sleepwalker 512 Report post Posted March 21, 2013 (edited) So, uh... After that period, I am sure a lot of you guys and gals are reconsidering your stance on allowing coaches a challenge each game, eh? In the thread a few weeks back, I remember the vast majority, pretty much everyone here, was against allowing coaches a challenge each game. This is the EXACT situation, which I pointed out in that thread, why we DO need to allow coaches a challenge. Because when a good goal is called back due to a refs bad/wrong on ice call, it is non-reviewable. Seems even the commentators forgot about that, as they kept talking about how it would be counted as Tootoos good goal, despite the ref calling it off... Edited March 21, 2013 by sleepwalker Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
unsaddleddonald 357 Report post Posted March 21, 2013 Oh you wanted him to set up a play with 7 seconds left? Lol Hah no, but that guy can never seem to miss a guy's stick/leg when he has one standing in front of him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hockeymom1960 5,107 Report post Posted March 21, 2013 Milbury likes the drama. He wouldn't have liked it if he was the coach. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vladifan 680 Report post Posted March 21, 2013 That was an awful call. Wings got screwed. That should have been a goal. War room should review. They just explained why they "couldn't" review it. And from what I understand, the ref STILL screwed up, because Miller HAD NO PART in touching the puck. I hope the Wings get really really ticked. 3 Hockeymom1960, Z Winged Dangler and Yeti reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Yeti 244 Report post Posted March 21, 2013 i hate these announcers... they like wrong calls. right Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
evilmrt 636 Report post Posted March 21, 2013 Watching Lafs blow out TB 4-0 and the game is not even half over. LOL poor Steve. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sleepwalker 512 Report post Posted March 21, 2013 They just explained why they "couldn't" review it. And from what I understand, the ref STILL screwed up, because Miller HAD NO PART in touching the puck. I hope the Wings get really really ticked. Well, almost everyone here, as evidenced by the thread the other week about allowing challenges, is in favor of this blown refs call and disallowing the good goal. I was one of the only people pointing out that this exact situation is why we need to allow coaches to challenge a refs call. For "non-reviewable" calls like this... 2 evilmrt and Hockeymom1960 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GMRwings1983 8,789 Report post Posted March 21, 2013 No s***, can we please just get Tatar back up already? I'd really love it if every time I said, "man he's got good hands" about a rookie it was immediately before or after a goal. I'm not talking about Nyquist. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hockeymom1960 5,107 Report post Posted March 21, 2013 Pierre how in the hell were you able to see whether it hit Miller's stick you stupid dweeb. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Travis 576 Report post Posted March 21, 2013 KRONWAAAAAALLL Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Carman 387 Report post Posted March 21, 2013 And that's why Kronwall doesn't try to hit anymore. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Z Winged Dangler 2,082 Report post Posted March 21, 2013 that was a good hit. keep your ******* head up Jr. nice cryfest from the announcers Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GoWings1905 2,694 Report post Posted March 21, 2013 Oh my, they called that high sticking? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jusek 437 Report post Posted March 21, 2013 Finally someone got Kronwalled. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GMRwings1983 8,789 Report post Posted March 21, 2013 Dammit Kronwall. Out of all the people you could pick to lay out, you pick on some kid no one here cares about. Do that to Parise or Heatley . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WorkingOvertime 536 Report post Posted March 21, 2013 Kronwalled. I don't know why the Wild player tried to avoid the hit- he made it worse. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Yeti 244 Report post Posted March 21, 2013 I think the NHL wants the wild to win.... bs Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Franzine 739 Report post Posted March 21, 2013 Ed Olczyk is an unbearable human. 4 CaliforniaWingsFan, Hockeymom1960, datterberg1340 and 1 other reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
evilmrt 636 Report post Posted March 21, 2013 KRONWALLED 2 unsaddleddonald and Travis reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Z Winged Dangler 2,082 Report post Posted March 21, 2013 how the hell was that a double minor?? 1 Vladifan reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
evilmrt 636 Report post Posted March 21, 2013 Ed Olczyk is an unbearable human. Is that the name of the guy pretending like he knows something about this game? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hockeymom1960 5,107 Report post Posted March 21, 2013 Ed Olczyk is an unbearable human. He and "Penis with Ears" ruin the hockey expierence. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest DeGraa55 Report post Posted March 21, 2013 So where all the people at crying when other have high hits? Where are you now? Kronwall with a high hit and left his feet. What do you people have to say now? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Yeti 244 Report post Posted March 21, 2013 that was a double minor?! wtf Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Playmaker Report post Posted March 21, 2013 It was the right call. He hit him high and had his stick up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites