
Hey, look whose's "caddying" for Uncle Gary!
Posted 14 August 2012 - 01:39 PM

"Mess up tomorrow, don't mess up now".
- Harry James Benson, CBE.
Posted 14 August 2012 - 01:57 PM
While Fehr did not get into specific line-by-line details of the proposal, he did indicate that the players were willing to take reduced hockey-related revenue for the next three seasons and that it did not suggest the elimination of the league's hard cap.
Fehr added that the union also asked that no changes be made in regards to player contracting rules.
Posted 14 August 2012 - 02:05 PM
"It's clear to me (the NHLPA) didn't put (the proposal) together in an hour or two," Bettman told reporters on Tuesday, confirming the league would evaluate the proposal at their offices.
"Mess up tomorrow, don't mess up now".
- Harry James Benson, CBE.
Posted 14 August 2012 - 02:24 PM
I think that's Bettman's idea of a compliment. What a diplomat.Nice sound bite.
Posted 14 August 2012 - 02:45 PM
"It's clear to me (the NHLPA) didn't put (the proposal) together in an hour or two," Bettman told reporters on Tuesday, confirming the league would evaluate the proposal at their offices.

That's right. Sad Simpsons Indian. I went there.
Posted 14 August 2012 - 03:06 PM

Posted 14 August 2012 - 03:11 PM
Surprise, surprise, Burke's tie is undone as to make him look frazzled and as though he has been working his butt off...
Hey, look whose's "caddying" for Uncle Gary!
Posted 14 August 2012 - 03:15 PM
.....I'm still a firm believer of my earlier predictions from a post in a similar thread; 60/40 in favor of a lock-out.

Posted 14 August 2012 - 04:27 PM
Posted 14 August 2012 - 04:41 PM
Posted 14 August 2012 - 05:00 PM
The union says its proposal to the league includes a smaller percentage of revenues for players and an expanded revenue sharing program to help struggling teams.
Fehr also said the union's proposal does not call for the removal of the hard salary cap the league won in the last round of negotiations.
Posted 14 August 2012 - 05:50 PM
Posted 14 August 2012 - 06:24 PM
My interpretation of it (which is a best guess given what few details we know) is this is the unions way of saying they'll cut the ownership a break for a few years while they get their franchises in order and figure out how to make these smaller markets profitable."Union leader Donald Fehr says players could give up as much as US$465 million in revenue under the proposal if the league continues to grow at an average rate. If the league grows at the rate it has over the past two seasons, he says the amount could reach $800 million."
Today must be my "off day"...can someone explain to me WHY the players are giving this up??
Why would the Owners agree to return to the current system after three years of the new one? They have stated they have no interest in the current system and will not return to it. I wonder why this was even added.
Posted 14 August 2012 - 07:01 PM
Edited by cusimano_brothers, 14 August 2012 - 07:02 PM.
"Mess up tomorrow, don't mess up now".
- Harry James Benson, CBE.
Posted 14 August 2012 - 10:33 PM
Posted 14 August 2012 - 10:45 PM
Surprise, surprise, Burke's tie is undone as to make him look frazzled and as though he has been working his butt off...
Posted 14 August 2012 - 11:49 PM
Jeff Marek
@JeffMarek
NHLPA proposal smartly crafted to position large market teams vs small market teams. Make this an internal owners fight.
Posted 15 August 2012 - 07:54 AM

"Mess up tomorrow, don't mess up now".
- Harry James Benson, CBE.
Posted 15 August 2012 - 09:13 AM
After finally getting around to reading that article, I liked that the players are being more reasonable than the initial dickweed proposal from the NHL, but at the same time, they didn't go into great detail as to what else was in the proposal and there's some things like contract length that seemed quite important to the owners. I hope that TSN isn't just leaving key info out of their stories to make a villian/hero scenarion with the owners/players. I'd like to see what else is in the players proposal. Don't want to read 8000 pages, but point form of each topic would be nice.Well that's very good news that the players are willing to take reduced revenues and not trying to get rid of the hard cap.
Even if it's the only change to contract rules though, they absolutely need to put some limit on length.
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=403068
Wings need some Ryan Pulock in the 1st round, a goal scorer in the 2nd round and rounds 3-7 all guys 6'4 or bigger. Please sign Dekeyser to play with Smith. <--Dekeyser signed, Paired next year. Mark your calendars.
Tootoo needs a partner in crime that plays like him on the other side of Helm. Oh hey, we have Mitchell Callahan. Problem solved.
Cleary....
XBox Live BleedRedWing
Posted 15 August 2012 - 02:04 PM
Bettman "its a little disapointing to not have their full slate of proposals with a month to go"
Bettman: "still a wide gap between us with not much time to go"
Bettman "sides are still far apart, different views of the issues"

That's right. Sad Simpsons Indian. I went there.
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NHL 14 Cover Vote - Jimmy or Pavel |
General Discussion | drumnj |
|
|
|
Watching Ericsson mature |
General Discussion | Motown4013 |
|
|
|
Jimmy D Speaks out on Lockout, fined $250k |
General Discussion | ShanahanMan |
|
|
Hockey Discussion Forums →
General Discussion →
IF there is a lockout, where will our players likely end up?Started by dirtydangles, 17 Aug 2012 |
|
|
||
Hockey Discussion Forums →
General Discussion →
What do you consider a fair CBA?Started by 55fan, 14 Aug 2012 |
|
|
||
Hockey Discussion Forums →
General Discussion →
Sal Galatioto Predicts NHL Cap & Floor DroppingStarted by MrBest7, 11 Jul 2012 |
|
|
||
Hockey Discussion Forums →
General Discussion →
Union to OK $70.2 Million Offseason Salary CapStarted by Datsyukian-Deke, 28 Jun 2012 |
|
|
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users