Jump to content


Photo
* * * * * 1 votes

What's Killing Our Offense?


  • Please log in to reply
164 replies to this topic

#61 Euro_Twins

Euro_Twins

    Healthy Scratch

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,367 posts
  • Location:Windsor, Ontario

Posted 25 October 2013 - 06:13 PM

Under the topic, what's killing our offense, is the topic Brendan Smith, I guess the forum answered the question for us


I'm a Red Wing for the next three years and I'm going to make sure every team we play knows that.'' -- Jordin Tootoo

#62 55fan

55fan

    All mine 'til 2-0-1-9

  • HoF Booster
  • 12,670 posts
  • Location:Fargo, ND

Posted 25 October 2013 - 06:25 PM

Under the topic, what's killing our offense, is the topic Brendan Smith, I guess the forum answered the question for us

That's funny.  When I came on, the topic below "What's Killing Our Offense?" was "Stephen Weiss".


Money on the board:  Current total: 0

$1 for a goal by any current Wing after whom I have named a hamster.  An additional $5 for a series-clinching goal scored by any current Wing after whom I have named a hamster. $5 if the other team fails to score against a current Wing goalie after whom I have named a hamster.

Hamsters I have had:  (current Wings highlighted)

Henrik Pavel Tomas Nicklas Dominik

Niklas Matthew Daniel Robert

Johan Andreas Valtteri Jonathan

Andrew Patrick Ian Todd

Jordin Damien Gustav James


#63 Euro_Twins

Euro_Twins

    Healthy Scratch

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,367 posts
  • Location:Windsor, Ontario

Posted 25 October 2013 - 06:46 PM

That's funny.  When I came on, the topic below "What's Killing Our Offense?" was "Stephen Weiss".

 

works just as well lol


I'm a Red Wing for the next three years and I'm going to make sure every team we play knows that.'' -- Jordin Tootoo

#64 Richdg

Richdg

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,596 posts

Posted 25 October 2013 - 08:37 PM

You do know we developed Datsyuk and z right?

Also Tatar does drive the net, and he is gritty. Him and goose are very different

Ummm yes. 15 years ago we drafted and developed Z and dat, which I said. there has been nothing since. A bunch of 3rd line role player types. That is a long long time between stars.

yes tatar is different than Nyquist. but not much and I don't expect much from him long term. 4 full seasons in the minors at GR and never scored more than 24 goals in a season. 30 games with the Wings to date and he has scored 5 goals. Now to be fair, he has never played 20+ games in a row which would help. I have said many times I see tatar and Nyquist as 40 point per year guys. tatar a few more goals and Nyquist a few more assists, and yes, both should be playing every game to prove one way or the other what type of players they are.



#65 joesuffP

joesuffP

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,800 posts

Posted 26 October 2013 - 01:00 AM

We used to be tops in the league in goals from defensemen and now we have got to be very close to the bottom. That's a big difference. Kindl looks like he's about ready to break through and put up points. Our D needs to be aggressive and we need speed in the lineup

#66 Euro_Twins

Euro_Twins

    Healthy Scratch

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,367 posts
  • Location:Windsor, Ontario

Posted 26 October 2013 - 05:55 AM

We used to be tops in the league in goals from defensemen and now we have got to be very close to the bottom. That's a big difference. Kindl looks like he's about ready to break through and put up points. Our D needs to be aggressive and we need speed in the lineup


As does dekeyser, and Ericsson looks like he will score when he finds open lanes, he has a cannon of a shot.

Ummm yes. 15 years ago we drafted and developed Z and dat, which I said. there has been nothing since. A bunch of 3rd line role player types. That is a long long time between stars.
yes tatar is different than Nyquist. but not much and I don't expect much from him long term. 4 full seasons in the minors at GR and never scored more than 24 goals in a season. 30 games with the Wings to date and he has scored 5 goals. Now to be fair, he has never played 20+ games in a row which would help. I have said many times I see tatar and Nyquist as 40 point per year guys. tatar a few more goals and Nyquist a few more assists, and yes, both should be playing every game to prove one way or the other what type of players they are.


Yes you're right, I apologize, because they are still playing I keep forgetting that they were drafted before the y2k scandal lol. Anyways mantha will hopefully change that, and Tatar and goose might be 40 point per year guys, but hopefully they produce more. That being said, goose is more of a playmaker, that is more responsible defensively and Tatar is more of a drive the net, shoot first ask questions later guy.
I'm a Red Wing for the next three years and I'm going to make sure every team we play knows that.'' -- Jordin Tootoo

#67 frankgrimes

frankgrimes

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,047 posts

Posted 26 October 2013 - 06:21 AM

The lack of offense to me is probably the biggest problem right now but can't be answered one sentence:

 

1. the often talked about identity crisis - personally I really couldn't describe the identity of this team if a non DetroitRedWings fan would ask me

 

2. playstyle (coupled with 1!) - why is it so hard for Babcocks and/or Kenny to accept that this team is not skilled enough to play puck posession style? I know I know, they can't play a grind it out or dump and chase style either because this team doesn't have the size for that (Kenny fix that!) but at least they could play a more defensive minded type of system. Z and Pasha are one of the best 200 ft game overall players in the game, why not take advantage of that?

 

3. youth = in and out all the time, I really thought making the playoffs thanks to a great YOUNG third line would have changed the mindset of the front-office sadly it did not. That's also the erason why I wanted them to miss the playoffs, because in doing so the top guys = Mr. I - best owner in all of sports by far - would have given Kenny more than just an advise on how to turn this thing around, or else...I mean honestly, a third line of Nyquist, Tatar and Andersson can't be worse than what this team is having right now they just can't. Yeah, young guys are going to make mistakes but at least they have enough time to learn from it and play their hearts out every shift.

 

4. Banking on the false players in the off-season. Back when Kenny signed Alfie to that ridiculous 5,5 m contract I wasn't thrilled. Does such a veteran loaded team really need another veteran in terms of leadership? I don't think so, don't get me wrong Alfie was an outstanding player and maybe an even better person but the timing to sign him was just odd, as seen so far he is nowhere close to what he once has been. I had to deal with criticism for wanting a player like Clarkson instead of Weiss well so far Weiss has turned out great hasn't he? I know it is hard to adjust to Babcocks systems but maybe just maybe (!) Weiss isn't the right fit for this team? Which then begs the question why did Kenny sign him? --->Rift between Babcock and Kenny?

 

5. Drafting, if you are drafting that late - like the DetroitRedWings - for over a decade it is really hard  to find some gems, Tatar, Pulkinen, Nyquist, Andersson...are all nice but let's be honest here none of them is going to be the next star in this league. That's why I wanted this team to start the youth movement after 2010 (at that point everyone knew the retirement of the perfect human) could come very soon...The way to rebuild/tool under the current NHL regime sadly is to suck and get rewarded for it.

 

6. Coupled with #5 other teams have closed the gap in terms of drafting. The DetroitRedWings had the privilege of finding european gems, when others didn't have scouts there but nowadays almost every team has a ton of scouts, so another advantage gone. Which begs the question why not go for the sure fire picks instead of mostly high risk / high reward?

 

Expecting Z and Pasha to carry this team over and over and over again is just asking for trouble, I mean give Weiss 10 - 15 more games if he doesn't work out at that point try to trade him and bring in a powerforward: I also would like to see a guy like Jake Gardiner here, he could try to become the next PP QB so Kronwall could be the shutdown force once again (which is a way better role for him), that way the defense could once again be helpful to our offense.

 

tl,dr

Kenny has his work cut out for him and the Babcock needs to change the playstyle.


lidsretire2.jpg
 

Thank you so much perfect human being #5

Welcome to hockeytown Jonas aka Lundquist 2 Gustavsson!

Phase I: injury rattled roster Phase II: BABCOCK Phase III: Playoffs XXIII !


#68 DRW Dominance

DRW Dominance

    Yzerman=God

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,318 posts
  • Location:Bowmanville, ON

Posted 26 October 2013 - 07:55 AM

LOL that 3rd line looks terrible.

yes it does.  why do we insist on franzen in the top six if everyone complains about him?

drop him to a third line centre and move Weiss up to the wing.

 

I am very guilty like others on here.  every year I expect franzen to score a lot and play hard and I don't know why I expect it because it never happens.  demote the donkey to a checking role.


Edited by DRW Dominance, 26 October 2013 - 07:59 AM.

naked is a state of mind

#69 Dabura

Dabura

    Cake Eater

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,065 posts
  • Location:In an octopus's garden

Posted 26 October 2013 - 09:49 AM

In the Kinda Sorta Feel-Good Department, our opponent tonight - the mighty New York Rangers (who most pundits have picked to finish ahead of us) (and they very well may) - have scored twelve goals thus far, five of those belonging to Brad Richards. Additionally, they'll be without their heart-and-soul captain Ryan Callahan, their resident former Wings killer Rick Nash, and the best goalie in the world in Henrik Lundqvist.

 

Point being, if we lose tonight, we suck. And if we don't score at least three goals, in a winning effort, we suck.


Don't Toews me, bro!


#70 Dabura

Dabura

    Cake Eater

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,065 posts
  • Location:In an octopus's garden

Posted 26 October 2013 - 10:22 AM

(Also: no Hagelin, I think.)


Don't Toews me, bro!


#71 joesuffP

joesuffP

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,800 posts

Posted 26 October 2013 - 12:15 PM

Teams like LA and St Louis play together and move the puck quickly with short passes and they have a lot of puck support. Our forwards are too slow to come through the neutral zone with support. One man enters the zone and if your not Datsyuk or zetterberg you get the puck taken away in the time it takes the other forwards to help support the puck

#72 Crymson

Crymson

    Ninjelephant

  • Gold Booster
  • 11,032 posts
  • Location:Denver, CO, USA

Posted 26 October 2013 - 12:19 PM

Teams like LA and St Louis play together and move the puck quickly with short passes and they have a lot of puck support. Our forwards are too slow to come through the neutral zone with support. One man enters the zone and if your not Datsyuk or zetterberg you get the puck taken away in the time it takes the other forwards to help support the puck

 

 

 

 

I have no idea how you've gotten the impression that the Wings' forwards are possessed of below-average speed. Of them all, only Andersson, Cleary, and Samuelsson are below-average skaters. 



#73 haroldsnepsts

haroldsnepsts

    "Classy"

  • HoF Booster Mod
  • 16,550 posts

Posted 26 October 2013 - 12:25 PM

Teams like LA and St Louis play together and move the puck quickly with short passes and they have a lot of puck support. Our forwards are too slow to come through the neutral zone with support. One man enters the zone and if your not Datsyuk or zetterberg you get the puck taken away in the time it takes the other forwards to help support the puck

 

Having watched a lot of LA games it is striking how much team speed the Wings lack compared to them, especially when exiting the zone. And it's not so much that the Kings have blazing speed (they have a handful of guys who are fast) as it is I think the Wings are on the slower end of the spectrum.

 

It's like I was saying in another thread.  They no longer have enough skill for puck possession to be as effective as it was, but they lack the speed and size to dump and chase.  I think it's where the mishmash of 3rd and 4th line particularly stands out.   On a lot of teams that's the fast, crash bang line that keeps the puck deep in the corners and will throw it out front for a good chance.  On the Wings it's just inferior versions of the top two lines.



#74 jimmyemeryhunter

jimmyemeryhunter

    1st Line Sniper

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 778 posts

Posted 26 October 2013 - 12:47 PM

Reading lgw after a bad game is depressing, and when they win the boards have very few comments.
This doesn't pertain to anything.
Just sayin.

#75 frankgrimes

frankgrimes

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,047 posts

Posted 26 October 2013 - 01:39 PM

The concerns are not based on one bad game, they've basically started one year after the DeteoitRedWings had their last cup run.Should an original 6 franchise be left behind the likes of St. Louis, LA or Pittsburgh I don't think so. Myself and others just fail to see, why it is so hard for this team to play a style better suited for the current skillset Like others mentioned have one - crash and bang line preferably the fourth one, a youth loaded third line and keep all the skill on the two top lines.

lidsretire2.jpg
 

Thank you so much perfect human being #5

Welcome to hockeytown Jonas aka Lundquist 2 Gustavsson!

Phase I: injury rattled roster Phase II: BABCOCK Phase III: Playoffs XXIII !


#76 DRW Dominance

DRW Dominance

    Yzerman=God

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,318 posts
  • Location:Bowmanville, ON

Posted 26 October 2013 - 04:27 PM

 

 I think it's where the mishmash of 3rd and 4th line particularly stands out.   On a lot of teams that's the fast, crash bang line that keeps the puck deep in the corners and will throw it out front for a good chance.  On the Wings it's just inferior versions of the top two lines.

this exactly.  drives me nuts how the bottom six try to play like the top 6.  they need to be more traditional when it comes to the bottom six.  do as much crash and bang as possible.  having said that though, helm, nyquist, tatar maybe would be excellent as a third line.


naked is a state of mind

#77 Richdg

Richdg

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,596 posts

Posted 26 October 2013 - 09:44 PM

 

 

 

 

I have no idea how you've gotten the impression that the Wings' forwards are possessed of below-average speed. Of them all, only Andersson, Cleary, and Samuelsson are below-average skaters. 

For many years the Wings could out skate 99% of all the other NHL teams. That is not true anymore. We just got out skated/out hustled by the Rangers tonight.


In the Kinda Sorta Feel-Good Department, our opponent tonight - the mighty New York Rangers (who most pundits have picked to finish ahead of us) (and they very well may) - have scored twelve goals thus far, five of those belonging to Brad Richards. Additionally, they'll be without their heart-and-soul captain Ryan Callahan, their resident former Wings killer Rick Nash, and the best goalie in the world in Henrik Lundqvist.

 

Point being, if we lose tonight, we suck. And if we don't score at least three goals, in a winning effort, we suck.

Well......



#78 number9

number9

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,729 posts
  • Location:East Lansing

Posted 27 October 2013 - 03:29 AM

The weird thing is the problem has reversed. Used to be top 6 now it's bottom 6. It's...

Cleary-Andersson-Bertuzzi
Eaves-Glendening-Samuelsson

Give or take a helm Tootoo and others

When I'd rather see

Prust-Helm-Neil
Carcillo-Gaustad-Tootoo

#79 pucktividi

pucktividi

    the usual suspect

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,273 posts
  • Location:Croatia

Posted 27 October 2013 - 06:35 AM

The last 2 games Pavs are Hanked looked kinda unmotivated and Babs looked more worried than pissed.I'm really scared there are some locker room issues that prevent team to stay focused the whole game.



#80 Dabura

Dabura

    Cake Eater

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,065 posts
  • Location:In an octopus's garden

Posted 27 October 2013 - 10:53 AM

Maybe we're over-thinking this.

 

Our roster is relatively thin (compard to what we're used to). Maybe it's as simple as that. We could do all that crazy high-scoring puck-possession stuff before because, well, we could - i.e. we had the requisite skill, talent, moxy. Now we can't because, well, we can't.

 

Is it a mere coincidence that 1) this is the weakest lineup we've had in maybe twenty years, and 2) we're looking absolutely lost?


Don't Toews me, bro!






Similar Topics Collapse

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users