Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Trial date set in Steve Moore’s lawsuit against Todd Bertuzzi


  • Please log in to reply
50 replies to this topic

#1 WingsAlways

WingsAlways

    Grind Line 2.0

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 327 posts

Posted 28 October 2013 - 01:19 AM

http://www.theglobea...rticle15073970/

 

The latest trial date set in Steve Moore’s lawsuit against Todd Bertuzzi will see the case finally come to Ontario Superior Court after 10 years and six months to the day when Bertuzzi attacked Moore during an NHL game.

On March 8, 2004, Bertuzzi, then playing for the Vancouver Canucks, jumped Moore, then 25, punched him repeatedly and drove him into the ice. Moore sustained three broken vertebrae, a concussion and lasting brain damage. He never played in the NHL again and in 2006 launched a lawsuit against Bertuzzi and the Canucks seeking more than $38-million in damages for his lost hockey career and a post-hockey career Moore says he is denied because of the effects of his injuries.

After years of legal wrangling over everything from the proper jurisdiction to a secret deal between Bertuzzi, the Canucks and former Canucks head coach Marc Crawford, the case will come to trial in Superior Court in Toronto on Sept. 8, 2014. The jury trial is expected to last up to three months.

The previous trial date was September, 2012 but when Moore’s lawyer, Tim Danson, learned of a secret agreement between Bertuzzi, Crawford and the company that owned the Canucks in 2008, Orca Bay, there was another delay. The agreement saw Bertuzzi drop his third-party claim against Crawford and then the Canucks, Crawford and Bertuzzi dismissed all cross-claims between each other. It also called for Bertuzzi, Crawford and the Canucks to share the cost of any damages awarded to Moore but the court did not make public how the three parties would split the payments.

Danson asked the court to reveal the details of the agreement. The court eventually allowed Danson to see the agreement but did not make it public.

I wonder what will become of this?

 


"Wow Chicago, you've won four Stanley Cups? Me too! - Kris Draper"


#2 Nev

Nev

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,041 posts
  • Location:Lincolnshire, England

Posted 28 October 2013 - 01:34 AM

Seriously, is this still not settled?  *facepalm*


"If I can be totally honest, it's not a lot of guys you get impressed by. Actually, it's no one else but him. From the bench, to see what move he makes -- you're like, 'I wish I could do that.' Sometimes you sit on the bench and just think, 'wow,' and you look over to the other bench and they sit there and shake their heads, too. He has great, great skills. I'm probably not going to play with another player who has the kind of skills he has." Mikael Samuelsson on Pavel Datsyuk

#3 Euro_Twins

Euro_Twins

    Healthy Scratch

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,096 posts
  • Location:Windsor, Ontario

Posted 28 October 2013 - 03:41 AM

Hell never win 38 million

#4 GoalieManPat

GoalieManPat

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,363 posts
  • Location:Swartz Creek, MI

Posted 28 October 2013 - 08:30 AM

Wow 10 years ago. I feel old. The 38 million number makes me LoL. If this guy gets any money look out for the next guy who gets majorly hurt in a fight. Lawsuit time!!


Edited by GoalieManPat, 28 October 2013 - 08:34 AM.


#5 sleepwalker

sleepwalker

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,057 posts

Posted 28 October 2013 - 01:22 PM

Seriously, is this still not settled?  *facepalm*

 

 

Well, cause 'ol Stevie is living up to his last name...

 

First he wanted a couple mil, then 5, then 10, now...40 mil?   Laughable.  By the time the trial starts, I'm sure Moore will be asking upwards of 60 mil.



#6 cusimano_brothers

cusimano_brothers

    Legend

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,605 posts
  • Location:Niagara Falls, ON

Posted 26 February 2014 - 08:07 AM

From CBC:

 

The National Hockey League refused to give Steve Moore $220,000 in a disability payment unless he dropped his civil suit against Todd Bertuzzi and the Vancouver Canucks, new court documents allege.

As well, a new motion was filed to compel former Canucks owner John McCaw Jr. to testify at the trial scheduled to start in September in Ontario Superior Court in Toronto.

 

The League's name now being part of this can't be good for it's "public relations" image, with regards to the treatment of their employees. If the right people are asked to testify, some rather interesting testimony might be heard.

After all, they're trying to run a business; a very, very lucrative business.


"Mess up tomorrow, don't mess up now".

- Harry James Benson, CBE.


#7 vladdy16

vladdy16

    The rest are neophytes.

  • HoF Booster Mod
  • 6,160 posts

Posted 26 February 2014 - 02:27 PM

Sorry, but we absolutely WILL NOT be turning this into another Bertuzzi/Moore thread to argue the same old stuff that's been discussed ad nauseum time and time again.  Let's keep this to the trial itself and the implications thereof, please.


Can't wait to read the "Phoenix: I still think it's a hockey market" chapter of Gary Bettman's autobiography. I'm guessing it's going to be chapter 11.

- mjlegend 3/9/2011

#8 Euro_Twins

Euro_Twins

    Healthy Scratch

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,096 posts
  • Location:Windsor, Ontario

Posted 26 February 2014 - 02:41 PM

Moore better settle, he won't win, he's asking way too much money. I think he has Damien Brunners agent as a lawyer.

#9 kipwinger

kipwinger

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,569 posts
  • Location:Mt. Pleasant, MI

Posted 26 February 2014 - 03:46 PM

Bertuzzi, the Canucks, Crawford, and the League just need to let Gary Bettman act as defense counsel.  If it wasn't already abundantly clear, the last lockout showed how much smarter and more devious that little guy is than anyone else. 

 

What?  You hired Donald Ferr, notorious ball breaking union lawyer to knock Gary down a peg or two?  How'd that work out for you?

 

Gary Bettman is like a real life version of the Vince McMahon's WWE character.  He's too damned slick to ever truly have something negative happen to him. 


GMRwings:  "Well, in other civilized countries, 16 years old isn't considered underage.  For instance, I believe the age of consent is 16 in Canada.  There's some US states where it's 16 as well.  

 

Get off the high horse.  Not like she was 10."

 

"Some girls are 17 even though they look 25."

 

 


#10 Donaldjr2448

Donaldjr2448

    LETS GO REDWINGS!!

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,065 posts
  • Location:Fenton, MI. The land of grid lock

Posted 27 February 2014 - 12:42 PM

I will say, I am no lawyer, but I do own a business and from my understanding is that Moore could only sue for damages, he would then have to prove that there is 38 Million in damages caused. I am not sure if that is how lawsuits work in Canada, but I cannot imagine it being much different than the United States.

 

I really hope this case will be sealed on the court date cause I would like to think we are getting close to a statue of limitations by now......



#11 number9

number9

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,205 posts
  • Location:East Lansing

Posted 27 February 2014 - 12:59 PM

I will say, I am no lawyer, but I do own a business and from my understanding is that Moore could only sue for damages, he would then have to prove that there is 38 Million in damages caused. I am not sure if that is how lawsuits work in Canada, but I cannot imagine it being much different than the United States.
 
I really hope this case will be sealed on the court date cause I would like to think we are getting close to a statue of limitations by now......


Pretty much, otherwise he'd have to prove some sort of negligence or criminal intent. However, I believe the damages he's seeking involves future earnings. He's trying to make Bertuzzi and the nucks pay for the money's he would have likely earned later in his career. Of course he doesn't know how his future career would have gone so the parties will likely settle for an amount smaller than 38.

#12 themcityblues

themcityblues

    2nd Line Scorer

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 583 posts

Posted 27 February 2014 - 11:15 PM

What if Bertuzzi loses to, say, 6m?  Surely he doesn't have 6m's hanging out.  And with his career nearly over is he going to be homeless or working at the thrifty?


Edited by themcityblues, 27 February 2014 - 11:16 PM.


#13 dirtydangles

dirtydangles

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,692 posts

Posted 27 February 2014 - 11:20 PM

What if Bertuzzi loses to, say, 6m?  Surely he doesn't have 6m's hanging out.  And with his career nearly over is he going to be homeless or working at the thrifty?

when you account for endorsements at the peak of his game and the length of time he has been playing I bet he has some decent assets squared away. additionally he will have known for years this was coming and probably has been careful with his money. but nevertheless I don't see Bert having to single-handedly give that much money - it will be spread between bert, crawford, and the nucks imo. 


Is there a kickstarter campaign for Jakub Kindl to never play another NHL game?


#14 T.Low

T.Low

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,897 posts
  • Location:Bellingham, Wa

Posted 28 February 2014 - 01:56 AM

I will say, I am no lawyer...
 
...we are getting close to a statue of limitations by now......



I've always wondered, do they give tours of the statue of limitations like they do the statue of liberty?


Edit: ;-)

Edited by T.Low, 28 February 2014 - 10:55 AM.


#15 T.Low

T.Low

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,897 posts
  • Location:Bellingham, Wa

Posted 28 February 2014 - 02:26 PM

Pretty much, otherwise he'd have to prove some sort of negligence or criminal intent. However, I believe the damages he's seeking involves future earnings. He's trying to make Bertuzzi and the nucks pay for the money's he would have likely earned later in his career. Of course he doesn't know how his future career would have gone so the parties will likely settle for an amount smaller than 38.




In regards to his "future earnings", Wasn't Moore a borderline 4rth liner, with a pretty unsure hockey future?

#16 Wheelchairsuperhero

Wheelchairsuperhero

    Wizard

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 224 posts

Posted 28 February 2014 - 03:01 PM

Bertuzzi, the Canucks, Crawford, and the League just need to let Gary Bettman act as defense counsel.  If it wasn't already abundantly clear, the last lockout showed how much smarter and more devious that little guy is than anyone else. 
 
What?  You hired Donald Ferr, notorious ball breaking union lawyer to knock Gary down a peg or two?  How'd that work out for you?
 
Gary Bettman is like a real life version of the Vince McMahon's WWE character.  He's too damned slick to ever truly have something negative happen to him. 

Well no wonder the lockout lasted so long. Next time we know that the real life version of Steve Austin needs to be hired to Stone Cold stunner him into defeat.

#17 ami

ami

    1st Line Sniper

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 760 posts
  • Location:San Diego, CA

Posted 28 February 2014 - 05:14 PM

Moore better settle, he won't win, he's asking way too much money. I think he has Damien Brunners agent as a lawyer.

Moore? This poor guy is a void. There are a couple 'smart' lawyer behind this who have been getting their checks for 10 years now. Why should they settle now?! I'm pretty sure they know they will never win this, but THEY DON'T CARE! AND NEVER HAVE.



#18 number9

number9

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,205 posts
  • Location:East Lansing

Posted 28 February 2014 - 11:07 PM

In regards to his "future earnings", Wasn't Moore a borderline 4rth liner, with a pretty unsure hockey future?


Yup

Moore? This poor guy is a void. There are a couple 'smart' lawyer behind this who have been getting their checks for 10 years now. Why should they settle now?! I'm pretty sure they know they will never win this, but THEY DON'T CARE! AND NEVER HAVE.


Yup

#19 cusimano_brothers

cusimano_brothers

    Legend

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,605 posts
  • Location:Niagara Falls, ON

Posted 01 March 2014 - 07:35 AM

There is a chain of guilt here; they just have to find it and "connect the dots", as it were.

People will have to outright lie for Moore not to win this lawsuit.


"Mess up tomorrow, don't mess up now".

- Harry James Benson, CBE.


#20 number9

number9

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,205 posts
  • Location:East Lansing

Posted 01 March 2014 - 11:08 AM

There is a chain of guilt here; they just have to find it and "connect the dots", as it were.
People will have to outright lie for Moore not to win this lawsuit.



That's why Bertuzzi hired a pro liar (lawyer)





Similar Topics Collapse

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users