Is Nicklas Lidstrom The Greatest Detroit Red Wing Of All Time?
#21
Posted 13 February 2012 - 01:30 PM
- haroldsnepsts, Uncle Danny and Frozen-Man like this
HankthaTank - Squirrels, they hate to be thrown. / Why is the magical unicorn named Brian... Jedi - I just downloaded the "kids" book, "Go the F--k to Sleep" as narrated by Samuel L. Jackson on my kindle. I am now ready to be a daddy. / *Checks Router* No, I'm positive I didn't hit the "Wings Defense Sucks" button. Electrophile - I'm just glad the Wings were able to win despite the Curse of Brian. ACallToArms - I think Trey needs to put something about payroll tax and deferred income in his sig... Edicius - I'd rather [have] a soundbite of me saying "I like (man sausage)" rather than "I like Crosby".
#22
Posted 13 February 2012 - 01:30 PM
Off topic now, but interesting that you make reference to Lemieux in terms of how wide of a margin Howe led in points rather than Gretzky. I did a quick comparsion and learned a few things (actually, learned one thing and was reminded of a few others). I didn't realize just how much of a wide marging Howe was winning scoring titles. I guess I just assumed it was small since he didn't put up huge point totals. So here is my comparison in terms of how much each led the rest of the league in the years they won the scoring title.I have Howe 2nd all-time, behind only Wayne Gretzky. He has led the league in points by Lemieux-like margins, but was mean and good defensively as well. He finished top 5 in points for 20 straight years - next closest is Gretzky at 16. He also led the league in postseason points 5 times.
I've put % in brackets beause scoring was lower in Howe's ara so his margin would look a lot smaller otherwise.
Howe:
'51 - 20pts (30%)
'52 - 17pts (25%)
'53 - 24pts (34%)
'54 - 14pts (21%)
'57 - 4pts (5%)
'63 - 5pts (6%)
Lemieux:
'88 - 31pts (18%)
'89 - 19pts (13%)
'92 - 8pts (7%)
'93 - 12pts (8%)
'96 - 12pts (8%)
'97 - 13pts (12%)
Gretzky:
'81 - 29pts (21%)
'82 - 65pts (44%)
'83 - 72pts (58%)
'84 - 86pts (68%)
'85 - 73pts (54%)
'86 - 74pts (52%)
'87 - 75pts (69%)
'90 - 13pts (10%)
'91 - 32pts (24%)
'94 - 10pts (8%)
A lot of people discount Gretzky's stats because he played in an era where every scored a ton. This is true, but the extent to which he dominated is quite amazing. The bolded stats are just plain stupid.
Another interesting note, if Lemieux didn't miss the entire 94/95 season, he or Gretzky would likely have won teh scoring title for 17 years in a row.
Edit - formatting
Edited by toby91_ca, 13 February 2012 - 01:31 PM.
- Heroes of Hockeytown likes this
#23
Posted 13 February 2012 - 01:39 PM
We need someone like Parise that can penetrate the box.-blueadams
#24
Posted 13 February 2012 - 03:07 PM
That's a tough one. We as Detroit fans are lucky to be contemplating who, the greatest was. I think this is an endless argument with possibilities of Howe, Lindsay, Abel, and Sawchuk that paid the price early on, and built a history. Then a kid named Yzerman that in a sense resurrected this organization single handedly in the 80's. Then a continuance of talent of Lidstrom, McCarty, and Draper.
I think my pick would have to be Yzerman for my 1a. He was the cornerstone building block for the modern era Detroit teams.
You went from Yzerman and Lidstrom then directly to McCarty and Draper??
Really?
Edited by cprice12, 13 February 2012 - 03:07 PM.
- stinky fish taco likes this
#25
Posted 13 February 2012 - 03:14 PM
Edited by Cajanek_Spielmacher, 13 February 2012 - 03:28 PM.
#26
Posted 13 February 2012 - 03:16 PM
I thought i made it clear on my post, that Yzerman was my pick. I was merely throwing in great names that helped make the Yzerman era that much greater. That guys like Draper and McCarty were built around Yzerman.You went from Yzerman and Lidstrom then directly to McCarty and Draper??
Really?
Sorry I lost you.
#27
Posted 13 February 2012 - 03:23 PM
I think you are losing me to. If you are having a discussion about all time greats, I don't think McCarty or Draper should even me allowed to know about the discussion, let alone be involved in itI thought i made it clear on my post, that Yzerman was my pick. I was merely throwing in great names that helped make the Yzerman era that much greater. That guys like Draper and McCarty were built around Yzerman.
Sorry I lost you.
- stinky fish taco likes this
#28
Posted 13 February 2012 - 03:29 PM
Well I am sorry you are lost. What is it you don't understand? I merely sated that Yzerman was my pick. Follow me so far? Great. Next I implied a reason for my pick saying that players like McCarty and Draper helped solidify his great position at being an outstanding leader that they built around him with good solid players to play with.I think you are losing me to. If you are having a discussion about all time greats, I don't think McCarty or Draper should even me allowed to know about the discussion, let alone be involved in it
I promise i will neverf****** use the words McCarty and Draper and Lidstrom in the same sentence, paragraph or breath ever again! My god are we that super sensitive around here, hanging on every post and how it is completely worded? My god it's the internet.
#29
Posted 13 February 2012 - 03:35 PM
Yeah, it is the internet so why have any pride in anything. It would be - " the words, McCarty,Draper and Lidstrom in the same sentence,"Well I am sorry you are lost. What is it you don't understand? I merely sated that Yzerman was my pick. Follow me so far? Great. Next I implied a reason for my pick saying that players like McCarty and Draper helped solidify his great position at being an outstanding leader that they built around him with good solid players to play with.
I promise i will neverf****** use the words McCarty and Draper and Lidstrom in the same sentence, paragraph or breath ever again! My god are we that super sensitive around here, hanging on every post and how it is completely worded? My god it's the internet.
#30
Posted 13 February 2012 - 03:39 PM
Yeah, it is the internet so why have any pride in anything. It would be - " the words, McCarty,Draper and Lidstrom in the same sentence,"
OMG the Grammar Police are here!!
Lets not even get into the whole 'pride thing' around here! Pandoras box
- Nev likes this
#31
Posted 13 February 2012 - 03:52 PM
- TheDetroitRedWings likes this

#32
Posted 13 February 2012 - 04:06 PM
I understood that to mean that you picked Yzerman, and that his greatness was leading a team of players who did their jobs well and since Yzerman brought the team together and lead them, he was great not only as a player but also as a leader.Well I am sorry you are lost. What is it you don't understand? I merely sated that Yzerman was my pick. Follow me so far? Great. Next I implied a reason for my pick saying that players like McCarty and Draper helped solidify his great position at being an outstanding leader that they built around him with good solid players to play with.
Players like Lids are great in and of themselves. The Russian Five had great chemistry and was composed of great players. The real feather in Stevie's hat was that he lead a team of role players, such as Mac and Drapes, along with the superstars and brought the team from lacking to dominance.
As for the original question, I'm sticking with Howe, but many, many good points have been raised in this thread, not the least of which is, "What constitutes 'the Greatest Red Wing?'"
Money on the board: $40
Thanks for a great season, guys. You exceeded expectations and have given us something to look forward to as the long summer approaches.
And next year we get to start in October, like hockey is SUPPOSED to.
#33
Posted 13 February 2012 - 04:21 PM
Stating an unpopular opinion does not make you an illegitimate member here.
And honestly the post that started this bickering is that McCarty and Draper shouldn't be mentioned in the same breath as Lidstrom, which is pretty accurate when you're discussing their place in the history of the game.
#34
Posted 13 February 2012 - 04:27 PM
My official apology to all who I have offended. My word. I have edited my original post. My bad.Stay on topic please.
Stating an unpopular opinion does not make you an illegitimate member here.
And honestly the post that started this bickering is that McCarty and Draper shouldn't be mentioned in the same breath as Lidstrom, which is pretty accurate when you're discussing their place in the history of the game.
My vote was for Yzerman.
Edited by miller76, 13 February 2012 - 04:31 PM.
#35
Posted 13 February 2012 - 04:39 PM
It depends on what kind of success you're talking about. If it's overall financial success of the franchise, certainly Yzerman and probably Howe would be ahead of Lids.easily.
people might claim yzerman or howe had better careers or were more important to the team's success.
those people would be wrong.
that's not a knock on Lidstrom, but for his career with the Wings there have always been other star players there helping to support him. Yzerman, Fedorov, Zetterberg, Datsyuk.
In the mid 80s, Yzerman was pretty much the only hope and only reason to watch the Red Wings.
#36
Posted 13 February 2012 - 04:45 PM
Even after tying that clarifying that I believe its Yzerman, Lidstrom does deserve some substantial credit. I didn't mention Howe because look at those jerseys in the rafters, all the top dogs, if you will, that played with him. Yzerman had a supporting cast no doubt but not until the 90's. Through the 80's and early 90's her carried the Wings on his back. Looking in the rafters do you see other players from his era? Nope... (Lidstrom eventually). Which is why I give him the nod over Howe, and over Lidstrom. I hope my rambling mess makes some sense...

#37
Posted 13 February 2012 - 05:43 PM
#38
Posted 13 February 2012 - 05:57 PM
Great post - I think a lot of people think Howe is great mainly because he played forever - but at his peak he really was head and shoulders above the rest of the league.Off topic now, but interesting that you make reference to Lemieux in terms of how wide of a margin Howe led in points rather than Gretzky. I did a quick comparsion and learned a few things (actually, learned one thing and was reminded of a few others). I didn't realize just how much of a wide marging Howe was winning scoring titles. I guess I just assumed it was small since he didn't put up huge point totals. So here is my comparison in terms of how much each led the rest of the league in the years they won the scoring title.
I've put % in brackets beause scoring was lower in Howe's ara so his margin would look a lot smaller otherwise.
Howe:
'51 - 20pts (30%)
'52 - 17pts (25%)
'53 - 24pts (34%)
'54 - 14pts (21%)
'57 - 4pts (5%)
'63 - 5pts (6%)
Lemieux:
'88 - 31pts (18%)
'89 - 19pts (13%)
'92 - 8pts (7%)
'93 - 12pts (8%)
'96 - 12pts (8%)
'97 - 13pts (12%)
Gretzky:
'81 - 29pts (21%)
'82 - 65pts (44%)
'83 - 72pts (58%)
'84 - 86pts (68%)
'85 - 73pts (54%)
'86 - 74pts (52%)
'87 - 75pts (69%)
'90 - 13pts (10%)
'91 - 32pts (24%)
'94 - 10pts (8%)
A lot of people discount Gretzky's stats because he played in an era where every scored a ton. This is true, but the extent to which he dominated is quite amazing. The bolded stats are just plain stupid.
Another interesting note, if Lemieux didn't miss the entire 94/95 season, he or Gretzky would likely have won teh scoring title for 17 years in a row.
Edit - formatting
I compared to Lemieux b/c Gretzky's dominance is simply unmatched --- Lemieux (minus Gretzky as his competition) is closer to Howe's margins.
Edited by egroen, 13 February 2012 - 06:01 PM.
"For my game, I don't need to score the goal," Konstantinov once explained. "I need someone to start thinking about me and forgetting about scoring goals."
#39
Posted 13 February 2012 - 05:58 PM
Please go away and don't come back until you have a real question.Outside Hater Here but I would say Lidstrom is the all time best defenseman. Howe is the best forward all time. Now who is the best Goalie of all time for you b######s!
Anywho...greatest redwing? Very tough...to many to choose from really...Gordie
Edited by KATIEBARTHEDOOR24, 13 February 2012 - 06:07 PM.
- Red Wings Addict likes this
#40
Posted 13 February 2012 - 06:08 PM
- Red Wings Addict likes this

"Forwards, not backwards! Upwards, not forwards! And always twirling, twirling, twirling towards freedom!"
Similar Topics
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wings interested in Stalberg and Bickell |
General Discussion | jollymania |
|
|
|
Coyotes file for Bankruptcy/City pays 25mil to keep them
Atlanta on the move |
General Discussion | MacK_Attack |
|
|
|
3 1sts for 1st Overall? |
General Discussion | Johnz96 |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users














