Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Brunner Contract Talks


  • Please log in to reply
1081 replies to this topic

#881 Spongewingredpants

Spongewingredpants

    Pragmatic Optimist

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,583 posts
  • Location:Zug, Switzerland

Posted 26 July 2013 - 09:28 AM

Brunner has no idea what his value is. He made like 400K max when he played in Switzerland. Its his ****** agent that told him...dude, i can get you 3,5 million

 

Idiot..... Agent, not Brunner

 

Its a real pity and i bet that Brunner would take the 2,5 million from the Wings but i dont see Holland extending the offer again. this is kind of like when nobody admits it was their fault that they screwed up


My wish: A healthy roster

 

 


#882 The Axe

The Axe

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,379 posts

Posted 26 July 2013 - 02:22 PM

Brunner has no idea what his value is. He made like 400K max when he played in Switzerland. Its his ****** agent that told him...dude, i can get you 3,5 million
 
Idiot..... Agent, not Brunner
 
Its a real pity and i bet that Brunner would take the 2,5 million from the Wings but i dont see Holland extending the offer again. this is kind of like when nobody admits it was their fault that they screwed up


I still want brunner @ 2.5 mil.

#883 St. Michael (the Red Wing)

St. Michael (the Red Wing)

    Heavenly With the Puck

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,822 posts
  • Location:Mankato, MN

Posted 26 July 2013 - 06:32 PM

I still want brunner @ 2.5 mil.

 

How about at 1.5 :P

 

I know the majority on here doesn't really care that Brunner comes back cause Tatar is the better replacement or whatever. Tatar has paid his dues etc etc I'm with you on that and I won't argue that Tatar is a d-bag. Didn't Tatar complain about being sent down to GR or something along those lines this year? I mean I understand where Tatar would be frustrated and to me that doesn't make him a d-bag.

 

Back on Brunner (topic here). However inconsistent Brunner was with us his 12 goals during the regular season and 5 in the playoffs wasn't too shabby.

 

Dude could score regardless of how weak his defensive game is. 



#884 Playmaker

Playmaker

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,194 posts

Posted 26 July 2013 - 06:45 PM

This.

I could see Kenny pulling off a huge trade within the next few years though when the next wave of prospects are ready (jurco frk oullette sproul etc...) There are so many promising names, love it!

How many "big trades" has Kenny EVER made?  Um, none.  So, I wouldn't hold your breath.



#885 Euro_Twins

Euro_Twins

    Healthy Scratch

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,310 posts
  • Location:Windsor, Ontario

Posted 26 July 2013 - 07:34 PM

This.

I could see Kenny pulling off a huge trade within the next few years though when the next wave of prospects are ready (jurco frk oullette sproul etc...) There are so many promising names, love it!


or when mantha is ready

#886 lomekian

lomekian

    3rd Line Checker

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 460 posts
  • Location:London - England (not Ontario)

Posted 26 July 2013 - 09:16 PM

 

How about at 1.5 :P

 

I know the majority on here doesn't really care that Brunner comes back cause Tatar is the better replacement or whatever. Tatar has paid his dues etc etc I'm with you on that and I won't argue that Tatar is a d-bag. Didn't Tatar complain about being sent down to GR or something along those lines this year? I mean I understand where Tatar would be frustrated and to me that doesn't make him a d-bag.

 

Back on Brunner (topic here). However inconsistent Brunner was with us his 12 goals during the regular season and 5 in the playoffs wasn't too shabby.

 

Dude could score regardless of how weak his defensive game is. 

 

If he'd been willing to sign at what now appears to be his market rate, he'd be a wing next year. And if we could buy out Sammy and cleary goes elsewhere, he'll wish he had....



#887 number9

number9

    All The Best Players Wear A 9

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,589 posts
  • Location:Buffalo

Posted 26 July 2013 - 11:53 PM

Jeez the prospect wave is prime and stacked, no room for brunner on a multi year deal

Tatar and Nyquist this year

Possible top 6ers coming in the next few years: Jarnkrok, Jurco, Frk, Pulkkinen, Tvrdon, Mantha
Possible bottom 6ers coming the next few years: Sheahan, Ferraro, Callahan, Nastasiuk, Bertuzzi, Bodin
Possible top D-men next few years: Sproul, Backman, Ouellet, Jensen, Marchenko, Almquist
Possible 5-6 D-men nest few years: Nedomlel, De Haas, Wheaton, McNulty, McKee

Among many other possible diamonds in the rough

I think I can honestly say I have never seen the farm this stacked. It's no surprise the Grifs just won a championship. We may have only drafted one "superstar" prospect in this years draft, but the other guys we got fill the nasty roles that fill out the lineup. Our prospect pool looks complete at this point. Very excited about the next few years. Brunner can suck it, forget about him. Should have got a better agent IMO


Brunner was always expendable


I love Brunner as much as the next guy, but at his age what we got was probably what we were going to get. I think it was smart to let him walk. I don't think he warrants even 2.5.



#888 The Axe

The Axe

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,379 posts

Posted 27 July 2013 - 01:13 AM

Brunner-Helm-Tatar would be sick

#889 matthewdanna

matthewdanna

    4th Line Grinder

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 254 posts
  • Location:San Jose, CA

Posted 27 July 2013 - 12:49 PM

As much as I liked Brunner for his hands and skating, he played literally no defense. He's not a top-6 guy on this team and as many have said, both Nyquist and Tatar are as good, if not better, than him right now.  More importantly, they are better fits for this team.



#890 The Axe

The Axe

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,379 posts

Posted 27 July 2013 - 12:57 PM

As much as I liked Brunner for his hands and skating, he played literally no defense. He's not a top-6 guy on this team and as many have said, both Nyquist and Tatar are as good, if not better, than him right now.  More importantly, they are better fits for this team.


Brunner had a chance to be one of "our" guys. He doesnt want to. End of story.

#891 Spongewingredpants

Spongewingredpants

    Pragmatic Optimist

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,583 posts
  • Location:Zug, Switzerland

Posted 28 July 2013 - 07:43 AM

so....Brunner news?

 


we need more two way forwards who are excellent at defense but cant score


Edited by Spongewingredpants, 28 July 2013 - 07:44 AM.

My wish: A healthy roster

 

 


#892 amberlynn25

amberlynn25

    2nd Line Scorer

  • Gold Booster
  • 521 posts
  • Location:michigan/Sarnia

Posted 28 July 2013 - 09:38 AM

 


I know more than a few Wingnuts are curious about what is going on with Damien Brunner so I thought now would be a good time to update the situation. He was in talks with the New Jersey Devils but those talks ended when it was announced the Devils signed Jaromir Jagr. It seems likely that he is headed back to Switzerland to play. I would say there is no chance that he and the Wings could come to some kind of agreement, he seems to have burned the bridges there.

https://www.facebook...478528565563902
 


I kind of called that.


I get up every day, and I live. Everybody says you should live to the fullest, but what is it? No one knows until you come so close that you're not worried about anything else but being alive."~ Jiri Fischer
my heart belongs to a canadian!

#893 BottleOfSmoke

BottleOfSmoke

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,033 posts
  • Location:It's so hot in the P

Posted 28 July 2013 - 11:35 AM


I kind of called that.


That seems to be from a fan site, compiled from the usual sources--MLive, FSD, etc. I think the Brunner bit is speculation, as his agent was quoted in a recent article as saying Brunner would be back in the NHL, and I think a lot of people just assume that talks ended with NJ when they got Jagr. So unless there is a more definitive source stating these things, I will take it for what it is.

That being said, I've always had an inkling that maybe Brunner *wants* to be back in Switzerland. Close to family, sleep in your own bed every night, top 6 role...doesn't sound half bad. Being in the NHL may have been one of those "if someone makes it worth my while I'll stay" kind of things, thus the high price tag. Who knows...

LGWsig_zpsa75c5d1e.jpg

 


#894 The Axe

The Axe

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,379 posts

Posted 28 July 2013 - 12:22 PM

so....Brunner news?
 

we need more two way forwards who are excellent at defense but cant score


We got rid of flip, brunner, and Cleaey. We added Weiss and Alfredsson. Seems like Holland is doing what you want.

#895 Crymson

Crymson

    Ninjelephant

  • Gold Booster
  • 11,032 posts
  • Location:Denver, CO, USA

Posted 28 July 2013 - 12:38 PM

That being said, I've always had an inkling that maybe Brunner *wants* to be back in Switzerland. Close to family, sleep in your own bed every night, top 6 role...doesn't sound half bad...

... and make 5% as much moolah.

#896 BottleOfSmoke

BottleOfSmoke

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,033 posts
  • Location:It's so hot in the P

Posted 28 July 2013 - 12:59 PM

... and make 5% as much moolah.

 

Indeed.  But it's not like he was poor in Switzerland, and some things are more important than money.

 

And, you know what they say...

 

tumblr_m55qlzydr71qgn1lio1_500_zpse3e178


LGWsig_zpsa75c5d1e.jpg

 


#897 jimmyemeryhunter

jimmyemeryhunter

    1st Line Sniper

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 927 posts

Posted 29 July 2013 - 04:00 AM

I doubt this will happen.
But I'd like to see him resign for 2 years putting his cap hit this year at his salary from last year(just under 1 m) and load the deal with incentives and a 2.5-3m cap hit hit next year.
This way if he proves himself, he could make back the money he would've lost this year, and it sets us up with a right handed potentially top six sniper after alfredsson is gone after next year.
If its done right It won't be too hard to clear the extra strain the deal would potentially put on the team in their efforts to lock up Andersson and Nyquist.
But if they do clear the cap space and another roster spot and they pay cleary $2-3m+ over something with Brunner, then I'll be extremely disappointed. Although I am a fan of cleary.

Edited by jimmyemeryhunter, 29 July 2013 - 04:44 AM.


#898 The Axe

The Axe

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,379 posts

Posted 29 July 2013 - 10:15 AM

I doubt this will happen.
But I'd like to see him resign for 2 years putting his cap hit this year at his salary from last year(just under 1 m) and load the deal with incentives and a 2.5-3m cap hit hit next year.
This way if he proves himself, he could make back the money he would've lost this year, and it sets us up with a right handed potentially top six sniper after alfredsson is gone after next year.
If its done right It won't be too hard to clear the extra strain the deal would potentially put on the team in their efforts to lock up Andersson and Nyquist.
But if they do clear the cap space and another roster spot and they pay cleary $2-3m+ over something with Brunner, then I'll be extremely disappointed. Although I am a fan of cleary.


But this is the problem. Brunner wants to play top 6 so he can score 50 pts and make 4 mil per. He's top 9 on our team and worth 2.5.

#899 evilzyme

evilzyme

    Games a gongshow.

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,095 posts
  • Location:Howell, Michigan

Posted 29 July 2013 - 10:48 AM

But this is the problem. Brunner wants to play top 6 so he can score 50 pts and make 4 mil per. He's top 9 on our team and worth 2.5.

 

This was my biggest problem with him. I thought Babcock did him more justice placing him on the 3rd line with 2 talented players that could compliment him. He couldn't handle top pairings, it was just that simple. The same inside leg to outside while coming along the boards within the zone. He did it every single time and it was poked or he just got pushed off the puck. He needs to learn his timing and space within the NHL and Babcock was allowing him to do this against the bottom 4. It was smart. He had a great playmaker in Nyquist and Andersson who could play hard in the corners and battle the crease. Both of those players play a great 200 ft game and could make up for Brunner's defensive game. Brunner did step it up defensively later in the season. He could actually account for men decently in the zone and pick whom he needed to cover. He started to finish checks, play the body, and overall I thought he was putting in some damn good effort for his first season (we know the other excuses). 

 

I guess I just underestimated his personality. I thought he was comfortable and wouldn't want to move out of a new locker room in a league that he just came to. Not to mention, he came to a decorated franchise with lots of love from the fans. Not only that but he has one of the best coaches teaching him how to play the game and some of the most talented players. Oh well though!


Pavel Datsyuk - "Pasha" - #13
"Got no fun if you got no puck"
'"I like ladies" - Towards the Lady Byng trophy
"Hannnnnnnnnnk"
"Okay $5 now"

 

I'm Don Cherry and Danny DeKeyser is my Kadri.


#900 The Axe

The Axe

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,379 posts

Posted 29 July 2013 - 10:53 AM

 
This was my biggest problem with him. I thought Babcock did him more justice placing him on the 3rd line with 2 talented players that could compliment him. He couldn't handle top pairings, it was just that simple. The same inside leg to outside while coming along the boards within the zone. He did it every single time and it was poked or he just got pushed off the puck. He needs to learn his timing and space within the NHL and Babcock was allowing him to do this against the bottom 4. It was smart. He had a great playmaker in Nyquist and Andersson who could play hard in the corners and battle the crease. Both of those players play a great 200 ft game and could make up for Brunner's defensive game. Brunner did step it up defensively later in the season. He could actually account for men decently in the zone and pick whom he needed to cover. He started to finish checks, play the body, and overall I thought he was putting in some damn good effort for his first season (we know the other excuses). 
 
I guess I just underestimated his personality. I thought he was comfortable and wouldn't want to move out of a new locker room in a league that he just came to. Not to mention, he came to a decorated franchise with lots of love from the fans. Not only that but he has one of the best coaches teaching him how to play the game and some of the most talented players. Oh well though!


Playing with Helm and Tatar 12-15 mins a night would be perfect for him as he develops. I agree.





Similar Topics Collapse

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users