM
Sorry, I wasn't referring to you when I said that. But, that seems to be what a lot of folks say his "potential" is. First line sniper, and that is as much of a dead horse as I am hating on him. Funny thing is, he probably will never be traded or let go and he will never be a sniper, so in the end we will all be wrong!I never said he could be a first line sniper. I said a line with him, Fabian and Pavs could turn out to be a really good line. From what I have seen so far, Hudler and Fabian have played really really well together on the same line. Hudler seems much better along the boards this year and is making smarter plays, Fabian has been impressive at all ends of the rink, and Pavs is the best player in the world. Don't tell me that line would not have the potential to dazzle and be a very effective top line for us. I am not saying Hudler is going to score 40 goals; more like around 25. I think Fabian could have the potential to score 30 goals playing with Pavs and Pavs would score 30-35 goals if he stays healthy all year (which the hockey gods owe the Wings an injury free season). A top line, combining for around 90- 95 goals is a pretty damn good top line. Then you have to take into account the 2nd line and 3rd line... the Wings team would be very deep with goal production using these lines.
#39
Posted 26 September 2011 - 10:59 PM
Wow, just what I was thinking everytime I hear the words "Hudler" and "Potential" in the same sentence or everytime he is placed on the top line... I'll stop talking crap about him when people stop saying he has the potential to be a first line sniper...
So for now, Brunnstrom over Hudler everyday of the week and twice on Sunday...
Brunnstrom: AHL player trying to make any NHL roster.
Hudler: proven NHL player working hard on having a better year because he is disappointed with last season.
You can have Brunnstrom. I'm sure you'll enjoy him. Especially twice on Sunday.
- Nightfall, 55fan and Zeowingsfan like this
"I once devoured a monk's soul. It tasted like chocolate."
#40
Posted 28 September 2011 - 11:08 PM
Similar Topics
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fabian Brunnström moves back to Sweden. |
General Discussion | Ekmanc |
|
|
|
Brunnstrom Update - Expects to sign new 1-yr 2-way deal |
General Discussion | Din758 |
|
|
|
Brunnstrom Question |
Minor & Pro Team Affiliates | Questron |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users















