Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Blockbuster deal?


  • Please log in to reply
47 replies to this topic

#1 Andy Pred 48

Andy Pred 48

    Coming soon,"the slovak line" Marek and 2 Toms!

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,885 posts
  • Location:Peterborough England

Posted 29 December 2013 - 01:09 PM

do any of us feel we need a deal to put us back amongst the elite sides in the show? i kinda feel we have drifted out of the top 6 teams in the last 3 years and dont see us getting back into the elite with what we have and what we have got in the minors in the near future. 
i have said in another thread that i would put Howard out there and package him with a top prospect and draft pick to see what we could get.
any thoughts or suggestions ? or do you feel we are still a elite side.
"What are you guys doing?" Reggie Dunlop
"Putting on the foil coach" Jeff Hanson
"Yeah, every game, you want some coach?" Steve Hanson
"Er, no. No thanks guys." Reggie Dunlop
"Make sure they don't leave the bench!" Reggie Dunlop.

#2 PumpkinEscobar

PumpkinEscobar

    3rd Line Checker

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 467 posts

Posted 29 December 2013 - 01:52 PM

Don't think they would trade Howard but I wouldn't be against it

#3 Playmaker

Playmaker

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,234 posts

Posted 29 December 2013 - 02:03 PM

Most teams are at or near the salary cap, so the Wings would have to take on salary and also shed salary, which is not easy to do.  The Wings do not have a history of making blockbuster trades.  Holland tends to favor trades that involve only giving up draft picks or lower level prospects.  Most of the dead weight they'd we'd all like to trade isn't going to be attractive to another team.  Not to mention, a lot of these guys have cleared waivers, meaning teams didn't want them for free, so it's not likely that anyone will part with anything.  Very small chance that any kind of a blockbuster will happen.



#4 GMRwings1983

GMRwings1983

    The Killer is Me

  • Silver Booster
  • 20,939 posts
  • Location:Jerkwater, USA

Posted 29 December 2013 - 03:55 PM

Which team would trade a top skater for Jimmy Howard?  


According to my profile, my reputation is excellent. LOL.

#5 Crashnburnluder

Crashnburnluder

    Crashnburnluder

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,270 posts
  • Location:Lancater, Pennsylvania

Posted 29 December 2013 - 03:57 PM

And then what are we doing... Riding a back up and a kid??? That should go great with Quincey and smith

#6 Dominator2005

Dominator2005

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,273 posts

Posted 29 December 2013 - 03:57 PM

In the past Detroit had some good (above average) goalies with the great DEF. Our goalies were paid "cheap" (beside Hasek/Cujo) but the team was build with the All Star DEF... Now we have a very good goalie who's getting paid big money and we have no DEF...

Edited by Dominator2005, 29 December 2013 - 04:38 PM.

"Some guys dream about scoring goals, or making big saves... I swear to God I dream about kicking ass in a hockey fight - no other way to say it than I love to do it, its who I am"... Brian McGrattan

#7 DeGraa55

DeGraa55

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,895 posts

Posted 29 December 2013 - 04:47 PM

Mrazek would be traded before Howard at this point IMO. And yes they do need to shake things up we can't win with 10 4th line players at forward. We need two or three guys up front before we will be legit. Defense will be fine once Quincey and maybe kindl to are gone.

#8 Red Crazy

Red Crazy

    2nd Line Scorer

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 628 posts
  • Location:Manitoba, Canada

Posted 29 December 2013 - 04:56 PM

Not sure if Kenny would ever actually do a big blockbuster deal. I wouldn't trade Howard. I would trade Mule to a team looking at a long playoff run like the Sharks in return for Boyle or a similar puck moving D man.



#9 Crymson

Crymson

    Ninjelephant

  • Gold Booster
  • 11,032 posts
  • Location:Denver, CO, USA

Posted 29 December 2013 - 06:09 PM

In the past Detroit had some good (above average) goalies with the great DEF. Our goalies were paid "cheap" (beside Hasek/Cujo) but the team was build with the All Star DEF... Now we have a very good goalie who's getting paid big money and we have no DEF...

 

Unfortunately, Lidstroms do not come along very often. Even today's most elite defensemen are quite a bit short of how good Lidstrom was in his prime.


Edited by Crymson, 29 December 2013 - 06:09 PM.

  • Nev likes this

#10 Crashnburnluder

Crashnburnluder

    Crashnburnluder

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,270 posts
  • Location:Lancater, Pennsylvania

Posted 29 December 2013 - 06:27 PM

I might be in the that small party that doesn't want a trade at this point. I'm not saying this team is a bust and won't make playoffs but in terms of trade we don't have the cap room or pieces to make something happen that makes us a contender.

Guys we want to trade Cleary, Quincey, bertuzzi, and franzen are not that highly desired by other teams. As far as the players with value to trade are our young prospects that have cheap contracts. You can't replace them with someone who makes more because of cap room and in the end a slight upgrade and more contract won't help anything when you still have those original 4 eating up cap and ice time.

I rather just muscle through the season and try to pick up a key asset in the off season when cleary, Quincey, bertuzzi, Sammy are all off the books... Heck only 1 of them should be playing per night and they take about 2/3 players worth of roster.

In the end there is no short term solution that makes us legit contenders this season but if we push through, bring up kids, and add the RIGHT pieces not the "panic" piece it will be a lot better situation for us long run.

Edited by Crashnburnluder, 29 December 2013 - 06:30 PM.


#11 GMRwings1983

GMRwings1983

    The Killer is Me

  • Silver Booster
  • 20,939 posts
  • Location:Jerkwater, USA

Posted 29 December 2013 - 06:30 PM

Maybe we can trade Steven Weiss for 1,000 shares of Blockbuster stock.  


According to my profile, my reputation is excellent. LOL.

#12 Dominator2005

Dominator2005

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,273 posts

Posted 29 December 2013 - 06:33 PM

Well, Girardi seems to be available.

 
Unfortunately, Lidstroms do not come along very often. Even today's most elite defensemen are quite a bit short of how good Lidstrom was in his prime.


I'm not talking only about Lids but theway the team was/is built
"Some guys dream about scoring goals, or making big saves... I swear to God I dream about kicking ass in a hockey fight - no other way to say it than I love to do it, its who I am"... Brian McGrattan

#13 LeftWinger

LeftWinger

    42 years in Detroit! Time to spend the rest in paradise!

  • Silver Booster
  • 8,810 posts
  • Location:HART - MI

Posted 29 December 2013 - 07:21 PM

trade Howard, Mule, Quincey, Kindl and a prospect in a blockbuster...what in return? Dunno...but if I am trading, those are the guys on my short list.


Don't Be Jealous, But I Live Here...

www.thinkdunes.com

 

Nestrasil, yes...Cleary....No!

Dump Q and K Now!


#14 Playmaker

Playmaker

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,234 posts

Posted 29 December 2013 - 07:52 PM

Well, Girardi seems to be available.

I'm not talking only about Lids but theway the team was/is built

If you take Lidstrom off any of the teams of the last 20 years, the defense was not superior, just average or above.

 

trade Howard, Mule, Quincey, Kindl and a prospect in a blockbuster...what in return? Dunno...but if I am trading, those are the guys on my short list.

Howard has a NMC for the first two years of his contract, and a NTC for the remainder.  He's not going anywhere.



#15 Echolalia

Echolalia

    Legend

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,124 posts
  • Location:fab ferndale

Posted 29 December 2013 - 10:01 PM

I might be in the that small party that doesn't want a trade at this point. I'm not saying this team is a bust and won't make playoffs but in terms of trade we don't have the cap room or pieces to make something happen that makes us a contender.

Guys we want to trade Cleary, Quincey, bertuzzi, and franzen are not that highly desired by other teams. As far as the players with value to trade are our young prospects that have cheap contracts. You can't replace them with someone who makes more because of cap room and in the end a slight upgrade and more contract won't help anything when you still have those original 4 eating up cap and ice time.

I rather just muscle through the season and try to pick up a key asset in the off season when cleary, Quincey, bertuzzi, Sammy are all off the books... Heck only 1 of them should be playing per night and they take about 2/3 players worth of roster.

In the end there is no short term solution that makes us legit contenders this season but if we push through, bring up kids, and add the RIGHT pieces not the "panic" piece it will be a lot better situation for us long run.

 

I'm with you, for a number of different reasons.

I don't think this team is that far off from being a legit contender, and I think a lot of the necessary pieces are already in our lineup; they just need to continue to develop and learn the game.  The biggest need of ours is a franchise forward (or two) that Holland can build a team around once Zetterberg and Datsyuk retire, and those aren't the type of players that even make it to the trade block.

Trades are also the least economic way to acquire a player, so I'd rather be aggressive once free agency begins and hang onto the prospects and picks that we have.  The value of hanging onto those guys has really made itself apparent in the last year, with guys like Nyqvist, Jurco, Tatar, Andersson, etc keeping the Wings in it.



#16 brett

brett

    Legend

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,077 posts
  • Location:NJ

Posted 29 December 2013 - 10:29 PM

our defense would look leaps and bound better with just girardi. would quincey and a 2nd land him? 

 

kronwall E

girardi kindl

dekeyser smith



#17 Crymson

Crymson

    Ninjelephant

  • Gold Booster
  • 11,032 posts
  • Location:Denver, CO, USA

Posted 29 December 2013 - 11:11 PM

our defense would look leaps and bound better with just girardi. would quincey and a 2nd land him? 

 

kronwall E

girardi kindl

dekeyser smith

 

 

Girardi gets vastly overrated once again. Are you aware of how bad he's been for the past season and a half? Do you really want another defenseman who will make mistakes on a regular basis?



#18 PumpkinEscobar

PumpkinEscobar

    3rd Line Checker

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 467 posts

Posted 29 December 2013 - 11:25 PM

Can we replace Quincey and Lashoff/Kindel with Ouellett and Sproul/Almquist?

#19 Z and D for the C

Z and D for the C

    This is the TBL forum, right?

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,034 posts
  • Location:D, Michigan

Posted 29 December 2013 - 11:27 PM

Howard is amazing for most of his career, has a bad stretch of games, and now people want his head. Unbelievable.

Just cause you look like the gimp don't mean you play like the gimp!


#20 rick zombo

rick zombo

    Grit

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,273 posts

Posted 29 December 2013 - 11:44 PM

Howard is amazing for most of his career, has a bad stretch of games, and now people want his head. Unbelievable.

 

I think it has more to do with tradable assets not named Zetterberg, Datsyuk, or Kronwall. Plus no one wants to trade a useful defencemen like Ericsson. And no one wants to trade the kids. 

 

That leaves Howard and Franzen as the Wing’s most valuable trade pieces. 

 

For the record, I think trading Howard is a bad idea. 


"In Detroit, every day is a good day to win"





Similar Topics Collapse

  Topic Forum Started By Stats Last Post Info

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users