Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Gallant and Barch find a way around the new helmet rule


  • Please log in to reply
25 replies to this topic

#21 Dabura

Dabura

    Everydayer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,011 posts
  • Location:In an octopus's garden

Posted 21 September 2013 - 08:20 AM

Just had a brainwave... yes helmets cause more injuries in fights than the fists that inevitably get injured, however what would happen if the league came out and said "helmets are worse for fighting related injuries than punches"? Imagine if Easton heard that and went, "I'm sorry, what?" Kiss that chunk of advertising revenue goodbye.

 

Just a thought though...

 

It's not just wearing a helmet, though. ("If you put on our helmet, you may incur injury! mwahahah!")

 

If we're talking about helmets in the context of fighting, hands are inextricably intertwined with the issue; it's not that helmets can lead to injury, it's that punching a helmet is almost guaranteed to screw up your hand(s). Ask Joey Kocur.


Don't Toews me, bro!


#22 55fan

55fan

    All mine 'til 2-0-1-9

  • HoF Booster
  • 12,878 posts
  • Location:Fargo, ND

Posted 21 September 2013 - 08:37 AM

Maybe they should ban the use of hands.  Those things can get hurt.



#23 Euro_Twins

Euro_Twins

    Healthy Scratch

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,097 posts
  • Location:Windsor, Ontario

Posted 21 September 2013 - 09:41 AM

Maybe they should ban the use of hands.  Those things can get hurt.

 

Datsyuk wouldn't need hands :)



#24 Spongewingredpants

Spongewingredpants

    Pragmatic Optimist

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,571 posts
  • Location:Zug, Switzerland

Posted 23 September 2013 - 09:58 AM

that is halarious and awkwardly intimate


My wish: A healthy roster

 

 


#25 toby91_ca

toby91_ca

    Legend

  • Gold Booster
  • 8,448 posts

Posted 23 September 2013 - 11:21 AM

Some may be surprised by the real reason behind the rule.  The league isn't wanting to keep helmets on during fights do reduce injuries caused by getting punched in the head without a  helmet on.  The league is genuinely concerned about the potential for a player to "DIE" if they fall and hit their head on the ice.  This is a real concern and they'd gladly take on the risk of hand injuries instead.

 

That said, while the risk of death is real....what are the chances?  There will surely be hand injuries.....  Flip side to that is....it doesn't matter what the probability is, there is a risk and if it can't be avoided, do it.

 

I really don't have much of an opinion on it myself.  I'm not on the side arguing to keep fighting in the game nor am I on the other side, but my enjoyment of a fight wouldn't change from the players taking their helmets off.



#26 55fan

55fan

    All mine 'til 2-0-1-9

  • HoF Booster
  • 12,878 posts
  • Location:Fargo, ND

Posted 23 September 2013 - 02:46 PM

Some may be surprised by the real reason behind the rule.  The league isn't wanting to keep helmets on during fights do reduce injuries caused by getting punched in the head without a  helmet on.  The league is genuinely concerned about the potential for a player to "DIE" if they fall and hit their head on the ice.  This is a real concern and they'd gladly take on the risk of hand injuries instead.

 

That said, while the risk of death is real....what are the chances?  There will surely be hand injuries.....  Flip side to that is....it doesn't matter what the probability is, there is a risk and if it can't be avoided, do it.

 

I really don't have much of an opinion on it myself.  I'm not on the side arguing to keep fighting in the game nor am I on the other side, but my enjoyment of a fight wouldn't change from the players taking their helmets off.

I guess when I think of a fight, I think of two guys punching each other.  As long as they're standing and hitting (or hugging, which happens a lot too), their heads are no where near the ice unless they get knocked out and fall.

 

It's the take-downs where the heads and ice make contact with enough force enough to cause injury or death.

 

I'd rather ban the take down and let them lose the helmets.

 

Maybe I'm just old, but the removal of helmets before a fight has always seemed like the chivalrous thing to do.  Back in the day, we didn't have to worry about it, but then when some players started wearing them, it caused a mis-match with one player wearing one and the other not.  Taking the helmet off evened the playing field.

 

Nowadays with everyone wearing them, I guess the playing field is even, but in cases where the combatants are standing mano a mano, it just looks like they're showing respect for the opponent's hands by removing the helmets.

 

When I see helmets on during a fight, I have the same reaction as when I see youngsters with their panties hanging out of their trousers.  You!  Young man!  Pull up your pants, get a job, and take off your helmet when you fight!  <grumble, grumble> Kids these days.

 

Alas, as usual with nostalgia, the Good Old Days were generally more Old than Good.







Similar Topics Collapse

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users