Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Canada can support 3 more teams in 20yrs


  • Please log in to reply
87 replies to this topic

#1 FireCaptain

FireCaptain

    This space for rent.

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,920 posts
  • Location:Atoka, TN

Posted 11 May 2014 - 04:43 PM

At least that's what a study says...

 

"The board suggested Monday that in addition to Canada's seven existing NHL teams, Quebec City and Hamilton, Ont., appear to meet minimum requirements to become home to franchises in the near future.

In the longer term, another franchise could eventually find its way to the Toronto area, but a lot of money and population growth would be required for the region to support two teams."

 

 

http://www.thehockey...-NHL-teams.html

 

 


Most nights, my posts are brought to you by Heineken and sarcasm.
Success has a thousand fathers, failure is an orphan.
We not score, is hard to win. - Pavel Datsyuk #13

#2 SDavis35

SDavis35

    1st Line Sniper

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 935 posts
  • Location:Burlington, ON

Posted 11 May 2014 - 06:08 PM

Hamilton AND two Toronto teams? I'm not so sure about that... 



#3 GMRwings1983

GMRwings1983

    The Killer is Me

  • Silver Booster
  • 20,852 posts
  • Location:Jerkwater, USA

Posted 11 May 2014 - 06:12 PM

I can't wait until the Saskatoon Panthers and the Halifax Predators are actual teams in the NHL.

 

:nhl2:


According to my profile, my reputation is excellent. LOL.

#4 PredsFanTheBayouState

PredsFanTheBayouState

    3rd Line Checker

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 497 posts
  • Location:louisiana

Posted 11 May 2014 - 06:59 PM

I can't wait until the Saskatoon Panthers and the Halifax Predators are actual teams in the NHL.

 

:nhl2:

Excuse me,Halifax will have to find a new name for their team,because the Predators will still be in Nashville,I have already been through a sale of the Nashville Predators and that took a toll on me,i ain't gonna go through another one



#5 FireCaptain

FireCaptain

    This space for rent.

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,920 posts
  • Location:Atoka, TN

Posted 11 May 2014 - 06:59 PM

Pretty sure Nashville's not going anywhere.

 

The article is about expansion, not relocation..

 

 

I can't wait until the Saskatoon Panthers and the Halifax Predators are actual teams in the NHL.

 

:nhl2:


Most nights, my posts are brought to you by Heineken and sarcasm.
Success has a thousand fathers, failure is an orphan.
We not score, is hard to win. - Pavel Datsyuk #13

#6 cusimano_brothers

cusimano_brothers

    Legend

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,615 posts
  • Location:Niagara Falls, ON

Posted 11 May 2014 - 07:23 PM

s-GARY-BETTMAN-HARPER-large.jpg?6

 

"You lost me after I heard "expansion into Canada".

 

Sadly, our dollar is currently undervalued about ten cents, being used as an incentive for investment dollars to flow into our glorious country.


"Mess up tomorrow, don't mess up now".

- Harry James Benson, CBE.


#7 GMRwings1983

GMRwings1983

    The Killer is Me

  • Silver Booster
  • 20,852 posts
  • Location:Jerkwater, USA

Posted 11 May 2014 - 08:13 PM

Expansion is a terrible idea.

 

30 teams is already a lot and there are too many "non traditional hockey markets" still somehow holding on to teams.  


According to my profile, my reputation is excellent. LOL.

#8 frankgrimes

frankgrimes

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,220 posts

Posted 11 May 2014 - 08:30 PM

Canada should have at least nine and the us around 15 30 is way too much. But with a new York lawyer running the show I've given up on good decisions for the game till he is fired

Edited by frankgrimes, 11 May 2014 - 08:31 PM.

kftx.jpg

 

The Offseason of truth ...

Welcome to hockeytown Jonas aka Lundquist 2 Gustavsson!

blank cheque for The Captain or Jim Star Nil please..

<< Win it for Mr. Hockey !


#9 Euro_Twins

Euro_Twins

    Healthy Scratch

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,576 posts
  • Location:Windsor, Ontario

Posted 11 May 2014 - 08:57 PM

Canada should have at least nine and the us around 15 30 is way too much.But with a new York lawyer running the show I've given up on good decisions for the game till he is fired

I'd say 8 and 16, but that's just me nitpicking

#10 Richdg

Richdg

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,952 posts

Posted 11 May 2014 - 09:06 PM

The NHL will go to 32 at some point. Not sure if Canada will get the teams though. Salt Lake, Seattle, Milwaukee, Grand Rapids, Portland, Las Vegas are all bigger cities/markets than any city in Canada which doesn't have a team.

 

As for bettmen, the owners love him, get over it.



#11 darkmanx

darkmanx

    Toronto's Finest

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,736 posts
  • Location:Toronto, Canada

Posted 11 May 2014 - 09:16 PM

The NHL will go to 32 at some point. Not sure if Canada will get the teams though. Salt Lake, Seattle, Milwaukee, Grand Rapids, Portland, Las Vegas are all bigger cities/markets than any city in Canada which doesn't have a team.

 

As for bettmen, the owners love him, get over it.

 

Toronto (Hamilton / Markham) could have two teams quite easily. Leafs will fight for it not to happen which is why it probably won't.



#12 PredsFanTheBayouState

PredsFanTheBayouState

    3rd Line Checker

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 497 posts
  • Location:louisiana

Posted 11 May 2014 - 09:34 PM

Expansion is a terrible idea.

 

30 teams is already a lot and there are too many "non traditional hockey markets" still somehow holding on to teams.  

i hate the term non traditional hockey markets,it's kind of a snobbish term that   the nothern/canadian hockey teams use



#13 GMRwings1983

GMRwings1983

    The Killer is Me

  • Silver Booster
  • 20,852 posts
  • Location:Jerkwater, USA

Posted 11 May 2014 - 10:08 PM

i hate the term non traditional hockey markets,it's kind of a snobbish term that   the nothern/canadian hockey teams use

 

The term means what it is meant to say.  Florida, Carolina, Phoenix, Columbus and Dallas were the five teams with the worst attendance this season, based on percentage of tickets sold.  All non-traditional markets.  

 

The league needs to cut base with these places, and try moving the teams elsewhere; or contract these teams altogether.  Instead, the league wants to expand, this time to Canadian cities that probably can't handle an NHL team.    


According to my profile, my reputation is excellent. LOL.

#14 PredsFanTheBayouState

PredsFanTheBayouState

    3rd Line Checker

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 497 posts
  • Location:louisiana

Posted 11 May 2014 - 10:19 PM

 

The term means what it is meant to say.  Florida, Carolina, Phoenix, Columbus and Dallas were the five teams with the worst attendance this season, based on percentage of tickets sold.  All non-traditional markets.  

 

The league needs to cut base with these places, and try moving the teams elsewhere; or contract these teams altogether.  Instead, the league wants to expand, this time to Canadian cities that probably can't handle an NHL team.    

if the league thinks that those team need to be moved then they will be moved,but until then they are staying right where they are.

 

i googled the term non traditional hockey market and this is what i found:

Any place that polar bears and/or eskimos don't need a parka to survive. (Usually a term used by northern/canadian hockey snobs to try and deter southern fans)
Dallas is a non-traditional hockey market


#15 Seraph

Seraph

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,148 posts
  • Location:Detroit, MI

Posted 12 May 2014 - 05:03 AM

I've always supported a team in the pacific northwest. They're so bored that soccer is huge there. I think they'd rally around a hockey team pretty easy.

Formerly known as The Nephilim.

QUOTE (Amberoonie)
Babs sure hurries himself into the presser, sits down, and f*cks up a bottle of water like no one in the room has had any for days.


#16 Z Winged Dangler

Z Winged Dangler

    Part 3: Return of the Hammer Hands

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,219 posts
  • Location:Winnipeg, MB

Posted 12 May 2014 - 06:34 AM

 

Toronto (Hamilton / Markham) could have two teams quite easily. Leafs will fight for it not to happen which is why it probably won't.

Yeah there was talk about Markham getting a team, which is weird cause it's basically just a different district of Toronto.  But whoever said Toronto needs to grow, i'm not sure they've been here.  This place is too big for it's own good, and is actually quite annoying.  The issue that came up with Hamilton is that it also fit in the whole geographical boundaries or whatever for the Leafs and the Sabres.  The Sabres also get a lot of Canadian business as it's closer for many and much cheaper and easier to get to games than Toronto, where you can't get tickets unless you deal with scalpers half the time.  Personally, I believe that the next place that gets a team will be Seattle and then QC.  After that, maybe Hamilton will get a team, but I really think that relocation should be back on the table for a team like Florida.  Nashville isn't going anywhere.  They have a strong fanbase from what i've seen/heard and their fans have really seem to have taken to the game.


"I play hockey, but I am not very good.  Can someone please tell me what it would take to sign with the Wings ? I can use a million or two."  ~ arag

 

Dan Cleary is an Xbox 360.  While good for a while, it's time for the new generation to take over.


#17 FireCaptain

FireCaptain

    This space for rent.

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,920 posts
  • Location:Atoka, TN

Posted 12 May 2014 - 09:09 AM


I've always supported a team in the pacific northwest. They're so bored that soccer is huge there. I think they'd rally around a hockey team pretty easy.

 

I found the new coach and GM.

 

portlandia_07-11-11_sg_00428-84e0e7d70bd


Most nights, my posts are brought to you by Heineken and sarcasm.
Success has a thousand fathers, failure is an orphan.
We not score, is hard to win. - Pavel Datsyuk #13

#18 vladdy16

vladdy16

    The rest are neophytes.

  • HoF Booster Mod
  • 6,231 posts

Posted 12 May 2014 - 09:55 AM

i hate the term non traditional hockey markets,it's kind of a snobbish term that   the nothern/canadian hockey teams use

i don't think it's snobbish at all.  I think it's as polite as you can get in describing a place where you wouldn't normally expect hockey or where the game doesn't already have a solid foothold.


Can't wait to read the "Phoenix: I still think it's a hockey market" chapter of Gary Bettman's autobiography. I'm guessing it's going to be chapter 11.

- mjlegend 3/9/2011

#19 DickieDunn

DickieDunn

    http://redwingsandotherthings.wordpress.com/

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,530 posts
  • Location:Belding

Posted 12 May 2014 - 10:02 AM

NHL needs to invest heavily in youth programs to grow the game. Kids play, they will watch. They need to get rid of the "it's a white sport" attitude a lot of minorities have. I can almost guarantee there will be 2 more teams to balance the conferences, either in the west or moving teams from the east. Florida should move. Phoenix will move eventually. They gave up on Atlanta too fast.

Oh this young man has had a very trying rookie season, with the litigation, the notoriety, his subsequent deportation to Canada and that country's refusal to accept him, well, I guess that's more than most 21-year-olds can handle... Ogie Ogilthorpe!


#20 frankgrimes

frankgrimes

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,220 posts

Posted 12 May 2014 - 11:56 AM

 

if the league thinks that those team need to be moved then they will be moved,but until then they are staying right where they are.

 

i googled the term non traditional hockey market and this is what i found:

Any place that polar bears and/or eskimos don't need a parka to survive. (Usually a term used by northern/canadian hockey snobs to try and deter southern fans)
Dallas is a non-traditional hockey market

 

 

The game is called ICEhockey for a reason, so if you put icehockey into places where you have almost no winters, not a lot of funding AND a non winning enviroment it's a setup for a team to fail. Personally speaking I don't want the game to grow. Less teams would be a good thing for a lot of the Original 6 teams:
 

- less revenue sharing

- less competiton for playoffs, stanley cups

- more talent for less teams = higher talent pool

- players: stars/superstars can finally get their huge paydays without GMs having to worry about the cap

 

This stupid "more scoring, oh no we can't have a white sport, grow the game" and other mantras are really pissing me off. If people want to see double or triple digits = watch NFL, NBA ...if people don't want to watch a white sport watch NBA, NFL, soccer where countries even have to  take foreigners into the national teams because the real natives have given up on the sport (as did fans). Constantly tweaking and bitching things about the game will only lead to the following: fans who are happy will give up and it's harder to gain new fans than to keep the old ones.

 

The best analogy would be the Simpsons: look at this great series during the early episodes and compare them to now ? It's almost like two complete different series, they've completely lost their charme because some smartguy thought it would be a good idea to go even more mainstream and change from hand drawn to computer animated episodes and add more "pop references" ...changing for the sake of change is not always the way to go.

 

If the Stars, Jackets, Coyotes and Panthers aren't cutting it then move them to Canada, the league didn't have a problem moving the Jets, Nordiques and other teams from Canada...so fair is fair.

 

Also as a disclaimer:

I have absolutely nothing against their fanbases but if not enough people are showing up, what can you do ? Expecting other teams to pay for their failures ? That's just stupid because it would mean teams like the Wings are helping the competition out and the reward would be losinga gainst them ? Sorry, but no.

 

 btw. the league can't support 30 teams so going to 32 would not only be overkill but absolutely idiotic. My personall view is, even support 24 - 28 is a hard thing at some point sports become too big for their own good - i.e soccer - hope that doesn't happen to hockey in my lifetime.


Edited by frankgrimes, 12 May 2014 - 12:08 PM.

kftx.jpg

 

The Offseason of truth ...

Welcome to hockeytown Jonas aka Lundquist 2 Gustavsson!

blank cheque for The Captain or Jim Star Nil please..

<< Win it for Mr. Hockey !






Similar Topics Collapse

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users