Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

[Retired] Official Lockout Thread


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
2458 replies to this topic

#481 GMRwings1983

GMRwings1983

    The Killer is Me

  • Silver Booster
  • 20,947 posts
  • Location:Jerkwater, USA

Posted 04 October 2012 - 08:44 PM

Does anyone think these owners or players really give a s*** about fans being upset?

I don't.
According to my profile, my reputation is excellent. LOL.

#482 mmorland

mmorland

    SRD Writer, Broadcaster

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 437 posts
  • Location:Dearborn, MI

Posted 04 October 2012 - 08:52 PM

As Matt finishes up the revamped LetsGoWings website, we're pushing ahead with the podcast.

The LetsGoWings.com podcast series, The Red Line, is back for a second season, with episode one out now. Episode 1 is all lockout talk, from money to egos and everything in between.

Follow This Link for More Details

Edited by mmorland, 04 October 2012 - 08:53 PM.

"I can't believe I shook this guys frickin' hand. We lost and I'm pissed off. But to see Kris Draper's face makes me sick. I didn't see his face until after the game, but his face is turned sideways. If the league doesn't do something about that ... I mean that's ridiculous. He could have broken his fricken neck."

-Dino Ciccarelli

#483 barabbas16

barabbas16

    3rd Line Checker

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 438 posts
  • Location:Parkersburg, WV

Posted 04 October 2012 - 08:56 PM

The ones previously were small in comparison to the one you just levied, but I digress. I was more relating to this thread in specific.

I apologize and will try to limit my comments to your posts.


I fixed it for you.


Ah, you did say 'could.' But you also said...

'we don't know what would have happened with more time because we don't have it today.'

AND

'The sooner that they met, the better off they would have been and the happier the fans would have been in the end.'

The first statement is fact. The second sure sounds like YOU seem to know what would have happened with more time.... you know, since you stated it there.... pretty much says we all lived happily ever after... except that it is based on no fact and is pure speculation.

I was trying to cleverly point out that you contradicted yourself. I thought it was funny, anyway.... even if noone else did. No offense or anything - just bored.

#484 Bump

Bump

    Prospect

  • Member
  • 38 posts

Posted 04 October 2012 - 09:00 PM

NHL agent Allan Walsh gets it:

"It's become perfectly clear that Gary Bettman cannot continue in his position. It's time for a new commissioner."

#485 toby91_ca

toby91_ca

    Legend

  • Gold Booster
  • 8,519 posts

Posted 04 October 2012 - 09:03 PM

Looks like a bit of a shot from Bobby Ryan at the players who decided to go overseas to play.

http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=406772

"I'm going to continue to skate with the guys," Ryan told the New Jersey Courier-Post. "Whether it's coming back here (to South Jersey) for a couple weeks at a time. I think it's important to stay here (in the United States) and be part of the solution and not just run from it."

#486 Nightfall

Nightfall

    My goal is to deny yours!

  • Gold Booster
  • 3,762 posts
  • Location:Grand Rapids

Posted 04 October 2012 - 09:07 PM

Ah, you did say 'could.' But you also said...

'we don't know what would have happened with more time because we don't have it today.'

AND

'The sooner that they met, the better off they would have been and the happier the fans would have been in the end.'

The first statement is fact. The second sure sounds like YOU seem to know what would have happened with more time.... you know, since you stated it there.... pretty much says we all lived happily ever after... except that it is based on no fact and is pure speculation.

I was trying to cleverly point out that you contradicted yourself. I thought it was funny, anyway.... even if noone else did. No offense or anything - just bored.

No offense taken. At the same time, my second statement does stand. If the NHLPA would have met with the NHL, the fans would have been happier because there would have been apparent traction. Also, if they would have met in January, both sides would have been better off in some part due to the fact they were talking sooner. I don't know if a deal would have been reached or not. I just can't understand how someone can say that meeting early wouldn't be a factor at all. The NHLPA behavior at least shows a pattern of negative bargaining behavior.

By my count we've lost 1,780 games due to Bettman's lockouts. That beats MLB, NBA and NFL by a longshot.

The sad part is we're still counting. That number is going to get even higher.

Hey, at least Bettman and Fehr are tied in locking out/striking their respective sides and each losing a championship series in their respective sports. :D
Christopher Brian Dudek
My Domain

#487 barabbas16

barabbas16

    3rd Line Checker

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 438 posts
  • Location:Parkersburg, WV

Posted 04 October 2012 - 09:37 PM

No offense taken. At the same time, my second statement does stand. If the NHLPA would have met with the NHL, the fans would have been happier because there would have been apparent traction. Also, if they would have met in January, both sides would have been better off in some part due to the fact they were talking sooner. I don't know if a deal would have been reached or not. I just can't understand how someone can say that meeting early wouldn't be a factor at all. The NHLPA behavior at least shows a pattern of negative bargaining behavior.


Oh, I don't think that it wouldn't be a factor at all. It would have to factor in somehow. But, there's no way to prove HOW it would factor in. There is a possibility that it would have factored in positively, but there's also a possibility that we would be sitting here writing these same messages today even if they had met in January.

It just seems to me like both sides would have dug the trenches no matter when the conversation started and both sides knew that their best chance to show they were 'really serious' and get as much of what they wanted was when this season would have started, when the other side was losing money. Not saying that definitely is the case, but it is what I think. Neither of these sides trusts the other side at all, imo, and good (i.e. quick) negotiations just aren't usually possible in that kind of environment.

#488 Buppy

Buppy

    1st Line All-Star

  • Silver Booster
  • 1,980 posts

Posted 04 October 2012 - 09:40 PM

... If the NHLPA would have met with the NHL, the fans would have been happier because there would have been apparent traction. Also, if they would have met in January, both sides would have been better off in some part due to the fact they were talking sooner. I don't know if a deal would have been reached or not. I just can't understand how someone can say that meeting early wouldn't be a factor at all.
...

Or the fans would be even more mad because the sides had been arguing for 9 months without reaching an agreement. Also, both sides could have been worse off due to all the bad blood simmering for 9 months...

#489 toby91_ca

toby91_ca

    Legend

  • Gold Booster
  • 8,519 posts

Posted 04 October 2012 - 09:53 PM

If the NHLPA would have met with the NHL, the fans would have been happier because there would have been apparent traction. Also, if they would have met in January, both sides would have been better off in some part due to the fact they were talking sooner. I don't know if a deal would have been reached or not. I just can't understand how someone can say that meeting early wouldn't be a factor at all. The NHLPA behavior at least shows a pattern of negative bargaining behavior.


I can absolutely, without any shred of doubt whatsoever, tell you that it wouldn't have matter at all whether they started negotiating in January or June. Time is not the issue. It takes no time at all to strike a deal. The issue is that no one wants to move off their positions. There is no way that would have happened before a deadline. No one would have lost any money between January and now....the only hope now is that as both sides start losing money, someone will make a move (history has shown that doesn't matter too much though).

#490 Johnz96

Johnz96

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,423 posts

Posted 04 October 2012 - 10:49 PM

Does anyone think these owners or players really give a s*** about fans being upset?

I don't.

Do we really give a s*** how the owners and players feel? All that we care about is that we get to watch our game. And considering we flocked back to the game after the last lockout, we are most responsible for this one.
It's only a game we watch for our amusement, it's their livelihood for Pete's sake

Edited by Johnz96, 04 October 2012 - 10:52 PM.


#491 Euro_Twins

Euro_Twins

    Healthy Scratch

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,885 posts
  • Location:Windsor, Ontario

Posted 05 October 2012 - 12:11 AM

I can absolutely, without any shred of doubt whatsoever, tell you that it wouldn't have matter at all whether they started negotiating in January or June. Time is not the issue. It takes no time at all to strike a deal. The issue is that no one wants to move off their positions. There is no way that would have happened before a deadline. No one would have lost any money between January and now....the only hope now is that as both sides start losing money, someone will make a move (history has shown that doesn't matter too much though).


I agree that we would still be in the same spot we are in now, but I may have been a little bit happier knowing that they were negotiating for 9 months before cancelling games, rather then 2 months

#492 Vladiator

Vladiator

    1st Line All-Star

  • Gold Booster
  • 1,104 posts
  • Location:Perrysburg, OH

Posted 05 October 2012 - 01:43 AM

I've been watching/reading this thread too long. Two weeks of the regular season are gone now. I think that many of you will agree that is time to walk away now. I'm sick of the drama. Go play in the KHL and all of the other leagues. Have fun traveling on those Russian jetliners.

#493 Nightfall

Nightfall

    My goal is to deny yours!

  • Gold Booster
  • 3,762 posts
  • Location:Grand Rapids

Posted 05 October 2012 - 07:18 AM

Well, the war of words is still going on. The NHL whines about not getting their way and the NHLPA says they would have played while they continued negotiating for a new CBA, forget the fact that the NHLPA has drug its feet through this process so far. Both sides just need to get back to the bargaining table.

I agree that we would still be in the same spot we are in now, but I may have been a little bit happier knowing that they were negotiating for 9 months before cancelling games, rather then 2 months

It either could go this way or fans could be more upset because they were talking for 9 months and nothing happened. I guess at this juncture, I don't think it could be any worse than where we are today if we started negotiating early.
Christopher Brian Dudek
My Domain

#494 cusimano_brothers

cusimano_brothers

    Legend

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,615 posts
  • Location:Niagara Falls, ON

Posted 05 October 2012 - 07:19 AM

“The decision to cancel the first two weeks of the NHL season is the unilateral choice of the NHL owners,” Donald Fehr, the executive director of the NHL Players Association, said in a release. “If the owners truly cared about the game and the fans, they would lift the lockout and allow the season to begin on time while negotiations continue.


“A lockout should be the last resort in bargaining, not the strategy of first resort. For nearly 20 years, the owners have elected to lockout the players in an effort to secure massive concessions.



"Mess up tomorrow, don't mess up now".

- Harry James Benson, CBE.


#495 Nightfall

Nightfall

    My goal is to deny yours!

  • Gold Booster
  • 3,762 posts
  • Location:Grand Rapids

Posted 05 October 2012 - 07:57 AM

Fehr is great at playing the public relations card. Just based on Fehr's behavior, if the league would have started the season, Fehr would have not negotiated a new CBA. Hell, I bet it would have been December/January before he even thought about it.

No doubt that the ownership is trying to secure massive concessions. At the same time, neither the owners or players are blinking off of their initial stances. A deal can be made, but only if both sides drift to the middle. It really is that simple.

Hell, Fehr is good at playing the PR card. What he should do is put forward a proposal that gives the players 52% of revenue while the owners get 48%, and then make it public.
Christopher Brian Dudek
My Domain

#496 RippedOnNitro

RippedOnNitro

    Rookie

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 111 posts

Posted 05 October 2012 - 09:12 AM

Andy Strickland
Told #NHLPA is working on proposal and will present it to #NHLsometime soon[/background][/font][/color]

http://bleacherrepor...er-cba-proposal

Edited by RippedOnNitro, 05 October 2012 - 09:12 AM.

First round series win: $0 () Second round series win: $0 () Third round series win: $0 () Fourth round series win: $0 () Goal difference: $0 (-3) Shutout difference: $0 (0) SHG difference: $0 (0) Extra points reg. season: $3 (102)

TOTAL COLLECTED: $0 TOTAL BONUS IF STANLEY CUP: $3

#497 RippedOnNitro

RippedOnNitro

    Rookie

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 111 posts

Posted 05 October 2012 - 09:31 AM

Working with some numbers again...although I have trouble finding the correct and full numbers, this is what I based it on.

The NHLPA is set on not reducing players salaries in year 1. While the NHL's latest offer was a player's share of 49%.

The NHLPA mentioned they wanted to keep the player's share on a fixed amount of $1.91B (equals 57%), while the NHL offered $1.64B (equals 49%).

Difference is $270M, calculating on the NHL proposal that is the same as $551M revenue.

Since a revenue of $100M was already lost due to cancelling the preseason, there is only an amount of $451M of revenue left, untill the proposal of the NHLPA (for year 1) is already below the offer of the NHL of 49%.

These calculations are based on year 1 only, but what I understand of what I've read...the NHLPA's most important point is to not reduce salaries in year 1.

Perhaps I will look into the other years tomorrow if I have time for it.

Edited by RippedOnNitro, 05 October 2012 - 09:35 AM.

First round series win: $0 () Second round series win: $0 () Third round series win: $0 () Fourth round series win: $0 () Goal difference: $0 (-3) Shutout difference: $0 (0) SHG difference: $0 (0) Extra points reg. season: $3 (102)

TOTAL COLLECTED: $0 TOTAL BONUS IF STANLEY CUP: $3

#498 haroldsnepsts

haroldsnepsts

    "Classy"

  • HoF Booster Mod
  • 17,136 posts

Posted 05 October 2012 - 10:12 AM

While it's not surprising that the owners don't want to play out the season without a CBA, Fehr is exactly right that under Bettman's reign lockout has not been a last resort but is the basis of his negotiating strategy.

Especially considering Bettman got the rules changed to make it even harder to overrule him, so compromise on the owners side is even less likely. Given the amount of concessions they want from the players, ownership had to know it would require locking the players out before they'd ever agree to them.

This lockout wasn't the unfortunate result of unexpected circumstances, it was almost certainly something ownership prepared for.

#499 Jedi

Jedi

    I used to be a spy...

  • HoF Booster Mod
  • 9,821 posts
  • Location:Dallas

Posted 05 October 2012 - 10:19 AM

Especially considering Bettman got the rules changed to make it even harder to overrule him, so compromise on the owners side is even less likely.


It's unbelievable that an employee of the owners/BoG has so much power over them. There are few jobs anywhere else in the world where the employee holds all the power over his employers...

I'm glad to hear that the PA is working on a new proposal, but I can't wait to see how long the League rejects it, and submits a counter offer that's pretty much the same thing as their first and second proposals.

burnnotice2.png
Covert Ops has its perks. You travel, make your own hours, and expense most of your meals.
The downside? Lots of people want you dead...


#500 haroldsnepsts

haroldsnepsts

    "Classy"

  • HoF Booster Mod
  • 17,136 posts

Posted 05 October 2012 - 10:23 AM

It's unbelievable that an employee of the owners/BoG has so much power over them. There are few jobs anywhere else in the world where the employee holds all the power over his employers...

I'm glad to hear that the PA is working on a new proposal, but I can't wait to see how long the League rejects it, and submits a counter offer that's pretty much the same thing as their first and second proposals.


When I found out how hard it is to overrule Bettman, it was both depressing and explained a lot about the last lockout.

We've seen how idiotic some of these owners can be. And now Gary only needs 8 not to vote against him. I've seen several references to what a hardliner Jeremy Jacobs (owner of the Bruins) is and how much influence he has. A friend of mine is from Boston and said fans hate him. They even booed him when he was announced during their Cup win.

Among ownership there's got to be more reasonable, intelligent voices in the group, but are there 24 of them? Probably not.

EDIT: And I just remembered that the league owns the coyotes, so Bettman probably gets one of those 30 votes himself. So he might only need 7 owners to support him.





Similar Topics Collapse

  Topic Forum Started By Stats Last Post Info

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users