You're saying the fact that Kopecky scored 40+ points while playing solid, physical, two way hockey is irrelevant? Even though Filppula's career high is 40?
Love it. Homer.
Good god you are seriously incompetent.
I already gave Kopecky his fair due in this thread, so no it is not irrelevant.
But ONCE AGAIN I refer to my question to you that, suprise suprise, you still have refused to answer - it's cool that you think he is worth something, but why do you think you will be able to convince the majority in here otherwise, a second time, of your thoughts on him when so many think less of him, fair or not?
That is all I asked to you, nothing more and nothing less, and you constantly are ignoring that question. Purposefully, probably. Why though, I have no clue. Not sure why you have to be hiding anything.
And calling me (or anybody in here) a homer is such a big pot meet kettle moment considering how much you hump the legs of some players on here (figuratively speaking of course). That's rich coming from you.