F.Michael 4,590 Report post Posted April 10, 2019 Truth be told I voted 'BIG DORKY BABY'. Would've been nice had the Gods from above graced us with a top 2 pick, but as I mentioned in another thread - it's well beyond our control, and getting a 6th overall pick will likely see a few gems available that could turn into 'All-Star' calibre talent. 1 krsmith17 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gcom007 1,465 Report post Posted April 10, 2019 I’m more pissed that a team like Chicago could jump as high as they did and come out ahead of us and other clearly more needy teams. That to me is evidence of a broken system. I think the draft lottery or whatever system should be limited to the bottom 8 teams. Playoff bubble teams that were a few wins out of a playoff spot shouldn’t be picking 3rd. 1 Rick D reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
krsmith17 7,191 Report post Posted April 10, 2019 We didn't get lucky in the draft lottery. However, there will be top-end talent available at 6. The question is, will we be lucky enough to pick one of them?... Top players that were available at 6 over the past 10 years (too early to tell on the last two drafts)... 2009 - Ekman-Larsson (6th) 2010 - Skinner (7th), Tarasenko (16th) 2011 - Scheifele (7th), Hamilton (9th), *Kucherov (58th)* 2012 - Forsberg (11th) 2013 - Monahan (6th) 2014 - Larkin (15th), Pastrnak (25th) 2015 - Werenski (8th), Rantanen (10th), Barzal (16th), Chabot (18th), Boeser (23rd), Aho (35th) 2016 - Tkatchuk (6th), Keller (7th), Sergachev (9th), McAvoy (14th), DeBrincat (39th) Some players / years obviously better than others, but there is always top-end talent available this high in the draft. And this seems like it could be another really deep draft, similar to the 2015 draft. I think a Scheifele (Cozens) or Werenski (Byram) caliber player could be available this year at 6. I'm pretty amped to add another big piece to the puzzle. 2 xtrememachine1 and AtlantaHotWings reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AtlantaHotWings 984 Report post Posted April 10, 2019 More disappointed in dropping vs going up had we remained at 4 I would have been okay. Still shaking my head over Chicago's leap of 12. Happier to see Avs drop just hate seeing someone get rewarded off another's effort. Was it just me or did Sakic look like he hadn't slept in months? 1 Rick D reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gcom007 1,465 Report post Posted April 10, 2019 I’m just hoping for Byram. I feel like in spite of our lack of luck in the lottery, we’ve gotten lucky with players. Byram is a piece we could really use right now and was my number one choice if we didn’t get Hughes and Kakko. 1 krsmith17 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BringBack19 110 Report post Posted April 10, 2019 32 minutes ago, krsmith17 said: We didn't get lucky in the draft lottery. However, there will be top-end talent available at 6. The question is, will we be lucky enough to pick one of them?... Top players that were available at 6 over the past 10 years (too early to tell on the last two drafts)... 2009 - Ekman-Larsson (6th) 2010 - Skinner (7th), Tarasenko (16th) 2011 - Scheifele (7th), Hamilton (9th), *Kucherov (58th)* 2012 - Forsberg (11th) 2013 - Monahan (6th) 2014 - Larkin (15th), Pastrnak (25th) 2015 - Werenski (8th), Rantanen (10th), Barzal (16th), Chabot (18th), Boeser (23rd), Aho (35th) 2016 - Tkatchuk (6th), Keller (7th), Sergachev (9th), McAvoy (14th), DeBrincat (39th) Some players / years obviously better than others, but there is always top-end talent available this high in the draft. And this seems like it could be another really deep draft, similar to the 2015 draft. I think a Scheifele (Cozens) or Werenski (Byram) caliber player could be available this year at 6. I'm pretty amped to add another big piece to the puzzle. Scheifele is a center and most experts project Cozens to the wing. Cozens ceiling is Scheifele and floor Virtanen. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
amato 3,210 Report post Posted April 10, 2019 10 hours ago, xault said: I am pissed that CHI won the 3rd overall pick. Wings picking 6th and falling again sucks as well. Just just bummed out on the season in general. The lottery is the cherry on top the cake. I hope Chicago drafts Podkolzin and he stays in the KHL his entire playing career. Would also settle for this happening to Colorado 1 1 2 F.Michael, Rick D, AtlantaHotWings and 1 other reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
krsmith17 7,191 Report post Posted April 10, 2019 7 minutes ago, BringBack19 said: Scheifele is a center and most experts project Cozens to the wing. Cozens ceiling is Scheifele and floor Virtanen. Cozens can play on the wing, as he did most of his rookie season in Lethbridge. However, he has played center pretty well all of this season, so I'm not sure who is projecting him to the wing... Regardless, it will be up to whichever team drafts him to determine where he is best suited. If the Wings do end up drafting him, I'd be completely fine with him developing into a winger. We have Larkin as our 1C and one of Veleno or Athanasiou as our 2C going forward. With Zadina, Mantha, Bertuzzi, Rasmussen and Cozens as winger options, that could be a lethal top 6 in a few years... 1 xtrememachine1 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The 91 of Ryans 3,014 Report post Posted April 10, 2019 59 minutes ago, krsmith17 said: Cozens can play on the wing, as he did most of his rookie season in Lethbridge. However, he has played center pretty well all of this season, so I'm not sure who is projecting him to the wing... Regardless, it will be up to whichever team drafts him to determine where he is best suited. If the Wings do end up drafting him, I'd be completely fine with him developing into a winger. We have Larkin as our 1C and one of Veleno or Athanasiou as our 2C going forward. With Zadina, Mantha, Bertuzzi, Rasmussen and Cozens as winger options, that could be a lethal top 6 in a few years... You all know my thoughts on AA as #2C. It would be great if Veleno can get there. Normally I'm 100% BPA, but I think we need to take the best play-making center that's available. If Dach's game compares to Thorton then he could be our guy. Or Zegras. I'd be "fine" with Turcotte or Cozens as well I just think this team lack elite playmakers. Or, if Byram's still there, take him. 3 Rick D, Akakabuto and amato reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BringBack19 110 Report post Posted April 10, 2019 40 minutes ago, The 91 of Ryans said: You all know my thoughts on AA as #2C. It would be great if Veleno can get there. Normally I'm 100% BPA, but I think we need to take the best play-making center that's available. If Dach's game compares to Thorton then he could be our guy. Or Zegras. I'd be "fine" with Turcotte or Cozens as well I just think this team lack elite playmakers. Or, if Byram's still there, take him. Thats what I love about Zegras game. His playmaking is as good as Hughes, but he may take a little while longer to develop than a guy like Turcotte. The wings want a guy who can be on the team quickly vs 2 or 3 years unless it’s Podkolzin. I’m lukewarm on Podkolzin but the wings brass think he is as good a prospect as Hughes/Kakko. I’m concerned about the Russia rumors, along with the push by ownership to keep him there so that taints him for me. I wouldn’t risk it when the team is only a couple prospects away from really competing in a few years. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The 91 of Ryans 3,014 Report post Posted April 10, 2019 44 minutes ago, BringBack19 said: Thats what I love about Zegras game. His playmaking is as good as Hughes, but he may take a little while longer to develop than a guy like Turcotte. The wings want a guy who can be on the team quickly vs 2 or 3 years unless it’s Podkolzin. I’m lukewarm on Podkolzin but the wings brass think he is as good a prospect as Hughes/Kakko. I’m concerned about the Russia rumors, along with the push by ownership to keep him there so that taints him for me. I wouldn’t risk it when the team is only a couple prospects away from really competing in a few years. Where did you see this? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BringBack19 110 Report post Posted April 10, 2019 2 hours ago, The 91 of Ryans said: Where did you see this? Ken Holland was on 97.1 the ticket and said he doesn’t view it as a top two but a top 3 with Podkolzin. Draper, while interviewed on FSN-D, parroted what Holland said and claimed those 3 have separated themselves from the pack. Do I think they would draft Podkolzin over Hughes, no I don’t. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ChristopherReevesLegs 7,022 Report post Posted April 10, 2019 Tide Pods is my guy Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DickieDunn 2,571 Report post Posted April 10, 2019 depends on what they do with it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wings3:16 318 Report post Posted April 10, 2019 Not happy but not butt hurt either, it is what it is! Maybe Byram will fall to us like Zadina did. 1 krsmith17 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Akakabuto 1,749 Report post Posted April 10, 2019 (edited) If Byram is still there at 6, would you trade that pick for Trouba? An agreement with Trouba will have to be in place beforehand of course. Edited April 10, 2019 by Akakabuto Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wings3:16 318 Report post Posted April 10, 2019 1 minute ago, Akakabuto said: If Byram is still there at 6, would you trade that pick for Trouba? An agreement with Trouba have to be in place beforehand of course. I wouldn't...by the time they're ready to compete he'll be close to 30 or more 1 krsmith17 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AtlantaHotWings 984 Report post Posted April 10, 2019 2 minutes ago, Akakabuto said: If Byram is still there at 6, would you trade that pick for Trouba? An agreement with Trouba have to be in place beforehand of course. You get Byram and go after Trouba next July 1 hope the appeal of a team on the rise snags Trouba. 2 krsmith17 and amato reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Akakabuto 1,749 Report post Posted April 10, 2019 1 minute ago, Wings3:16 said: I wouldn't...by the time they're ready to compete he'll be close to 30 or more So in his prime? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
robb himself 143 Report post Posted April 10, 2019 15 hours ago, ChristopherReevesLegs said: Beverley Hills = Beverley Hills Cop < Ninja Easy math fren Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Neomaxizoomdweebie 3,083 Report post Posted April 10, 2019 16 hours ago, ChristopherReevesLegs said: Beverley Hills = Beverley Hills Cop < Ninja Easy math fren 1. There are cops in Beverly Hills, there aren't any Ninjas. 2. Detective Axel Foley was actually a member of the Detroit Police Dept, not Beverly Hills. 3. Beverly Hills Cop spawned 2 sequels. BHN? No. 4. It's spelled. B-e-v-e-r-l-y Hills. 5. Beverly Hills Ninja > Beverly Hills 90210. Can we agree on that? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ChristopherReevesLegs 7,022 Report post Posted April 10, 2019 5 minutes ago, Neomaxizoomdweebie said: 1. There are cops in Beverly Hills, there aren't any Ninjas. That's what the ninja wants you to think And that's when they strike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chaps80 1,591 Report post Posted April 11, 2019 On 4/9/2019 at 11:06 PM, Wheelchairsuperhero said: If we weren't getting a top 2 I honestly didn't really care, I'll be pleased with any number of the guys who will be available at 6. I'm bitter as s*** that Chicago jumped 9 ******* spots, f*** them. REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE This. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Neomaxizoomdweebie 3,083 Report post Posted April 11, 2019 If we were in the running for #1 and got 6th, what is there to be "happy" about? Am I ok with it, content? Yes. But definitely not happy. Although the conspiracy theories and tank lover meltdowns are entertaining. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brett 1,029 Report post Posted April 12, 2019 (edited) expected a 4th or better. i dont think you should be allowed to get a worse pick. only better. would never work but yea. really should NOT be a freaking lotto and you get whatever pick you finish with a 6th round pick we will get another non roster player. non impact player. a 4th liner 3rd liner at best. top 7 dman or bottom pairing d Edited April 12, 2019 by brett Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
