Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

2/10 GDT : Kings 2 at Red Wings 3

gdt

  • Please log in to reply
516 replies to this topic

#501 haroldsnepsts

haroldsnepsts

    "Classy"

  • HoF Booster Mod
  • 16,904 posts

Posted 10 February 2013 - 09:42 PM

Maybe I'm wrong but doesn't the puck have to be in the zone actually? It has to completely exit the zone, past the blue line to come out, so isn't it the same going in? I've played hockey my whole life but that's not one I can answer for some reason. It escapes me.

Exactly. 

 

The blueline is essentially considered a part of whatever zone the puck is currently in, so the puck has to completely cross the blueline before it is considered to have changed zones. 



#502 dat's sick

dat's sick

    Fear can hold you prisoner, hope can set you free

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,335 posts
  • Location:Sweden

Posted 10 February 2013 - 09:43 PM

Maybe I'm wrong but doesn't the puck have to be in the zone actually? It has to completely exit the zone, past the blue line to come out, so isn't it the same going in? I've played hockey my whole life but that's not one I can answer for some reason. It escapes me.

Yeah since he's coming from the neutral zone the whole blueline is part of that zone as opposed to the offensive zone, meaning the puck has to go completely past the blueline before Dats enters the zone. So the play is actually offside. 

 

But in reality, it was a bang-bang play and a split-second decision for the linesman. If not for people watching the play with modern technology in slow-motion and freeze-framing no one would even be discussing it. Also you could easily make an argument for the play falling under the exception that he had the puck under control, in which case it's okay for the puck to enter the zone after the player. 

 

There were no complaints from Kings players or coaches, the fact that the puck entered the zone a millisecond after Pavel had no impact on how he split the D and scored on Quick. Beauty play no matter what. NHL linesmen get it right 99 times out of a 100 and the ones they get wrong usually even out over a season, you win some you lose some. In plays like this where it's extremely close and difficult to call on the ice I prefer that they let it go as opposed to breaking up the play. 



#503 RedWingsDad

RedWingsDad

    Bigot

  • Restricted
  • PipPip
  • 437 posts

Posted 10 February 2013 - 10:24 PM

We got outplayed, Howard stood on his head to give us the victory.  Rest up boys!


Tim Thomas - Patriot and generally awesome human being.
 
Romans 10:13 - For whoever calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved.

#504 8 Legged RedWing

8 Legged RedWing

    Arms... Legs... Whatever.

  • Bronze Booster
  • 1,276 posts
  • Location:Farmington Hills, MI

Posted 10 February 2013 - 10:25 PM

I know it's going to be tough all season long but this team has a bit more hunger than they have had in recent years. I didn't get to watch this game because I was skiing but I think the infusion of young players is pushing the vets and making everyone try just a bit harder to get the W every game.



#505 Nightfall

Nightfall

    My goal is to deny yours!

  • Gold Booster
  • 3,742 posts
  • Location:Grand Rapids

Posted 10 February 2013 - 10:39 PM

From HFB;

 

BCxCi3MCMAAqb5I.jpg

 

i'd have to see a full replay to see exactly how the puck was played, but it probably was ruled.... positive control? I know there's been some messy calls with that ruling, especially when Iginila burned us on it a few seasons ago

 

When the game is called by humans, mistakes will be made.  This picture just confirms it.  How many calls have the wings gotten away with though that have not been called correctly by the refs?  A lot.  Same goes for the opposite.  Fans of one team will look at all the missed or bad calls against the opposing teams as acceptable, while the blown calls against their team are unacceptable.  The point is that mistakes are made and they all even out in the end.  To use them as a crutch or excuse for winning or losing a game is just dumb.


Christopher Brian Dudek
My Domain

#506 thegerkin

thegerkin

    Statue of Liberty!!!

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,564 posts
  • Location:Grand Rapids, MI

Posted 10 February 2013 - 11:04 PM

With that photo, he's onside. Think about it from a defensemen's point of view. Kronner at the point with the puck for example. He's still onside.



#507 esteef

esteef

    Legend

  • HoF Booster
  • 8,874 posts

Posted 10 February 2013 - 11:37 PM

What happens is Dats gets the benefit of the doubt because he actually plays pucks with his skate like that on purpose.  Like in this case, he receives the pass at his feet either before or at the blue line, and the refs who are so accustomed to him using his feet gave him "possession" even though he technically skates ahead of the puck across the line.  He maintained possession and no one was checking him for the refs to say he didn't have it.  If that had been Tootoo it would've probably been called offsides.

 

esteef


Edited by esteef, 10 February 2013 - 11:40 PM.

"The Wings haven't won a Cup without Darren McCarty since 1955."

#508 beachwing

beachwing

    Reader

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,253 posts
  • Location:Destin

Posted 10 February 2013 - 11:39 PM

Detroit just crushed Colorado 32-2 on South Park.... The boys showed some grit, liked what I saw!

#509 Yzermania

Yzermania

    In it to win it like Yzerman.

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 950 posts

Posted 10 February 2013 - 11:57 PM

Yeah since he's coming from the neutral zone the whole blueline is part of that zone as opposed to the offensive zone, meaning the puck has to go completely past the blueline before Dats enters the zone. So the play is actually offside. 

 

But in reality, it was a bang-bang play and a split-second decision for the linesman. If not for people watching the play with modern technology in slow-motion and freeze-framing no one would even be discussing it. Also you could easily make an argument for the play falling under the exception that he had the puck under control, in which case it's okay for the puck to enter the zone after the player. 

 

There were no complaints from Kings players or coaches, the fact that the puck entered the zone a millisecond after Pavel had no impact on how he split the D and scored on Quick. Beauty play no matter what. NHL linesmen get it right 99 times out of a 100 and the ones they get wrong usually even out over a season, you win some you lose some. In plays like this where it's extremely close and difficult to call on the ice I prefer that they let it go as opposed to breaking up the play. 

 

Yep, this is what I thought. Some posts were just making me second guess myself. 

Also, completely agree with everything you said. Mistakes like this happen all the time in such a fast moving game.



#510 T.Low

T.Low

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,906 posts
  • Location:Bellingham, Wa

Posted 11 February 2013 - 07:03 AM

It's not his mindset, but his physical skills which have deteriorated - and no - I don't by the "getting in shape" argument.  Franzen, maybe yes.  Cleary is just plain done.

 

 

Cleary has more goals than Henrik Sedin... :ninja:



#511 Hockeytown0001

Hockeytown0001

    Legend

  • HoF Booster
  • 22,609 posts
  • Location:A2, Michigan

Posted 11 February 2013 - 08:48 AM

frozen_021013_std.jpg


"All done? Five bucks." - Pavel Datsyuk after an interview
"Very few cities in the NHL have the history or the following of the Detroit Red Wings." - Steve Yzerman

 

 


#512 Wingsfan72

Wingsfan72

    3rd Line Checker

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 407 posts
  • Location:kalamazoo

Posted 11 February 2013 - 03:07 PM

Don't know if this has been posted but I had to share:

 

http://www.usatoday....ories=obnetwork

 

Apparently Big E was a hero for more than the Wings last game haha.




 
If I die tell my wife I said, "Hello".

#513 puckbags

puckbags

    The Future

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,601 posts
  • Location:Cobble Hill, BC, Canada ( 2,522 Miles from the Joe)

Posted 11 February 2013 - 04:23 PM

frozen_021013_std.jpg

 

Sweet pic, Dats uses this controller when he plays NHL 13 

 

Datsyuk controller

"Hard Work Beats Talent When Talent Refuses to Work Hard"

 

LGW after 1 loss is irrational, after a few in a row it becomes quite comical, 22 playoff appearances in a row and 4 cups in that time and still going strong. Relaxxxxx !!
 


#514 irishock

irishock

    Into the sunset

  • Silver Booster
  • 1,837 posts

Posted 11 February 2013 - 04:32 PM

Sweet pic, Dats uses this controller when he plays NHL 13 

 

no need for that when you have legit hacking software


bringit.jpg


#515 HelmFan

HelmFan

    Rookie

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 144 posts
  • Location:Winnipeg

Posted 11 February 2013 - 05:31 PM

What happens is Dats gets the benefit of the doubt because he actually plays pucks with his skate like that on purpose.  Like in this case, he receives the pass at his feet either before or at the blue line, and the refs who are so accustomed to him using his feet gave him "possession" even though he technically skates ahead of the puck across the line.  He maintained possession and no one was checking him for the refs to say he didn't have it.  If that had been Tootoo it would've probably been called offsides.

 

esteef

I think it's pretty safe to assume that if the puck is within 8' of Pavel, then he has control of it. Doesn't matter who has the puck.



#516 Euro_Twins

Euro_Twins

    Healthy Scratch

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,135 posts
  • Location:Windsor, Ontario

Posted 11 February 2013 - 08:30 PM

I think it's pretty safe to assume that if the puck is within 8' of Pavel, then he has control of it. Doesn't matter who has the puck.

 

you should probably make that 10'... just to be on the safe side here



#517 Hockeytown0001

Hockeytown0001

    Legend

  • HoF Booster
  • 22,609 posts
  • Location:A2, Michigan

Posted 12 February 2013 - 12:35 AM

Hopefully that gets Big E going. 


"All done? Five bucks." - Pavel Datsyuk after an interview
"Very few cities in the NHL have the history or the following of the Detroit Red Wings." - Steve Yzerman

 

 






Similar Topics Collapse


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users