Jump to content


xtrememachine1's Photo

xtrememachine1

Member Since 19 May 2008
Offline Last Active Dec 05 2014 12:58 PM
*----

#2437122 9/16 Pre-Season GDT : Red Wings 4 at Penguins 1

Posted by xtrememachine1 on 17 September 2013 - 06:34 AM

I just saw the third period, but it looked like a typical Wings-Pens game.  Wings winning, Pens getting swarmed with defense, Pens acting like thugs because they're losing, Crosby acting like a spoiled brat.  On one play, Crosby skated through the middle with the puck, was swarmed with Wings, Quincy ended up being the one that knocked the puck off his stick, it went to the boards, Quincy moves it over to the other d-man and Crosby takes a swipe at Quincy's head with his stick.  Seriously?  Its preseason, its 4-1, its the last half of the third period.  Kunitz blindsides Abdelkader.  Orpik took a couple of shots at players.  Its really disgraceful how they play, even in preseason.  

 

It may have been just a preseason game, but man, did it feel good watching the Wings beat them so badly.




#2425243 Report: Red Wings out on Lecavalier - signs with Philly 5@4.5 per

Posted by xtrememachine1 on 03 July 2013 - 06:42 AM

Philly is a prime example of how NOT to do it.  Sure they're making trades, making big signings, buying out players, but they're also over the cap even after buying out Briere and Bryzgalov.  They're stuck with Pronger's contract, Giroux and Brayden Schenn are RFAs next year and Giroux should be getting a huge deal coming up, they have just one goalie right now, Wayne Simmonds is signed through 2019(?), 7 of their 9 defensemen are making over $3.5 mil...  its things like this that make me glad we have a GM that takes a more patient approach.


  • Nev likes this


#2425061 Wings buy out Colaiacovo, will keep Bertuzzi

Posted by xtrememachine1 on 02 July 2013 - 07:57 PM

I think using a buyout on Carlo is a waste.  IMHO, he was one of our top 4 defensemen in the playoffs, and is paid less than at least one guy who he outplayed (Quincy).  I think he could and would crack our lineup even with DeKeyser back.  Now, we are relying on Smith to step it up and Quincy to play to his potential every night vs. having a guy that came in and played rock solid in our back pocket.  And we're doing this why? To keep Samuelsson??  WTF???

 

I agree 100%.  Colo actually did something this past season and is in a position of need.  Sammy did literally nothing for us, costs us more and plays a position we're log jammed at already.  I'm not sure why they're keeping him.  He's not good enough to be top 6 and if he plays the bottom 6, he'll take away a roster spot from one our younger players that should be with the big club.  I really hope there's a trade in the works here.




#2423115 Blackhawks Letter of Appreciation

Posted by xtrememachine1 on 28 June 2013 - 01:30 PM

This is just to make up for those Blackhawks t-shirts that said "Chicago Stronger".




#2423000 Letang Turns Down 8x$7m

Posted by xtrememachine1 on 28 June 2013 - 06:14 AM

This looks like "Jordan Staal Part II".  Quite frankly I'm surprised Shero made that kind of offer.  Does he not understand that one of the contributing factors to the Pens failures is the fact that they have no depth?  Crosby makes almost $9 mil per year, Malkin is over $9 mil, Fleury, Martin and Neal are all making $5 mil.  And now you want to blow another $7 mil on a one dimensional defenseman?  I think they're lucky he rejected the deal.  




#2422164 2013 Stanley Cup Finals - Boston Bruins vs. Chicago Blackhawks

Posted by xtrememachine1 on 25 June 2013 - 11:49 AM

Sorry man but I respectfully and wholeheartedly disagree. A Calder Cup championship in no way makes up for the fact that our franchise had three chances to put away the team that eventually hoisted. That is choke/heartbreak/salt in wound all over the place.

 

To each his own.  The Wings were not expected to do anything this year and I felt the most important part of this year was the development of our young guys.  I mean, if our top prospects don't perform well, we're looking at some lean years, lottery draft picking years.  Seeing them take it to Chicago, a team that eventually won the Stanley Cup, is very promising.  Seeing them win the Calder Cup down in the AHL is even more promising.  Losing never feels good, especially to Chicago, but there's a big shiny silver lining to this past season and maybe that makes me a glass half full kind of guy, but the promise these young guys showed this spring outshine the loss.  Again though, that's just me.




#2422110 Hawks new model franchise?

Posted by xtrememachine1 on 25 June 2013 - 08:25 AM

 

Guy threw horseshoes at a dart board to set his lines throughout this whole offseason... he had no clue how to even strategize matchups until Babs schooled him.

 

Joel is a good coach in that he came up with a good system that works for the Hawks and their team to make them successful.  He's not a good coach at making adjustments.  He had no answer for what Babcock was doing and when he did change something, Babcock came right back and countered.




#2422074 2013 Stanley Cup Finals - Boston Bruins vs. Chicago Blackhawks

Posted by xtrememachine1 on 25 June 2013 - 06:24 AM

Congrats to the Hawks.  Even with the injuries to Toews and Hossa, they still pulled out a series win.  Having said that, after Game 3 Boston looked like a completely different team.  I don't know if it was a loss of focus because maybe they thought they had this in the bag or more likely they were exhausted, but the passing wasn't there like it had been and the speed wasn't there on the offensive forecheck.  I know he got hurt last night, but Jagr played like a 41 year old hockey player in the last 3 games.  Krejci pretty much disappeared.  Marchand didn't have the speed like he did before.  Rask looked pretty unsure of himself at the end too.  He was so confident in net and in the zone and then after that 6 goal game, he never got back into form.  Patrice Bergeron's injury was tough on them.  He's a pretty important part of their team and his injury can't be understated.

 

As its been said before in this thread, we were the closest team to knocking off the Hawks and that's pretty damn good considering all of the inexperience we had on our team and the fact that we weren't expected to do anything.  We weren't lucky either.  It was inexperience, some bad luck and some bad breaks that led to our loss.  




#2420486 2013 Stanley Cup Finals - Boston Bruins vs. Chicago Blackhawks

Posted by xtrememachine1 on 18 June 2013 - 07:04 AM

I think at this point, unless Boston quits playing or suffers an injury to a star player, there's no way they can lose this.  Chicago was having trouble just getting shots on goal and when they did it was just one shot and no rebound.  Rask will stop those all day.  If it wasn't for that cheap third goal, off the skate, in Game 1, this series could be 3-0 right now.

 

On a side note, does anyone else think this is Jagr's best playoffs post-1996.  The numbers aren't there and he doesn't have a goal in the playoffs, but he looks like a very well rounded player.  He's making some nice plays defensively, setting up offense.  He's contributing in big ways that don't show up on stat sheet.




#2419701 2013 Stanley Cup Finals - Boston Bruins vs. Chicago Blackhawks

Posted by xtrememachine1 on 13 June 2013 - 01:39 PM

Can CHI lose an OT for once, please?

 




#2419666 What would you give up for Malkin?

Posted by xtrememachine1 on 13 June 2013 - 10:24 AM

 

According to capgeek, the have 7+mil of space for next year, and 10 guys to sign. Gotta believe Letang is gone next year. Id take him, might cost you 6+mil for him though.

 

I was actually teasing a friend of mine who is a HUGE Letang fan saying he should go to Detroit.  But actually that might not be a bad idea.  Give us a good right handed shot from the point, a true powerplay QB, he'd fit right into our system.  I don't see why he couldn't be another Brian Rafalski for us.




#2419664 What would you give up for Malkin?

Posted by xtrememachine1 on 13 June 2013 - 10:21 AM

I kind of figured he'd get a deal like this, but $9.5 mil and he's somewhat injury prone.  Plus, you're already committing $8.7 mil per year to another player who's even more injury prone.  This top heavy, shootout, superstar team might do well in the regular season, but its proven it can't handle the playoffs.  I'm not saying that they shouldn't have resigned Malkin, but I don't know if signing someone to a huge contract that eats up a bunch of cap space is a good idea when the cap's going down and your team has been exposed several times in the postseason as having a ton of holes and lack of depth. Letang's pretty much a goner and your blue line is already the weak point on the team.  I keep reading Pens fans saying "Okay, let's go lock up Tanger long term.  And then Duper and then Iginla.  And then get Cooke back!".  I'm like, "You know there's a salary cap right?  And these guys aren't going to play for free"  I'm soooo glad the Wings don't think like this and they would rather have a well balanced team.




#2419362 Bylsma and McLellan Extended

Posted by xtrememachine1 on 12 June 2013 - 10:33 AM

I really don't get how Byslma gets extended.  You have arguably the two best players in the league on your roster and every spring for the past 4 years has been a playoff embarrassment.  Oh well, I guess I don't have to worry about them getting Dave Tippett. lol




#2418983 2013 Stanley Cup Finals - Boston Bruins vs. Chicago Blackhawks

Posted by xtrememachine1 on 10 June 2013 - 07:11 AM

Well since getting scared by the Leafs in the first round, the B's are 8-1 and just swept the top seeded Penguins, who also led the league by a wide margin in goals for during the regular season and were held to just 2 goals for the entire series.  Its really hard NOT to pick the Bruins here.  I think this series will be similar to ours.  Toews and Kane will get swarmed by defenders, they won't be able to forecheck as well against Boston's system and I think the B's could have this in 6 games.  I would say 5 games, but I think Chicago is good enough to prevent the Cup from being won on their ice.




#2418709 ECF - (4) Boston Bruins vs. (1) Pittsburgh Penguins

Posted by xtrememachine1 on 08 June 2013 - 09:02 PM

My favorite line from watching the sports talks shows here is "50 years from now, we'll look back on this and still have no idea how the Pens lost this series."  Watching Milbury and Jones on NBC was like watching them mourn over the loss of a friend, saying how surprising it was.  The sweep was the surprise, the results was not.  Sure the Pens had all the talent to win a Cup, but that's pretty much it.  It takes more than talent to win it.  Boston was well coached, well organized, they played a great defensive system, people were in position all the time, passes were sharp and frequent, nobody panicked when they had the puck and they capitalized on defensive breakdowns.  That's how the Pens lost. Boston was well prepared.  It was obvious from Game 1.  Bylsma will be gone, when your expectations are that high and your roster is that loaded, somebody has to take the fall.  I just hope they don't go out and get Dave Tippett to replace him.  Look at how much he got out of the Coyotes, I would hate to see him in Pittsburgh.