Jump to content


Photo
* * * * * 1 votes

Z basically says Bettman should be fired


  • Please log in to reply
102 replies to this topic

#1 stevkrause

stevkrause

    Legend

  • Bronze Booster
  • 5,236 posts
  • Location:Detroit, MI

Posted 05 October 2012 - 12:46 PM

He heavily eludes to it without saying the exact words (probably to avoid a fine)


I think this quote speaks volumes -

This is the way (Bettman) negotiates,'' Zetterberg said. “We've been through this before and if he's going to stay there we'll probably go through it again.



http://www.mlive.com...ng_anticip.html

Edited by stevkrause, 05 October 2012 - 12:47 PM.

All I have to say about Holland and our off-season:

Here in this thread

Here in this one as well

Here in this one too

and finally

Here


Holland is a damn good GM. period.


#2 Johnz96

Johnz96

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,423 posts

Posted 05 October 2012 - 12:56 PM

He heavily eludes to it without saying the exact words (probably to avoid a fine)


I think this quote speaks volumes -



http://www.mlive.com...ng_anticip.html

Like a good chess player he is probably planning the next one now.
We got to get him out of our game and there is only 1 way to do it because the owners don't care about us

#3 esteef

esteef

    Legend

  • HoF Booster
  • 8,874 posts

Posted 05 October 2012 - 12:57 PM

"Speaks volumes" as in I'm on the player's side? How profound.

esteef
"The Wings haven't won a Cup without Darren McCarty since 1955."

#4 drwscc

drwscc

    I drink your milkshake...I drink it up!!!!

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,289 posts
  • Location:Austin, TX

Posted 05 October 2012 - 12:58 PM

Nobody cares about the fans. They all want money. They want as much as they can get, both sides. If it was Bettman or Selig or Shanny up there, it'd be the same story. But keep believing that if Bettman magically disappeared that Jeremy Jacobs and Mike Illitch would stop caring about money.
Faith is to believe what you do not yet see; the reward for this faith is to see what you believe.

I went to a doctor the other day, and all he did was suck blood out of my neck. Never go see Dr. Acula
- Mitch Hedberg

#5 kipwinger

kipwinger

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,758 posts
  • Location:Mt. Pleasant, MI

Posted 05 October 2012 - 01:29 PM

Any player that wants Bettman fired is a fool. The current lockout is based on the fact that the players want to retain a high percentage of the revenue that Bettman is largely responsible for creating. No reasonable player has any intention of going back to the "good" old days.

Edit: As evidenced by the fact that the players' whole position in these negotiations has been to keep everything exactly the way it is right now.

Edited by kipwinger, 05 October 2012 - 01:33 PM.

GMRwings:  "Well, in other civilized countries, 16 years old isn't considered underage.  For instance, I believe the age of consent is 16 in Canada.  There's some US states where it's 16 as well.  

 

Get off the high horse.  Not like she was 10."

 

"Some girls are 17 even though they look 25."

 

 


#6 Johnz96

Johnz96

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,423 posts

Posted 05 October 2012 - 02:04 PM

Any player that wants Bettman fired is a fool. The current lockout is based on the fact that the players want to retain a high percentage of the revenue that Bettman is largely responsible for creating. No reasonable player has any intention of going back to the "good" old days.

Edit: As evidenced by the fact that the players' whole position in these negotiations has been to keep everything exactly the way it is right now.

Anybody that defends Bettman is a fool. Bettman is not responsible for the growth, in fact he has hindered it. Hockey has grown in popularity in the States because more kids became exposed to it because of international success the Americans have since the Miracle on Ice, something they have never had before.
Bettman is the worst thing to ever happen to the game of hockey

#7 One4TheWings

One4TheWings

    "dc"

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 179 posts

Posted 05 October 2012 - 02:16 PM

Any player that wants Bettman fired is a fool.

Anybody that defends Bettman is a fool.


Ooh. Name calling. I wonder how productive this conversation will be. How about something we can all agree on.. I miss hockey.
4G1V3N

#8 RedWingsDad

RedWingsDad

    Bigot

  • Restricted
  • PipPip
  • 437 posts

Posted 05 October 2012 - 02:25 PM

Ooh. Name calling. I wonder how productive this conversation will be. How about something we can all agree on.. I miss hockey.


Anyone that misses hockey is a tool! :P
Tim Thomas - Patriot and generally awesome human being.
 
Romans 10:13 - For whoever calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved.

#9 toby91_ca

toby91_ca

    Legend

  • Gold Booster
  • 8,412 posts

Posted 05 October 2012 - 02:31 PM

He heavily eludes to it without saying the exact words (probably to avoid a fine)


I think this quote speaks volumes -



http://www.mlive.com...ng_anticip.html

For the life of me, I'm trying to figure out how you get from what Zetterberg said to him thinking Bettman should be fired. I read it as him talking about Bettman's negotiating style and as long as he is in that role, he expects the same. That to me is just basic logic. Doesn't say anything about whether he thinks he's doing a good job or a bad job.

#10 RedWingsDad

RedWingsDad

    Bigot

  • Restricted
  • PipPip
  • 437 posts

Posted 05 October 2012 - 02:38 PM

For the life of me, I'm trying to figure out how you get from what Zetterberg said to him thinking Bettman should be fired. I read it as him talking about Bettman's negotiating style and as long as he is in that role, he expects the same. That to me is just basic logic. Doesn't say anything about whether he thinks he's doing a good job or a bad job.


I guess this is the closest thing Z said to covertly suggesting Bettman should be canned:

“This is the way (Bettman) negotiates,'' Zetterberg said. “We've been through this before and if he's going to stay there we'll probably go through it again."

Edited by RedWingsDad, 05 October 2012 - 02:39 PM.

Tim Thomas - Patriot and generally awesome human being.
 
Romans 10:13 - For whoever calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved.

#11 hockey&beer

hockey&beer

    4th Line Grinder

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 204 posts
  • Location:North of Detroit, way south of heaven.

Posted 05 October 2012 - 03:16 PM

...The current lockout is based on the fact that the players want to retain a high percentage of the revenue that Bettman is largely responsible for creating. No reasonable player has any intention of going back to the "good" old days.

Edit: As evidenced by the fact that the players' whole position in these negotiations has been to keep everything exactly the way it is right now.


The biggest issue with the revenue sharing isn't exactly the percentage. THe issue that players have is that the definition of "hockey related revenue" changes drastically. Even if the profit was split 50/50, with the owners new definiton of HRR, the players would be taking a MUCH larger hit than the perceived 7%. Bettman and Co. have been doing a great job trying to appeal to the fans by "giving back" some percentage points from the initial offer, but the fact is still that it is from a smaller piece of the revenue pie.

"Matt Moulson... he would get more air time if he was Matt Labatt." Ken Daniels

#12 Seraph

Seraph

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,126 posts
  • Location:Detroit, MI

Posted 05 October 2012 - 03:28 PM

So, best way to predict future behavior is to look at past behavior. In the last lock-out, the NHL ended up offering the players a deal in the last minute and the players rejected it, so the season was canceled and the players got an EVEN WORSE deal at the beginning of the next season.

My thought is maybe this time around, the NHL will make a similar offer in order to have a shortened season. Maybe the players will learn this time and take the offer and we can at least have some hockey this year.

Zetterberg's comments make it sound like the players are dead serious this time around. Multiple players have said they're prepared for a multiple year work stoppage. They could be bluffing, but who knows? Let's hope something gets worked out.

Formerly known as The Nephilim.

QUOTE (Amberoonie)
Babs sure hurries himself into the presser, sits down, and f*cks up a bottle of water like no one in the room has had any for days.


#13 toby91_ca

toby91_ca

    Legend

  • Gold Booster
  • 8,412 posts

Posted 05 October 2012 - 03:45 PM

So, best way to predict future behavior is to look at past behavior. In the last lock-out, the NHL ended up offering the players a deal in the last minute and the players rejected it, so the season was canceled and the players got an EVEN WORSE deal at the beginning of the next season.

My thought is maybe this time around, the NHL will make a similar offer in order to have a shortened season. Maybe the players will learn this time and take the offer and we can at least have some hockey this year.

Zetterberg's comments make it sound like the players are dead serious this time around. Multiple players have said they're prepared for a multiple year work stoppage. They could be bluffing, but who knows? Let's hope something gets worked out.

Well, they went a full year last time, which is really concerning to me. I truly do hope they are bluffing, because if they are not, they are just plain stupid + getting bad advice. I understand fighting for principle and if they go so far and "win", it won't be for them, it will be for the next players (but even then, there will be different CBA so it will be a waist anyway). The amount of money they will lose from even sitting out a year will never be recouped.

#14 sibiriak

sibiriak

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,641 posts

Posted 05 October 2012 - 04:55 PM

Well, they went a full year last time, which is really concerning to me. I truly do hope they are bluffing, because if they are not, they are just plain stupid + getting bad advice. I understand fighting for principle and if they go so far and "win", it won't be for them, it will be for the next players (but even then, there will be different CBA so it will be a waist anyway). The amount of money they will lose from even sitting out a year will never be recouped.

You are absolutely right. The players will not recoupe their lost income even if they eventually "win".
This is not as much about the money for the players, as It is about standing up to owners attempt to "unguarantee' the signed contracts.

#15 chances14

chances14

    The Magician

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 591 posts
  • Location:Michigan, USA

Posted 05 October 2012 - 05:09 PM

Nobody cares about the fans. They all want money. They want as much as they can get, both sides. If it was Bettman or Selig or Shanny up there, it'd be the same story. But keep believing that if Bettman magically disappeared that Jeremy Jacobs and Mike Illitch would stop caring about money.

exactly. if either side cared about the fans, this lockout would have already been over

Any player that wants Bettman fired is a fool. The current lockout is based on the fact that the players want to retain a high percentage of the revenue that Bettman is largely responsible for creating. No reasonable player has any intention of going back to the "good" old days.

Edit: As evidenced by the fact that the players' whole position in these negotiations has been to keep everything exactly the way it is right now.


it is quite ironic how the players are fighting tooth and nail to keep a system that they lost a whole season trying to fight against 8 years ago.

#16 wings_fanatic

wings_fanatic

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,033 posts

Posted 05 October 2012 - 05:46 PM

No one can sit here and defend Bettman. Bettman is ruining hockey in many respects. His job is to RUN THE LEAGUE. Since he took charge of the NHL, there have been 3 lockouts, one of which lasted an ENTIRE SEASON- - and this one does not look too promising. Simply put, allowing 3 lockouts is not doing his job. He is a terrible negotiator, and is running the league into the ground. On another note, the ONLY reason he still has the job is that he has pleased all of the poor ass teams that can't afford to run their own franchises. But if the league is locked out all year, these poor ass franchises will not ever be able to recover, and I think that will spell the end of Bettman finally.

#17 frankgrimes

frankgrimes

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,047 posts

Posted 05 October 2012 - 06:46 PM

Sure they can sit here and defend him but so what? This guy is an absolute enigma to hockey and needs to be canned asap, hell even Daily could do a better job than him and yes including the golfpro!

Midget has accomplished:

=3 lockouts in two decades thats a 100 % lockout success.
=Responsible for failed franchises and not willing to admit it cause of his little man syndrome like Lupul mentioned.
= most hated man in hockey
= fullfills every stereotype about a certain type of lawyers
= destroyed the game and doesn't care about our tradition
= no special thanks to he leagues backbone
= hated by Illitch
= cost DRW fans two years of Yzerman, Fedorov Shanhan and one of the perfect human that alone is enough to hate this damn midget

Enough is enough can this greedy bastard.

The league as a whole doesn't lose money some franchises are actually making money.

Just get rid off the damn CBA and introduce a luxury tax like the MLB. I am sick of seeing the Wings handicapped because some owners want to play it poor.

When classacts like Selanne, Toews, Boyle and now our next captain are fed up you know something has gone very wrong. Also the media has jumped on the fire Bettman wagon at some point the owners wont have a choice other than finally firing this 8 million waste of a human.

Sent from my BlackBerry

Edited by frankgrimes, 05 October 2012 - 06:50 PM.

lidsretire2.jpg
 

Thank you so much perfect human being #5

Welcome to hockeytown Jonas aka Lundquist 2 Gustavsson!

Phase I: injury rattled roster Phase II: BABCOCK Phase III: Playoffs XXIII !


#18 thegerkin

thegerkin

    Statue of Liberty!!!

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,541 posts
  • Location:Grand Rapids, MI

Posted 05 October 2012 - 06:54 PM

When classacts like Selanne, Toews, Boyle and now our next captain are fed up you know something has gone very wrong. Also the media has jumped on the fire Bettman wagon at some point the owners wont have a choice other than finally firing this 8 million waste of a human.

Sent from my BlackBerry


http://www.tsn.ca/wi...tory/?id=406758

I found this quote from Toews:

"It's another disappointing but expected move from the league," Toews told the Chicago Tribune via text from Phoenix, where he is working with his personal trainer. "This seems to be our commissioner's bread and butter; it's almost like he is excited to take away hockey from the fans and the players just because he can."

The longer it lasts the nastier it's going to get...

#19 cusimano_brothers

cusimano_brothers

    Legend

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,409 posts
  • Location:Niagara Falls, ON

Posted 05 October 2012 - 07:02 PM

Uncle Gary must love hearing his name, but there's usually an expletive in front of it.

"Mess up tomorrow, don't mess up now".

- Harry James Benson, CBE.


#20 Dabura

Dabura

    Cake Eater

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,066 posts
  • Location:In an octopus's garden

Posted 05 October 2012 - 09:33 PM

Players aren't going to criticize their respective team-owners.

Don't Toews me, bro!






Similar Topics Collapse

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users