Edited by Hatethedrake!, 07 March 2012 - 10:12 AM.
The Blues are in the driver's seat
#41
Posted 07 March 2012 - 10:07 AM
We need someone like Parise that can penetrate the box.-blueadams
#42
Posted 07 March 2012 - 10:18 AM
..just my 2 cents
#43
Posted 07 March 2012 - 10:32 AM
The Blues have everything what it takes,but the lack of Playoffs experience could be decisive factor
..just my 2 cents
Haven't followed them too closely, but I've heard a lot of people talk about how St. Louis lacks defensive depth. If true, that will cost them in the playoffs.
Honestly, the Wings are one game out of 1st in the league, I'm not too concerned yet.
New e-book: The Spanish-American War: A Brief History. Relatively short, introductory read for casual history buffs and people who want to learn more about a forgotten war that changed America. Available at BN.com, Smashwords, Kobo, and Diesel E-Books right now. Same link as above.
#44
Posted 07 March 2012 - 10:43 AM
#45
Posted 07 March 2012 - 09:02 PM
Everybody is going to have their preferences, I just basically want a high seed as possible moreso than ever this season since the Wings have barely been beatable on home ice (not using these recent games as much factor due to injuries), and less travel to a lesser degree.Why are people afraid of playing Nashville in the first round? If we can't beat them, then who are we kidding about a possible Cup run?
I'd rather play them over Chicago or San Jose.
Other than that, doesn't matter who they play. If they are healthy and can match the other team's work ethic, they win more often than they lose.
Of those three you mentioned, they've beaten them all this season at various points, bring any of them on.
#46
Posted 07 March 2012 - 10:54 PM
And here I am living in St Louis. Blues fans act like they've been up there with the elite for years and have been battling for the division and have been making the playoffs for years.
Before they went through their rebuilding period, The Blues were elite or at the very least, very good, for a long time, challenged for the division often, were always in the playoffs, won the President's trophy, went to the conference finals, blah, blah...they just could't get over the hump in the playoffs.
Some of you think the Blues came into the league in 2005. Blues fans have just been waiting for this.
Blues fans are excited about their team's return to respectability...and they should be.
They are playing some great hockey, and they have the best goaltending they have ever had...maybe the best goaltending duo in the last 40 years (haven't looked it up though). They are playing a great system and have a balanced attack. And they are doing it without one of their best two-way players in Alex Steen.
They could win the West and/or the division. Their 7 game road trip they have coming up will play a big part in where they finish. Their last road trip was 6 games and they went 5-1 on it.
The 4 vs 5 matchup is going to be a war with Nashville...so whoever finishes 4th is in for a dogfight. Winning the division is a big deal.
Looking forward to the home stretch.
St.Louis is a good team, but at the end of the day they're not the Red Wings
No, they're not. They are two points better.
#47
Posted 07 March 2012 - 11:34 PM
Before they went through their rebuilding period, The Blues were elite or at the very least, very good, for a long time, challenged for the division often, were always in the playoffs, won the President's trophy, went to the conference finals, blah, blah...they just could't get over the hump in the playoffs.
Some of you think the Blues came into the league in 2005. Blues fans have just been waiting for this.
Blues fans are excited about their team's return to respectability...and they should be.
They are playing some great hockey, and they have the best goaltending they have ever had...maybe the best goaltending duo in the last 40 years (haven't looked it up though). They are playing a great system and have a balanced attack. And they are doing it without one of their best two-way players in Alex Steen.
They could win the West and/or the division. Their 7 game road trip they have coming up will play a big part in where they finish. Their last road trip was 6 games and they went 5-1 on it.
The 4 vs 5 matchup is going to be a war with Nashville...so whoever finishes 4th is in for a dogfight. Winning the division is a big deal.
Looking forward to the home stretch.
I realize that but leading the league with a month to go does not excuse a decade of irrelevancy. If they're excited then more power to them, it's great for the game. However, they need to stop it with the "Detroit sucks" and saying Vancouver is s***ty when they really have no room to talk.
"To whom much is given, much is expected."
"Play them six times, they might win four, but not this game. Not tonight."
"Hard work beats talent when talent doesn't work hard."
#48
Posted 08 March 2012 - 12:21 AM
No, they're not. They are two points better.
I’d be ditching that zoom lens shot for a 20 year wide panoramic.
- redwings4life, Ram, Zeowingsfan and 2 others like this
#49
Posted 08 March 2012 - 12:34 AM
- Z Winged Dangler likes this
#50
Posted 08 March 2012 - 01:12 AM
The Blues have everything what it takes,but the lack of Playoffs experience could be decisive factor
..just my 2 cents
At first glance, you'd think they didn't have much playoff experience.
But that's not really true.
Arnott and Langenbrunner have loads of playoff experience and are very vocal in the locker room.
Halak took Montreal to the Conference finals a couple years ago.
McDonald has won a cup.
And most of the Blues roster got a taste of the playoffs a few years ago when they were bounced by Vancouver in the first round.
They may not have a vast amount of playoff experience from top to bottom, but the veteran leaders on this team have a lot of playoff experience.
#51
Posted 08 March 2012 - 01:23 AM
I’d be ditching that zoom lens shot for a 20 year wide panoramic.
Why?
What does 20 years ago have to do with right now?
Nothing really.
#52
Posted 08 March 2012 - 01:41 AM
I realize that but leading the league with a month to go does not excuse a decade of irrelevancy. If they're excited then more power to them, it's great for the game. However, they need to stop it with the "Detroit sucks" and saying Vancouver is s***ty when they really have no room to talk.
A decade?
Not quite. They missed the playoffs 5 of the last 6 years.
And why such a small sample size? I like to look at it and say we've been competitive/very good and made the playoffs 26 of the last 31 years. No, there isn't much to show for it...but they were a lot of fun to watch.
And saying so and so "sucks" is part of the game. It's just how it is. And ummm, I'll let you in on something...saying "Detroit Sucks" or "Vancouver Sucks" doesn't mean we think they are actually a bad hockey team. Does that even need to be said?? Come on.
#53
Posted 08 March 2012 - 08:43 AM
Why are people afraid of playing Nashville in the first round? If we can't beat them, then who are we kidding about a possible Cup run?
I'd rather play them over Chicago or San Jose.
in addition...have the Wings ever lost to the Preds in the playoffs? didn't think so. i'm not overly worried about the Sharts this year as they lack effort needed to win in the reg season this year let alone the playoffs. i'd be more worried about playing hard nosed teams like the Blues and Hawks, or the Canucks cause the Wings will get f***ed by the refs and spend the entire series on the PK like against San Jose in the past. If the Wings don't end up in the SCF, I really hope that the Blues represent the West. It's really hard not to like the Blues team top to bottom, and Pietrangelo and Shattenkirk are 2 of the best young dmen in the game for sure. I would go as far as to say as good if not better than Keith/Seabrook.
Wings need some Ryan Pulock in the 1st round, a goal scorer in the 2nd round and rounds 3-7 all guys 6'4 or bigger. Please sign Dekeyser to play with Smith. <--Dekeyser signed, Paired next year. Mark your calendars.
Tootoo needs a partner in crime that plays like him on the other side of Helm. Oh hey, we have Mitchell Callahan. Problem solved.
Cleary....
XBox Live BleedRedWing
#54
Posted 08 March 2012 - 08:56 AM
Why?
What does 20 years ago have to do with right now?
Nothing really.
Not 20 years ago, rather the last 20 years as large sample group. All the Blues have to brag about vs the Red Wings success is whay exactly? A presidents trophy and a current 2 point lead that's been flip-flopping all year? Unless you live in denial land, how hard is this to understand?
And why such a small sample size?
This is what I was saying to you.
- Hatchet Barry likes this
#55
Posted 08 March 2012 - 09:17 AM
HankthaTank - Squirrels, they hate to be thrown. / Why is the magical unicorn named Brian... Jedi - I just downloaded the "kids" book, "Go the F--k to Sleep" as narrated by Samuel L. Jackson on my kindle. I am now ready to be a daddy. / *Checks Router* No, I'm positive I didn't hit the "Wings Defense Sucks" button. Electrophile - I'm just glad the Wings were able to win despite the Curse of Brian. ACallToArms - I think Trey needs to put something about payroll tax and deferred income in his sig... Edicius - I'd rather [have] a soundbite of me saying "I like (man sausage)" rather than "I like Crosby".
#56
Posted 08 March 2012 - 09:33 AM
With that said, St. Louis is playing great hockey under Hitch, only a fool would doubt that. You cannot make an argument about lack of playoff experience because they have a very good coach, several veteran players with playoff experience and, most importantly, they have 2 great goalies. I predict they are going to go with Halak for the playoffs and he is having an outstanding season. Halak has playoff experience by almost single-handlidy carrying the Habs to the Conference finals 2 seasons ago. Playing for the Habs as a goalie in the playoffs has a ton more pressure than the Blues, so I think he will continue to be very good for the Blues in the post season. The Blues play a great, tightly contested defensive system and could be a real threat in the playoffs.
It is because of that, that I believe the Red Wings need to do what they can to get 1st or 2nd seed and we have a schedule to make that possible once we get Nick and Pavel back within the next week or so. Simply put, if the Red Wings play like they should, and have for a majority of the season, then they should be able to pass St. Louis and possibly Vancouver because we have a pretty easy schedule for the remainder of the season (especially after next week's road trip is over). Since Mike Babcock has come here, he has typically been able to get the Wings to finish their seasons on a strong note, and I have no doubt in my mind that this year will be no exception. Zetterberg and Fil are playing very well, and with Pavel back we will be able to get a much stronger team balance in scoring. Also, with Nick back it will make things flow much better and help lead to success heading into the playoff season.
I respect the Blues and what they have been able to do this season. I am happy for their fans who have waited a long while for their team to become a contender again. With that said, I think the Wings will finish strong and a strong finish is important to the Wings because it ensures home ice through at least most of the playoffs and we all know how good the Wings are at home.
#57
Posted 08 March 2012 - 10:58 AM
#58
Posted 08 March 2012 - 02:36 PM

credit to my friend, Steve.
- Jedi, WizardOfOz30 and Red Wings Addict like this
#59
Posted 08 March 2012 - 05:30 PM
#60
Posted 08 March 2012 - 06:49 PM
You are right, lets look at the last 20 years.A decade?
Not quite. They missed the playoffs 5 of the last 6 years.
And why such a small sample size? I like to look at it and say we've been competitive/very good and made the playoffs 26 of the last 31 years. No, there isn't much to show for it...but they were a lot of fun to watch.
And saying so and so "sucks" is part of the game. It's just how it is. And ummm, I'll let you in on something...saying "Detroit Sucks" or "Vancouver Sucks" doesn't mean we think they are actually a bad hockey team. Does that even need to be said?? Come on.
Vancouver made it to the playoffs 13 times, and to the finals 2 times.
Detroit made it to the playoffs all 20 times, made it to the finals 6 times, and won the cup 4 times.
St. Louis made it to the playoffs 14 times, and made it to the conference finals only once.
As you said, they are fun to watch, and they have been relevant in the last 20 years. Five of the last six seasons have been forgetful ones though. Its good to see them come back to relevancy though, but how far they will get remains a mystery. Can Hitchcock get this team to play playoff hockey when the playoffs come around? Stay tuned.....
Edited by Nightfall, 08 March 2012 - 10:30 PM.
My Domain
Similar Topics
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The person below me game...
|
Water Cooler | SouthernWingsFan |
|
|
|
Red Wings don't belong in the same rink as the Hawks? |
General Discussion | MidMichSteve |
|
|
|
Coyotes file for Bankruptcy/City pays 25mil to keep themAtlanta on the move |
General Discussion | MacK_Attack |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users















