• Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

Sign in to follow this  
kipwinger

Wings sign Defenseman Joe Hicketts to Entry Level Contract.

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

Adding small guys to the D only means he probably needs to be paired with one of the largest guys you have. He won't be able to push guys around in the D zone, so it's best to have a guy with a long reach, who can cover a lot of ice, next to him.

Chara - Krug is a good example in my mind.

Edited by number9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Adding small guys to the D only means he probably needs to be paired with one of the largest guys you have. He won't be able to push guys around in the D zone, so it's best to have a guy with a long reach, who can cover a lot of ice, next to him.

Chara - Krug is a good example in my mind.

I thought Chara and Boychuk were a pair? I never, ever, heard that Krug had been promoted to top pair minutes last year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought Chara and Boychuk were a pair? I never, ever, heard that Krug had been promoted to top pair minutes last year.

Part of me knew this was coming. I said that knowing they played on the PP together. I assumed they were paired together, at least occasionally, outside of that. I'm probably wrong, but I think the point I was trying to make still makes sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Adding small guys to the D only means he probably needs to be paired with one of the largest guys you have. He won't be able to push guys around in the D zone, so it's best to have a guy with a long reach, who can cover a lot of ice, next to him.

Chara - Krug is a good example in my mind.

He was with paired with Nedomlel in Traverse City, and they worked well together.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Part of me knew this was coming. I said that knowing they played on the PP together. I assumed they were paired together, at least occasionally, outside of that. I'm probably wrong, but I think the point I was trying to make still makes sense.

I'd agree that in general you'd want a big guy paired with a little guy to help out in the d-zone. But the broader point would be that regardless of his partner, Hicketts (like Torey Krug) is too small to defend against NHL forwards and would have to be EXTREMELY sheltered. Krug, for instance, only played around 14:30 minutes per game at even strength. He just got a TON of icetime on the powerplay (led their team). So in a role like that, I could see Hicketts being viable. But at his size, unless he turns out to have Rafalski like passing, he should never be allowed to sniff top four minutes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Adding small guys to the D only means he probably needs to be paired with one of the largest guys you have. He won't be able to push guys around in the D zone, so it's best to have a guy with a long reach, who can cover a lot of ice, next to him.

Chara - Krug is a good example in my mind.

It depends. Lidstrom - Rafalski was one of the best pairings we ever had. Lidstrom was bigger than most people realise, but he wasn't physical - although he did make whoever he was paired with look better.

As for Hicketts, he can skate (which Almquist couldn't) and he's quite physical and feisty by all accounts, despite his size. Reading around people who've watched him in Junior, the consensus is that if he were 2-3 inches taller he'd have gone in the 1st round.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this