What do you think needs to be done to fix the PP/PK
#21
Posted 06 March 2012 - 02:52 PM
I think most guys will play hard to get it out of the zone and get it deep. My only complaint is that little finesse pass they sometimes do which always seems to lead to a loss of possession and a shot on our net. Get the puck and hammer it OUT of the zone. No need to get style points...just get it the f out!
- Rick D likes this
Money on the board-SCP 2013
I'm going with the 22 special. 2 bucks for every 22 goal. 2 bucks for every 22 fight
5 bucks for every series win....another 5 for every shut out! LETS GO RED WINGS!!
ADDENDUM: Since it looks like Toots may not reinserted in the series, I would like to offer Bert his money on the board. So, 2 bucks for every Bert fight, 2 bucks for every Bert goal AND since OT has been a pattern, I want to add 5 bucks for any RED WINGS OT winner. LET'S GO RED WINGS!!!!
#22
Posted 06 March 2012 - 03:17 PM
As for our powerplay, it is just pathetic. Granted, we have not had Nick or Pavel, but our powerplay was lacking consistency with them too. Simply put, we just need to get back to basics... set up and have different options available. It is good to have Nick available to shoot from the point, but also we need hank to be able to get set up for some one-timers in the slot and stuff like that. A theme of our powerplay is they often have a forward skate towards our left D, pass them the puck and then the D skates walks the line and either takes a shot or passes back to the forward on the left side who will then take a shot. Those seem to be our only plays and its too easy to read. We need to get to basics and have the forwards move around and have different options set up. Also, with the full lineup Babs needs to go back to Pavs and Hank together imo.
Zetterberg- Datsyuk- Homer
White- Lidstrom (this powerplay unit has always worked for us in the past so lets use it. Also I want to see less shots from White and more from Nick)
Franzen- Filpulla- Hudler
Quincy- Kronwall (I would play Franzen as the net front presence because in 2008 that is how he got going and scored so many goals for us)
#23
Posted 06 March 2012 - 04:43 PM
#24
Posted 06 March 2012 - 05:51 PM
Edited by bentcobra, 06 March 2012 - 05:53 PM.
#25
Posted 06 March 2012 - 06:07 PM
This ignores the fact that the Wings PP still sucked this year before they got injured, in fact this years Wings PP is the worst in recent memory.
#26
Posted 06 March 2012 - 06:35 PM
I like the responses saying that once everyone is healthy the PP will be great, or we just need Lids and Pav back and it'll click like it has in past years.
This ignores the fact that the Wings PP still sucked this year before they got injured, in fact this years Wings PP is the worst in recent memory.
I like the responses that fail to see that the return of Lidstrom and Pav and the addition of Quincey on the powerplay makes a ton of difference, considering he's been a point on a top power play and is clearly more well suited for that job than Hudler, whose addition to the second power play unit along the half boards is also likely to increase that units effectiveness considering if you take all the end to end skating and defense out of the game (which a power play essentially does) he's actually a really good player.
- 55fan likes this
"I don't care how fast a skater you are, if you don't play this game with a big heart and a big bag of knuckles in front of the net, you don't got dinky-do."
#27
Posted 06 March 2012 - 07:01 PM
- Rick D and DatsyukianDangles122 like this
#29
Posted 06 March 2012 - 08:09 PM
White is a good 2nd pairing d-man, but he's no Rafalski, and isn't really a top pairing guy. He's having a solid season because he's playing with Lidstrom more than anything.
The powerplay misses Rafalski.
- Wingsequallife13 and Rick D like this
#31
Posted 07 March 2012 - 12:22 AM
Hmm... What if they both took a page out of Tortorella's book?
"What is the remedy?... Play f***in' harder."
- Rick D and DatsyukianDangles122 like this
#32
Posted 07 March 2012 - 01:25 AM
Don't know if it's been mentioned, but Rafalski's absence is big. He made a lot of blunders defensively, but offensively, he had great vision, was a terrific passer with a good shot.
White is a good 2nd pairing d-man, but he's no Rafalski, and isn't really a top pairing guy. He's having a solid season because he's playing with Lidstrom more than anything.
The powerplay misses Rafalski.
Yet people were complaining about the PP last year also, and the team is scoring more goals this year than last.
Attributing White's play entirely to Lidstrom's presence is silly. He's doing well because he's doing well, and he's certainly better defensively than Rafalski was.
#33
Posted 07 March 2012 - 08:25 AM
SHGA: 9
anyone really think that's going to get it done in the playoffs?
LOLHelm is a perennial Selke candidate
#34
Posted 07 March 2012 - 10:41 AM
Really though, I think sometimes the Wings just get too cute on the pp. Passes that are in tight areas and the other team just picks it off. More shots would be good
#35
Posted 08 March 2012 - 08:51 AM
I feel like the book is written on our PP. The oposing teams jam up the high zone when we carry the puck over. The even the other teams defence is cheating. the best way to beat that is to dump it in and cycle low. It will force to be more honest then we can move the puck back to our best PP assets, our defencemen. my .02
Agreed. I see a lot more opposing teams 4 wide across their blue line as the wings try to enter the zone. They are sucessful in entry less than half the time (my estimate). The times they do gain entry there is no support and a scramble occurs where there may be a shot or there may be a clear. The wings need to change it up. Dump it in and crash on the forecheck. Most PP goals are scored when the opposing team is scrambling. Passing the puck rythmically around the outside allows for easy defensive coverage.
#36
Posted 08 March 2012 - 09:59 AM
#37
Posted 08 March 2012 - 10:27 AM
PP%: 16.6%
SHGA: 9
anyone really think that's going to get it done in the playoffs?
And why do you think this thread exists? To celebrate? Way to hammer the nail through the board.
Edited by rick zombo, 08 March 2012 - 10:28 AM.
#38
Posted 08 March 2012 - 04:22 PM
And why do you think this thread exists? To celebrate? Way to hammer the nail through the board.
That is why I made the thread though!!
Really though preventing shorties is part of fixing the PP. Scoring on the PP would also prevent them.
"To whom much is given, much is expected."
"Play them six times, they might win four, but not this game. Not tonight."
"Hard work beats talent when talent doesn't work hard."
#39
Posted 08 March 2012 - 05:00 PM
Edited by brett, 08 March 2012 - 05:01 PM.
#40
Posted 08 March 2012 - 05:23 PM
Agreed. I see a lot more opposing teams 4 wide across their blue line as the wings try to enter the zone. They are sucessful in entry less than half the time (my estimate). The times they do gain entry there is no support and a scramble occurs where there may be a shot or there may be a clear. The wings need to change it up. Dump it in and crash on the forecheck. Most PP goals are scored when the opposing team is scrambling. Passing the puck rythmically around the outside allows for easy defensive coverage.
I've noticed that as well. With that kind of coverage you can't just skate it in, throw it in and have a guy like Helm, Flip or Mursak go after it. Defense will race for the puck but with our guys having more momentum they could get to it first and start setting up for a shot or take a shot or two
"To whom much is given, much is expected."
"Play them six times, they might win four, but not this game. Not tonight."
"Hard work beats talent when talent doesn't work hard."
Similar Topics
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Another reason why Red Wings fans are awesome. |
General Discussion | RedLightGoesOn |
|
|
|
Any pickins from the Canucks carcass? |
General Discussion | RedWingsRox |
|
|
|
The person below me game...
|
Water Cooler | SouthernWingsFan |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users














