Bettman's response, from THN's "The Stats Guy"...
He's such a prick.
The NHLPA's response might have been more timely had they known the league's offer would be insane and not worth waiting to see before responding.
Posted 15 August 2012 - 02:07 PM
Bettman's response, from THN's "The Stats Guy"...
Posted 15 August 2012 - 02:21 PM
He's such a prick.
The NHLPA's response might have been more timely had they known the league's offer would be insane and not worth waiting to see before responding.
Don Fehr says the reason a wide economic gulf remains between the sides is because of the NHL's original proposal.

That's right. Sad Simpsons Indian. I went there.
Posted 15 August 2012 - 03:20 PM
I agree wholeheartedly that Bettman is a prick, but remember what i was saying about the NHLPA not adding a lot of different issues in their proposal.He's such a prick.
The NHLPA's response might have been more timely had they known the league's offer would be insane and not worth waiting to see before responding.
Wings need some Ryan Pulock in the 1st round, a goal scorer in the 2nd round and rounds 3-7 all guys 6'4 or bigger. Please sign Dekeyser to play with Smith. <--Dekeyser signed, Paired next year. Mark your calendars.
Tootoo needs a partner in crime that plays like him on the other side of Helm. Oh hey, we have Mitchell Callahan. Problem solved.
Cleary....
XBox Live BleedRedWing
Posted 15 August 2012 - 03:26 PM
He's got a point. The NHL's first proposal was a bunch of hardball dictator jargen. Not gonna get anywhere when you start by telling the players to give up a large percentage of their salary right off the bat again.Fehr had a pretty good followup response, as per Chris Johnston from The Hockey News...
Wings need some Ryan Pulock in the 1st round, a goal scorer in the 2nd round and rounds 3-7 all guys 6'4 or bigger. Please sign Dekeyser to play with Smith. <--Dekeyser signed, Paired next year. Mark your calendars.
Tootoo needs a partner in crime that plays like him on the other side of Helm. Oh hey, we have Mitchell Callahan. Problem solved.
Cleary....
XBox Live BleedRedWing
Posted 15 August 2012 - 03:43 PM
Edited by frankgrimes, 15 August 2012 - 03:47 PM.

Posted 15 August 2012 - 03:50 PM
Posted 15 August 2012 - 03:56 PM
the players should have low balled them. bettman is acting as if they did anyways and now is gonna want more movement from the nhlpa towards what he would like. whatever concessions the players made over salary should be solidified and they can budge a bit on contract terms for length etc. thats all i can see the players giving up at this point without taking a huge blow.

Posted 15 August 2012 - 04:23 PM
Posted 15 August 2012 - 04:48 PM
Posted 15 August 2012 - 05:06 PM
A few quotes from Bettman's response, from THN's "The Stats Guy"...
Not surprising, as I don't think anyone expected the League to accept the PA's first proposal any more than the PA would accept the League's first offer. That said, sure seems like Bettman's trying to angle towards the player's being the ones dragging their feet.
Next meeting is set for one week from today.
Posted 15 August 2012 - 05:30 PM
Bettman is just pulling more political bs to try and make the union look bad. It doesn't sound like the players left out the meat and potatoes, they just didn't include everything Bettman would want in there. Which isn't really a surprise considering it's a negotiation.I agree wholeheartedly that Bettman is a prick, but remember what i was saying about the NHLPA not adding a lot of different issues in their proposal.
From Gary Bettman's statement:
"There's still a wide gap between us with not much time to go," NHL commissioner Gary Bettman told reporters after Wednesday's session. "This is a process that we're going to continue to work hard on. I think there's still a number of issues where we're looking at the world differently."
Bettman says he understands what the NHLPA has put forth, but adds that it isn't a full proposal and he is "disappointed" that he's still waiting for one at this late stage.
I normally don't agree with the Anti-Christ, but I was sort of afraid of this being the answer back from the NHL. The players while being reasonable in their proposal, once again like i said earlier, left out the meat and potatoes of the new CBA. They added jack about contract length and front loading contracts and all that stuff. They want a quick fix and want to play when the scheduled games start, but they need to cover all aspects when they make their counter proposals.
Posted 15 August 2012 - 07:06 PM
"Mess up tomorrow, don't mess up now".
- Harry James Benson, CBE.
Posted 15 August 2012 - 07:08 PM
As a child, I can picture Uncle Gary never losing a game of Monopoly. If he was losing, he merely flipped the board in the air and stormed away.
Posted 15 August 2012 - 07:10 PM
"Mess up tomorrow, don't mess up now".
- Harry James Benson, CBE.
Posted 15 August 2012 - 10:17 PM
If Holmgren signed Bettman to an offer sheet would any team match?
Posted 15 August 2012 - 10:46 PM
Edited by Hatethedrake!, 15 August 2012 - 10:47 PM.
Posted 16 August 2012 - 07:11 AM
If Holmgren signed Bettman to an offer sheet would any team match?
Why does Bill Daly look like Elmer Fudd?

"Mess up tomorrow, don't mess up now".
- Harry James Benson, CBE.
Posted 16 August 2012 - 07:42 AM

Turtling is for the weak
Grand Rapids Griffins Fights
Posted 16 August 2012 - 08:48 AM
Bettman thinks he's god and everyone should just work on his schedule which as you stated is very loose followed by threatening a lockout. I agree with everything you said, but the only thing i wish the NHLPA would have done was make their intentions known on a few more things. If you don't want a cap on contract length, say it..."we don't want a cap on contract lengths". That's all i want from the players.Bettman is just pulling more political bs to try and make the union look bad. It doesn't sound like the players left out the meat and potatoes, they just didn't include everything Bettman would want in there. Which isn't really a surprise considering it's a negotiation.
I don't know that the players didn't cover all aspects. I don't agree with it but it sounds like they don't want contract length limited. So there's not going to be a provision offering that.
And what good is a "full proposal" from the NHL when most of what they proposed is insane?
Just listen to the tone that Fehr takes in his public comments about the CBA negotiations, then listen to Bettman. Bettman takes every opportunity to take shots at the union and threaten lockout. When the NHL took until mid July to give their first proposal to the players union, was he disappointed in the timeline then?
Seems like Bettman's got a case of short man syndrome and loves to wield his power whenever he's given the opportunity. That or he really wants to get the lockout hat trick.
Wings need some Ryan Pulock in the 1st round, a goal scorer in the 2nd round and rounds 3-7 all guys 6'4 or bigger. Please sign Dekeyser to play with Smith. <--Dekeyser signed, Paired next year. Mark your calendars.
Tootoo needs a partner in crime that plays like him on the other side of Helm. Oh hey, we have Mitchell Callahan. Problem solved.
Cleary....
XBox Live BleedRedWing
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NHL 14 Cover Vote - Jimmy or Pavel |
General Discussion | drumnj |
|
|
|
Watching Ericsson mature |
General Discussion | Motown4013 |
|
|
|
Jimmy D Speaks out on Lockout, fined $250k |
General Discussion | ShanahanMan |
|
|
Hockey Discussion Forums →
General Discussion →
IF there is a lockout, where will our players likely end up?Started by dirtydangles, 17 Aug 2012 |
|
|
||
Hockey Discussion Forums →
General Discussion →
What do you consider a fair CBA?Started by 55fan, 14 Aug 2012 |
|
|
||
Hockey Discussion Forums →
General Discussion →
Sal Galatioto Predicts NHL Cap & Floor DroppingStarted by MrBest7, 11 Jul 2012 |
|
|
||
Hockey Discussion Forums →
General Discussion →
Union to OK $70.2 Million Offseason Salary CapStarted by Datsyukian-Deke, 28 Jun 2012 |
|
|
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users