Player discussions III: Samuelsson, Helm, White
Posted 07 January 2013 - 06:55 PM
Posted 07 January 2013 - 07:22 PM
A: No, the NTC makes it a bad contract, otherwise yes.
B: Helm's, The other two lines have guys who like to shoot from the perimeter (Brunner and Zetterberg).
C: No, every scoring line needs a guy who likes to shoot.
D: Yes, he's done it before and we don't have anyone else
A: Yes, he's a thief's bargain for his intangibles
B: No, PP's are about scoring, Helm can't score.
C: Not much, if any. Maybe more assists with the right wingers.
D: No, Filppula or Franzen is.
A: He'll get a contract similar to Ericsson's, but I don't think we'll resign him.
B: No, we need a more diversified defensive corps
C: Yes, but not as well (nobody can).
D: No, his play will force that. They'll give him a lowball offer and be o.k. with him signing somewhere else for more, a la Hudler.
Edited by kipwinger, 07 January 2013 - 07:23 PM.
GMRwings: "Well, in other civilized countries, 16 years old isn't considered underage. For instance, I believe the age of consent is 16 in Canada. There's some US states where it's 16 as well.
Get off the high horse. Not like she was 10."
"Some girls are 17 even though they look 25."
Posted 07 January 2013 - 07:26 PM
a. Yes , hes versatile and will get 20 goals
b. 3rd line, 2 PP unit..Right handed shot is valuable
c. Can never shoot too much
d. no..dats, z, filp
abc - All depends on his play this year
"Hard Work Beats Talent When Talent Refuses to Work Hard"
LGW after 1 loss is irrational, after a few in a row it becomes quite comical, 22 playoff appearances in a row and 4 cups in that time and still going strong. Relaxxxxx !!
Posted 07 January 2013 - 08:13 PM
a - 3 mill is pretty steep especially when ya consider his age, and probable decline in production
b - agree with others by saying the 3rd line
c - helps since this team doesn't have any true snipers and yes Franzen isn't a true sniper since he's way too inconsistent
d - no White, Cola, and Smith are much better options at the point for the pp
a - yes, and he's only getting better
b - no since he's better at pk
c - yes since his speed alone makes him dangerous
d - maybe 6th, or 7th, but not 3rd
a - depends on his play, but I'm thinking a slight raise (think $3 to $3.25 mill per season for 3 seasons)
b - probably since I don't have a crystal ball to see who'll be available (Dmen) via trade/buyouts/ufa
c - he's played well everywhere he's been prior to becomming a Red Wing although we'll see what he can do without Nick, and I'm guessing he'll have a few more misques every now, and then
d - I think Kenny can understand the players frustrations, and I wouldn't be too surprised if Holland thinks Bettman is a tool (remember Devellano's comment, and fine) plus he's been thru much worse (Fedorov's contract in 1998, and off ice issues concerning Kournikova)
Posted 07 January 2013 - 08:57 PM
THE ONLY PROOF HE NEEDED
FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD
-- Kurt Vonnegut
Posted 07 January 2013 - 10:20 PM
SamuelssonA) Is he worth the 3 mil, 2 years, NTC contract?HELL NO. In this new cap structure Sammy is not worth 3 mill. He isn't 1/2 the player datsyuk is.B) Will he play best on Datsyuk's line, Zetterberg's line, Helm's line or Abdelkader's line?Helm's line. His constant shooting will cause loss of possession on dats and z's line. Helm can grind it out to get the puck back.C) Does his constant shooting mentality hurt or benefit the team?Depends how accurate he is this season... if past years are an indicator then yes, it hurts.D) Serious question: would you play him at the point on the PP?Leaves us vulnerable.HelmA) Is he worth 2.15 mil annually for 4 years?YESB) Would you play him on the PP?NOC) Can he improve offensively?YES. Golfball on cement.D) Would you say he's the 3rd most important forward on the Wings?NO. That award goes to Fil.WhiteA) Predict the economics of his next contract2.5-3 mill per yearB) Would you offer him that deal?Yes if no free agents available.C) Can he play well without Lidstrom?He will be exposed a little more.D) Will his controversial public comments force Kenny to not offer him an extension?Dunno.
Posted 08 January 2013 - 12:29 AM
A. No. The NTC makes it a bad contract.
B. I think he'll bounce between the 2nd and 3rd lines.
C. Benefits the team. You can never shoot too often.
D. Meh. I don't know. Maybe on the 2nd PP unit. He's got experience.
A. Absolutely. He's one of the most underrated players in the NHL, in my opinion.
B. No. He's built for the PK.
C. I think so.
D. I'm not sure about 3rd, but he's a big piece to our team.
A. Depends on how he plays this year. Around $3 mil/year seems about right.
B. We'll see how he plays. I don't mind him.
C. Yeah, although his play will suffer without Lidstrom, like everyone else.
D. Doubt it. He spoke his mind. Who cares? Players should be allowed to criticize an idiot when they see one.
RIP Bob Probert
RIP Wade Belak
RIP Derek Boogaard
RIP Rick Rypien
Posted 08 January 2013 - 02:52 AM
SamuelssonA) Is he worth the 3 mil, 2 years, NTC contract? NopeB) Will he play best on Datsyuk's line, Zetterberg's line, Helm's line or Abdelkader's line? AbbysC) Does his constant shooting mentality hurt or benefit the team? No EffectD) Serious question: would you play him at the point on the PP? NoHelmA) Is he worth 2.15 mil annually for 4 years? YesB) Would you play him on the PP? NoC) Can he improve offensively? YesD) Would you say he's the 3rd most important forward on the Wings? PerhapsWhiteA) Predict the economics of his next contract 3-4 millionB) Would you offer him that deal? NoC) Can he play well without Lidstrom? YesD) Will his controversial public comments force Kenny to not offer him an extension? No
Posted 08 January 2013 - 06:42 AM
- Re-signed, 10% increase
Posted 08 January 2013 - 07:28 AM
|Topic||Forum||Started By||Stats||Last Post Info|
||General Discussion||Son of a Wing||
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users