D Justin Schultz signs with Oilers
#1
Posted 30 June 2012 - 02:53 PM
#2
Posted 30 June 2012 - 02:57 PM
- Hockeymom1960 and darkmanx like this
#3
Posted 30 June 2012 - 03:04 PM
- stevkrause likes this
#4
Posted 30 June 2012 - 03:28 PM
#5
Posted 30 June 2012 - 03:34 PM
#6
Posted 30 June 2012 - 03:37 PM
Datsyukian
Dat·syu·ki·an [dat-soo-kee-uh n]
adjective
1. When your moves are so amazing and beyond reason, the only way to describe them is "datsyukian."
#7
Posted 30 June 2012 - 03:46 PM
Edmonton likely offered him top 2 ice time ( their defense is that bad ) Edmonton will not make the playoffs again this year and they will fire yet another coach.
They'll finish dead last again and earn another No. 1 pick.
#8
Posted 30 June 2012 - 03:51 PM
Good for the Oilers, but they still need at least one solid veteran on the blueline to have a chance at the playoffs.
well, they need way more than that. Something that cannot be signed or traded for without heavily affecting what they call a bright future. Expierence. Their lineup is full of teenagers....
Edited by RusDRW, 30 June 2012 - 03:52 PM.
© mikah
#9
Posted 30 June 2012 - 04:11 PM
- Hockeymom1960 likes this
#10
Posted 30 June 2012 - 05:15 PM
They'll finish dead last again and earn another No. 1 pick.
until uncle Gary decides they finally need a cup.
© mikah
#11
Posted 30 June 2012 - 05:45 PM
#12
Posted 30 June 2012 - 05:55 PM
#13
Posted 30 June 2012 - 05:56 PM
#14
Posted 30 June 2012 - 05:56 PM
Ducks must be pissed that they are losing a prospect so soon and they won't get anything in return.
#15
Posted 30 June 2012 - 06:27 PM
#16
Posted 30 June 2012 - 06:49 PM
Schultz will learn the art of loosing there for a few years. That would be great for his NHL experience.
Having Hudler there will also teach him how to suck.
Edited by arag, 30 June 2012 - 06:50 PM.
#17
Posted 30 June 2012 - 07:10 PM

"Somehow, someway, I will screw all of this up."
- Wing Across The Pond likes this
"Mess up tomorrow, don't mess up now".
- Harry James Benson, CBE.
#18
Posted 30 June 2012 - 08:02 PM
#19
Posted 30 June 2012 - 09:11 PM
Not completely the same thing as the Penner situation, but does anyone else find it more than a little ironic that Anaheim lost another promising prospect to Edmonton? Sure, they could've lost Shultz to anyone, but it's funny to me that it turned out to be Edmonton. If Burkie was still soaking up the sun in Anaheim, we'd definitely have that barn fight between him and Lowe.
Anyway, definitely cannot say the kid went where the money was or wanted to ride the coat-tails of an already contending team. Seems he simply wanted to be apart of a young, fast, talented team with the potential (until they make any noise in the playoffs, that's all it is) to be the next great team built through consistent losing and high draft picks.
It seems odd to me he signed a 2-year deal. Isn't a 3-year deal pretty much a given when it comes to max entry level deals?
Edited by WhiteLightning91, 30 June 2012 - 09:13 PM.

GMRwings1983: "Hudler has been stellar"
#20
Posted 30 June 2012 - 10:57 PM
Length is determined by the player's age, it had to be two years.It seems odd to me he signed a 2-year deal. Isn't a 3-year deal pretty much a given when it comes to max entry level deals?
Similar Topics
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Signed
Alexei Marchenko signs 3 year entry level deal |
General Discussion | turbowhistle86 |
|
|
|
Datsyuk: I want to sign extension with Wings this summer |
General Discussion | Jedi |
|
|
|
Poll: If you could pick any 20 players to start an NHL franchise with. |
General Discussion | blueadams |
|
|
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: justin schultz, edmonton oilers
![]() |
Hockey Discussion Forums →
General Discussion →
Red Wings OUT of bidding for D Justin SchultzStarted by redwingfan19, 27 Jun 2012 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Hockey Discussion Forums →
General Discussion →
Red Wings make contract offer to D Justin SchultzStarted by Tim.D, 25 May 2012 |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users















