Do They Deserve It?
#1
Posted 17 November 2011 - 08:06 PM
14 games, 1 goal and 4 assists for Tomas Holmstrom.
http://www.nhl.com/i...id=nhl-keymatch
11 games, 1 goal and 2 assists for Todd Bertuzzi.
I can't believe people will post "What's wrong with Datsyuk" and "What's up with Zetterberg" threads all day long and leave these two WASTES OF SPACE alone. Bertuzzi and Holmstrom are the biggest problem cases on the Red Wings right now, and imo, are keeping the team from developing the players they will need to make a run in this year's playoff. They are both 5-7 years past their primes, and 2-3 years past their effectiveness limit. Why is it that these two guys, who can't open up a square inch of ice, consistently see time with our big guns and drag them down, but a guy like Helm who can open up the whole rink can't sniff a shift with Hank? To me, this is the biggest problem with the Red Wings. The GM has invested in two guys who skate like they're on one leg, and the coach isn't willing to put them in the stands. "But Homer can't be effective without a top line center." HE ISN'T EFFECTIVE PERIOD. The Red Wings need to stop pretending it's 2002. Pavel and Hank need SPEED. They aren't 21 and 23 anymore. Get them some guys who can skate and open up the ice, already.
- Detroit # 1 Fan, Z Winged Dangler, Green Wing and 4 others like this
#2
Posted 17 November 2011 - 08:20 PM
Datsyuk and Zetterberg are the teams two star players and get almost 20 minutes of ice time a night. Of course the expectations are higher on them than Bert and Holmstrom.
Though I think you're barking up the wrong tree with Homer. He only plays 13 minutes a night, but has been among the better guys on the ice. Unlike many of the forwards this season, Homer goes to the tough areas of the ice, wins puck battles in the corners, and goes to the net. Obviously his skill set is limited, but it's probably not a coincidence that he hasn't been sitting out as much as Babcock made it sound like he would at the start of the season.
Also, Homer only had 26 points in 2002, so that's an odd year for you to pick. But Homer's been a pretty consistent 40 point guy most seasons.
Don't get me wrong, I'd love for the Wings to have a pure goalscorer on the top line, preferably one with speed. But of the current problems with this team, I wouldn't put Holmstrom in the top ten.
As for Helm, he can open up the whole rink with his speed, but he has hands that are marginally better than Draper's.
Edited by haroldsnepsts, 17 November 2011 - 08:22 PM.
- Frozen-Man likes this
#3
Posted 17 November 2011 - 08:30 PM
Bertuzzi started off great and only drifted off when the team took a leap off the diving board into the deep end of the pool.
- 55fan likes this
New e-book: The Spanish-American War: A Brief History. Relatively short, introductory read for casual history buffs and people who want to learn more about a forgotten war that changed America. Available at BN.com, Smashwords, Kobo, and Diesel E-Books right now. Same link as above.
#4
Posted 17 November 2011 - 08:58 PM
http://www.nhl.com/i...id=nhl-keymatch
14 games, 1 goal and 4 assists for Tomas Holmstrom.
http://www.nhl.com/i...id=nhl-keymatch
11 games, 1 goal and 2 assists for Todd Bertuzzi.
I can't believe people will post "What's wrong with Datsyuk" and "What's up with Zetterberg" threads all day long and leave these two WASTES OF SPACE alone. Bertuzzi and Holmstrom are the biggest problem cases on the Red Wings right now, and imo, are keeping the team from developing the players they will need to make a run in this year's playoff. They are both 5-7 years past their primes, and 2-3 years past their effectiveness limit. Why is it that these two guys, who can't open up a square inch of ice, consistently see time with our big guns and drag them down, but a guy like Helm who can open up the whole rink can't sniff a shift with Hank? To me, this is the biggest problem with the Red Wings. The GM has invested in two guys who skate like they're on one leg, and the coach isn't willing to put them in the stands. "But Homer can't be effective without a top line center." HE ISN'T EFFECTIVE PERIOD. The Red Wings need to stop pretending it's 2002. Pavel and Hank need SPEED. They aren't 21 and 23 anymore. Get them some guys who can skate and open up the ice, already.
Wow, this thread is a waste of space
- Frozen-Man and MCleveland89 like this
#5
Posted 17 November 2011 - 09:04 PM
Wow, this thread is a waste of space
Pretty much.
- Hockeymom1960, Ally and Scott Stevens like this
#6
Posted 17 November 2011 - 09:25 PM
http://www.nhl.com/i...id=nhl-keymatch
14 games, 1 goal and 4 assists for Tomas Holmstrom.
http://www.nhl.com/i...id=nhl-keymatch
11 games, 1 goal and 2 assists for Todd Bertuzzi.
I can't believe people will post "What's wrong with Datsyuk" and "What's up with Zetterberg" threads all day long and leave these two WASTES OF SPACE alone. Bertuzzi and Holmstrom are the biggest problem cases on the Red Wings right now, and imo, are keeping the team from developing the players they will need to make a run in this year's playoff. They are both 5-7 years past their primes, and 2-3 years past their effectiveness limit. Why is it that these two guys, who can't open up a square inch of ice, consistently see time with our big guns and drag them down, but a guy like Helm who can open up the whole rink can't sniff a shift with Hank? To me, this is the biggest problem with the Red Wings. The GM has invested in two guys who skate like they're on one leg, and the coach isn't willing to put them in the stands. "But Homer can't be effective without a top line center." HE ISN'T EFFECTIVE PERIOD. The Red Wings need to stop pretending it's 2002. Pavel and Hank need SPEED. They aren't 21 and 23 anymore. Get them some guys who can skate and open up the ice, already.
...so what do you propose to do with them? You can't waive them, they cannot retire because if they did, their salary would still count against the cap, you know you cannot trade them, ya, sit them, but then you are wasting their cap hit in the press box, plus your roster is full, so unless they go on LTIR you cannot sit them and play a youngster... so, like them or not, they are here for the reminder of their contract, and then, they will most likely be gone...
- 55fan and Frozen-Man like this
#7
Posted 17 November 2011 - 09:39 PM
- CenterIce, Hockeymom1960 and Uncle Danny like this
#8
Posted 17 November 2011 - 09:53 PM
...so what do you propose to do with them? You can't waive them, they cannot retire because if they did, their salary would still count against the cap, you know you cannot trade them, ya, sit them, but then you are wasting their cap hit in the press box, plus your roster is full, so unless they go on LTIR you cannot sit them and play a youngster... so, like them or not, they are here for the reminder of their contract, and then, they will most likely be gone...
This is a good point. And I'm glad you recognize that it is SOMEONE ELSE'S fault that the stars on our team are struggling instead of the players. I don't blame Holmstrom and Bertuzzi for being old and slow, and I don't blame Hank and Dats for not scoring with old and slow line-mates. I blame the management of the organization. Holland and Babcock need to learn when to sit people in the stands and chew up a sunk cost. Holmstrom and Bertuzzi are playing this year when they should be sitting or playing somewhere else.
- Lonewuhf likes this
#9
Posted 17 November 2011 - 10:08 PM
Our secondary scoring has been inconsistent the last few seasons, and we have aging forwards like Bertuzzi and Homer who were only headed downhill. Likewise, Cleary, Hudler and Franzen are known to be streaky players.
Holland did nothing about it, really. We have a few younger forwards like Nyquist, Brunnstrom and Mursak, but it doesn't seem like they're going to be top 6 forwards anytime soon.
This is basically the same forward group we had the last few years, only older. No reason to think we're magically going to be more consistent in our secondary scoring.
- haroldsnepsts, SaCkaveli20, Motown4013 and 1 other like this
#10
Posted 17 November 2011 - 10:13 PM
My point is that we cannot pin- point faults to one or two players... its the entire top 6 (which Cleary should have no business being in at this point)
#11
Posted 17 November 2011 - 10:18 PM
Agreed.These are all problems which could have been addressed in the offseason.
Our secondary scoring has been inconsistent the last few seasons, and we have aging forwards like Bertuzzi and Homer who were only headed downhill. Likewise, Cleary, Hudler and Franzen are known to be streaky players.
Holland did nothing about it, really. We have a few younger forwards like Nyquist, Brunnstrom and Mursak, but it doesn't seem like they're going to be top 6 forwards anytime soon.
This is basically the same forward group we had the last few years, only older. No reason to think we're magically going to be more consistent in our secondary scoring.
I'm hoping as we get closer to the trade deadline Holland makes a move, or two, and makes use of the cushion we have against the cap.

#12
Posted 17 November 2011 - 10:21 PM
Cleary and Bertuzzi, in particular, have looked god awful. I'd like to see us get younger at the deadline as well as in the offseason.Agreed.
I'm hoping as we get closer to the trade deadline Holland makes a move, or two, and makes use of the cushion we have against the cap.
RIP Bob Probert
RIP Wade Belak
RIP Derek Boogaard
RIP Rick Rypien
#14
Posted 18 November 2011 - 12:38 AM
Cleary and Bertuzzi, in particular, have looked god awful. I'd like to see us get younger at the deadline as well as in the offseason.
Cleary not only doesn't improve the line he's on, he just downright hurts it. He gives up the puck too often, his passing is terrible, and all he does when entering the zone is shoot it in then lose it. I don't understand why he's still getting top 6 minutes.
Also, on Homer, yeah, he may be giving it his all, but that doesn't mean he deserves top play time. Helm gives his all every game but he's not put on the top line. Yeah, he sits in front of the net, but if you put someone skilled there, we shouldn't even need an in front of the net presence. Not very many teams use players in front of the net because they simply put players who can score on the line. I realize we don't have those players right now, and like someone said above, it's the management's fault for not acquiring them.
- Motown4013 likes this
#15
Posted 18 November 2011 - 10:48 PM
Holmstrom at least busts his rear end even if he's not producing on the stat sheet.
#16
Posted 19 November 2011 - 06:55 PM
- Motown4013 likes this
#17
Posted 19 November 2011 - 10:19 PM
- Motown4013 likes this
#18
Posted 19 November 2011 - 10:35 PM
#19
Posted 20 November 2011 - 12:20 AM
Side note, anyone else notice that the game after Cleary was taken off the 1st line and put on the 2nd the 2nd line started sucking and the first is doing well? Coincidence?
You neglect to mention that he was swapped with Franzen. The latter is the team's best goal-scoring forward, and he's a big body. Cleary is not as good as Franzen. Nobody is disputing this. Swapping a better player out for a player who is not as good will make a line perform with lesser efficiency. Case closed.
- 55fan and Frozen-Man like this
#20
Posted 20 November 2011 - 12:25 AM
Similar Topics
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NHL penalties/suspensions for hits getting out of hand.
|
General Discussion | jollymania |
|
|
|
Do Maple Leaf fans deserve better?
or are you content to watch them suffer? |
General Discussion | Hockeytown0001 |
|
|
|
ECQF - (8) NY Islanders vs. (1) Penguins |
General Discussion | Hockeytown0001 |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













