Jump to content


MTU_Huskies963's Photo

MTU_Huskies963

Member Since 21 Apr 2007
Offline Last Active Dec 17 2014 07:20 AM
-----

#2417807 WCF : (5) Los Angeles Kings vs. (1) Chicago Blackhawks

Posted by MTU_Huskies963 on 05 June 2013 - 10:36 AM

Chicago has been getting away with murder these playoffs. Still amazed that the slew foot by shaw did not get any attention from the league. I seriously think the reaction of NBC plays a big part in if it get looks at or not.




#2417189 WCF : (5) Los Angeles Kings vs. (1) Chicago Blackhawks

Posted by MTU_Huskies963 on 02 June 2013 - 07:37 PM

What is it going to take to get shaw suspended, this guy is injuring everyone. 




#2416311 WCSF Game 7 GDT: Red Wings 1 at Blackhawks 2 OT (CHI wins series, 4-3)

Posted by MTU_Huskies963 on 30 May 2013 - 06:15 PM

I know it seems like boarding or charging or something every time one of your guys gets hit but THAT wasn't boarding in THAT situation. I don't think it was boarding in any situation. He had the puck, he had seen or should have seen Bolland, he hung on to it a little longer to make a play, Bolland hit him from the side, Bolland was gliding all the way from center ice to the boards....

 

 

He wasn't defenseless either..

 

Rule 41 - Boarding

41.1 Boarding – A boarding penalty shall be imposed on any player or goalkeeper who checks or pushes a defenseless opponent in such a manner that causes the opponent to hit or impact the boards violently in the boards. The severity of the penalty, based upon the impact with the boards, shall be at the discretion of the Referee.

There is an enormous amount of judgment involved in the application of this rule by the Referees. The onus is on the player applying the check to ensure his opponent is not in a defenseless position and if so, he must avoid or minimize the contact.

 I guess all those people that get nailed from behind should not have held onto the puck too long, or should have known the player was there  :lol: . Nyquist is defenseless Bolland comes from his blind side and hits him into the board. When he lines up the hit Nyquists back is facing him ,so it's not like nyquist put himself in that position. At that point it's bolland's responsibility to let up. Was it the single reason the wings lost this game? nope. Should it have been called? yes.




#2416265 WCSF Game 7 GDT: Red Wings 1 at Blackhawks 2 OT (CHI wins series, 4-3)

Posted by MTU_Huskies963 on 30 May 2013 - 03:52 PM

How many more breaks do you think the Wings needed? They got plenty. The disallowed goal in game 3, no call on hooking Saad on a break away and the coincidentals last night that shouldn't have been called. The Wings got plenty of breaks and still came up short. The better team won. 


I just answered the question. Are penalties considered breaks now? How many breaks did the hawks have? No penalty shot when abby had the stick knocked out of his hands, shaw clearly slew footing flip, franzen boarded and a goal scored. I won't deny the better team won, but don't justify not calling a dangerous play because one team appears to have more "breaks".


#2415901 WCSF Game 7 GDT: Red Wings 1 at Blackhawks 2 OT (CHI wins series, 4-3)

Posted by MTU_Huskies963 on 29 May 2013 - 11:33 PM

The NHL in the offseason, needs to take a good look at how this game is offciated. Penalties need to be black or white again. I really don't remember refs beings this bad in the past. The players never adapted to the post lockout rules the refs have just decided when to call it a penalty. If the league really wanted to eliminate all this clutching and grabbing they would call it everytime it occurred. Then the players would truly have to adjust.


#2415345 WCSF Game 7 GDT: Red Wings 1 at Blackhawks 2 OT (CHI wins series, 4-3)

Posted by MTU_Huskies963 on 29 May 2013 - 09:18 PM

what took so long for that change?


#2415338 WCSF Game 7 GDT: Red Wings 1 at Blackhawks 2 OT (CHI wins series, 4-3)

Posted by MTU_Huskies963 on 29 May 2013 - 09:16 PM

this league is dead if that is a hook!


#2415320 WCSF Game 7 GDT: Red Wings 1 at Blackhawks 2 OT (CHI wins series, 4-3)

Posted by MTU_Huskies963 on 29 May 2013 - 09:13 PM

call it both ways ref!


#2415298 WCSF Game 7 GDT: Red Wings 1 at Blackhawks 2 OT (CHI wins series, 4-3)

Posted by MTU_Huskies963 on 29 May 2013 - 09:08 PM

I wish we would make them pay for this cherry picking


#2415293 WCSF Game 7 GDT: Red Wings 1 at Blackhawks 2 OT (CHI wins series, 4-3)

Posted by MTU_Huskies963 on 29 May 2013 - 09:06 PM

franzen GET ANGGGGGRRRRY!


#2415221 WCSF Game 7 GDT: Red Wings 1 at Blackhawks 2 OT (CHI wins series, 4-3)

Posted by MTU_Huskies963 on 29 May 2013 - 08:51 PM

Can franzen just show some emotion?! lol if he was even mic'd up for the game I don't think we would hear one word!


#2415017 WCSF Game 7 GDT: Red Wings 1 at Blackhawks 2 OT (CHI wins series, 4-3)

Posted by MTU_Huskies963 on 29 May 2013 - 08:10 PM

miller lost his stick hahahaha yeah that's what happened
  • Y19 likes this


#2414825 WCSF Game 7 GDT: Red Wings 1 at Blackhawks 2 OT (CHI wins series, 4-3)

Posted by MTU_Huskies963 on 29 May 2013 - 07:06 PM

Hit Early, Hit Hard, and Hit Smart


  • DBR likes this


#2414508 WCSF Game 7 GDT: Red Wings 1 at Blackhawks 2 OT (CHI wins series, 4-3)

Posted by MTU_Huskies963 on 29 May 2013 - 01:35 PM

If a game 7 against a division rival does not wake up franzen, I don't know what will. I am not asking him to show up and score a goal (although that would be awesome), just make his presence felt. Throw some weight around, and wear out the D. Flip was skating really well in game 6, I would not be surprised if he gets a goal tonight.




#2413843 WCSF Game 6 GDT- Blackhawks 4 @ Red Wings 3, - (Series tied 3-3)

Posted by MTU_Huskies963 on 27 May 2013 - 10:31 PM

I can't defend smith anymore, these are not rookie mistakes. I can maybe defend a forward for losing his man, but not a Dman. The scheme was man to man how do you let your guy sit in front of the net? Datsyuk and Z need to step up big time in game 7. The 3rd and 4th lines can not continue to carry this team and expect to win.