Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Mr Holland.....


  • Please log in to reply
189 replies to this topic

#41 Number19

Number19

    I like our team

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 355 posts

Posted 31 March 2013 - 04:58 PM

It's just now hitting me we gave a 1st away for Quincy. Had to let that sink in for over a year.


Edited by Number19, 31 March 2013 - 04:58 PM.


#42 kipwinger

kipwinger

    Legend

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,004 posts
  • Location:Mt. Pleasant, MI

Posted 31 March 2013 - 05:00 PM

It's just now hitting me we gave a 1st away for Quincy. Had to let that sink in for over a year.

 

We gave away a first, and we signed Brunner for nothing.  We got a better player than we would have with that first rounder.  It's really no big loss, unless you lament not having Brunner AND the pick, which is understandable but not that big of a deal in the scheme of things. 


GMRwings:  "Well, in other civilized countries, 16 years old isn't considered underage.  For instance, I believe the age of consent is 16 in Canada.  There's some US states where it's 16 as well.  

 

Get off the high horse.  Not like she was 10."

 

"Some girls are 17 even though they look 25."

 

 


#43 Number19

Number19

    I like our team

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 355 posts

Posted 31 March 2013 - 05:03 PM

We gave away a first, and we signed Brunner for nothing.  We got a better player than we would have with that first rounder.  It's really no big loss, unless you lament not having Brunner AND the pick, which is understandable but not that big of a deal in the scheme of things. 

I guess that's one way of looking at it.



#44 kipwinger

kipwinger

    Legend

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,004 posts
  • Location:Mt. Pleasant, MI

Posted 31 March 2013 - 05:05 PM

I guess that's one way of looking at it.

 

That's why I think we should trade our first rounder this year too.  We got Dekeyser, and he's better than anyone we'd likely get with our pick, so put that bad boy in play and land a scoring winger.


GMRwings:  "Well, in other civilized countries, 16 years old isn't considered underage.  For instance, I believe the age of consent is 16 in Canada.  There's some US states where it's 16 as well.  

 

Get off the high horse.  Not like she was 10."

 

"Some girls are 17 even though they look 25."

 

 


#45 Number19

Number19

    I like our team

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 355 posts

Posted 31 March 2013 - 05:08 PM

That's why I think we should trade our first rounder this year too.  We got Dekeyser, and he's better than anyone we'd likely get with our pick, so put that bad boy in play and land a scoring winger.

I'm all with that. I've never had a problem with trading away our low first round picks for established talent. The problem was the player we traded for. The trade has been beaten to death so I won't say anymore.



#46 unsaddleddonald

unsaddleddonald

    2nd Line Scorer

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 748 posts

Posted 31 March 2013 - 05:09 PM

Holland at his best. Per the Free Press today.

 

LOL.

 

Does Kenny think that this team has won the Cup the past 4 years? Because this has been the same lineup. And we haven't won it....



#47 beachwing

beachwing

    Reader

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,253 posts
  • Location:Destin

Posted 31 March 2013 - 05:14 PM

In the last 12 months we have landed
Brunner, Dekeyser and Quincey for a
1st round pick....not bad.

#48 darkmanx

darkmanx

    Toronto's Finest

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,723 posts
  • Location:Toronto, Canada

Posted 31 March 2013 - 05:22 PM

In the last 12 months we have landed
Brunner, Dekeyser and Quincey for a
1st round pick....not bad.

 

Would have been way better with Dekeyser, Brunner and a drafted player.



#49 Buppy

Buppy

    1st Line All-Star

  • Silver Booster
  • 1,980 posts

Posted 31 March 2013 - 05:25 PM

That's why I think we should trade our first rounder this year too.  We got Dekeyser, and he's better than anyone we'd likely get with our pick, so put that bad boy in play and land a scoring winger.

I think even with a scoring winger, we could still miss the playoffs. There's a chance that pick could be first overall.

 

Gaborik might be worth that small risk, depending on what else we had to give up. I don't see why the Rangers would be particularly desperate to move him, so I assume it'd be quite a bit more.

 

I can't think of anyone else rumored to be available that would be worth if. Maybe Vanek if we didn't have to give up any top prospects.



#50 TheCaptain19

TheCaptain19

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,175 posts

Posted 31 March 2013 - 05:33 PM

holland+golf.jpg



#51 Crymson

Crymson

    Ninjelephant

  • Gold Booster
  • 11,032 posts
  • Location:Denver, CO, USA

Posted 31 March 2013 - 05:55 PM

It's just now hitting me we gave a 1st away for Quincy. Had to let that sink in for over a year.

 

Last year's draft sucked, so it ain't that big of a deal.



Would have been way better with Dekeyser, Brunner and a drafted player.

 

Dekeyser wasn't ready until late in the season, and there's no way to tell if that drafted player would have amounted to anything even within the next several years.

 

Yours is conjecture, and most likely incorrect conjecture. If Holland hadn't picked up Quincey, you'd probably now be talking about how he did nothing to replace Stuart. I guess there's no pleasing some people.



Lets not forget to mention, Hossa is the best defensive elite winger in the league. Franzen is.... yeah, Franzen.

 

Untrue, else he'd not have been passed over for the Selke every single season of his career.



#52 Carman

Carman

    Legend

  • HoF Booster
  • 5,114 posts
  • Location:Riverview, MI

Posted 31 March 2013 - 06:07 PM

Untrue, else he'd not have been passed over for the Selke every single season of his career.

 

Give me the list of wingers that get nominated for the Selke recently. It's mostly a center only trophy now.

 

Hossa is one of, if not the best defensive winger in the game. I really don't see how that can be argued, and citing lack of Selke nominations for Winger really means absolutely nothing. Watch the games.


Edited by Carman, 31 March 2013 - 06:08 PM.


#53 Crymson

Crymson

    Ninjelephant

  • Gold Booster
  • 11,032 posts
  • Location:Denver, CO, USA

Posted 31 March 2013 - 06:25 PM

Give me the list of wingers that get nominated for the Selke recently. It's mostly a center only trophy now.

 

Hossa is one of, if not the best defensive winger in the game. I really don't see how that can be argued, and citing lack of Selke nominations for Winger really means absolutely nothing. Watch the games.

 

"It's a center-only trophy" is an empty argument. If any wingers were good enough to win the award, they'd win it. As things stand, Selke winners tend to be centers because those centers happen to be the best defensive forwards in the game. When people talk about the Selke, they speak of the likes of Datsyuk, Kesler, Toews, Richards, as so on. Hossa isn't mentioned, because he's not as good on defense as they are.

 

I've watched plenty of games that Hossa has played in. He is an excellent backchecker and he's hard on the puck when others have it, but those are only two aspects of defense.


Edited by Crymson, 31 March 2013 - 06:26 PM.


#54 Carman

Carman

    Legend

  • HoF Booster
  • 5,114 posts
  • Location:Riverview, MI

Posted 31 March 2013 - 06:32 PM

"It's a center-only trophy" is an empty argument. If any wingers were good enough to win the award, they'd win it. As things stand, Selke winners tend to be centers because those centers happen to be the best defensive forwards in the game. When people talk about the Selke, they speak of the likes of Datsyuk, Kesler, Toews, Richards, as so on. Hossa isn't mentioned, because he's not as good on defense as they are.

 

I've watched plenty of games that Hossa has played in. He is an excellent backchecker and he's hard on the puck when others have it, but those are only two aspects of defense.

 

Can you name some Wingers that are better defensively than him? We aren't comparing Hossa with Datsyuk and other Selke winners, we're comparing Hossa to Franzen. And it's not even close to who is a better two-way player. Hossa is an awesome player and his effect on the game isn't limited to his production. Which is why he would be worth the higher contract. That's all I'm trying to say.



#55 derblaueClaus

derblaueClaus

    1st Line Sniper

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 908 posts
  • Location:Rotenburg (Wmme), Germany

Posted 31 March 2013 - 06:34 PM

C'mon guys lets be fair. Yes, the loss today was extremely painful but what do you expect if you put a bunch of relatively young players on your blueline ? That they are playing like Lids, Stuart and Raf ? They are making mistakes, because they are young, thats just the price you have to pay. In the very article that is cited here, Holland also said that the team is in transition. And thats how they played. Get used to it the next two to three years till its ironed out. Switching to panicmode now and demanding overpriced trades is absolutely useless.


"I'd have my **** out if I scored four goals. Id have my **** out, stroking it." - "Jumbo" Joe Thornton

 

 

Monsterblue.jpg

 

Thanks MabusIncarnate


#56 kipwinger

kipwinger

    Legend

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,004 posts
  • Location:Mt. Pleasant, MI

Posted 31 March 2013 - 06:39 PM

I think even with a scoring winger, we could still miss the playoffs. There's a chance that pick could be first overall.

 

Gaborik might be worth that small risk, depending on what else we had to give up. I don't see why the Rangers would be particularly desperate to move him, so I assume it'd be quite a bit more.

 

I can't think of anyone else rumored to be available that would be worth if. Maybe Vanek if we didn't have to give up any top prospects.

 

I hear you, but given that we've been solidly in a playoff position for about two months I'm banking on us making it,  and as such not getting the shot at the first pick.  But you're right, there's no guarantee. 


GMRwings:  "Well, in other civilized countries, 16 years old isn't considered underage.  For instance, I believe the age of consent is 16 in Canada.  There's some US states where it's 16 as well.  

 

Get off the high horse.  Not like she was 10."

 

"Some girls are 17 even though they look 25."

 

 


#57 TheOwl

TheOwl

    1st Line Sniper

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 945 posts

Posted 31 March 2013 - 06:40 PM

The Wings should trade for Ryan Clowe. Trade and sign, no rental bs. Clowe will greatly help the Wings now, and when the Wings move to the East. The move to the east could make trading Clowe more digestable to the Sharks.

 

In my mind, the major problem the Wings have is the number of people on the roster.

 

The Wings currently have 16 forwards, 9 defenseman, and two goalies. Just think, instead of spending 3 million each on two players, you replace that with one better player who makes 6 million. The latter a much better scenero since we have an abundance of NHL players. Why do we need so many players. Holland is wasting over 10 million dollars of the cap, on players who aren't even playing. And even when they are playing, they aren't useful.

 

Imagine if Quincey, Sammy, White weren't here. All three are expendable, and combined, are wasting 10 million in cap space. That space could easily be used on a top 3 forward, and an upgrade on defense.

 

Holland should clear house at the deadline. It's obvious he isn't going to make a big move. If he would trade all the extra players, who are useless on or off the ice, then he could at least accumulate a bunch of picks. Those picks could either be used in a trade now, or in the off season. Clear house Kenny. We don't need all these extra  players. Losing these players also wouldn't hurt our mediocre play-off push.


Edited by TheOwl, 31 March 2013 - 06:42 PM.


#58 Playmaker

Playmaker

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,206 posts

Posted 31 March 2013 - 06:46 PM

ARGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

Honestly, what do you expect him to say?  This team isn't good enough?  The players aren't good enough?  You just don't know what's being offered and what's not.  He's not going to say I'm definitely making a trade if one doesn't materialize that makes sense short and long term.  It's so easy to say "Make a trade!", but it's silly to make a trade for the sake of making a trade.  Sometimes it's a good thing, sometimes it isn't.   I just love how everyone thinks that being a GM is so easy.  Only  on the internet.



#59 Richdg

Richdg

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,951 posts

Posted 31 March 2013 - 06:48 PM

lets all stop talking about the past, it is over. Discussing further is a waste of time. The only real question is, what do we do between now and Wednesday? I like our D, so all take of picking up more D seems to be misguided. Unless we are picking up a true #1 that is RHed. We need Forwards that can score, plain and simple. But we are not going to get a 40+ goal scorer. Just isn't out there. So we will need to take some risks. Find those guys that have already shown than can score 20+ goals in their past, that are also signed, and under 30 years of age. There are several guys like that available.

In another thread I mentioned several. 2 of which Kulimein of Tor and Stafford of Buf come to mind. van wants to move louango, Tor wants him, and vac wants a 2nd line C. Tor doesn't want to move Bozak. This sound like a perfect Filppula move to me. Fil to Van, Louango to Tor, and recent 30 goal scorer Kulimein to us. Now is that so hard? Make that move.

Then move Nyquist for Stafford. That gives us 2 former 30 goal scorers, both of which are signed for at least 1 more year, both under 30 (27 each), both are 6-2/215ish. Both are good 2 way players. The only cost is a future 2 way playmaking passing C. Simple and stright forward deals that should help us right now, and for the next couple of years.



#60 esmeralda575

esmeralda575

    Please trade..CLEARY.. for a bola popcorn

  • Restricted
  • 12 posts

Posted 31 March 2013 - 06:49 PM

Ugly is an understatement," Babcock said. "Preparation and work ethic are two things you need to be successful in any walk of life, and we weren't prepared and we didn't compete at a high enough level. Any way you look at it, they capitalized on our poor effort. Did I see it coming? No. Is there any excuse for it? No. It's flat-out not acceptable."

 

So Mr. Babcock,

What do we have to do? or what are you going to do? The last 5 years this team haven't done anything. :shout: 


,, Please trade ,,CLEARY,, for a bola popcorn.....!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!





Similar Topics Collapse

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users