Jump to content


GMRwings1983's Photo

GMRwings1983

Member Since 18 Jul 2007
Offline Last Active Today, 02:15 PM
**---

#2234778 12/10 GDT : Jets 1 at Red Wings 7

Posted by GMRwings1983 on 10 December 2011 - 08:32 PM

Wow!

I was going to hold off watching this game until it's about halfway through. Same thing last game.

I think I'll make it a pattern now. :lol:


#2233778 12/6 GDT : Red Wings 2 at Blues 3

Posted by GMRwings1983 on 06 December 2011 - 10:06 PM

I hope Jackman's greed comes back to bite him here...


I hope he gets bitten by werewolves with STD's.


#2233734 12/6 GDT : Red Wings 2 at Blues 3

Posted by GMRwings1983 on 06 December 2011 - 09:58 PM

Time to send the paralyzer out there.

He's useless anyway. May as well just do it agian.


#2233631 12/6 GDT : Red Wings 2 at Blues 3

Posted by GMRwings1983 on 06 December 2011 - 09:32 PM

we could paint the number 52 on a pylon and pay it 3 million and it would be more effective.


Surely, there's some team in the Swedish Elite League who'll take him?


#2233619 12/6 GDT : Red Wings 2 at Blues 3

Posted by GMRwings1983 on 06 December 2011 - 09:30 PM

f*** this s***.

The Blues have our number. Guess it's not just San Jose.


#2233546 12/6 GDT : Red Wings 2 at Blues 3

Posted by GMRwings1983 on 06 December 2011 - 08:52 PM

Ozzie has to stop that.


#2233442 12/6 GDT : Red Wings 2 at Blues 3

Posted by GMRwings1983 on 06 December 2011 - 08:18 PM

Jackman wanting to fight Datsyuk yet again.

I wish we'd dress an enforcer for just one of these games, just so he can pound hyena-face Jackman to the ice in his own pool of blood.

Hate that piece of s***.


#2233116 Dan Carcillo Comments on David Backes

Posted by GMRwings1983 on 05 December 2011 - 11:28 PM

So a spotpicker is someone who likes to take fights with non-fighters too much of the time? Huh.

I thought a spotpicker, or at least part of being a spotpicker, is say Backes, or a top six capable fighter and power forward in general, turning down a fight with a pure enforcer because he'd rather be on the ice or because his team needs him to be on the ice?


Well, if he fights lots of non-fighters and turns down fights with tougher guys, then yes, he is a spotpicker.

Basically, he picks his spots.


#2233073 Realignment decided - 4 Conferences

Posted by GMRwings1983 on 05 December 2011 - 10:23 PM

Here's the division I was hoping we'd be in. :hehe:


Wings
Penguins
Sharks
Canucks
Bruins
Flyers
Blackhawks
Capitals


#2233065 Realignment decided - 4 Conferences

Posted by GMRwings1983 on 05 December 2011 - 10:14 PM

Yeah, it's exciting for the rest of the league, but Detroit gets stuck with the reject teams. That's why they voted against it. It's like a Harvard grad being forced to ride on the short bus.


Would you rather have us in a division with the Hawks, Pens and Bruins or something?

And those reject teams are who we're playing against now.


#2233063 Realignment decided - 4 Conferences

Posted by GMRwings1983 on 05 December 2011 - 10:13 PM

How exactly did the Wings get f***ed with the realignment?


They didn't.

If anyone got f***ed, it'd be Tampa and Florida, because of more travel.


#2233061 Realignment decided - 4 Conferences

Posted by GMRwings1983 on 05 December 2011 - 10:11 PM

What Bettman wants Bettman gets. We all should have seen this coming.

I guess nothing really changes for Detroit except that the first two rounds will likely be boring as all get out from here on out. I really wanted to move East, but I guess it's hard to argue that when Columbus is farther east than us.

Too bad, as the Western Conference Finals are usually better than the Cup Finals. Would have liked to play a Western team for the Cup.


:rolleyes:

Yeah, playing against the Hawks will be boring around here.


#2233052 Realignment decided - 4 Conferences

Posted by GMRwings1983 on 05 December 2011 - 10:06 PM

What are you guys whining about? We'll dominate that division. Chicago is the only other powerhouse in our division.

We'll have to play them in the playoffs perenially. It'll heat the rivalry up even more.

It's not as good as just moving the Wings to the East but it is MUCH better than what we have now. Only 1 trip to Western Canada and 1 to the California. And in the playoffs we play the first 2 rounds in our time zone or the Central time zone. No flights to California in the first two rounds.

We also see Montreal, Toronto and Boston for a home and home every year. I would prefer to play them more but as I said, it's a big improvement over what we have now.


I agree. People are forgetting the bolded part as well. It's a good deal.


#2232824 Filppula leaves game with lower-body injury

Posted by GMRwings1983 on 04 December 2011 - 10:30 PM

Disappointed Bertuzzi didn't confront Jones after that hit.


#2232524 Teams Wings Fear Most In Playoffs?

Posted by GMRwings1983 on 04 December 2011 - 01:02 PM

Definitely this team was chock-full of gritty characters in 2002 and 2008.



The Wings` OT record in the post-lockout era is only slightly below .500. As for the OT losses against the Sharks, one was on an absurd bounce off of Stuart and the other was on a very lucky deflection off Zetterberg's stick. That's luck, not skill. But as usual, you're doing your best to sell the Wings short.


No, I'm just looking at our OT record and saying that it's subpar. You're the one making excuses for why i it is that way.