Jump to content


Photo
* * * * * 3 votes

3/7 GDT: Devils 4 at Red Wings 7


  • Please log in to reply
546 replies to this topic

#501 themcityblues

themcityblues

    2nd Line Scorer

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 740 posts

Posted 08 March 2014 - 01:19 AM

Anyone else think it's kind of crazy that tsn started off the season ranking the Wings around 12 and now they have them at 24th?  Seriously?  We're only better than 6 teams?



#502 dat's sick

dat's sick

    Fear can hold you prisoner, hope can set you free

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,352 posts
  • Location:Sweden

Posted 08 March 2014 - 01:21 AM

4th line is nice

Miller-Andersson-Bert

There might be use for old Bert yet. Results are showing on the power play

Well... no reason to break them up right now, but I wonder if they can keep it up. They still don't look great at times, they're a slow bunch when they get stuck in the defensive zone. But all 3 are good at shielding the puck along the boards and they also all got decent vision and hands making them an okay offensive threat. 

 

I wish Glendening could stop being an offensive black hole because just a little bit of offense from him would make him such a solid player. I wonder if Ferraro or Callahan can steal his job next year. 



#503 wings87

wings87

    Wake Up!

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,013 posts
  • Location:Texas

Posted 08 March 2014 - 01:25 AM

Why take a guy who specializes on dealing with personnel? and make him deal with assets? I have no idea if you have experience in business, but as someone who does, my best guess is you don't

 
I think you misunderstood me, by no means do I think that it makes any sense to make Babs the GM. My point was that in sports a lot of times experience trumps education. There have been plenty of coaches/managers that turn out to be great front office guys. GM's deal with assets as well as personnel, same as coaches do. Babs might even make a great GM, but not only does it not make any sense for the Wings to make him the GM, I'm also pretty sure it's not something that Babs would even consider. 

Edited by wings87, 08 March 2014 - 01:46 AM.

"He usually shows up when the game is over and tries to be the hero. Puts his cape on and goes and flies out there." ~ Franzen 


#504 nyqvististhefuture

nyqvististhefuture

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,339 posts

Posted 08 March 2014 - 01:40 AM

Well... no reason to break them up right now, but I wonder if they can keep it up. They still don't look great at times, they're a slow bunch when they get stuck in the defensive zone. But all 3 are good at shielding the puck along the boards and they also all got decent vision and hands making them an okay offensive threat. 
 
I wish Glendening could stop being an offensive black hole because just a little bit of offense from him would make him such a solid player. I wonder if Ferraro or Callahan can steal his job next year.


Got a good feeling about Callahan .... Glendening won't be in the league within 5 yrs guy has no skill with the puck

#505 themcityblues

themcityblues

    2nd Line Scorer

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 740 posts

Posted 08 March 2014 - 02:01 AM

Got a good feeling about Callahan .... Glendening won't be in the league within 5 yrs guy has no skill with the puck

Solidly agree with this.



#506 Dabura

Dabura

    Everydayer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,113 posts
  • Location:In an octopus's garden

Posted 08 March 2014 - 02:04 AM

This team could plausibly be #2 in the division and #3 in the conference come playoff time.

 

I have no idea how we're only two points back of the Bolts, but I'll take it!


Don't Toews me, bro!


#507 joesuffP

joesuffP

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,442 posts

Posted 08 March 2014 - 02:08 AM

With all the injuries these youngsters are getting a ton of great experience.

Nyquist is close to a point a game. Crazy season

#508 Dabura

Dabura

    Everydayer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,113 posts
  • Location:In an octopus's garden

Posted 08 March 2014 - 02:13 AM

Got a good feeling about Callahan .... Glendening won't be in the league within 5 yrs guy has no skill with the puck

 

Everyone and his mom has a good feeling about Callahan. I'm not seeing it.

 

Glendening's no Datsyuk, but he's not supposed to be. His job is to shut down other players, kill penalties, agitate, win faceoffs, work hard, be physical. He's not the top-sixer Babcock is asking him to be.


Don't Toews me, bro!


#509 wingslionstigers

wingslionstigers

    4th Line Grinder

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 341 posts

Posted 08 March 2014 - 02:23 AM

 

Jarnkrok was arguably our best prospect. People all around the hockey world weren't praising him to make Red Wings fans feel good. He's an elite young talent, and it's a big blow to lose him. That and the fact that we needed Legwand don't have to be mutually exclusive. We don't have to act like Jarnkrok's an overrated scrub who ANYONE WITH EYES could see was never a high-end player and was never going to be one. That's lame.

 

Along the same lines... it's easy to say now that we didn't in fact need Brunner at all and that OBVIOUSLY he was just a one-dimensional player who was gonna crash and burn blah blah blah. But, truth is, there's nothing to say he wouldn't have been a good player for us this season. Look at all the surprises we've had.

 

I guess I'm being a wet blanket. Apologies. I just feel like if we're gonna play the HA! EVERYONE WAS CRYING ABOUT IT BUT THE TRULY WISE AMONG US KNEW BETTER game, well, how many of us knew Sheahan would be playing and producing like a legitimate second-line pivot this season? How many of us knew Gustavsson would be the better goalie?


What has Jarnkrok done? I'm not asking at the pro level because it was obviously to earlier for that. But please explain to me in his hockey career what he has done for anyone to think he is going to be a point per game NHL player. On the 2012-13 Sweden WC A team he recorded 1 point in 10 games at -2. The year before that 1 point in 8 games. Look up Swedish players who exceled in the NHL, Zetterberg, Backstrom, etc and tell me the difference. Jarnkrok was a 4th line grinder on that team with that type of talent. Sure Jarnkrok posted somewhat similar stats in the SEL to those guys. Jarnkrok was a good prospect but I'm not believing for a minute he was going to be anything close to a Zetterberg and to be honest, this team has enough 3rd liners for the foreseeable future. We needed a real number two. Pav is going to be around for a little while and we have plenty of time to find a new number one.

On to Brunner it was actually very easy to see then. Anyone that watches the game conscious to the details with the ability to apply logic when analyzing a player could see it with ease. Although what I just described seems to be RARE now days and that is the truth. Talk about sheep, but thats another subject for a different place. Everyone was smoke screened by Brunners somewhat flashy plays he rarely pulled off and the fortunate points he was able to put up early on. The guy did put up a few at first but he scored them because of the line mates he played with. Nobody seemed to notice how many easy goals he didn't score because his shot was unreliable and weak. His lack of strength and desire to battle in corners or help out defensively. The guy sucked. For a quick moment after you ignored his clear flaws it looked like maybe he would just be one of those guys that just might somehow plug in with Z or Datsyuk and manage to produce ok points. It didn't last and once he got demoted he didn't do anything. He hasn't done much sense. I said it then and I say the same thing now.

What surpises did we have? Nyquist wasn't a surprise this year, it was clear last year this guy was serious. We seen enough of Tatar last year to know he had some serious talent too. Their stats in the AHL backed what we saw at first NHL glimpse. There was a clear difference between Nyquist and Tatar's first 8 games than compared to say Andersson or Glendenning. Talent is not that hard to spot, and when you spot talent and see hard work ethics combined with solid skating abilities and vision then you know you have something, very rarely you won't. Which Nyquist and Tatar had all of. Those guys were easy to spot from a distance. Last year I said those guys could be anywhere from top 3 forwards and at worst 4th to 6th forwards on a good team. Nyquist being likely a top 3 and Tatar more likely at the bottom of the top six. Sheahan did come as a surprise as in nobody thought he would walk in and be a guy ready to stick around from the start. Sheahan has shown no ability to ever be as good as Nyquist is going to be. Sheahan looks like maybe a really good 3rd liner. Regardless I guess he is still a nice gift for this roster to receive earlier than recently projected.

The reason I get into this guys. Is not to say anybody is stupid but let's start seeing the big picture and look at what we have going forward. Just think and analyze things, stop reading other peoples conclusions and spreading this negativity about our team and its future. A few people started this and everybody takes it for fact like it must be right. It's like social media advertising all the crap it does and people eat it up and don't question any of it. Use your own brain. Its sad really. This team and prospect pool excites me more than it has in a long time. Our team is really good and we got a lot more coming. The hardest part is going to figure out who we keep and who we trade off because of an over abundance of good players. We are not going to be able to afford it all. If we are missing a piece Holland will get it don't worry. He has been clearly trying but the right piece for the right price hasn't showed up at the right time. Free agency is hard to get a good player for a good price now days. A big piece is likely going to have to come via trade. We haven't had the chips to trade in the past. We have chips now but we need to cash those chips in on our current roster, we are re-tooling and we will have plenty of chips left over after we finish the process. That is when left over chips can be used to bring something big in that puts our team over the top. It's a very simple process to understand. It is exactly what Holland is doing. Holland didn't make that bad of moves with Sammy, Bert, etc. What happened here was simply a miscalculation. We knew Nyquist and Tatar were going to be good, but what we did not know is that they would 'already' be this good. He calculated we needed these guys to fill out roster for another season before we started cashing in the chips. Any one of us could have made that mistake. Some of you guys just have no concept of what these GM's are faced with when your trying to stay competitive, develop properly and transition these guys in at the right times. Ken Holland knows what he is doing and it becomes very clear when you break down and deeply analyze it as well as the situations he previously and will soon be faced with. This team is on a very calculated plan with constant projections of whats going to happen this year, next year, the year after. Holland knows decisions made today have to be parallel with what he has projected in three years from now for example.You just can't always make the right moves I don't care how intelligent you are. If you think Ken Holland is honestly stupid your a fool and need reevaluate your thought process and understanding of your own mind and the world around you.

Bring back the positive energy to this fan base and stand behind this promising team and for f**** sakes quit your B****ing. I just wish we could talk intelligently about hockey around these forums and not have to skim threw post of whiners every time something isn't perfect.

Oh one more thing. Remember Filppula, I told everyone here years ago how good this kid is and how important to our team he is. Look what happened when we got Weiss, most finally realized it. Fil made the Red Wings a much harder team to play against and increased our teams puck possession time. Most probably don't have the brain capacity to understand how much an extra couple minutes per game of a player on their team floating around with the puck on your teams stick increases your odds of winning games through out the season. Point here, appreciate guys like Franzen. Who only have a salary hit of 3.9 million per year who can clearly keep this team a float with two of the best players in the world injured. What a beast and what a shame for all you people who disrespect him any night he doesn't score 2 goals.

 



#510 Datsyukian-Deke

Datsyukian-Deke

    1st Line Sniper

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 783 posts

Posted 08 March 2014 - 02:50 AM

If we make the playoffs Babcock deserves coach of the year!

#511 themcityblues

themcityblues

    2nd Line Scorer

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 740 posts

Posted 08 March 2014 - 02:56 AM

I think Brunner had a chance to be a good player, if he could adapt to "the system" and grow into the role.  Sort of like his attitude towards resigning (or his agent's), Brunner had no attutide for the team.  That's why he's worthless.  It's not that he doesn't have skill (remember the SO goal?)

 

Franzen may score goals but he seems easy to play against.  Lazy, floats.  Compare that to Fillipula who makes your team difficult to play against.  For every goal Fil scored to every goal Franzen scored should be calculated 1.2:1.0



#512 joesuffP

joesuffP

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,442 posts

Posted 08 March 2014 - 03:08 AM

Other teams seem to get a lot more frustrated and angry at Franzen then they ever did at Flippula

#513 themcityblues

themcityblues

    2nd Line Scorer

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 740 posts

Posted 08 March 2014 - 03:09 AM

That's true.  He's getting under their skin.  I didn't think about that.  Kind of remembering the old Franzen I guess.



#514 peabrain

peabrain

    Jr. Prospect

  • Member
  • 16 posts

Posted 08 March 2014 - 03:20 AM

Legwand has been the #1 C on a team thats biggest problem had always been forwards. I think his best line mate ever was that bum Radulov. Gotta think his numbers may increase now that he's got legit wingers.


I see a problem here. It's called negotiating new contract.

#515 GoalieManPat

GoalieManPat

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,412 posts
  • Location:Swartz Creek, MI

Posted 08 March 2014 - 04:47 AM

Howard gives up 3 last night, one of which was a terrible unlucky bounce and another a complete defensive breakdown, and gets crucified by the fans after the game. The next night Gus gives up 4 and looks shakier than Howard yet the offense bails him out with 7 goals and not a peep about his less than stellar game. More proof that Wings fans will never be happy with a goaltender and will always be wanting "the next one" instead of the current one.



#516 Ekmanc

Ekmanc

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,118 posts

Posted 08 March 2014 - 06:51 AM

Well Howard lets in bouncy crap goals last game while the 3/4 of the goals monster let in were pretty much perfect shots.

#517 wings4thecup06

wings4thecup06

    1st Line Sniper

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 934 posts
  • Location:London, United Kingdom

Posted 08 March 2014 - 07:20 AM

Howard gives up 3 last night, one of which was a terrible unlucky bounce and another a complete defensive breakdown, and gets crucified by the fans after the game. The next night Gus gives up 4 and looks shakier than Howard yet the offense bails him out with 7 goals and not a peep about his less than stellar game. More proof that Wings fans will never be happy with a goaltender and will always be wanting "the next one" instead of the current one.

 

I agree. No way in hell Gus should have let Elias blast that buy him from the top of the circle no less. That started the whole thing for the Devils last night, but luckily we responded. I've liked Gus this year, he's been very very solid, and I don't know where we would be right now without him. But Jimmy is our number 1, and IMO he's played solid the last month or so. 

 

I'd go back with Howie tomorrow at MSG.


temp 1

 


#518 SFwingsfan

SFwingsfan

    Helm's Hoes

  • HoF Booster
  • 249 posts
  • Location:Chicago

Posted 08 March 2014 - 08:33 AM

 "Franzen has five goals and six assist for 11 points in the five games since the Olympic break" 


Edited by SFwingsfan, 08 March 2014 - 08:34 AM.


#519 darkmanx

darkmanx

    Toronto's Finest

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,776 posts
  • Location:Toronto, Canada

Posted 08 March 2014 - 08:48 AM

Howard gives up 3 last night, one of which was a terrible unlucky bounce and another a complete defensive breakdown, and gets crucified by the fans after the game. The next night Gus gives up 4 and looks shakier than Howard yet the offense bails him out with 7 goals and not a peep about his less than stellar game. More proof that Wings fans will never be happy with a goaltender and will always be wanting "the next one" instead of the current one.

 

Are we basing this off one game ? Howard has sucked almost all year, Gus has won us some big games.



#520 Dabura

Dabura

    Everydayer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,113 posts
  • Location:In an octopus's garden

Posted 08 March 2014 - 08:54 AM

Howard gives up 3 last night, one of which was a terrible unlucky bounce and another a complete defensive breakdown, and gets crucified by the fans after the game. The next night Gus gives up 4 and looks shakier than Howard yet the offense bails him out with 7 goals and not a peep about his less than stellar game. More proof that Wings fans will never be happy with a goaltender and will always be wanting "the next one" instead of the current one.

 

What it proves is that Wings fans, like fans of any and every other team, value winning above all else. If we're losing, everyone and everything sucks. If we're winning, everyone and everything is awesome (except for Quincey).

 

I will say, though: the Howard-never-makes-the-big-save argument is pretty weak. I feel like every game Howard plays there's at least one major stop that has everyone here saying, "Now that's the Howard we know!" There was definitely at least one of those in the Avs game. And then everyone turned right around and said, "He never makes the big stop!" Seriously?

 

Doesn't matter, though. Winning matters, and, for whatever reasons, we win with Gustavsson in net. That's mostly down to us scoring more when he's in net, but, hey, when deciding which goalie you want to ride, every consideration should be fair game. Of course, that's not how it works. Howard is getting paid an ass-ton to be a top goalie in this league and carry us to a Cup, so he's gonna get every opportunity to get back on the horse and regain the form which has mostly eluded him this season.


Don't Toews me, bro!






Similar Topics Collapse

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users