Jump to content


Hack & Whack Rule!'s Photo

Hack & Whack Rule!

Member Since 13 Mar 2008
Offline Last Active Jan 26 2015 08:25 PM
*----

#2038049 NHL Center Ice

Posted by Hack & Whack Rule! on 29 September 2010 - 04:49 PM

I live in Alberta and will be moving to Saskatchewan soon...I couldn't see many Wings games without it. I can't stand watching the s***ty streams off the webernet, so the money is totally worth it.


#1961927 Someone's not happy with Red Wings fans.....

Posted by Hack & Whack Rule! on 27 April 2010 - 06:51 PM

Let me get this straight.... A writer in a city whose team is in the playoffs is trashing the other team's fans. This, in the words of Mike Tyson, is ludicrous! I'm absolutely flabbergasted. What is hockey coming to? Take away the traditions, the rivalries, the over-the-top celebrating and douchebag writers and guess what you are left with. That's right...Ping Pong! That guy has a bad case of cranial-rectal inversion, obviously. Maybe he's just f***ed up because he, like everyone else in Dogtown, just realized there is a professional hockey team there, and after searching "hockey" on wikipedia, came to the conclusion that it's the greatest f***in' sport in the universe.


I fart in his general direction...


#1807286 OHL Hit

Posted by Hack & Whack Rule! on 02 November 2009 - 10:05 PM

QUOTE (Four @ November 2, 2009 - 10:59PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I called it a terrible hit, and it was. What good came out of that hit? Please tell me.


If Fanelli ever plays again, and I pray for a full recovery for him, he has probably learned a lesson here. That probably sounds cold, but it isn't meant to. This is a tough sport we watch and play. The next time something like this goes down, I'll bet he doesn't turn his back. That's the best I can come up with. Nobody said that a good hit can't have terrible consequences, and that is just what happened here.

Is it a s***ty deal for Fanelli? Yes, without a doubt.
Was there anything wrong with the hit? Nope, other than the outcome, of course.
Suspension worthy? Only if suspensions are given out for the result of "good hockey gone bad".




#1807279 OHL Hit

Posted by Hack & Whack Rule! on 02 November 2009 - 09:55 PM

QUOTE (Four @ November 2, 2009 - 10:39PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
You want history?
One of many dirty hits, this one on Tavares.

An excellent post from another forum made by an Otter fan;


And H&WR, I'm not even going to waste my time with you. I made this thread to show the hit, not create a huge argument. Instead of hoping the guys okay, you resort to bashing me and saying I'm wrong. Get a life and quit arguing. It was an intent to injure, and he has a history of doing so. He charges players all the time.



My first post in this thread:

QUOTE
First of all, I hope the kid will be okay.

Second of all, dude saw the train coming...twice! You can't spin like that to turn your back on somebody and not expect to get hit. He wasn't looking where he should have been. The guys elbows were tucked and he had his guy lined up for a check. That's the name of the game here, folks.

It sucks the kid went down like that, but I don't see anything deserving of a penalty.


An excerpt from a subsequent post of mine:

QUOTE
Again, I hope the kid is okay.



Slow down big fella! You are making guesses and assumptions, then stating them as fact. I refer to the intent to injure part. Fine, you showed the hit. You also posted this at the same time:

QUOTE
I live very close to Kitchener and I'm sure some of you have heard or seen this already. Terrible hit.


When you state an opinion on LGW, some are going to agree with you and some won't. We know which group I stand in. Dissenting opinions is what keeps things like this going. I think I'm right, you think you are right. One of us is wrong. As I said...if you don't want to be called out on the playground, stay inside at recess. As for this guy's history, I'll be honest and tell you I don't know s*** about him, and I also don't care. I'm talking about this hit.

And relax, I'm okay with you disagreeing with me.

Good luck to the Fanelli family.


#1807242 OHL Hit

Posted by Hack & Whack Rule! on 02 November 2009 - 09:14 PM

QUOTE (Four @ November 2, 2009 - 09:59PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
My eyes are dirty?
...Who the f*** are you?!
Did the kid put himself in a bad position? Yes of course he did.
Did the guy hitting him charge? Yes, I believe he did.
Did the guy hitting him, hit too high? Yes, I believe he did.
Did the guy hitting him try to slow down? No.
Did the guy hitting him show any remorse? Hell no, he pushes another guy other right after the hit.
Did an overage OHL player hit a 16 year old rookie with intention to hurt? I believe so.

It's people like you why I hate trying to debate on here. You are rude and cannot let people debate different sides, you have to resort to pointing fingers and accusing people of being wrong.


Yes, your eyes are dirty because you aren't seeing clearly.
I the f*** am Hack and Whack Rule.
...bad position? Yes, you agree with me.
...charge? No, he stopped skating at the bottom of the circle.
...hit too high? Possibly, apparently size matters (my wife was wrong). But I'll give you that one up to the point that Liamba is smidge taller.
...slow down? It's called hockey. People get the smackdown in hockey. Why slow down? Refer to the bad position part of this post.
...remorse? The other guy was going to level him, so he prepared himself. Nothing wrong there, either. In fact, he then took a shot from the goalie.
...intention to hurt? You think so, or you know so?

I apologize if I hurt your feelings. That sounds like attitude, but it is not meant to. The whole point of debate is to accuse the other of being wrong, and then show them why. You have done this yourself in this thread. If you don't want to be "accused" of being wrong (I call it "proven" wrong, but whatever) then you should be more selective in your posts. Especially if you are going to use a frame from a video showing an elbow up on a hit, when the hit is clearly complete in said frame. Again, I apologize for sounding rude.


#1807221 OHL Hit

Posted by Hack & Whack Rule! on 02 November 2009 - 08:50 PM

QUOTE (Four @ November 2, 2009 - 09:44PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Eat crow? It was a dirty hit in my eyes, I don't care what you believe it was.

As Broken mentioned above, it's clearly a head shot when the guy gets his skull fractured.


Your eyes are dirty not the hit. You are looking at the outcome of the collision and jumping to conclusions. The kid put himself in that situation. He saw the hit coming, turned his back at the last second, and got laid out. Very unfortunate ending to a hit does not mean the hit was dirty. He tried to protect the puck and keep possession, so he's got a good head on his shoulders (no sick joke intended), but he turned his back on a hit that he knew was coming.


#1807207 OHL Hit

Posted by Hack & Whack Rule! on 02 November 2009 - 08:40 PM

QUOTE (Four @ November 2, 2009 - 09:27PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I don't really see that as tucked in..


Dude, you just lost all credibility with this one. I just watched it again, in case I made a mistake, and I paused the video at the right time. The kid is going down and elbows are still tucked in. Watch it again, and warm up your fork, because it's time to eat crow.

Again, I hope the kid is okay.


#1807198 OHL Hit

Posted by Hack & Whack Rule! on 02 November 2009 - 08:34 PM

First of all, I hope the kid will be okay.

Second of all, dude saw the train coming...twice! You can't spin like that to turn your back on somebody and not expect to get hit. He wasn't looking where he should have been. The guys elbows were tucked and he had his guy lined up for a check. That's the name of the game here, folks.

It sucks the kid went down like that, but I don't see anything deserving of a penalty.