Jump to content

softshoes's Photo


Member Since 16 Jan 2009
Offline Last Active Sep 25 2014 10:33 PM

#1923602 Life after Lids

Posted by softshoes on 24 March 2010 - 08:20 AM

Attached File  JohnnyDangerously70.jpg   81.24KB   0 downloads

That's a farging trick question.There is no life after Lids

#1923051 DET-PIT Post-Game Discussion

Posted by softshoes on 23 March 2010 - 09:52 AM

What Howard did was cool but at some point Hank's gonna have to take care of s*** like this himself.

Maybe in a playoff game and you want the extra man you don't engage but last night was the end of the game. Do yourself a favor Z and clock him when he pulls that, he may reconsider the next time you bunch his panties up.

Just my 2cents, your mileage may vary.

#1916141 Teams that Should Have Never Changed their Jerseys

Posted by softshoes on 15 March 2010 - 08:55 AM

Tradition people. I hope to never see the Wings make changes to their uni.

Tradition is why a the Hawks sold jerseys when they stunk the joint up. It's why a team like the Tigers could be in the top 5 in the market when their team was losing 100 games a year.

If it's a good design, and they don't f*** with it, any generation can say that's what they looked like when I started watching hockey.

Instant recognition shouldn't be taken lightly.

#1914619 Retired Jerseys?

Posted by softshoes on 12 March 2010 - 08:04 AM

Sorry to be picky but wasn't it 3 Cups for Ozzie? It just helps his case!

3cups but only netminding for 2, he watched Vernon win the first one.

I'm disappointed in you Grind Liners, almost 2 whole pages for Maltby, Draper and Mac's name to come up.

/waiting for the any goalie could have won with the Wings argument against Osgood.<_<

#1911801 3/9 GDT: Flames 4 at Red Wings 2

Posted by softshoes on 09 March 2010 - 08:21 AM

you're not kidding ledba lilja was solid in the playoffs the last 2 years can't figure this one out
Erickson needs to ponder life and hockey from the press box for a long time
I'd be in the house that would designate him injury only to dress at this point
my 2 cents worth

There is a "." missing here or something, maybe some of these ",". :P

Not that I disagree with the sentiment.