• Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

Dabura

2020 Draft Thread

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

I said it last night when everyone was saying Drapes was angry. I said it'll all be forgiven when they allow him to pick his kid in the 7th.

Just now, TLGTrico said:

Wait how did the Wings get pick 203?   I stopped watching after we took Draper..

traded next years 7th 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, LeftWinger said:

They did it! LOL! How cool! I wish they would've shown Drapes make the announcement!

I've been chuckling at your prediction.  Love it that you were right.  Now we just have to get Lil Drapes out against Lil Turtle and see who's Daddy gave his baby the bigger yambags.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, DonHakan said:

Based on this info. Why do we even bother drafting after rounds 1 and 2? Yzerman should be spending his 3-7 picks for assets or using them to trade up

Because every now and then you get Ondrej Palat, John Klingberg etc. Is the Don going to pretend to be black-hole-dense? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, The 91 of Ryans said:

Because every now and then you get Ondrej Palat, John Klingberg etc. Is the Don going to pretend to be black-hole-dense? 

Sure but when 68% of the league is comprised of 1st + 2nd + undrafted players, it seems to stand that those picks are probably worth more in trades than in actually betting on a Klingberg every single year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, DonHakan said:

Sure but when 68% of the league is comprised of 1st + 2nd + undrafted players, it seems to stand that those picks are probably worth more in trades than in actually betting on a Klingberg every single year.

Ah, but if those picks hold as little value as you say they do, then they should have very little trade capital too then. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, The 91 of Ryans said:

Ah, but if those picks hold as little value as you say they do, then they should have very little trade capital too then. 

Which is exactlly why we shouldn't be selling players like AA and Green for 3rd and 4th round selections. If anything you should be packaging them along with your own 3-7 round picks in order to jump up into the 2nd round.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://hockeysverige.se/2020/10/08/hakan-andersson-detroits-draft

Some Hakan quotes on the top three Swedes from the link(via google translate and minor editing from me). 

 

On Raymond and trading back in the first round:

- Yes, we also thought that the three who went top-three would go top-three. Had any of them fallen down to our choice, we would have had to have a discussion about who we would choose. But we probably had four, five names that we talked about and that we really liked and it ended up with Lucas coming out on top of them.

 

- There were a number of different scenarios. We talked about what we would do if someone wanted the fourth choice and offered something in return for us to jump down to election six or seven and things like that. Had we got an equally good player then? But in the end, everyone was very excited that we got Lucas.

 

On WW and how he is the next Hedman:

- It was a gift from above when he landed in the second round, so we could pick him then. I can say as such, that if we had chosen somewhere between pick 20 and 31 in the first round, I would have discussed Wallinder quite hard.

 

- He's a fine raw material. Someone told me that Hedman had taken part in some training with Modo, and then many had commented on the similarities between them. "They skate the same, they carry the puck the same" and things like that. Then he has a long way to go, he is not a finished product in any way. Now he has been up and played a bit with the A-team and there he has had his ups and downs - but there is nothing strange about that. He is still young and gaining experience.

 

On Niederbach(my favourite):

- This is a super exciting player. He's really in the same category as Lucas Raymond. They are both right hand shots, they are about the same size and this guy's main characteristic is that he has a head that works really fast. Raymond has fantastic hands, Niederbach is also sharp there. They are similar in many ways.

 

- Many teams talk about the players as "top-six" or "bottom six-forwards" and we see that Niederbach has the potential to become a top six-forward in a few years.

 

A knee injury spoiled the entire 2018-2019 season for the Frölunda talent, and the way he recovered from it impresses Håkan Andersson.

- Such a thing is weighed in as a positive trait. When he started playing hockey again last year, he had not played in 14 months, I think. Still, he basically came in the top ten in the points league in the junior series, and then he played against players who were one or two years older than him. Then you saw what potential he has.

 

On CatboysRossi's Hijacking Theory and picking swedes:

- I have worked for Detroit for 30 years and it is clearly most of those who are in the club now. That discussion comes up at regular intervals and I am the first to say "screw what it says in the passport - choose the best players"

 

- Steve Yzerman knows that if we choose a Swede, they are easily socially adapted, they speak good English, they are good at adapting tactically and things like that. But we do not hunt Swedes. We chase good hockey players regardless of nationality. Then we know that Swedes are in a certain way, if you are to generalize, while Russians are in a way, Finns in a different way and Czechs have their special characteristics. But in the end, it's the best hockey player we want. It does not matter what nationality the player has.

 

Edited by Akakabuto

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Akakabuto said:

On CatboysRossi's Hijacking Theory and picking swedes:

- I have worked for Detroit for 30 years and it is clearly most of those who are in the club now. That discussion comes up at regular intervals and I am the first to say "screw what it says in the passport - choose the best players"

 

- Steve Yzerman knows that if we choose a Swede, they are easily socially adapted, they speak good English, they are good at adapting tactically and things like that. But we do not hunt Swedes. We chase good hockey players regardless of nationality. Then we know that Swedes are in a certain way, if you are to generalize, while Russians are in a way, Finns in a different way and Czechs have their special characteristics. But in the end, it's the best hockey player we want. It does not matter what nationality the player has.

 

don-corleone.jpg

"Come sit. Talk with Don Hakan"

>Kronwall holds out a chair for you

"You need to understand young @Akakabuto Swedes are more socially fit for our 'club'. They speak English well. They're adaptable. Good at tactics. Of course I'm not saying you must take a Swede, don't be so presumptuous of me... You must always take the best hockey player... But Swedes are a certain... way, and you would be very wise - and it would humble the Don - if you were to select one."

 

Edited by DonHakan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Dabura said:

I love Raymond and Niederbach. Wallinder fits the mold of what Yzerman looks for in defensemen. We drafted a lot of defensemen. Cross Hanas is an awesome name and he's from Texas.

I'm good with this draft.

How bout you get on here more often and help class up this joint? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now