HadThomasVokounOnFortSt 878 Report post Posted September 8, 2016 Save Larkin for real season. 2 F.Michael and frankgrimes reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NerveDamage 4,176 Report post Posted September 8, 2016 Matt Murray's WCH design Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
toby91_ca 620 Report post Posted September 8, 2016 That suuuucks... Hopefully extra motivation. Larkin must be really disappointed hopefully he changes the coaches minds. This decision is purely based on hype I don't know about that, probably based on how the coaches felt about him during their camp as well as his performance earlier this year at the World Championships....which was pretty good...I think he led Team USA in scoring. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
frankgrimes 1,836 Report post Posted September 9, 2016 Season hasn't even started and the slobbering on Mathews has already begun.just wait till he scores his first goal, tsn will have it covered with at least 4 articles.I know people are disappointed for Larkin..But this is great for him he doesn't get hurt and might play angry. I mean everyone knew the center position would be If McJesus - Eichel - Matthews. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Buppy 1,720 Report post Posted September 9, 2016 Even if not at center, Larkin should be playing over Couturier, Drouin, or Miller. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
krsmith17 7,191 Report post Posted September 9, 2016 They announced before last night's game even started that Larkin will be playing Sunday against Team Europe. These are just exhibition games that mean nothing. Larkin will be in the lineup next weekend when the games matter... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dabura 12,207 Report post Posted September 9, 2016 They announced before last night's game even started that Larkin will be playing Sunday against Team Europe. Good to know. Thanks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nyquistfan14 489 Report post Posted September 9, 2016 Anybody know if vanek played last night? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
toby91_ca 620 Report post Posted September 9, 2016 Vanek was one of the scratches for Team Europe. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nyquistfan14 489 Report post Posted September 9, 2016 I would think he would draw in next game that team needs scoring Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jfranzen 51 Report post Posted September 9, 2016 Just throwing this out, if you guys are interested in discussing the WC games in more of a chat format, theres a reddit group that has a discord room running for all things hockey. https://discord.gg/SFRmfx5 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jimmyemeryhunter 2,747 Report post Posted September 10, 2016 Abby is holding his own on a line with kesler and oshie... And u.s. is up 2-0 on Canada heading into the nd Anybody know if vanek played last night? He was scratched. And thank god.. Team n.a effin dominated. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dabura 12,207 Report post Posted September 10, 2016 Abby getting under Getzlaf's skin. Love it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DatsyukianDekes 2,428 Report post Posted September 10, 2016 First game, but Canada looked awful at times. Better team won tonight. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hillbillywingsfan 792 Report post Posted September 10, 2016 USA USA I'm just happy to see some hockey again. 1 kickazz reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LeftWinger 4,951 Report post Posted September 10, 2016 Doesn't matter who wins, the Anthem played will be "We Are The World." ...Kaepernick and Rapinoe won't honor that one either... 1 Hockeymom1960 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hockeymom1960 5,107 Report post Posted September 10, 2016 I didn't see the game but I heard it was very physical. That's the way the game should be played not this pansified stuff we're seeing today in the NHL. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jacksoni 418 Report post Posted September 10, 2016 I saw a 5 minute highlight of the USA-CAN game. It looked rough out there, they sure weren't holding back. Also watched the FIN-SWE game. Less physicality but they didn't play soft. Those teams don't bully as much as the good old Canadians do. But both teams defenders went full on when hitting in the corners. 1 Hockeymom1960 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
toby91_ca 620 Report post Posted September 10, 2016 (edited) First game, but Canada looked awful at times. Better team won tonight. I'm not sure what game you were watching, but other than the last 10 minutes of the 1st period, Canada dominated. Price was clearly rusty, in my opinion, all 3 goals were terrible...some could argue 1, but the other 2 were simply bad....he was rusty. Other than those 10 minutes in the 1st, Canada outshot them 41-7 I think. Edit - I think was for sure though....that game was far more intense than the NA vs Europe game. Edited September 10, 2016 by toby91_ca Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hockeymom1960 5,107 Report post Posted September 10, 2016 I'm not sure what game you were watching, but other than the last 10 minutes of the 1st period, Canada dominated. Price was clearly rusty, in my opinion, all 3 goals were terrible...some could argue 1, but the other 2 were simply bad....he was rusty. Other than those 10 minutes in the 1st, Canada outshot them 41-7 I think. Edit - I think was for sure though....that game was far more intense than the NA vs Europe game. Well it deosn't matter how many shots, you still have to be ahead at the end of the third. 1 DatsyukianDekes reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DatsyukianDekes 2,428 Report post Posted September 10, 2016 (edited) I'm not sure what game you were watching, but other than the last 10 minutes of the 1st period, Canada dominated. Price was clearly rusty, in my opinion, all 3 goals were terrible...some could argue 1, but the other 2 were simply bad....he was rusty. Other than those 10 minutes in the 1st, Canada outshot them 41-7 I think. Edit - I think was for sure though....that game was far more intense than the NA vs Europe game. Sorry but shots don't do anything for me. Canadians did not dominate every minute outside of 10 minutes of the 1st either, so not sure what game you were watching. Edited September 10, 2016 by DatsyukianDekes Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jacksoni 418 Report post Posted September 10, 2016 Topic header updated with all Red Wing players in the tournament. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dabura 12,207 Report post Posted September 10, 2016 Well it deosn't matter how many shots, you still have to be ahead at the end of the third. Well, yeah. But if the opposition is outshooting you by a 2:1 margin...most nights, you're gonna lose. Unless, perhaps, your goalie is routinely sensational. Canada should've won that game. And I say that as an America who was rooting for the Americans. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hockeymom1960 5,107 Report post Posted September 10, 2016 Well, yeah. But if the opposition is outshooting you by a 2:1 margin...most nights, you're gonna lose. Unless, perhaps, your goalie is routinely sensational. Canada should've won that game. And I say that as an America who was rooting for the Americans. Maybe they should have but they didn't. America isn't just going to roll over for the Canadians. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
toby91_ca 620 Report post Posted September 10, 2016 I think if Canada had a goalie that played more recently than Nov 2015, it would have been no contest. Shots are definitely not everything, but the game I watched was dominated by Canada, don't have to look at shot totals for that, the majority of the game appeared to be in the US end. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
