because we are talking about perfectly trained adults here, they are the players and I would guess that they now exactly what is best for them and what is not.
Which is why as a whole the players agreed to implement the new rule about visors.
the fact that not wearing a visor gives you way better vision.
Until you get a stick/puck to the eye.
The vision increase is not that significant, and easily adapted to. It's one thing to ask players that have played without one their whole career to suddenly wear one, it's quite another to keep making younger players wear it. The risk/reward is so evident, that's what makes it tough for a lot of people to understand why people are against visors.
Good! Does that mean they found the problem? or are they just hoping
That's the thing with backs, it's so hard to diagnose the exact cause. The scary thing is like concussions is one day you'll feel 100% and then the next you'll be in agony. Backs and the brain are about the last two places on the body that the medical community hasn't quite nailed down 100% yet.
It's not fun to be in Marian Hossa's shoes where you're high stick caused the end of someone's career, it can have a traumatic effect on how you go on in life. If a simple rule can cut down on those situations I don't see the big deal about it.
Find content
Male
