• Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

Sign in to follow this  
krsmith17

Who would you rather?

Rate this topic

Who would you rather?  

19 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

It's easy to see why you would wanna vote for option nr 2 here with Hughes great season at Michigan and the promise he showed at his short NHL stint last season. But I think we have a great offensive RHD prospect in Hronek so I don't mourn that we didn't have the chance to pick him very much. Still have big hopes for Zadina too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Akakabuto said:

It's easy to see why you would wanna vote for option nr 2 here with Hughes great season at Michigan and the promise he showed at his short NHL stint last season. But I think we have a great offensive RHD prospect in Hronek so I don't mourn that we didn't have the chance to pick him very much. Still have big hopes for Zadina too.

Hughes is a LHD prospect.

To be honest, option 2 would be 3rd on my list. For me, it's a toss up between what we currently have in Zadina / Seider and what we could have had in Bouchard / Cozens. I'm very happy with our last two 6th overall picks. Just curious to see how others feel about it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i like Zadina, but I feel we are going to regret each day we didn't draft Hughes. With Yzerman so in love with Seider, it could/should have possibly been Hughes/Seider. Imagine that!

Let's hope Zadina starts filling the nets, to the tune if 40 goals, because Holland passed on a few NHL defensemen with that pick. 

Edited by LeftWinger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Zegras would have been a perfect fit here, hence my choice. Seider/Zadina is a very very close second, only because I'm not sure how good Zadina will turn out and we already have scoring wingers, but not enough playmaking centers. With his and Seiders potential however, I might look like an idiot for that vote here a few years down the road.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, krsmith17 said:

Hughes is a LHD prospect.

oops.

1 hour ago, Akakabuto said:

that we didn't have the chance to pick him very much

Just ignore my post entirely. Just saw that he was elected right after us too. 

This must be some sort of a Mandela effect.

Edited by Akakabuto

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, krsmith17 said:

That wasn't an option... There's always one f***ing a**hole... :P

If we're doing that though, Bouchard > Hughes... Fight me!

I just think it's sort of cosmically funny that Hughes-Seider is, in theory, a perfect D pairing. LH-RH. Hughes is your prototypical tiny rover guy and Seider is your prototypical big-bodied two-way workhorse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Dabura said:

I just think it's sort of cosmically funny that Hughes-Seider is, in theory, a perfect D pairing. LH-RH. Hughes is your prototypical tiny rover guy and Seider is your prototypical big-bodied two-way workhorse.

In an ideal world we would have three pairs with a lefty / righty combo, but I don't think it's a must. Assuming one of Seider or Hronek could play on the left side, I think that could potentially be a very good top pair in a few years. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, krsmith17 said:

In an ideal world we would have three pairs with a lefty / righty combo, but I don't think it's a must. Assuming one of Seider or Hronek could play on the left side, I think that could potentially be a very good top pair in a few years. 

So from not having a decent rhd for years we sre suddenly going to play them on the same pair? This is madness!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Akakabuto said:

So from not having a decent rhd for years we sre suddenly going to play them on the same pair? This is madness!

Well, we very well could have 4 in the lineup in 2-3 years time... Seider, Hronek and maybe a couple of Bowey / Kaski / Lindstrom / Tuomisto / Regula / Barton... Of course we also have DeKeyser, Cholowski and McIsaac on the left side along with maybe Kotkansalo / Johansson...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, krsmith17 said:

Well, we very well could have 4 in the lineup in 2-3 years time... Seider, Hronek and maybe a couple of Bowey / Kaski / Lindstrom / Tuomisto / Regula / Barton... Of course we also have DeKeyser, Cholowski and McIsaac on the left side along with maybe Kotkansalo / Johansson...

Ummmmmmmm, Lashoff?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, krsmith17 said:

In an ideal world we would have three pairs with a lefty / righty combo, but I don't think it's a must. Assuming one of Seider or Hronek could play on the left side, I think that could potentially be a very good top pair in a few years. 

Not a prerequisite to greatness, I just think it's funny how Hughes-Seider is, in theory, That Dynamic Pairing We Have in Our Minds When We Complain That the Wings Don't Have "That Kind of Pairing." Having Hughes and Seider and Hronek and the others in the system would be pretty swell. Of course, I could flip that around and half-seriously lament the fact that we maybe could've been looking at, say, a future 1-2-3 of Larkin, Cozens, Veleno at center. At the end of the day, it's all coulda shoulda woulda. Sucks that Zadina didn't score 90 goals with the Griffins and sucks that we don't get to read tons of non-Detroit think pieces breathlessly praising Seider -- but I have zero complaints with those two picks.

Regardless of anything the blogosphere intelligentsia set says to the contrary, no two or three or four picks are necessarily going to make or break this organization's rebuild. We're working with a rebuild timeline of something like five or six years and that's a lot of time to collect a lot of Pokemon. I hated the Rasmussen pick at the time, but I talked myself into seeing it as just one of many puzzle pieces. Even if all Rasmussen becomes is a uniquely effective power play specialist, one Rasmussen power play goal could be the difference between winning Game 7 of the SCF and losing Game 7 of the SCF.

We won't know how all of these futures will/won't come together until, at the very earliest, we're waist-deep in those years. Could be that we get two franchise cornerstone players in the 2020 draft and by 2022 the whole "Larkin is our future" paradigm has been rendered totally obsolete.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this