Jump to content


Photo
* * * * * 2 votes

1/18 GDT: Kings 2 @ Red Wings 3 (Shootout)



  • Please log in to reply
417 replies to this topic

#381 rrasco

rrasco

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,900 posts
  • Location:Texas

Posted 19 January 2014 - 02:00 AM

That goal was hilarious and I don't even care they got it wrong.  I had to watch the replay on FSD and they cut out like half the game, so I'll have to watch an archive later to see everything that happened, but lolz @ Howard...I love it.


Kronwalled.net - Keep Yer Head up Kid

 

MONEY ON THE BOARD: $10/Kronwalling (1), $1/goal by: Nyquist, Tatar, Jurco, Sheahan, Glendening (1), Andersson, Dekeyser, Pulkinnen, Ouellet, or Sproul.  2X MULTIPLIER: Glendening.  MOTB TOTAL: $12


#382 hankzet40

hankzet40

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,720 posts
  • Location:Calgary, Alberta

Posted 19 January 2014 - 02:32 AM

I'm sure it's been mentioned in this thread but the Wings have been screwed by a goal like this before (against the Sharks IIRC) so I shed no tears for the Kings. They badly needed these points so good on them for getting them.


Edited by hankzet40, 19 January 2014 - 02:33 AM.


#383 RyanBarnes!

RyanBarnes!

    Legend

  • HoF Booster
  • 5,871 posts

Posted 19 January 2014 - 05:00 AM

Yes, i'll take the win, eventhough it should not have been a good goal. Detroit played pretty well in the third and even established some offensive pressure. I dont get why Sheahan and Tatar was split up, those two have been great together. Now if anything chemistry is more important than depth. Sheahan should be a regular by next season.
"Joey (Kocur) has no fear" -Lyndon Byers
"Empty-net goals are for homos" -Al Iafrate

#384 Playmaker

Playmaker

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,034 posts

Posted 19 January 2014 - 08:06 AM

It's good the Wings got 2 points. They need them.

Kings are my second favorite team so it's unfortunate to see them lose on such an awful goal. Darryl Sutter summed it up, no matter who it was scored on it's embarrassing for the league.

How does a puck go 30 feet in the air into the netting and four officials don't see it? And the bigger question, how does O'Halloran still have a job as an NHL ref? If there's a record for being involved on terrible goal calls, he owns it.

 

 

 Rule 85 the NHL rulebook:  "If the puck striking the spectator netting goes unnoticed by the on ice officials, play shall continue on as normal and resulting play with puck shall be deemed legitimate"

 

As Osgood stated in the post game show, they can't assume where the puck went, they actually have to see it.  The one official behind the net was clearly fixed on the goal area.  The second referee was also looking downward and towards the goal.  Toronto can only review whether the puck crossed the line.  That was obvious.  But they can't review whether the puck hit the netting.  Should they have seen the puck? Yes.  But, they followed the NHL rules as written, so it isn't the horrific call that everyone seems to think it is.

 

I was really appreciative that Ken Daniels was on top of it and knew the situation.  The radio guys didn't at all and couldn't believe that Toronto couldn't see that it hit the netting.


Edited by Playmaker, 19 January 2014 - 08:12 AM.


#385 darkmanx

darkmanx

    Toronto's Finest

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,493 posts
  • Location:Toronto, Canada

Posted 19 January 2014 - 08:09 AM

That OT period with Jurco and Shehan was amazing. They created alot of scoring chances, but yeah according to some we don't need those chances.


02_notcomplicated_Kronwalled55_zpsc7d665


#386 Playmaker

Playmaker

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,034 posts

Posted 19 January 2014 - 08:13 AM

That OT period with Jurco and Shehan was amazing. They created alot of scoring chances, but yeah according to some we don't need those chances.

Did my eyes deceive me or was Danny Cleary no where to be found in the late stages of the game and OT?



#387 Z Winged Dangler

Z Winged Dangler

    GooZe! Z Jr. ~ Acting Captain

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,035 posts
  • Location:Winnipeg, MB

Posted 19 January 2014 - 09:19 AM

 

 

tumblr_mzmpiqeJ7E1sf5kxoo1_500.png

Thanks for my new avatar bud!


This offseason will determine whether Ken Holland should still be employed with the Wings organization.

 

Please put Smith on the Power Play!


#388 Z Winged Dangler

Z Winged Dangler

    GooZe! Z Jr. ~ Acting Captain

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,035 posts
  • Location:Winnipeg, MB

Posted 19 January 2014 - 09:30 AM

12023585555_0cd0e277ed_o.jpg

 

Per request by BottleOfSmoke somewhere in tonights GDT. You may use as you see fit. 

If I hadn't already changed my avatar to Tatar, I'd be using this one for sure.  Background on my phone......yeah it is!

 

Edit:  Mabus......nice work dude, as always.


Edited by Z Winged Dangler, 19 January 2014 - 09:32 AM.

This offseason will determine whether Ken Holland should still be employed with the Wings organization.

 

Please put Smith on the Power Play!


#389 RyaN_84

RyaN_84

    Rookie

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 168 posts
  • Location:Ontario, Canada

Posted 19 January 2014 - 10:30 AM

do red wings fans really think they deserved that win?!
i mean come on seriously!!!



#390 GoWings1905

GoWings1905

    Beat Boston!

  • Gold Booster
  • 5,021 posts
  • Location:Near Toledo, OH

Posted 19 January 2014 - 10:37 AM

do red wings fans really think they deserved that win?!
i mean come on seriously!!!


Who claimed that? Pretty much every person in this GDT has acknowledged the tying goal was a huge break.

The Red Wings still played a solid game. They deserved something to go their way finally.
 
 
15
 
 

 

 

 

 


#391 St. Michael (the Red Wing)

St. Michael (the Red Wing)

    Heavenly With the Puck

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,820 posts
  • Location:Mankato, MN

Posted 19 January 2014 - 10:41 AM

really lucky win last night but much needed and we'll take it.



#392 aflac9262

aflac9262

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Gold Booster
  • 4,337 posts
  • Location:Warren, MI

Posted 19 January 2014 - 10:48 AM

Flashback time. Anybody remember this?

Edited by aflac9262, 19 January 2014 - 11:00 AM.


#393 Hockeymom1960

Hockeymom1960

    Legend

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,000 posts

Posted 19 January 2014 - 10:55 AM

do red wings fans really think they deserved that win?!
i mean come on seriously!!!

 

No one says they deserved but by the rules the goal is good.


do red wings fans really think they deserved that win?!
i mean come on seriously!!!

 

Are you even a Wings fan or are you just trolling?



#394 evilmrt

evilmrt

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,408 posts
  • Location:Winter Freakin Wonderland

Posted 19 January 2014 - 10:59 AM

The goal was a joke, and the NHL needs serious reform in terms of how these games are officiated.

With that said, I think the Wings deserve it after so many bad calls against them. It's nice for it to go their way for once.

But I'll be pretty disgusted if this is a regular thing.
IPB Image

#395 Hockeymom1960

Hockeymom1960

    Legend

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,000 posts

Posted 19 January 2014 - 11:01 AM

I agree with Mickey, make the nets fair play.



#396 St. Michael (the Red Wing)

St. Michael (the Red Wing)

    Heavenly With the Puck

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,820 posts
  • Location:Mankato, MN

Posted 19 January 2014 - 11:08 AM

I agree with Mickey, make the nets fair play.

 

It just needs to be consistent on the call either way. 

 

I'm all for that as well. 



#397 dat's sick

dat's sick

    Fear can hold you prisoner, hope can set you free

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,293 posts
  • Location:Sweden

Posted 19 January 2014 - 11:22 AM

I agree with Mickey, make the nets fair play.

It could lead to tactics like 'dump the puck into the zone off the netting' to make it harder for the defending team to pick up the puck. 

 

The nets are out of bounds, it's just a safety measure. If you make it fair play you may as well encase the whole rink in glass and make everything fair play. 

 

Though this goal was definitely legal by the rule book. If the refs don't blow the play dead then play goes as usual. Lucky break, which we needed. 



#398 RyaN_84

RyaN_84

    Rookie

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 168 posts
  • Location:Ontario, Canada

Posted 19 January 2014 - 11:26 AM

i really hope this isn't a constant thing.
the league needs to look at this and make ALL plays reviewable.



#399 Blood On The Ice

Blood On The Ice

    3rd Line Checker

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 493 posts
  • Location:Toledo

Posted 19 January 2014 - 11:49 AM

i really hope this isn't a constant thing.
the league needs to look at this and make ALL plays reviewable.

 

Can't do that, where will it end. Games will end up being 4 hours long. Line has to be drawn somewhere. This type of play does not happen often. Nobody is perfect, people make mistakes. At least the rule book covers the scenario and by the rule book, the call was correct. Best way to fix the net thing, allow play off the net, just like the glass. If it's not the net, it will be something else. I can think of worse calls, especially when the ref is looking right at the puck and still misses it. Many of the Homy calls were worse, Wings lost goals just because he sniffed the blue paint. Won't be long, wings will have one that does not go their way. 


Edited by Blood On The Ice, 19 January 2014 - 11:50 AM.


#400 Playmaker

Playmaker

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,034 posts

Posted 19 January 2014 - 11:59 AM

i really hope this isn't a constant thing.
the league needs to look at this and make ALL plays reviewable.

Not realistic, nor would I want it to be that way.  Games are already too long, it would be ridiculous.







Similar Topics Collapse


Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: GDT

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users