• Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

Hockeytown0001

9/22 Exhibition GDT : @ Chicago Blackhawks 5, Red Wings 4 (OT)

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

Oh, so now you agree that I had him on my roster? And it never was anything about an eye for talent. My stance has been for a while now that Jensen deserves a shot (as do all 4 of the kids.) I always chose Jensen because of the 4, he seemed to be the least likely to be a top 4 guy and that the other 3 should not come up to be #7.

But just like always when you are wrong, you just try to attack someone from a different angle. All three of you guys should just admit you were wrong on this one and go about your day. That is the difference between us, sure I am loud and boisterous and talk a lot of crap, but when I am proven wrong, I do own up to it and admit it. You guys can't and won't. Don't worry Dudez, you internet cred is still good, even if you admit you aren't as k00l as you think you are.

I am owning up to it. I said you didn't mention Jensen, when you did. You had him penciled into Brian Lashoff's old spot. You clearly recognized his potential (on one of your many different lineups). On another one you had Sproul in that spot. If he had had a good game last night you could have gloated about that.

I said you didn't mention him, and I was wrong. You had quite clearly given him his rightful place as 7th defenseman on one of your lineups. And now you're vindicated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice spin Kip. Whether or not he is in the press box, he was on my roster and you guys just jumped on the flame bus trying to make fun of me by saying I never mentioned him ONCE.

#7 or not, someone has to be, I think he deserves #7 minutes to see what he has in the REAL NHL and maybe he can steal a job. That's all I said and have said in the past, nothing about eye for talent or anything. I simply said he deserves some NHL time to try to prove he can play, and being at #7 would get him that. But now that your true colors are shining again, you are exposed. I see the other two either ran away with their tail between their legs or are on a mission to dig up something else I said (or they think I said or didn't say) just to save face.


That's not even the point Kip. First I didn't GLOAT about Jensen. if you read my response to the OP, I said I agree, Jensen deserves a shot and I have had him on my roster. Zombo, who seems butt hurt on flaming me every chance he or she gets, decided to attempt to call me out by saying I didn't mention him, then you two piled on. #7 is still on the roster, it's not about recognizing talent or wasting talent in the press box. It's about Jensen being promoted to the #7 spot in Detroit in order to get SOME NHL playing time and try to prove he belongs. Simple, never GLAOTED about any of it, simply agreed with another user and then you guys showed up to try to make fun and flame me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice spin Kip. Whether or not he is in the press box, he was on my roster and you guys just jumped on the flame bus trying to make fun of me by saying I never mentioned him ONCE.

#7 or not, someone has to be, I think he deserves #7 minutes to see what he has in the REAL NHL and maybe he can steal a job. That's all I said and have said in the past, nothing about eye for talent or anything. I simply said he deserves some NHL time to try to prove he can play, and being at #7 would get him that. But now that your true colors are shining again, you are exposed. I see the other two either ran away with their tail between their legs or are on a mission to dig up

something else I said (or they think I said or didn't say) just to save face.

It's not spin. You totally mentioned him as the 7th defenseman one time. Another time you said Kindl should be, and if not Kindl then Jensen. And the third time you said Ouellet/Jensen/Sproul.

So again, props, you totally called it. One of the four guys you mentioned as a 7th defenseman had a good game last night and you knew it all along.

I had silly old Smith as my 7th. What do I know? You were right and I was wrong. You definitely mentioned Jensen...as well as three other guys.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...and to be fair about your mention of me having Sproul, I can honestly say, without a doubt that more times than not I had Jensen on my roster a lot more than Sproul. Honestly I don't even remember having Sproul there (not saying I didn't) so I probably would not have said the same thing about Sproul as I did Jensen. Of the 4 kids I have always been more in favor of Jensen coming up to #7 than the others because the others always seemed to have a higher top out than Jensen so I always felt they would be wasted at #7, but Jensen always seemed to be the one less mentioned in a top 4 capacity, so that is why I always penciled him in at #7. Not eye for talent, but an eye for trying to get one of them up here now instead of all 4 next year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't "call" anything, nor did I know it all along. Again, show me in my post where I "gloated" about being "right" about Jensen. I didn't gloat nor did I say I was right, I say to another user, I agree, Jensen deserves a shot, I have had him on my roster for a while. I don't see a gloat.

I know you guys get pissed at me for Franzen, but this has nothing to do with him. If I did gloat about Jensen, and said I told you so, etc...I could see the excuse for the attack by you guys, but I didn't, and then when I was pretty much called a liar about Jensen, I blew up because I knew what my roster scenario said.

You guys flame me all the time about me talking about getting rid of Q, K and E and in most if not all those trade scenarios, my D ends up with Jensen at #7. I am not even mad that you guys make fun of me by saying I should be a scout or my eye for talent sarcasm, but it pissed me off when you guys piled up on me because you guys said I never mentioned him on my roster(s.) That is why I got angry. When I deserved to be flamed, I take it and lick my wounds, just like when I liked the Franzen and Q signing's initially, you guys were right about those, I did initially like them, but have grown to hate them. When I get flamed on those, I deserve it, but I did not deserve this and my reaction was just.


...and no, I did not mention a bunch of guys at #7 in the roster thread, it was Jensen. There were different top 6 pairings, but Jensen was #7 in the three mentions of rosters.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love to dig.

Pretty much every time you listed Jensen as a #7 this summer it was some weird fantasy scenario where you had Ericsson or Quincey cut/traded, and had other players we didn't even sign like Franson in the lineup.

Then other times you did the same thing and listed Marchenko or Sproul as your 7th.

The few times that you did give a D lineup with our actual D you listed Kindl as your 7th, or you didn't list a 7th at all.

So again no, you didn't have Jensen in your lineup "all summer". But I'm glad we hashed this out deeper. The tantrums are more fun than being right lol

Oh, and yeah, Itoldyaso

Edited by number9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

9, 9, 9....tsk tsk...the argument was that I never even mentioned him once in the roster thread. Which was proven I did, each time I made a roster he was on it. So, thanks again for being you and never being able to admit you're wrong. That's ok, because even though you do prove me wrong sometimes, it way fun when you get proved wrong then try to run around and deflect that fact. But again, thanks for everything! I look forward to the time you tell me I never said Mrazek will take Jimmy's job.

I guess the words "most the summer" were wrong, but that was not the debate. Although I have had Jensen on my roster before and even back to the end of last season. I agree I have had some other guys there as well, but Jensen has made MULTIPLE appearances there. And yes, it was always at the expense of dumping one of Q, K, E or Smith and it still is, because in order for MORE THAN ONE of the kids to fit next season, more than just Q has to be gone next off season.

Edited by LeftWinger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

9, 9, 9....tsk tsk...the argument was that I never even mentioned him once in the roster thread. Which was proven I did, each time I made a roster he was on it. So, thanks again for being you and never being able to admit you're wrong. That's ok, because even though you do prove me wrong sometimes, it way fun when you get proved wrong then try to run around and deflect that fact. But again, thanks for everything! I look forward to the time you tell me I never said Mrazek will take Jimmy's job.

No, this all stemmed from your original comment "Jensen has been on my roster all summer" and that is not the case as I've shown. I never claimed you never mentioned him, you can reread the thread.

You failed to include him in many of your rosters.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I cannot agree with you more. I've had Jensen on my roster pretty much all summer long. I also agree that, unfortunately, Smith has seemed to top out. He has some value in trade right now, K not much, but you could keep K as a 7th dman with Jensen and him rotating in the 6th spot. I still don't know what we're going to do when all 4 kids are out if exemptions next season. Miele played great, yet another hard working player that earns his paycheck that there is no room for because of overcrowding of players, a couple that are very replaceable.

9, 9, 9....tsk tsk...the argument was that I never even mentioned him once in the roster thread. Which was proven I did, each time I made a roster he was on it. So, thanks again for being you and never being able to admit you're wrong. That's ok, because even though you do prove me wrong sometimes, it way fun when you get proved wrong then try to run around and deflect that fact. But again, thanks for everything! I look forward to the time you tell me I never said Mrazek will take Jimmy's job.

I guess the words "most the summer" were wrong, but that was not the debate. Although I have had Jensen on my roster before and even back to the end of last season. I agree I have had some other guys there as well, but Jensen has made MULTIPLE appearances there. And yes, it was always at the expense of dumping one of Q, K, E or Smith and it still is, because in order for MORE THAN ONE of the kids to fit next season, more than just Q has to be gone next off season.

Nice revisionist history. You've proven time and time again you're the best at it.

The debate is that you said you've had him on your roster all summer long. That's simply not true. And all your kicking and screaming won't change it.

9, 9, 9....tsk tsk...the argument was that I never even mentioned him once in the roster thread. Which was proven I did, each time I made a roster he was on it. So, thanks again for being you and never being able to admit you're wrong. That's ok, because even though you do prove me wrong sometimes, it way fun when you get proved wrong then try to run around and deflect that fact. But again, thanks for everything! I look forward to the time you tell me I never said Mrazek will take Jimmy's job.

I guess the words "most the summer" were wrong, but that was not the debate. Although I have had Jensen on my roster before and even back to the end of last season. I agree I have had some other guys there as well, but Jensen has made MULTIPLE appearances there. And yes, it was always at the expense of dumping one of Q, K, E or Smith and it still is, because in order for MORE THAN ONE of the kids to fit next season, more than just Q has to be gone next off season.

Mrazek will never take Jimmy's job, so I will be telling you nothing of the sort.

Edited by number9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmmm, Mrazek sure did a great job tonight in taking another step towards taking Jimmy's job.

Fact: I've included Jensen on my rosters on many occasion, NOT just in the most recent thread. You are the king of looking up old posts, please do so, I may not have mention him ALL the time, but I have mentioned him tons, and way before the latest thread. Good day sir.

Let's see, so far this preseason, Jimmy 3 goals against, roughly 30 minutes of play, the other 3 goalies 2 goals against in 90 minutes of play.

The debate was that I did not even mention him ONCE on my roster. I said he was on my roster basically all summer, your little buddy pulled up post #4 in the lines thread and said I didn't have him on my roster, then you guys piled on with the chastising like you are some sort of sped schooler laughing and pointing that I was busted because I didn't have him on my roster. IF the debate was whether I talked about him all summer, then I would have been accused of only mentioning him in August and that is not all summer, but no, the accusation was that I never even had him on my roster NOT ONCE.

This is too easy. See even when you are wrong you dig yourself deeper, I, at least, can fess up to being wrong.

Edited by LeftWinger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice revisionist history. You've proven time and time again you're the best at it.

The debate is that you said you've had him on your roster all summer long. That's simply not true. And all your kicking and screaming won't change it.

Hmm...two posts in the lines thread that include a roster, and both include Jensen. The one roster that didn't (which was included in the second post) was clearly stated what he thought it would be, barring trades, and not what he would want it to be. Plus several other posts over the summer including Jensen...

And you guys are making fun of him? Shameful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm...two posts in the lines thread that include a roster, and both include Jensen. The one roster that didn't (which was included in the second post) was clearly stated what he thought it would be, barring trades, and not what he would want it to be. Plus several other posts over the summer including Jensen...

And you guys are making fun of him? Shameful.

All I can do at this point is direct you to reread the thread and/or dig up his posts. I stand by all my statements. Yup he listed Jensen as a 7th sometimes, but only when the depth was destroyed because he sent Ericsson and Quincey to the minors, which is is laughable. Every FULL roster he listed did not include Jensen.

So, AGAIN, no Jensen was not on his roster all summer as he would like to claim.

Seriously, do your own digging.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Still trying to save face 9? Wow! Now I am sending Q and E to the minors? Best if you just stop now. Besides, no one cares anymore. Thanks for playing.

I really don't care anymore. And am getting tired of seeing it in every single thread. Everyone is trying to move past it all and enjoy the fact that hockey is back but the ones who complain the most are the ones that bring it up the most now.

Edited by hillbillywingsfan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Still trying to save face 9? Wow! Now I am sending Q and E to the minors? Best if you just stop now. Besides, no one cares anymore. Thanks for playing.

That or bought them out or traded them. It's your roster, feel free to explain.

I really don't care anymore. And am getting tired of seeing it in every single thread. Everyone is trying to move past it all and enjoy the fact that hockey is back but the ones who complain the most are the ones that bring it up the most now.

You care so little u felt the need to write out a post telling everyone about it? K

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really don't care anymore. And am getting tired of seeing it in every single thread. Everyone is trying to move past it all and enjoy the fact that hockey is back but the ones who complain the most are the ones that bring it up the most now.

Oh it's just the beginning... :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That or bought them out or traded them. It's your roster, feel free to explain.

You care so little u felt the need to write out a post telling everyone about it? K

Number9...come on seriously. Just let it go man. Lets all move past it already. You were right...he was wrong...he was right you were wrong....we all are right in our own mind and wrong in everyone elses.....The fact of the matter is Hockey is back. Let's try and enjoy it and respect everyone's opinions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.