Helm has shown decent touch this season. Besides, if he skates around like a maniac and forechecks hard like usual, that's insanely valuable. Tatar and Pav will score on that line anyways. Pulkkinen can't get the puck to those two or create space anywhere near the level that Helm can.
Helm's play style is even more valuable come playoffs.
Mule retire... it's not worth it... Great Wing when healthy, but take care of your son
I agree that it's probably best for his own health to 'hang'em up' - however he'll go on LTIR just as Marc Savard, and Chris Pronger had done (collecting a paycheck for the duration of his contract, but the $$$ will not go against the cap).
Posted by F.Michael
on 24 February 2015 - 06:12 PM
Meh, I started law school one year before I joined this forum. You can post here and do school at the same time. Just need to know how to multitask.
Speaking of, I was studying for the bar in law school when we lost game 7 of the SCF. You're more than welcome to read my post game comments that night. You'll see what you have to look forward too.
I should have known you're a JD. It explains so much. In all seriousness, you deserve some kudos. The legal market is still pretty bad, but you got in at the worst possible time.
I try to avoid multitasking, especially when I'm working on something that is particularly dry, like reading for corps. I'm too ADD. I prefer to just buckle down and get it over with, not that it always works.
I too was well on my way to law school - except I didn't find it all that challenging.
Instead - I opted to attend MATC (Milwaukee Area Tech College or Milwaukee's Alternative To College), and immersed myself into the world of Respiratory Therapy, and a whopping 2 years later I was the proud recipient of an Assoc. degree...Woo-hoo for me!
Posted by F.Michael
on 23 February 2015 - 01:49 PM
For everybody except those who formerly felt entitled to degrade and undermine those they found "lesser". They long for the days when they could say whatever they wanted, whenever they wanted, and nobody would object. Because heaven forbid people universally condemn these idiots. That's "overly PC".
Not that we have any of those folks around here.
People have opinions - whether you agree with them, or not - they're still entitled to them.
For you, or anyone else to chastise them because of that - does that make you any better than those who you're condemning?
I agree it was a poor decision by Rielly to associate girls/women with how pissy/moody his Leaf team mates are acting, but it's these sorts of issues that create such an uproar make my knuckle-dragging-neanderthal brain hurt.
Posted by F.Michael
on 23 February 2015 - 01:40 AM
Let me give you an easy example: what would happen if people who are offended that others are offended did the same thing and complained in groups about the "offended party " ? That's right a never ending circle of being offended that others are offended...it would be so comically chaotic and stupid at the same time.
Maybe it's just me and I'm too relaxed for stuff like this it just doesn't bother me.
People get offended over anything in todays ultra 'pc' society we live in.
That said - wonder Rielly will be on the trading block.
Posted by F.Michael
on 23 February 2015 - 12:47 AM
Fighting after a cheap-shot has exactly one purpose: to fulfill a primal sense of revenge for one's team. It doesn't cure the injured player. It doesn't prevent a cheap shot from happening. It doesn't discourage players from doing it again after they've already committed the cheap-shot. In fact, it has been demonstrated repeatedly that teams with more fighting majors actually tend to have more injuries and stick infarction penalties against, which would suggest that fights actually increase the amount of cheap shots you receive, which is the complete opposite of "keeping the opposition honest". This has been repeatedly demonstrated on separate occasions by separate people (a few sources for the curious: http://regressing.de...-don-1442618145, http://www.pensionpl...ness-in-hockey,http://blogs.edmontonjournal.com/2013/09/30/the-edmonton-oilers-and-the-new-era-of-the-one-dimensional-fighter/). Its also not that hard to see if you just watch a hockey game. Ericsson fought Benn. Benn still cheap-shotted Zetterberg. Downey was in the lineup when Lapierre injured Lidstrom. Lapierre didn't shy away. In fact, he came back at Downey for more in the third period, looking to crosscheck the guy in the head. Colton Orr was on the ice when Kadri was getting cheap-shotted, and eventually Kadri got into his first fight against Tampa Bay, despite Orr being out there with him. To keep the flies off. And so on, and so on.
So if you're pro-fighting, fine. I understand that it gets the heart racing, and there's a certain primitive sense of satisfaction you get when watching someone get their face beat down after wronging one of our guys. OK. I get that feeling, too, so I understand where the desire to see fights comes from (and keep in mind that I'm not at all pro-fighting. I would rather see fighting removed from the game entirely). But what I won't do is try to justify those emotions by wrongly suggesting that fighting prevents injuries from happening or keeps the rats in line. It just doesn't work that way. And its especially silly to dedicate a roster spot to an enforcer based on this false notion.
I can live without the 'staged' fights, but I feel it's important for the NHL/AHL to tolerate the 'heat of the moment' fights where 2 players agree to drop the gloves, and get it over with (would rather have that than a stick swinging affair).
It's nice to see teammates stand up for one another, and one could argue that it may build camaraderie within the locker room.
Yes - I do agree that having a roster with a handful of players capable of fighting won't stop cheapshots, but it may make some members of the opposing team think twice if they know they may have to 'face the music' later in the game, or sometime down the road.
The Wings don't need McGrattan types, but those like McCarty who can play on the 3rd/4th line, and drop the gloves when needed are always welcome (now if Babcock would play them - that's a different story).