Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Paul Kelly: Expansion coming


  • Please log in to reply
58 replies to this topic

#1 FireCaptain

FireCaptain

    Whaddya mean I can't beat BOSTON?

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,887 posts
  • Location:Atoka, TN

Posted 30 January 2013 - 01:19 AM

According to ousted NHLPA boss, Paul Kelly, the NHL spoke with him about adding 2 more teams.

(when this allegedly happened is not clear)

 

 

For anyone who thinks that the NHL can't handle another round of expansion, former NHLPA director Paul Kelly has got some news for you.

Kelly, at a city council meeting in Markham, Ontario, over the Toronto-area city's arena proposal, said the league discussed expanding from 30 to 32 teams with him, and that he believes Quebec City and Southern Ontario will have franchises in the next two to three years.

The NHL, throughout the lockout, said that expansion wasn't on the table.

The case actually isn't all that tough to make. A 32-team league would reap the benefits of expansion fees, balanced conferences and, certainly in the case of Quebec City and Ontario, two more packed arenas.

 

 

WTF??

 

http://aol.sportingn...ey-coyotes-sale


Edited by FireCaptain, 30 January 2013 - 01:30 AM.

Most nights, my posts are brought to you by Heineken and sarcasm.
Success has a thousand fathers, failure is an orphan.
We not score, is hard to win. - Pavel Datsyuk #13

#2 The Greek

The Greek

    3rd Line Checker

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 399 posts
  • Location:L-Town

Posted 30 January 2013 - 01:28 AM

I like how he says that it's only logical because by doing so the league will reap the benefits of two more packed arenas. They could achieve the same thing by moving the panthers and the coyotes to the two locations mentioned in the excerpt. I don't see the need for other teams. I wouldn't even be opposed to dropping two teams. Either way, I think a few teams need to move at the very least.

#3 Euro_Twins

Euro_Twins

    Healthy Scratch

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,096 posts
  • Location:Windsor, Ontario

Posted 30 January 2013 - 01:37 AM

I wouldn't mind 2 extra teams (or two less) if they wanted to do that re-alignment



#4 Salviaman

Salviaman

    Tool + Red Wings = Bliss

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,284 posts
  • Location:Northville, Michigan

Posted 30 January 2013 - 01:43 AM

Southern Ontario eh? Windsor or Hamilton?
Think for yourself. Question authority. Throughout human history as our species has faced the frightening, terrorizing fact that we do not know who we are or where we are going in this ocean of chance, it has been the authorities, the political, the religious, the educational authorities who attempted to comfort us by giving us order, rules, regulations, informing, forming in our minds their view of reality. To think for yourself you must question authority and learn how to put yourself in a state of vulnerable, open mindedness, chaotic, confused vulnerability to inform yourself.

#5 The Axe

The Axe

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,379 posts

Posted 30 January 2013 - 01:45 AM

Portland Ice Pirates

Seattle Blades

#6 Euro_Twins

Euro_Twins

    Healthy Scratch

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,096 posts
  • Location:Windsor, Ontario

Posted 30 January 2013 - 01:46 AM

Windsor  :hysterical:

We don't have nearly close enough a population for a nhl team to survive, it would probably do as bad as Phoenix



#7 Phil Lesh

Phil Lesh

    Silver apples in the sun.

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 304 posts
  • Location:Parts unknown

Posted 30 January 2013 - 01:54 AM

I would think the league would want to worry about relocating a couple franchises before it moved on to expansion.



#8 vangvace

vangvace

    no such thing as overkill

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,453 posts
  • Location:Αρώνη Κρήτη Ελλάδα

Posted 30 January 2013 - 03:40 AM

I would think the league would want to worry about relocating a couple franchises before it moved on to expansion.

 

Both is the key! Nomadic teams to keep the league fresh I say.


I make 1 or 2 posts a week tops. Sometimes they're gold, sometimes they're crap, but the end weight is the same.

http://www.letsgowin...tion=boardrules

#9 LeftWinger

LeftWinger

    42 years in Detroit! Time to spend the rest in paradise!

  • Silver Booster
  • 8,586 posts
  • Location:HART - MI

Posted 30 January 2013 - 06:57 AM

Whatever gets Detroit in the East is fine with me...


Don't Be Jealous, But I Live Here...

www.thinkdunes.com

 


#10 LeftWinger

LeftWinger

    42 years in Detroit! Time to spend the rest in paradise!

  • Silver Booster
  • 8,586 posts
  • Location:HART - MI

Posted 30 January 2013 - 08:21 AM

basically if Seattle gets one and another Western/Mid Canada team, then Detroit/Columbus and Nashville can go East....If just Seattle and then Quebec, still Detroit and Columbus can go East so I am all for it...

 

Just hope that they don't put two new teams East....


Don't Be Jealous, But I Live Here...

www.thinkdunes.com

 


#11 cusimano_brothers

cusimano_brothers

    Legend

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,605 posts
  • Location:Niagara Falls, ON

Posted 30 January 2013 - 08:27 AM

From Toronto Star:

 

...

 

But Marilyn Ginsburg, who represents the Grandview Area Residents Association, countered that argument by quoting industry studies, including one that concluded: “If you build it, they might not come.”

NHL commissioner Gary Bettman has also stressed that an arena won’t guarantee a franchise.

Ginsburg added the city has not addressed other risks for taxpayers and pointed to the experience of Glendale, Ariz., where residents are paying millions of dollars annually for their arena, the home of the financially struggling Phoenix Coyotes.

...

 

 

 

 

At least one "bag-o-money" has been sniffing around; from Toronto Star:

 

 

 

George Gillett, a U.S.-based multimillionaire, revealed in an interview Sunday that if Markham council stepped back and took a broader approach to integrating the downtown with a major arena and the city wanted his participation, he would “certainly” return later.

“At a later date as time goes by and they decide to approach it a different way or a broader-based way, and they wanted me to come back, I would certainly come back,” he told the Star after a two-hour meeting with councillors.

“Right now, I’m not here under any circumstances,” Gillett said. “I’m not here on an agenda.”

...

 

Expansion is not a good idea. Moving teams to markets with a better chance of making money is a much better idea.


"Mess up tomorrow, don't mess up now".

- Harry James Benson, CBE.


#12 Z Winged Dangler

Z Winged Dangler

    Part 3: Return of the Hammer Hands

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,181 posts
  • Location:Winnipeg, MB

Posted 30 January 2013 - 08:49 AM

 

I like how he says that it's only logical because by doing so the league will reap the benefits of two more packed arenas. They could achieve the same thing by moving the panthers and the coyotes to the two locations mentioned in the excerpt. I don't see the need for other teams. I wouldn't even be opposed to dropping two teams. Either way, I think a few teams need to move at the very least.

 

Funny thing too is all the usual talks last year of "record revenue"... Ultimately, having teams in Quebec and Markham with packed buildings, all that does is make the cap rise due to sell out crowds and makes it harder for teams like Phoenix and Florida among others to keep up. So yeah, I agree with you that before expansion that some of the teams need to make a move.

Free darkmanx!

 

"I play hockey, but I am not very good.  Can someone please tell me what it would take to sign with the Wings ? I can use a million or two."  ~ arag


#13 Pskov Wings Fan

Pskov Wings Fan

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,027 posts
  • Location:Minneapoilis, MN

Posted 30 January 2013 - 09:44 AM

basically if Seattle gets one and another Western/Mid Canada team, then Detroit/Columbus and Nashville can go East....If just Seattle and then Quebec, still Detroit and Columbus can go East so I am all for it...

 

Just hope that they don't put two new teams East....

 

Both Canadian location mentioned are to the east of Detroit. I do not see any cities left in Western/Mid Canada where an NHL team can be placed.



#14 Osgood4President

Osgood4President

    Top Prospect

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 76 posts
  • Location:Sterling Heights, MI

Posted 30 January 2013 - 10:01 AM

This may be slightly off-topic, but with all the talk about putting teams west of us so we are in the east for realignment, it may be relevant.

 

I wouldn't mind, if 2 new teams were added, a system like the NFL or MLB, with conferences that aren't geographically split. I think we would be at an advantage in that system, along with the other central division teams, since our travel situation would probably improve and most other teams would have to travel substantially more.



#15 St. Michael (the Red Wing)

St. Michael (the Red Wing)

    Heavenly With the Puck

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,822 posts
  • Location:Mankato, MN

Posted 30 January 2013 - 10:08 AM

I wouldn't mind 2 extra teams (or two less) if they wanted to do that re-alignment

 

Me either.



#16 Euro_Twins

Euro_Twins

    Healthy Scratch

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,096 posts
  • Location:Windsor, Ontario

Posted 30 January 2013 - 10:19 AM

This may be slightly off-topic, but with all the talk about putting teams west of us so we are in the east for realignment, it may be relevant.

 

I wouldn't mind, if 2 new teams were added, a system like the NFL or MLB, with conferences that aren't geographically split. I think we would be at an advantage in that system, along with the other central division teams, since our travel situation would probably improve and most other teams would have to travel substantially more.

 

They would adapt to it. I think you would see us play with more of an edge if we didn't have to travel so much



#17 ogreslayer

ogreslayer

    1st Line All-Star

  • HoF Booster
  • 1,959 posts
  • Location:Indianapolis

Posted 30 January 2013 - 10:45 AM

This smacks of "As owners we're OK with the money we lost in the lockout, because we'll just turn around & create two new teams and rake in that expansion fee money to make up for it". Certainly doesn't look like it's for the overall health of the league to me, just the owners' wallets.

#18 Pskov Wings Fan

Pskov Wings Fan

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,027 posts
  • Location:Minneapoilis, MN

Posted 30 January 2013 - 11:44 AM

This smacks of "As owners we're OK with the money we lost in the lockout, because we'll just turn around & create two new teams and rake in that expansion fee money to make up for it". Certainly doesn't look like it's for the overall health of the league to me, just the owners' wallets.

 

I think that (some) owners equate state of their own wallets with the health of the league.



#19 CrimsonFlame

CrimsonFlame

    1st Line Sniper

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 862 posts
  • Location:Troy, Michigan

Posted 30 January 2013 - 11:47 AM

If the NHL did expand to 32 teams then I think it would have to adopt the 8 divisions of 4 approach like the NFL.  Assuming Hamilton and Quebec city are going to be the new franchies, here's how I would align them according to Geography

 

Eastern Conference

 

Northeast

Quebec City

Montreal

Ottawa

Toronto

 

Atlantic

Boston

Rangers

Islanders

New Jersey

 

Placeholder Name

Buffalo

Pittsburgh

Philadelphia

Washington

 

Southeast

Carolina

Nashville

Florida

Tampa Bay

 

Western Conference

 

Great Lakes

Detroit

Hamilton

Chicago

Columbus

 

Central

St. Louis

Minnesota

Colorado

Dallas

 

Northwest

Calgary

Edmonton

Vancouver

Winnipeg

 

Pacific

San Jose

Los Angeles

Annehiem

Phoenix

 

Unfortunately that means we will still be stuck in the west and still have to travel a lot.  But our divsion gets noticably easier with losing Nashville and St. Louis for a new expanshion franchise.  And we still get to beat up on the Blue Jackets.


Edited by CrimsonFlame, 30 January 2013 - 11:52 AM.


#20 GMRwings1983

GMRwings1983

    The Killer is Me

  • Silver Booster
  • 20,658 posts
  • Location:Jerkwater, USA

Posted 30 January 2013 - 11:58 AM

Why not move the Panthers and Coyotes?


According to my profile, my reputation is excellent. LOL.





Similar Topics Collapse

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users