Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Zetterberg out with herniated disc


  • Please log in to reply
228 replies to this topic

#101 Playmaker

Playmaker

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,189 posts

Posted 14 February 2014 - 12:39 PM

Did you see the part about condensed schedule?  They are playing more games with less rest, which could be contributing to the injuries.  Zetterberg will definitely be missing games.  



#102 DickieDunn

DickieDunn

    http://redwingsandotherthings.wordpress.com/

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,455 posts
  • Location:Belding

Posted 14 February 2014 - 12:51 PM

Did you see the part about condensed schedule?  They are playing more games with less rest, which could be contributing to the injuries.  Zetterberg will definitely be missing games.  

 

He'd be missing games if it was the Olympics or not.  Now he has 2 weeks to get rest or rehab.  So do Franzen and Weiss.


Oh this young man has had a very trying rookie season, with the litigation, the notoriety, his subsequent deportation to Canada and that country's refusal to accept him, well, I guess that's more than most 21-year-olds can handle... Ogie Ogilthorpe!


#103 sleepwalker

sleepwalker

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,063 posts

Posted 14 February 2014 - 12:53 PM

It truly amazes me how idiotic some people are acting about the players participating in the Olympics.  First the Pav thing, now this.

 

Hank's back has been injured for a couple years now, its been an ongoing thing.  Anyone who follows the Wings knows this. If he hadn't tweaked it in the Olympic game, he would have tweaked it in the next Wings game.



#104 number9

number9

    All The Best Players Wear A 9

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,528 posts
  • Location:Buffalo

Posted 14 February 2014 - 01:25 PM

Listening to the radio today... They said Zetterbergs back pain is 20 times worse than it was in the past. He can't even move and hasn't come back to Detroit yet bc the pain is too bad to travel. He likely needs back surgery and could be done for the season.

Datsyuk still not 100% yet, but still playing.

#105 Son of a Wing

Son of a Wing

    London Lions Captain

  • Gold Booster
  • 1,769 posts
  • Location:London, Ontario

Posted 14 February 2014 - 01:37 PM

It truly amazes me how idiotic some people are acting about the players participating in the Olympics.  First the Pav thing, now this.

 

Hank's back has been injured for a couple years now, its been an ongoing thing.  Anyone who follows the Wings knows this. If he hadn't tweaked it in the Olympic game, he would have tweaked it in the next Wings game.

 

It used to. Not anymore. lol  I just assume a lot of the people making fools of themselves are kids.  

 

Then they start talking about "their" employees and I cringe. lol

 

Anyways...I'll wait to hear official word from Detroit doctors before I make assumptions and conclusions and never will I "write off" this season.


"The leader must never close the gap between himself and the group. If he does, he is no longer what he must be. He must walk a tightrope between the consent he must win and the control he must exert."
Vince Lombardi
 
When asked who won, Babcock said, “Well it doesn’t really matter as long as you don’t lose. It’s like going bear hunting, you take a slow guy with you in case the bear is hungry.”

#106 sibiriak

sibiriak

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,644 posts

Posted 14 February 2014 - 01:43 PM

I do have leisure activities that I am unable to participate in and can be found legally negligent if I participate in them.  

 

If 10 of my best employees said, hey, we're leaving for 3 weeks, but we expect you to still pay us, you will have to close down your business, we expect you to still pay the 10 other employees that will sit and do nothing while we go, we will all have to work extra hours because of it and it will bring your business absolutely no extra money or exposure.  Oh and by the way, I'm too sick or hurt to work right now, though I'm still getting paid, but I'm more than okay to go off for 3 weeks and do my job for my pride.  There's also a good chance that when I come back I'll be too hurt to work also.  But you will still have to pay me.  I have been a good employee for 10 years, so I don't owe you anything.  But you still have to pay me.  Sorry, not going to fly.

Boy, one has to try hard  to be wrong on every single point one made.

1. Players get paid X dollars per year, to be available to play 82 games + playoffs. They are, with or without the Olympics  So "your 10 best employees"

are NOT paid by the Wings while they play in the Olympics.

2. Their NHL salaries are INSURED for injury by their national hockey federations. So the Wings are NOT on the hook for Zetterberg's salary from now until he comes back from injury.

3. The Olympic break is 9 days longer than the normal All-Star break. Just 9 days over a 160 days season.

So your analogy does not fly. Sorry.


Edited by sibiriak, 14 February 2014 - 01:53 PM.


#107 ShanahanMan

ShanahanMan

    DUUUUUUUUH

  • Silver Booster
  • 5,656 posts
  • Location:Michigan, then Los Angeles, now Tokyo, Japan

Posted 14 February 2014 - 02:36 PM

Listening to the radio today... They said Zetterbergs back pain is 20 times worse than it was in the past. He can't even move and hasn't come back to Detroit yet bc the pain is too bad to travel. He likely needs back surgery and could be done for the season.

Datsyuk still not 100% yet, but still playing.

 

If he has to have surgery, he might as well call it a career. Once it gets to that point, there's no coming back and even if you try, you're never the same. 

 

For whatever reason, they don't seem to be too common in the NHL but in football they happen all the time and most that get to Z's stage end up retiring. 

 

Sorry guys, we're going to be looking at Captain Kronwall soon. 




I HATE JASON WILLIAMS

#108 Playmaker

Playmaker

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,189 posts

Posted 14 February 2014 - 03:20 PM

Boy, one has to try hard  to be wrong on every single point one made.

1. Players get paid X dollars per year, to be available to play 82 games + playoffs. They are, with or without the Olympics  So "your 10 best employees"

are NOT paid by the Wings while they play in the Olympics.

2. Their NHL salaries are INSURED for injury by their national hockey federations. So the Wings are NOT on the hook for Zetterberg's salary from now until he comes back from injury.

3. The Olympic break is 9 days longer than the normal All-Star break. Just 9 days over a 160 days season.

So your analogy does not fly. Sorry.

LOL, if you're going to correct someone for being wrong, at least be right.

 

The NHL players are insured during the Olympics by the IOC.  Will they pay when the player was already injured.  It'll be interesting to see.

 

A normal All Star Break is 4 days, five or six at most. The Olympic Break is 17 days.  In US Math, 9+4 or 5 or 6 doesn't equal 17.  Not sure about the math where you're from.



#109 Stinkyness

Stinkyness

    Top Prospect

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 88 posts
  • Location:Fountain, CO

Posted 14 February 2014 - 03:22 PM

Like no one knew this was going to happen. Just waiting for the other shoe(dats) to drop.

 

Olympics needs to go back to amatuer status. 20 yr old age limit. But thats another thread.

 

Bulls***. Management should have made them all take the time off.



#110 wingedominance13

wingedominance13

    3rd Line Checker

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 381 posts

Posted 14 February 2014 - 03:28 PM

Its appropriate to mention that a lot of his pain is probably due to the fact that per IIHF rules he cant use cortison shots, which i'm assuming he was using to stem the pain and function these past couple weeks. 



#111 Dabura

Dabura

    Everydayer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,086 posts
  • Location:In an octopus's garden

Posted 14 February 2014 - 03:35 PM

If he hadn't tweaked it in the Olympic game, he would have tweaked it in the next Wings game.


Again I ask: Why are we acting like there's no two-week vacation option? Is it inconceivabe that taking a two-week vacation might've done Z's back some real good, or at the very least been infinitely kinder and easier on it than...playing in the Olympics? Why is it "Destroy back in Olympics or destroy back in the same way when the NHL resumes?" There are steps players can take to combat and minimize injury woes and risks. We're acting like the very concept of "maintenance days" is stupid because "Well, he's gonna get hurt anyway. Why bother resting up?"

 

I think had he not been named captain of the Swedish team, there's a reasonable chance he might not have gone. Same with Datsyuk. So, what I'm saying is, being captain sucks.


Its appropriate to mention that a lot of his pain is probably due to the fact that per IIHF rules he cant use cortison shots, which i'm assuming he was using to stem the pain and function these past couple weeks. 

 

Yep, this is definitely worth considering. (Not sarcasm.)


Don't Toews me, bro!


#112 darkmanx

darkmanx

    Toronto's Finest

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,628 posts
  • Location:Toronto, Canada

Posted 14 February 2014 - 03:36 PM

Again I ask: Why are we acting like there's no two-week vacation option? Is it inconceivabe that taking a two-week vacation might've done Z's back some real good, or at the very least been infinitely kinder and easier on it than...playing in the Olympics? Why is it "Destroy back in Olympics or destroy back in the same way when the NHL resumes?" There are steps players can take to combat and minimize injury woes and risks. We're acting like the very concept of "maintenance days" is stupid because "Well, he's gonna get hurt anyway. Why bother resting up?"

 

I think had he not been named captain of the Swedish team, there's a reasonable chance he might not have gone. Same with Datsyuk. So, what I'm saying is, being captain sucks.


 

Yep, this is definitely worth considering. (Not sarcasm.)

 

I think people are assuming this because he has months off after each season and ends up with back issues 30 games into the season. Sitting out 2 weeks wasn't going to do anything for him. He might have been able to play for another couple of games without issue, but there is no telling.



#113 Playmaker

Playmaker

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,189 posts

Posted 14 February 2014 - 03:46 PM

 

I think people are assuming this because he has months off after each season and ends up with back issues 30 games into the season. Sitting out 2 weeks wasn't going to do anything for him. He might have been able to play for another couple of games without issue, but there is no telling.

Resting a herniated disc is never worse than playing with it. Would it have cured him?  Of course not, but it absolutely would not have made things worse.  Playing would and it did.  The travel could have had an impact also.  Nothing worse for a bad back than a long plane ride where you can't move around.   



#114 sibiriak

sibiriak

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,644 posts

Posted 14 February 2014 - 04:16 PM

LOL, if you're going to correct someone for being wrong, at least be right.

 

The NHL players are insured during the Olympics by the IOC.  Will they pay when the player was already injured.  It'll be interesting to see.

 

A normal All Star Break is 4 days, five or six at most. The Olympic Break is 17 days.  In US Math, 9+4 or 5 or 6 doesn't equal 17.  Not sure about the math where you're from.

 

Well, let's see.

1. IOC does not insure anybody. The national hockey federations (like USA Hockey) do. They have done so in the past and there's no reason to doubt that they will pay if liable. The contracts are insured with he same pool of insurance companies that the NHL uses, so I don't see why it would make any difference to those insurance companies, whether they pay the same amount of money to the Red Wings on the policy taken by the Wings themselves, or by the Swedish Hockey Federation.

2. I don't know about "US Math" but in normal math, here's how it works:

The last 2 All-Star breaks were 5 days each.

The Olympic break this year consists of: Feb. 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23,  24. That's 16 days by my count (not 17). So the difference is 16 - 5 = 11 days. OK it's 11 days and not 9 days over almost 200 days season (Pre-season NHL games started Sept. 14, Playoffs will go till about the end of May). Such a biiig difference.



#115 Dabura

Dabura

    Everydayer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,086 posts
  • Location:In an octopus's garden

Posted 14 February 2014 - 04:26 PM

Resting a herniated disc is never worse than playing with it. Would it have cured him?  Of course not, but it absolutely would not have made things worse.  Playing would and it did.  The travel could have had an impact also.  Nothing worse for a bad back than a long plane ride where you can't move around.   

 

Agreed.

 

You have a bad back. It's screaming bloody murder for some rest and relaxation. You've been putting it through hell because you're the effing captain of the Detroit Red Wings. But now the NHL's going on a two-week vacation. So, you can give your back some much-needed rest and relaxation...or you can fly over to Russia and play in the Olympics. Like, I get wanting/needing to play in the Olympics. I'm not faulting Z for that at all. He pretty much had an obligation to go and represent and lead and push himself as hard as humanly possible. What I honestly don't get is how so many intelligent people can not see how two weeks of rest might be better for Z's back than playing in the Olympics, in Russia. "Yeah, well, he was just gonna get hurt anyway" doesn't strike me as a terribly strong counterargument, because, again, why even take maintenance days?


Don't Toews me, bro!


#116 pucktividi

pucktividi

    the usual suspect

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,330 posts
  • Location:Croatia

Posted 14 February 2014 - 04:49 PM

Resting a herniated disc is never worse than playing with it. Would it have cured him?  Of course not, but it absolutely would not have made things worse.  Playing would and it did.  The travel could have had an impact also.  Nothing worse for a bad back than a long plane ride where you can't move around.   

It makes sense,but my mother had the same problems as Z and sometimes just making a simple "wrong" move while lying in a freaking bad made things much worse.



#117 kipwinger

kipwinger

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,683 posts
  • Location:Mt. Pleasant, MI

Posted 14 February 2014 - 04:51 PM

In for a penny in for a pound. I'll be done with this season when lockers are being cleaned out.

 

Atta girl.  Fair weather fans be damned.


GMRwings:  "Well, in other civilized countries, 16 years old isn't considered underage.  For instance, I believe the age of consent is 16 in Canada.  There's some US states where it's 16 as well.  

 

Get off the high horse.  Not like she was 10."

 

"Some girls are 17 even though they look 25."

 

 


#118 kipwinger

kipwinger

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,683 posts
  • Location:Mt. Pleasant, MI

Posted 14 February 2014 - 04:57 PM

Again I ask: Why are we acting like there's no two-week vacation option? Is it inconceivabe that taking a two-week vacation might've done Z's back some real good, or at the very least been infinitely kinder and easier on it than...playing in the Olympics? Why is it "Destroy back in Olympics or destroy back in the same way when the NHL resumes?" There are steps players can take to combat and minimize injury woes and risks. We're acting like the very concept of "maintenance days" is stupid because "Well, he's gonna get hurt anyway. Why bother resting up?"

 

I think had he not been named captain of the Swedish team, there's a reasonable chance he might not have gone. Same with Datsyuk. So, what I'm saying is, being captain sucks.


 

Yep, this is definitely worth considering. (Not sarcasm.)

 

Again I ask:  Why would a guy who's been playing very well night in and night out in Detroit, take a "two week vacation" rather than captain his country's Olympic team?  Just because he might re-aggravate an injury which hadn't seemed to be bothering him the last ten games he played before the break? 

 

Nobody was suggesting that Zetterberg was "walking wounded" for the last two weeks while his highlight reel play was making Nyquist look like a superstar.  Now all of a sudden it's, "He's been playing injured for weeks and he should have known better".  Fact is, he was feeling better and playing well in Detroit, so he came to the Olympics (like anyone would) and re-aggravated a pre-existing condition.  Simple as that.


GMRwings:  "Well, in other civilized countries, 16 years old isn't considered underage.  For instance, I believe the age of consent is 16 in Canada.  There's some US states where it's 16 as well.  

 

Get off the high horse.  Not like she was 10."

 

"Some girls are 17 even though they look 25."

 

 


#119 Rivalred

Rivalred

    Legend

  • HoF Booster
  • 7,270 posts

Posted 14 February 2014 - 06:27 PM

Get well Z, give it be you have to retire.
D-Fence Avatar Win-O-Meter 8-1

#120 Playmaker

Playmaker

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,189 posts

Posted 14 February 2014 - 07:01 PM

Well, let's see.

1. IOC does not insure anybody. The national hockey federations (like USA Hockey) do. They have done so in the past and there's no reason to doubt that they will pay if liable. The contracts are insured with he same pool of insurance companies that the NHL uses, so I don't see why it would make any difference to those insurance companies, whether they pay the same amount of money to the Red Wings on the policy taken by the Wings themselves, or by the Swedish Hockey Federation.

2. I don't know about "US Math" but in normal math, here's how it works:

The last 2 All-Star breaks were 5 days each.

The Olympic break this year consists of: Feb. 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23,  24. That's 16 days by my count (not 17). So the difference is 16 - 5 = 11 days. OK it's 11 days and not 9 days over almost 200 days season (Pre-season NHL games started Sept. 14, Playoffs will go till about the end of May). Such a biiig difference.

http://prohockeytalk...nsurance-costs/

 

Like I said, if you are going to call someone out for being wrong, at least be right.

 

Oh, so if you're close, you're not wrong? 9 days, 11 days, 16 days, who knows?  So you're wrong, but you're right?  The Red Wings break is through the 25th which is 17 days.  Math is not your strong point.







Similar Topics Collapse

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users