Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

[Retired] Official Lockout Thread


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
2458 replies to this topic

#781 Nev

Nev

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,038 posts
  • Location:Lincolnshire, England

Posted 17 October 2012 - 12:40 AM

At last the league comes forward with a reasonable starting point for negotiations. I still don't think we're going to get an 82-game season, but I am hopeful that we will get more than half a season now.
"If I can be totally honest, it's not a lot of guys you get impressed by. Actually, it's no one else but him. From the bench, to see what move he makes -- you're like, 'I wish I could do that.' Sometimes you sit on the bench and just think, 'wow,' and you look over to the other bench and they sit there and shake their heads, too. He has great, great skills. I'm probably not going to play with another player who has the kind of skills he has." Mikael Samuelsson on Pavel Datsyuk

#782 frankgrimes

frankgrimes

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,726 posts

Posted 17 October 2012 - 12:47 AM

why is that ridiculous? the nba has a 5 year max for players signing with their returning teams and 4 year max if they sign with another team during free agency


Taking away security from players is never a good thing!

Couldn't care less about the NBA this is hockey we are talking here.

Sent from my BlackBerry

kftx.jpg

 

The Offseason of truth ...

Welcome to hockeytown Jonas aka Lundquist 2 Gustavsson!

blank cheque for The Captain or Jim Star Nil please..


#783 hillbillywingsfan

hillbillywingsfan

    Awww poor butch

  • Gold Booster
  • 3,517 posts

Posted 17 October 2012 - 01:05 AM

Taking away security from players is never a good thing!

Couldn't care less about the NBA this is hockey we are talking here.

Sent from my BlackBerry

I'm not sure I understand you not wanting to talk about other leagues that are way more successful than the nhl and the reasons why they are. There are things that other leagues do that the nhl would be smart to adopt and some things that they need to stay clear of. there is nothing wrong with bringing those facts up. I hope that the 10+ yr contracts are a thing of the past.
msg-10491-1258682020.jpg


I LIVE IN TEXAS SO I DON'T DESERVE HOCKEY

#784 number9

number9

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,185 posts
  • Location:East Lansing

Posted 17 October 2012 - 01:11 AM

I'm not sure I understand you not wanting to talk about other leagues that are way more successful than the nhl and the reasons why they are. There are things that other leagues do that the nhl would be smart to adopt and some things that they need to stay clear of. there is nothing wrong with bringing those facts up. I hope that the 10+ yr contracts are a thing of the past.


Other sports are semi-comparable....but when it comes down to it this is a different league, different sport, different problems

#785 cusimano_brothers

cusimano_brothers

    Legend

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,605 posts
  • Location:Niagara Falls, ON

Posted 17 October 2012 - 07:18 AM

On the other side of the coin....

Why didn't Uncle Fehr make the first major concession? I guess Uncle Gary cared a little bit more than Fehr. Especially after Fehr was given the last proposal and he chose not to negotiate by saying it wasn't a game of "ping-pong".


Make the first "major concession". See "Lockout #2, in a series of three 9so far)".
Why did Uncle Gary enforce the lockout?
Why did Uncle Gary "lowball" in the first offer?
A lot of people have put their blinders on and focused on "50-50" aspect of the offer and that's a big mistake.
I totally agree with the observations made by Mr. MacKenzie and Mr. Dreger on TSN that there is a lot buried in this proposal and that, if they're not careful and make a counter-proposal, the players are going to get screwed... again.
As of this moment in time, Uncle Gary has underestimated his bargaining opponent.

"Mess up tomorrow, don't mess up now".

- Harry James Benson, CBE.


#786 StormJH1

StormJH1

    2nd Line Scorer

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 696 posts
  • Location:Twin Cities, MN

Posted 17 October 2012 - 07:26 AM

This is still such an encouraging sign, even if it's a PR play. Talks have continued, an they just moved the dial in the first significant way. Didn't even talk until Dec in the 04 lockout.


Sent on iPhone using Tapatalk

#787 cusimano_brothers

cusimano_brothers

    Legend

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,605 posts
  • Location:Niagara Falls, ON

Posted 17 October 2012 - 07:39 AM

Posted Image

"Please settle...NOW!!! I've heard a rumour that NBC Sports plans to use me for the Professional Bull Riders coverage".

"Mess up tomorrow, don't mess up now".

- Harry James Benson, CBE.


#788 toby91_ca

toby91_ca

    Legend

  • Gold Booster
  • 8,439 posts

Posted 17 October 2012 - 08:07 AM

The more details I see coming out of the league's proposal yesterday, the more pessimistic I'm getting about a potential deal in the short term. I guess it will depend on how reasonable the league will be in negotiating off that offer and how reasonable the NHLPA will be in their requests.

#789 toby91_ca

toby91_ca

    Legend

  • Gold Booster
  • 8,439 posts

Posted 17 October 2012 - 08:18 AM

Here's a decent summary of the proposal. The good news is that the defnition of HRR seems to be unchanged from the last CBA.

http://espn.go.com/b...eagues-proposal

#790 toby91_ca

toby91_ca

    Legend

  • Gold Booster
  • 8,439 posts

Posted 17 October 2012 - 08:38 AM

Akward translation, but this seems to suggest players that went to Europe to play have been asked not to play for those clubs until at least October 23rd.

Not sure how credible this is seeing as I haven't seen it pop up anywhere in North American news, but I'll look around

http://translate.goo...05034_hokej_cig

#791 Jedi

Jedi

    Spell Forged - Unparalleled Quality

  • HoF Booster Mod
  • 9,804 posts
  • Location:Dallas

Posted 17 October 2012 - 08:45 AM

LeBrun's reporting that the League and the PA will have meetings again tomorrow in Toronto.

snyoep.jpg
"I am the sword in the darkness... I am the watcher on the walls...
I am the shield that guards the realms of men..."


#792 F.Michael

F.Michael

    Old School Dynamic Duo

  • HoF Booster
  • 7,502 posts
  • Location:Wisconsin

Posted 17 October 2012 - 09:13 AM

Here's a decent summary of the proposal. The good news is that the defnition of HRR seems to be unchanged from the last CBA.

http://espn.go.com/b...eagues-proposal

If I remember correctly - wasn't it Fehr whom said that the BOG had "other" sources of revenue that could be looked at as "HRR" ie: concessions, or parking?

'Evolution' created by Offsides

#793 Pskov Wings Fan

Pskov Wings Fan

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,027 posts
  • Location:Minneapoilis, MN

Posted 17 October 2012 - 09:27 AM

The more details I see coming out of the league's proposal yesterday, the more pessimistic I'm getting about a potential deal in the short term. I guess it will depend on how reasonable the league will be in negotiating off that offer and how reasonable the NHLPA will be in their requests.


Which specific part do you think would be an issue for players? I do not see anything, which would make the offer unacceptable. Players might ask for contract limit to be longer than 5 years. Maybe a gradual move from 57% to 50%.

#794 haroldsnepsts

haroldsnepsts

    "Classy"

  • HoF Booster Mod
  • 16,866 posts

Posted 17 October 2012 - 09:27 AM

One interesting aspect that's relevant to the Wings:

  • All existing NHL contracts which go longer than five years will be subject to new cap calculations, specifically those deals will count against a team's cap regardless of whether the player is still playing or not. My belief here is that this is the NHL's attempt at correcting the so-called "cheat deals" or back-diving deals -- like those of Marian Hossa or Roberto Luongo -- which carry bogus salaries at the end of deals to lower the cap hit.


That would effect Z and Franzen's contract if they don't play out the full length. Their contracts aren't as ridiculous as Luongo's, but they're a stretch.


I'm also surprised by this a bit:

Embracing an idea first proposed by Maple Leafs GM Brian Burke years ago, the league’s offer included the ability to retain salary in trades. Under the expired CBA, teams could not trade or keep parts of a player’s salary in a trade. This new provision would obviously facilitate trades in a cap market that saw deals minimized, especially in the first half of the season.


It seems like being able to bail out of bad contracts like that will help player movement, but also give GM's an out when they grossly overpay players. And I thought that's what we're trying to clamp down on here.

http://espn.go.com/n...tep-save-season

#795 Jedi

Jedi

    Spell Forged - Unparalleled Quality

  • HoF Booster Mod
  • 9,804 posts
  • Location:Dallas

Posted 17 October 2012 - 09:33 AM

Doesn't sound like the PA is too thrilled with the NHL's offer. Bob McKenzie/TSN has a story up with snippets of Fehr's letter to the PA that breaks down the proposal...


The first official NHLPA reaction to the NHL offer is in -- NHLPA executive director Don Fehr sent a letter to all players and agents last night -- and not unexpectedly the league's proposal wasn't met with great enthusiasm.

In the letter, which breaks down a summary of the NHL offer, Fehr writes the following:

- "Simply put, the owners' new proposal, while not quite as Draconian as their previous proposals, still represents enormous reductions in player salaries and individual contracting rights. As you will see, at the 5 per cent industry growth rate the owners predict, the salary reduction over six years exceeds $1.6 billion. What do the owners offer in return?"

- "The proposal does represent movement from their last negotiating position, but still represents very large, immediate and continuing concessions by players to owners, in salary and benefits (the Players' Share) and in individual player contracting rules."

On some of the specific aspects of the NHL proposal...


Read the whole story for more. Offers some interesting insights into the PA's mindset.

snyoep.jpg
"I am the sword in the darkness... I am the watcher on the walls...
I am the shield that guards the realms of men..."


#796 Buppy

Buppy

    1st Line All-Star

  • Silver Booster
  • 1,980 posts

Posted 17 October 2012 - 09:34 AM

If the 5 year limit goes through, top UFA prices will skyrocket. ~$12M cap hits for Getzlaf/Perry. That would probably drive up the price of 2nd-tier players too. Imagine $6-7M for Flip.

On the other side, prices for UFAs in their 30s could come down to compensate, particularly those coming off down seasons, and prices for the majority of younger players should stay lower for a bit longer. Both factors could be good for the Wings, considering all our promising (but not "star") prospects and typical willingness to rely on aging vets.

#797 toby91_ca

toby91_ca

    Legend

  • Gold Booster
  • 8,439 posts

Posted 17 October 2012 - 09:37 AM

Which specific part do you think would be an issue for players? I do not see anything, which would make the offer unacceptable. Players might ask for contract limit to be longer than 5 years. Maybe a gradual move from 57% to 50%.

There are tons of issues, but two big ones:

- players will take a big hit in current salaries. The NHL says they aren't asking for a rollback, but at 50% right away, that's a 12.3% rollback. While current year salaries will remain intact, the function to allow that would be the players taking less money in later years. So, if a player is currently signed to $5M for the next 5 years, they might get their $5M this year, but maybe only $3M in each of the following 4 years.

- from the looks of it, the definition of HRR is still cloudy, the league says it's unchanged, but the PA is not so sure and will look to clarify that.

#798 Rick D

Rick D

    4th Line Grinder

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 303 posts
  • Location:Houston, TX by way of Utica, MI

Posted 17 October 2012 - 09:39 AM

http://www.nhl.com/i...s.htm?id=643570
Here is the whole proposal...

Eff Chicago

Eff Boston


#799 Buppy

Buppy

    1st Line All-Star

  • Silver Booster
  • 1,980 posts

Posted 17 October 2012 - 09:45 AM

...
It seems like being able to bail out of bad contracts like that will help player movement, but also give GM's an out when they grossly overpay players. And I thought that's what we're trying to clamp down on here.

http://espn.go.com/n...tep-save-season

They're trying to limit circumvention, so as long as someone is eating the cap hit, I'd say it's fine.

I'd assume the cap hit would go with the player, even though the trading team still pays some of the salary. This would allow rich teams to dump bad cap hits, and allow poor teams to reach the floor without actually paying the salaries. Not quite as good as trading cap space or cash, but it does add a tool to help address the revenue disparity. It's probably my favorite part of the owner's proposal (assuming it would work the way I think, and owners would actually use it wisely).

#800 Nightfall

Nightfall

    My goal is to deny yours!

  • Gold Booster
  • 3,738 posts
  • Location:Grand Rapids

Posted 17 October 2012 - 10:05 AM

Make the first "major concession". See "Lockout #2, in a series of three 9so far)".
Why did Uncle Gary enforce the lockout?
Why did Uncle Gary "lowball" in the first offer?

Ah, so two wrongs make a right? Got it.
Christopher Brian Dudek
My Domain





Similar Topics Collapse

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users