Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Shanahan snubbed from HoF induction

Hall of Fame Retired Jersey

  • Please log in to reply
73 replies to this topic

#1 ogreslayer

ogreslayer

    1st Line All-Star

  • HoF Booster
  • 1,971 posts
  • Location:Indianapolis

Posted 26 June 2012 - 10:29 AM

To give everyone something to talk about other than free agency...

I think it's pretty clear that Shanny gets the call this afternoon on his first HoF ballot. Since that's the first step to have your jersey retired in Hockeytown, what's everyone's thoughts on whether he gets that honor too?

Personally, I don't think he gets his jersey in the rafters of the Joe or whatever the new arena is called when it opens. If he had stuck around & retired as a Wing, I think he still would have been a long-shot but once he left for New York in 2006, that shot disappeared.

Discuss....

#2 hooon

hooon

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,224 posts
  • Location:Denver

Posted 26 June 2012 - 10:43 AM

Nope.

Lidstrom, yes.
Posted Image

#3 Jedi

Jedi

    Spell Forged - Unparalleled Quality

  • HoF Booster Mod
  • 9,807 posts
  • Location:Dallas

Posted 26 June 2012 - 10:52 AM

I'd say no. HOF, for sure, but he didn't have a long enough & illustrious enough career in a Wings jersey to belong next to the other 6 guys up there (7, surely, next year with #5 going up there).

Compare Stevie & Nick's numbers compared with Shanny's.

Stevie - 22 seasons in Detroit, Captain for 20 seasons, Lester B Pearson Trophy, Conn Smythe Trophy, Selke Trophy, Masterton Trophy, 3 Time Stanley Cup Champion.

Nick - 20 seasons in Detroit, Captain for 6 seasons, 7 Norris Trophies, Conn Smythe Trophy, 4 time Stanley Cup Champion.

Shanny - 9 seasons in Detroit, King Clancy Memorial Trophy. 3 time Stanley Cup Champion.

It's easy to see that Shanny had a great career as a Red Wing, and that he was an indispensable part of the '97, '98 and '02 Cup teams. However, when you compare resume's in the Red Wings uniform, his just doesn't match up to Stevie's or Nick's.

This is why I think the new arena should have a "Ring of Honor" or something like it. That way guys like Shanny, McCarty, Draper, Maltby, Homer, etc can be honored, without taking that number out of circulation.

snyoep.jpg
"I am the sword in the darkness... I am the watcher on the walls...
I am the shield that guards the realms of men..."


#4 dirtydangles

dirtydangles

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,705 posts

Posted 26 June 2012 - 10:55 AM

I'd say no. HOF, for sure, but he didn't have a long enough & illustrious enough career in a Wings jersey to belong next to the other 6 guys up there (7, surely, next year with #5 going up there).

Compare Stevie & Nick's numbers compared with Shanny's.

Stevie - 22 seasons in Detroit, Captain for 20 seasons, Lester B Pearson Trophy, Conn Smythe Trophy, Selke Trophy, Masterton Trophy, 3 Time Stanley Cup Champion.

Nick - 20 seasons in Detroit, Captain for 6 seasons, 7 Norris Trophies, Conn Smythe Trophy, 4 time Stanley Cup Champion.

Shanny - 9 seasons in Detroit, King Clancy Memorial Trophy. 3 time Stanley Cup Champion.

It's easy to see that Shanny had a great career as a Red Wing, and that he was an indispensable part of the '97, '98 and '02 Cup teams. However, when you compare resume's in the Red Wings uniform, his just doesn't match up to Stevie's or Nick's.

This is why I think the new arena should have a "Ring of Honor" or something like it. That way guys like Shanny, McCarty, Draper, Maltby, Homer, etc can be honored, without taking that number out of circulation.

AGREED. would be nice to honour life longers who bled for us and some shorter term talent.

Is there a kickstarter campaign for Jakub Kindl to never play another NHL game?


#5 WizardOfOz30

WizardOfOz30

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Gold Booster
  • 4,726 posts
  • Location:Michigan

Posted 26 June 2012 - 11:01 AM

I agree with Jedi, I like the idea of being able to honor those that made a big impact on the team but not enough to have the jersey number retired.

Do hope that he does get the HOF.

Posted Image

Thanks Offsides


"If I could sum up my career in Detroit, I was a perfect goalie for the team at the perfect time. I just wanted to be a Red Wing, that's it." Chris Osgood, July 19, 2011

#6 xtrememachine1

xtrememachine1

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,427 posts
  • Location:Pittsburgh

Posted 26 June 2012 - 11:19 AM

He'll get the Hall of Fame for sure, but he wasn't as impactful as the guys already hanging in the rafters.

#7 Nev

Nev

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,054 posts
  • Location:Lincolnshire, England

Posted 26 June 2012 - 11:35 AM

Lock for the HOF, but he's in that big group of question marks for number retirement - the "lifers" like Homer, Ozzie, Draper and Maltby who embody everything about what it is to be a wing but didn't have mad HOF skillz, and the guys like Shanny and Feds who had the mad HOF skillz but weren't lifers.

The problem with using Listrom and Yzerman as your benchmarks for retirement is that we might not retire another number for the next 100 years. Some Wings fans are certainly quite snobbish about this , and wouldn't have a problem with that, but in the era of the cap and free agency, 1st ballot HOFers who spend their entire career with one club and win multiple cups are going to become increasingly rare.
"If I can be totally honest, it's not a lot of guys you get impressed by. Actually, it's no one else but him. From the bench, to see what move he makes -- you're like, 'I wish I could do that.' Sometimes you sit on the bench and just think, 'wow,' and you look over to the other bench and they sit there and shake their heads, too. He has great, great skills. I'm probably not going to play with another player who has the kind of skills he has." Mikael Samuelsson on Pavel Datsyuk

#8 Jedi

Jedi

    Spell Forged - Unparalleled Quality

  • HoF Booster Mod
  • 9,807 posts
  • Location:Dallas

Posted 26 June 2012 - 11:49 AM

The problem with using Listrom and Yzerman as your benchmarks for retirement is that we might not retire another number for the next 100 years. Some Wings fans are certainly quite snobbish about this , and wouldn't have a problem with that, but in the era of the cap and free agency, 1st ballot HOFers who spend their entire career with one club and win multiple cups are going to become increasingly rare.

I, for one, have no problem with using guys like Lidstrom and Yzerman as your benchmark. In the entire history of the Red Wings, they have only retired 6 numbers (7, if you count Larry Aurie's #6). That's less than 1 per decade. Even when Lidstrom's number is retired, it will still be less than 1 number retired per decade of the team's existence.

Jersey retirement is the ULTIMATE way of saluting a player's career. The way the club can say "Your contributions to this sport, this city and this team were so special that no one will EVER be able to wear that number again". Does anyone REALLY want the club to start a policy of "Come here, win a few cups, and we'll honor you the same way we honored Gordie Howe, Ted Lindsay, or Steve Yzerman"? That would cheapen the honor immeasurably (See: Colorado Avalanche & Ray Borque).

Besides, no one wants the Wings rafters to be like the Canadiens, who have retired #'s 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 12, 12 again, 16, 16 again, 18, 19, 23, 29, and 33.

snyoep.jpg
"I am the sword in the darkness... I am the watcher on the walls...
I am the shield that guards the realms of men..."


#9 StormJH1

StormJH1

    2nd Line Scorer

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 702 posts
  • Location:Twin Cities, MN

Posted 26 June 2012 - 11:49 AM

Consider the following: The Red Wings are an Original Six team, yet have only six (currently or officially) retired numbers. The Montreal Canadiens have retired 17. The Bruins have retired 10.

However, the Maple Leafs use an "honoured" system for guys like Wendel Clark, Mats Sundin, etc...their numbers are recognized but left in circulation. Under that approach, they've only actually retired TWO numbers, though the bar for getting "honoured" is obviously far lower than getting a number retired.

The problem with retiring Shanahan's is that if you do that, there are strong rationales for also retiring other numbers, such as Fedorov and Osgood. I like to start with the question of "Should this player's number be retired somewhere?" In other words, had he played for one team exclusively, are the merits of his career sufficent for that degree of recognition. I think with Shanahan and Fedorov, the answer is absolutely yes. Osgood? Hmm, maybe, maybe not. Yet, if you asked people on this board, more people would want to see Shanny's number retired than Fedorov, and many would put Osgood in front of Fedorov too. I think that's just wrong. While Yzerman's importance is unquestioned, don't forget that this team didn't truly go from Dead Wings to perennial playoff team (and still going) until Fedorov (and Lidstrom) came along. They are the Scottie Pippen to Yzerman's Michael Jordan.

So, really, I could go either way on this, but if you have to go ALL the way in whatever direction you choose. If you feel that 3 Cups in 6 seasons ('97 to '02) is a significant achievement, and far more significant in a modern league with 26 to 30 teams than it would have been in the 40's or 50's, then I am okay with recognizing that through multiple retired numbers for players who were integral in that success.

But if you feel that Yzerman and Lidstrom are the only two worthy of that recognition, then cut it off. If you choose that route, however, I have serious doubts that Datsyuk or Zetterberg could ever have their numbers retired at the current place. Unless Datsyuk wins additional Cups, retiring #13 but NOT #91, to me, makes no sense whatsoever.

Edited by StormJH1, 26 June 2012 - 11:51 AM.


#10 StormJH1

StormJH1

    2nd Line Scorer

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 702 posts
  • Location:Twin Cities, MN

Posted 26 June 2012 - 11:55 AM

By the way, I thought the fact that Derek Meech, Nyquist , (and others?) have already worn #14 post-Shanny was cited on LGW as proof that the Wings had no intent of retiring it. Nobody seems to think that a Konstantinov number retirement is imminent, yet nobody (not even Hull) will touch that number in Hockeytown. So it seems counterintuitive that they would print up #14 jerseys for rookies if they planned on retiring it down the road.

#11 irishock

irishock

    Into the sunset

  • Silver Booster
  • 1,837 posts

Posted 26 June 2012 - 12:18 PM

Fedorov left the team on bad conditions.

bringit.jpg


#12 Din758

Din758

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,176 posts
  • Location:Hockeytown, USA

Posted 26 June 2012 - 12:25 PM

yes on the ring of honor idea.

in other news, some less than crdible sources on twitter have been saying shanny didnt get in the HOF this year. sometimes these people are right though.
Crosby is a crybaby *****

#13 kook_10

kook_10

    I Like Our Team

  • Gold Booster
  • 2,230 posts
  • Location:Los Angeles, CA

Posted 26 June 2012 - 12:32 PM

I love Shanny, but he jumped ship so there is no way. If he had retired a Wing with another cup there may be some discussion, but none of that matters now.

works every time


#14 Hockey13Playa

Hockey13Playa

    Here's my card.

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,413 posts
  • Location:Michigan

Posted 26 June 2012 - 12:34 PM

Plain and simple, short and sweet:


HOF: YES

JERSEY RETIRED: NO (Not in Detroit anyways)

Great player but I don't think he met the criteria to hang in the rafters with the elites. If you retired Shanahan's jersey just think of all the other wings that should "technically" then be retired as well...

Posted Image


#15 chances14

chances14

    The Magician

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 664 posts
  • Location:Michigan, USA

Posted 26 June 2012 - 02:10 PM

Ansar Khan@AnsarKhanMLive
Shocker: Brendan Shanahan did not get elected to Hall of Fame in first year of eligibility. Bure, Oates, Sakic, Sundin are in.


talk about being snubbed.

Edited by chances14, 26 June 2012 - 02:10 PM.


#16 ogreslayer

ogreslayer

    1st Line All-Star

  • HoF Booster
  • 1,971 posts
  • Location:Indianapolis

Posted 26 June 2012 - 02:11 PM

That is shocking. On a lighter note, I wonder if he's going to suspend the voting committee now?

#17 jeff48109

jeff48109

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,522 posts
  • Location:formerly Ann Arbor; now VA

Posted 26 June 2012 - 02:14 PM

supplemental discipline is warranted

#18 Jedi

Jedi

    Spell Forged - Unparalleled Quality

  • HoF Booster Mod
  • 9,807 posts
  • Location:Dallas

Posted 26 June 2012 - 02:14 PM

Wow. Shanahan has more Stanley Cup rings than those 4 guys combined.

Twitter is lighting up with jokes about Shanny suspending the HHoF Selection Committee.

snyoep.jpg
"I am the sword in the darkness... I am the watcher on the walls...
I am the shield that guards the realms of men..."


#19 ogreslayer

ogreslayer

    1st Line All-Star

  • HoF Booster
  • 1,971 posts
  • Location:Indianapolis

Posted 26 June 2012 - 02:17 PM

Wow. Shanahan has more Stanley Cup rings than those 4 guys combined.

Twitter is lighting up with jokes about Shanny suspending the HHoF Selection Committee.

I'm sensing another Will Arnett video on the horizon.

#20 chances14

chances14

    The Magician

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 664 posts
  • Location:Michigan, USA

Posted 26 June 2012 - 02:17 PM

i really don't think sundin should have gotten in over shanny. must be the toronto factor





Similar Topics Collapse

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users