Ferraro on waivers

[frankgrimes 1,836]

Wtf since when was Lucic the face of the Bruins?! I hope you're only kidding Frank..

Ive been to a few Bruins games (sister lives out there) and Bergeron/Chara have always been the "face" of that organization imo.

Here http://www.todaysslapshot.com/nhl-west/pacific/los-angeles-kings/milan-lucic-grateful-for-time-in-boston-move-to-la/- http://www.thesportster.com/hockey/top-15-dumbest-moves-of-the-nhl-offseason/?view=all -

http://www.therichest.com/sports/hockey-sports/top-10-best-selling-nhl-jerseys-of-2013/?view=all

The "bruiser" is always the face of the franchise for Frank.

It's okay you are free to cheer for another 160 lbs player...if you want.

Edited December 7, 2015 by frankgrimes

[amato 3,210]

Lucic was not the face of any franchise. Kessel trade turned into Seguin.

They made many other bad moves before trading Hamilton and Lucic.

And Hamilton too, if I remember correctly..

[frankgrimes 1,836]

And Hamilton too, if I remember correctly..

My bad (now corrected) just googled it and indeed Kessel turned into Seguin and Hamilton

[kickazz 5,459]

Here http://www.todaysslapshot.com/nhl-west/pacific/los-angeles-kings/milan-lucic-grateful-for-time-in-boston-move-to-la/- http://www.thesportster.com/hockey/top-15-dumbest-moves-of-the-nhl-offseason/?view=all -

http://www.therichest.com/sports/hockey-sports/top-10-best-selling-nhl-jerseys-of-2013/?view=all

That's a bit of a weak argument. The first article is opinion based - a journalist claiming he might be the face of the franchise (similar to the way journalists over hype players like Eichel over Larkin even though Larkin is inherently the better player!). and the second one is jersey sales.

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nhl-puck-daddy/patrick-kane-had-the-best-selling-nhl-jersey-of-2014-184731755.html

http://www.ranker.com/list/greatest-boston-bruins-of-all-time/ranker-hockey

I can do that too. ^

I think it's more legit if the org claimed these things or maybe even a fan poll from Boston.

Maybe Lucic was the face behind the grit Boston brought. I would agree with that aspect probably.

Anyways before I diverge anymore lol.. back to Ferraro.

Any word on how he's fitting with the the B's?

Edited December 7, 2015 by kickazz

[Hockeytown0001 7,652]

That's a bit of a weak argument. The first article is opinion based - a journalist claiming he might be the face of the franchise (similar to the way journalists over hype players like Eichel over Larkin even though Larkin is inherently the better player!). and the second one is jersey sales.

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nhl-puck-daddy/patrick-kane-had-the-best-selling-nhl-jersey-of-2014-184731755.html

http://www.ranker.com/list/greatest-boston-bruins-of-all-time/ranker-hockey

I can do that too. ^

I think it's more legit if the org claimed these things or maybe even a fan poll from Boston.

Maybe Lucic was the face behind the grit Boston brought. I would agree with that aspect probably.

Anyways before I diverge anymore lol.. back to Ferraro.

Any word on how he's fitting with the the B's?

Scored against Vancouver last game.

[vladdy16 2,154]

The last two pages have nothing whatsoever to do with Ferraro. If you want to talk Bruins, by all means, start a thread.