15 replies to this topic

[Din758]

Decent pick up for their horrible D. Alot of people wanted him here to help us. MIstake for us not signing him first?

[Din758]

Decent pick up for their horrible D. Alot of people wanted him here to help us. MIstake for us not signing him first?

1yr 2mil

[haroldsnepsts]

I thought they had to amputate his leg after the Brown hit. At least that's what it sounded like based on the Yotes players comments.

He wasn't anyone that was on my radar, but looking at the blueline right now, it sure wouldn't have hurt as a depth signing since we have none.

[wingslogo19]

Couldn't agree more that the Wings should of signed him for depth on the back end

[brett]

i guess holland is alright with our d group

[Crymson]

Those of you who believe that the Wings should have signed Roszival are almost certainly thinking about the Roszival of three or five years ago. The Roszival of today is a shadow of his former self so far as hockey is concerned. He is a liability in his own end and poor in the offensive zone.

[St. Michael (the Red Wing)]

I would have passed on him 3 years ago and still pass now.

[haroldsnepsts]

Those of you who believe that the Wings should have signed Roszival are almost certainly thinking about the Roszival of three or five years ago. The Roszival of today is a shadow of his former self so far as hockey is concerned. He is a liability in his own end and poor in the offensive zone.

I'm not high on Rozsival, but that's pretty much your standard response for everyone the Wings don't sign.

More than anything he likely would've been a middle of the pack defenseman, which isn't what the Wings really need as much as they do a top pairing guy and a cheap depth d-man.

[Dabura]

Something something kicked the tires, something something price wasn't right something something....

[Crymson]

I'm not high on Rozsival, but that's pretty much your standard response for everyone the Wings don't sign.

This is pretty much your standard sort of response to everything I post.

Decent pick up for their horrible D.

I wouldn't say that the Hawks have a horrible D. Hjalmarsson, Keith, and Seabrook are not bad defensemen.

[Detroit # 1 Fan]

They can have him. He's terrible.

[The Axe]

Wings are going to win the Suter/Parise sweepstakes. Oh wait...

[Bring Back The Bruise Bros]

Wings are going to win the Suter/Parise sweepstakes. Oh wait...

Wings should've paid each player $100 millon each over the course of 13 years and financially strapped the franchise for years to come.

Get it together, Ken.

Anyhow, Chicago will be moving a defenseman or two. Chicago's got the following players on the blueline:

1. Brent Seabrook
2. Duncan Keith
3. Johnny Oduya
4. Michal Rozsival
5. Nick Leddy
6. Niklas Hjalmarsson
7. Sheldon Brookbank
8. Steve Montador
9. Dylan Olsen

Edited by Bring Back The Bruise Bros, 11 September 2012 - 11:58 PM.

[frankgrimes]

Seabrook next Chicago? Thanks your detroit Red Wings

[Bring Back The Bruise Bros]

Jim Vandermeer waits.

[evilmrt]

“On the back end, we don’t have enough depth,'' Babcock said. “You got (Brian) Rafalski and Stuart and Lidstrom all leaving the club in just over a year, that’s a chunk of cheese leaving. Now we have to replace them with people that step up. There’s opportunity for others.
“(Niklas) Kronwall and (Jonathan) Ericsson will do that. We think Smith has a chance.''

It's not enough, however, as the Red Wings are sure to acquire another defensemen, through free agency or trade, before the season.
“You can’t go into the season with 6 D,'' Babcock said. “We’ll have to get that fixed up, and we will.''

http://www.mlive.com...ck_confide.html