Then why 3 games for Shaw?
None for Weber based on no injury. If Smith starts tonight, that just shows how much BS the NHL has become
End of Rant
11 replies to this topic
#2
Hockeytown0001
-
- Silver Booster
-
- 21,544 posts
Legend
- Location:A2, Michigan
Posted 17 April 2012 - 06:39 PM
Because the NHL is incompetent.
/thread
/thread
- wings1110 and like this
"All done? Five bucks." - Pavel Datsyuk after an interview
"Very few cities in the NHL have the history or the following of the Detroit Red Wings." - Steve Yzerman
"Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the American people’s liberty teeth and keystone under independence." - George Washington
"Suck my machine gun." - Ted Nugent responding to British pansy Piers Morgan whining for gun control
US Bill of non-rights
#3
jollymania
-
- Member
-
- 3,512 posts
Heavy Hitter
- Location:GCA
Posted 17 April 2012 - 07:13 PM
It was because it was a goalie, harder, and he is the coyotes best player.
"I assure you the hits along the boards he(Aaron Downey) constantly threw SEVERAL TIMES EVERY SHIFT were far more damaging hits that what Kronwall throws."
- uk_redwing
HockeyArchive Twitter
- uk_redwing
HockeyArchive Twitter
#4
NHLrules?
-
- Member
-
- 926 posts
1st Line Sniper
Posted 17 April 2012 - 07:24 PM
It was because it was a goalie, harder, and he is the coyotes best player.
How many things do they have to consider?
That contact was legal BTW, the goalie left his crease.
If he went for the head then Weber went for the head
Im glad to see shanny getting heat for it, in fact he should be s*** canned.
Most of us would have to answer a ton of questions if we f ed up like that.
#5
Crymson
-
- Gold Booster
-
- 9,714 posts
Caustic
- Location:Boulder, CO, USA
Posted 17 April 2012 - 07:33 PM
How many things do they have to consider?
That contact was legal BTW, the goalie left his crease.
If he went for the head then Weber went for the head
Im glad to see shanny getting heat for it, in fact he should be s*** canned.
Most of us would have to answer a ton of questions if we f ed up like that.
The contact was completely illegal. It's the player's job to avoid the goalie. Shaw blew in at full speed, did not make even nearly enough of an effort to avoid the goalie, and then jumped before he made contact with the goalie. That's very illegal.
#6
NHLrules?
-
- Member
-
- 926 posts
1st Line Sniper
Posted 17 April 2012 - 07:40 PM
The contact was completely illegal. It's the player's job to avoid the goalie. Shaw blew in at full speed, did not make even nearly enough of an effort to avoid the goalie, and then jumped before he made contact with the goalie. That's very illegal.
69.4 Contact Outside the Goal Crease - If an attacking player initiates any contact with a goalkeeper, other than incidental contact, while the goalkeeper is outside his goal crease, and a goal is scored, the goal will be disallowed.
A goalkeeper is not “fair game” just because he is outside the goal crease. The appropriate penalty should be assessed in every case where an attacking player makes unnecessary contact with the goalkeeper. However, incidental contact will be permitted when the goalkeeper is in the act of playing the puck outside his goal crease provided the attacking player has made a reasonable effort to avoid such unnecessary contact.
When a goalkeeper has played the puck outside of his crease and is then prevented from returning to his crease area due to the deliberate actions of an attacking player, such player may be penalized for goalkeeper interference. Similarly, the goalkeeper may be penalized, if by his actions outside of his crease he deliberately interferes with an attacking player who is attempting to play the puck or an opponent.
The guy had no place to go, he went to play the puck and didnt deliberately attack the goalie.
No penalty in my mind.
#7
dobbles
-
- Member
-
- 719 posts
2nd Line Scorer
- Location:Tulsa, OK
Posted 17 April 2012 - 07:42 PM
ok, am i the only one that came in here because they thought brendan smith was potentially playing???
i was about to rant about him not being anywhere near capable of replacing any of our top 6!!!!
i was about to rant about him not being anywhere near capable of replacing any of our top 6!!!!
I love Maltby, but to say he wasn't a ****** is a dis-service to his career of douchebaggery.
#8
NHLrules?
-
- Member
-
- 926 posts
1st Line Sniper
Posted 17 April 2012 - 07:46 PM
ok, am i the only one that came in here because they thought brendan smith was potentially playing???
i was about to rant about him not being anywhere near capable of replacing any of our top 6!!!!
LOL
#9
jollymania
-
- Member
-
- 3,512 posts
Heavy Hitter
- Location:GCA
Posted 17 April 2012 - 08:26 PM
he obviously didn't make a good enough attempt to avoid it and it wasn't a sudden move by smith69.4 Contact Outside the Goal Crease - If an attacking player initiates any contact with a goalkeeper, other than incidental contact, while the goalkeeper is outside his goal crease, and a goal is scored, the goal will be disallowed.
A goalkeeper is not “fair game” just because he is outside the goal crease. The appropriate penalty should be assessed in every case where an attacking player makes unnecessary contact with the goalkeeper. However, incidental contact will be permitted when the goalkeeper is in the act of playing the puck outside his goal crease provided the attacking player has made a reasonable effort to avoid such unnecessary contact.
When a goalkeeper has played the puck outside of his crease and is then prevented from returning to his crease area due to the deliberate actions of an attacking player, such player may be penalized for goalkeeper interference. Similarly, the goalkeeper may be penalized, if by his actions outside of his crease he deliberately interferes with an attacking player who is attempting to play the puck or an opponent.
The guy had no place to go, he went to play the puck and didnt deliberately attack the goalie.
No penalty in my mind.
"I assure you the hits along the boards he(Aaron Downey) constantly threw SEVERAL TIMES EVERY SHIFT were far more damaging hits that what Kronwall throws."
- uk_redwing
HockeyArchive Twitter
- uk_redwing
HockeyArchive Twitter
#10
NHLrules?
-
- Member
-
- 926 posts
1st Line Sniper
Posted 17 April 2012 - 08:28 PM
Shaw has just as much right to the puck as Smith.
#11
jollymania
-
- Member
-
- 3,512 posts
Heavy Hitter
- Location:GCA
Posted 17 April 2012 - 09:32 PM
he didn't try to avoid head contact though, it was a move where if you know you aren't going to get past smith you stop.Shaw has just as much right to the puck as Smith.
"I assure you the hits along the boards he(Aaron Downey) constantly threw SEVERAL TIMES EVERY SHIFT were far more damaging hits that what Kronwall throws."
- uk_redwing
HockeyArchive Twitter
- uk_redwing
HockeyArchive Twitter
#12
NHLrules?
-
- Member
-
- 926 posts
1st Line Sniper
Posted 17 April 2012 - 09:57 PM
he didn't try to avoid head contact though, it was a move where if you know you aren't going to get past smith you stop.
What? Shaw tried to squeeze by against the boards. Smith wasnt even injured.
BTW. Brendan Shanaf*** or however you spell his name, needs to lose his job.
This is a travesty, the whole league is up for grabs.
I hope they fold and all these aholes have to work for a living.
Similar Topics
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pinned Money on the Board - playoff style!
|
General Discussion | vladdy16 |
|
|
|
Trade Smith ASAP!
|
General Discussion | Wings_Dynasty |
|
|
|
Heading to JLA for the first time ever for Game 3 - few questions |
General Discussion | DntDrnkThWtr |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
