Well, opinions can change. Having said that, I don't know what makes people more confident now that there will be games as opposed to two weeks ago. If anything, those are backwards from what I would expect.
My thought exactly
Posted 02 November 2012 - 12:04 PM
Well, opinions can change. Having said that, I don't know what makes people more confident now that there will be games as opposed to two weeks ago. If anything, those are backwards from what I would expect.
Posted 02 November 2012 - 01:33 PM
Posted 02 November 2012 - 01:43 PM
Fixed it for you.Boycott spending money on the NHL.
Edited by Nightfall, 02 November 2012 - 01:44 PM.
Posted 02 November 2012 - 01:51 PM
Just to note, the "profit" numbers being used here are actually operating income. Before taxes, interest, depreciation, and amortization. None of us really have any idea what the real profits are. The average team is carrying about $100M in debt, which could certainly eat up that operating income. However, we don't know the real details. Regardless, the revenue disparity is still the biggest problem.~$ stuff...
Posted 02 November 2012 - 02:41 PM
If I’m a fan today, I’m angry that the league and NHLPA haven’t been able to resolve their differences in labor talks. It’s an absolute disgrace that the lockout even had to last into November, never mind the possibility it may go even longer than that.
It should not have been that hard to figure out how to divvy up the revenue pie. And for that, NHL commissioner Gary Bettman and NHLPA executive director Donald Fehr deserve all the criticism they’re getting from fans.
But it’s my opinion that when it comes to Friday’s cancellation of the Winter Classic, it was the right move, and the only move.
This season is going to be a sham either way. Let’s not denigrate the Winter Classic with it.
Posted 02 November 2012 - 02:50 PM
Posted 02 November 2012 - 03:20 PM
that's a great article by lebrun.
hopefully illitch makes it to next year to see it. by the looks of him he might not.
Posted 02 November 2012 - 03:44 PM
that's a great article by lebrun.
hopefully illitch makes it to next year to see it. by the looks of him he might not.
"...that was me with the semen thing."--Dabura
Posted 02 November 2012 - 04:41 PM

"All done? Five bucks." - Pavel Datsyuk after an interview
"Very few cities in the NHL have the history or the following of the Detroit Red Wings." - Steve Yzerman
"Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the American people’s liberty teeth and keystone under independence." - George Washington
"Suck my machine gun." - Ted Nugent responding to British pansy Piers Morgan whining for gun control
US Bill of non-rights
Posted 02 November 2012 - 05:20 PM
As we just discussed on Sportscentre. NHL advised PA it will absorb share of Make Whole provision. This is a considerable concession.
Posted 02 November 2012 - 05:26 PM
How ironic would it be if a deal came a day too late to save the WC?Per Dreger's twitter:
If this turns out to be true (both that the NHL actually said it would do this and that the math supports their claim), then they better be able to knock out a friggin deal very very soon.
"...that was me with the semen thing."--Dabura
Posted 02 November 2012 - 05:37 PM
Per Dreger's twitter:
If this turns out to be true (both that the NHL actually said it would do this and that the math supports their claim), then they better be able to knock out a friggin deal very very soon.
Posted 02 November 2012 - 05:56 PM
Posted 02 November 2012 - 06:13 PM
Posted 02 November 2012 - 06:24 PM
Posted 02 November 2012 - 06:38 PM
After the "50/50" deal the NHL proposed, I'm not surprised. Considering where both sides are at the moment, they're certainly not going to take anything on faith.what????
Darren Dreger @DarrenDreger
The NHL's verbal offer to absorb some or all of Make Whole was made Tuesday. 3 days ago?? PA wants more detail before getting too excited.
Posted 02 November 2012 - 08:38 PM
After the "50/50" deal the NHL proposed, I'm not surprised. Considering where both sides are at the moment, they're certainly not going to take anything on faith.
It all comes down to if the math (and legalese) is in line with what they're claiming.

Posted 02 November 2012 - 08:42 PM
Another PR move and I am sure some of the ,,I only read the headline - because my attention span is that small" guys will pretty much fall in love with those greedy bastards again. Fehr is right, let's see the numbers first and how they are trying to tweak it again...
Posted 02 November 2012 - 09:35 PM
I don't see how that can be true ($5-6M on average per team that is). Last year the owners' share of revenues after paying the players was about $52M per team. I know it costs approximately $30M to run a team before player salaries, so I'm not sure where that other $15M or so goes.Just to note, the "profit" numbers being used here are actually operating income. Before taxes, interest, depreciation, and amortization. None of us really have any idea what the real profits are. The average team is carrying about $100M in debt, which could certainly eat up that operating income. However, we don't know the real details. Regardless, the revenue disparity is still the biggest problem.
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Official 2013 MLB Thread |
Other Sports | Hockeytown0001 |
|
|
|
Posts in Threads |
Water Cooler | SaCkaveli20 |
|
|
|
Official Franzen VS Hossa
|
General Discussion | 13dangledangle |
|
|
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users