Edited by Matt, 28 June 2012 - 10:30 PM.
Jump to content
Posted 28 June 2012 - 10:36 PM
Posted 28 June 2012 - 10:39 PM
Posted 28 June 2012 - 10:49 PM
im surprised that Scneider didnt wait for the Luongo fiasco to come to an end before signing but no way Vancouver gives him 4 mill a year to be a back up
Posted 28 June 2012 - 11:06 PM
Lot a money for an unproven player. Canucks better hope they're making the right decision.
Posted 28 June 2012 - 11:14 PM
well he has backed up for a couple years so its not quite like schultz where he hasnt played a game but I agree, he has never had the reigns in Vancouver and I'm sure he will be the new scapegoat when they get knocked out of the playoffs again this year.
Posted 28 June 2012 - 11:22 PM
Posted 28 June 2012 - 11:28 PM
Am I the only one who wouldn't pay a guy who's never played more than 33 games in a season 4 million a season?
I mean he was very good in his 60 some-odd games he's played but there have been a ton of goalies who have had a great season only to fall apart the next.
If they move Luongo and he falls apart that fan-base will go crazy.
Posted 29 June 2012 - 12:01 AM
"All done? Five bucks." - Pavel Datsyuk after an interview
"Very few cities in the NHL have the history or the following of the Detroit Red Wings." - Steve Yzerman
Posted 29 June 2012 - 04:36 AM
That kind of contract definitely points to a Luongo trade.
Posted 29 June 2012 - 07:08 AM
"Mess up tomorrow, don't mess up now".
- Harry James Benson, CBE.
Posted 29 June 2012 - 07:19 AM
Posted 29 June 2012 - 09:26 AM
Posted 29 June 2012 - 09:34 AM
Posted 29 June 2012 - 10:57 AM
|Topic||Forum||Started By||Stats||Last Post Info|
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users