• Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

Sign in to follow this  
number9

Norris Watch

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

Actully no.

If the ball is red, the FACT is that the ball is red. If you take that FACT and form an opinion from a different perspective and say the ball is blue, I wouldn't call that an opinion, I'd call it simply being WRONG.

What if you're color blind? Or the Doppler example HoH posted. It's also true that different animals or even individuals of the same species see and hear into different ranges; so "red" is entirely subjective.

Actully no.

If the ball is red, the FACT is that the ball is red. If you take that FACT and form an opinion from a different perspective and say the ball is blue, I wouldn't call that an opinion, I'd call it simply being WRONG.

What if you're color blind? Or the Doppler example HoH posted. It's also true that different animals or even individuals of the same species see and hear into different ranges; so "red" is entirely subjective.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just realized why Sheldon Souray has seemingly revitalized his career.

110815.08.jpg

Because he's dating WWE diva Kelly Kelly.

Don't know if he'll be a Norris nominee, but he should get some kind of award for this accomplishment. :thumbup:

Edited by GMRwings1983

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I had a vote and voted today...

1. Chara

2. Letang

3. Souray

Chara and Lidstrom are picking it up. Phaneuf is cooling off offensively it seems. Weber and Boyle are on the radar. Green is injured.

Got my eye on Edler as well. Always really liked the kid. If he can learn to play sound D he would be really good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lidstrom, playing on a team that just went through a painful six game losing streak in which they didn't score more than twice in a game is only 5 points behind #1 in defensemen and has three games in hand on #1. He's also only 8 off of #1 in +/-, again during a time when his team was outscored by a ridiculous amount. He can make that up in a couple of games. Lidstrom will win it this year, I think, but it's probably way too early.

Edited by VM1138

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actully no.

If the ball is red, the FACT is that the ball is red. If you take that FACT and form an opinion from a different perspective and say the ball is blue, I wouldn't call that an opinion, I'd call it simply being WRONG.

Truth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Problem is that Eva tends to communicate personal opinions as if they were facts.

Bingo

FACT: Opinions are facts viewed from different perspectives.

Nope

What if you're color blind? Or the Doppler example HoH posted. It's also true that different animals or even individuals of the same species see and hear into different ranges; so "red" is entirely subjective.

The colour red is a range of colour based on science that humans have adopted and defined. The true colour of red is fact. Your perceptive (based on eye sight, perception, interpretation etc.) can be coined an 'opinion'. However, that does not imply that your opinion is now fact.

Just like in the example, the ball may appear to be blue to you but the ball has not become blue. It is still in fact red. Unless the ball goes through a physical change it's still red. Besides, I don't think you're sitting on LGW cheering for the Blue Wings...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lidstrom, playing on a team that just went through a painful six game losing streak in which they didn't score more than twice in a game is only 5 points behind #1 in defensemen and has three games in hand on #1. He's also only 8 off of #1 in +/-, again during a time when his team was outscored by a ridiculous amount. He can make that up in a couple of games. Lidstrom will win it this year, I think, but it's probably way too early.

im thinkin its gonna come down to lidstrom, chara, letang

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just like in the example, the ball may appear to be blue to you but the ball has not become blue. It is still in fact red. Unless the ball goes through a physical change it's still red.

The color of an object is defined by the light that reflects off the surface. So what appears red to one person may appear blue to another, depending on the circumstances and the perspective.

For example, a during a half moon, part of the moon is a bright silver-gray and part of the moon is a very dark gray, almost black. About a month later, it will be the reverse. The bright side will be dark and the dark side light. The color has not changed at all, but the circumstances have.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The color of an object is defined by the light that reflects off the surface. So what appears red to one person may appear blue to another, depending on the circumstances and the perspective.

For example, a during a half moon, part of the moon is a bright silver-gray and part of the moon is a very dark gray, almost black. About a month later, it will be the reverse. The bright side will be dark and the dark side light. The color has not changed at all, but the circumstances have.

some people think BS smells like flowers...but at the end of the day it's still BS

this isn't a ball, or the moon, or ROYGBIV...this is hockey, and if you want to pretend your not wrong, then we'll say your "opinion" is far-off, awful, stinky, not good, or simply BAD.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this