Jump to content

Opie's Photo


Member Since 04 Jun 2002
Offline Last Active Today, 03:15 PM

#2591769 Red Wings clinch 24th consecutive Playoff appearance

Posted by Xitium on 09 April 2015 - 09:38 PM

I was 21 when the Wings won it all in '97. The dead Wings era is still in my memory.


I hope this streak is all a lot of you will ever remember.



#2569700 Babcock: "HE WINS, FULL STOP" - THN

Posted by number9 on 10 February 2015 - 10:13 PM

But he still has these states:

Alabama; Arkansas; Washington, D.C.; Guam; Hawaii; Kentucky; Montana; Nevada; New Hampshire; New Jersey; New Mexico; Ohio; Texas; Vermont; Virginia; West Virginia; and Wyoming.


Only 4 of which have hockey teams.. 


wait, wtf are we talking about again?





Most of these states don't surprise me

#2547534 Gustavsson injured

Posted by BottleOfSmoke on 05 November 2014 - 11:40 PM

*fake shocked face*

#2512156 ECQF Game 2 GDT : Red Wings 1 at Bruins 4 - Series tied 1-1

Posted by AtomicPunk on 20 April 2014 - 02:55 PM

Marchand is extra douchy...

#2509092 2014 Round 1 Photoshop War: Boston Bruins

Posted by MabusIncarnate on 13 April 2014 - 02:36 AM


#2508427 Nyquist since Datsyuk's Return & Unnatural NHL Development

Posted by rick zombo on 10 April 2014 - 08:15 AM

This. Also Nyquist can't be expected to score at that kind of pace for the long term. If he did he would have like 50 goals or something. He stepped up his game and got some good bounces for a while and now he will just keep plugging. 


Exactly. What we saw from Goose wasn't typical production IMO. He was on pace for over 40 goals and I think he's closer to a 30 goal guy.


So, it's not like something's wrong with his play now, in fact it's more normal than it was when he was on his rampage.

#2504447 Dive of the Year

Posted by BottleOfSmoke on 01 April 2014 - 08:36 PM

Good lord.

Maybe the ref had...you know...like razor blades tucked in his knuckles? I mean you never know, we don't know his struggles. Coming up from the wrong side of the tracks and whatnot. He had to learn how to take care of himself, no one else was going to. What with his dad leaving when he was four and his mom working three jobs just to make ends meet. He had to make a name for himself on the streets, so no one would mess with his mute brother Clarence. "Razor Fists" they would call him. Now he lies awake at night, wondering how things could have been different.

Or, you know, Crysby is a poopy diaper diving baby.

#2493357 Legwand to Detroit for Eaves, Jarnkrok + cond 3rd/2nd

Posted by Ally on 09 March 2014 - 02:13 AM

I can't keep track of which people are mad about the trade and which are mad that we never make trades and the large group of people who seem to be upset about both.

Glad Kenny did something, we'll see how it turns out in the end but I'm not too upset. Have to give something to get something despite what many seem to think.

#2492469 Patrick Eaves First Game as a Predator

Posted by Echolalia on 07 March 2014 - 03:20 PM

It's good that he's getting a shot at keeping his career alive. Patty is a class act and a contributor. He deserves to play.

#2491910 Legwand to Detroit for Eaves, Jarnkrok + cond 3rd/2nd

Posted by joesuffP on 06 March 2014 - 07:29 PM

Leino. Board was devastated when they let him go

#2491715 Legwand to Detroit for Eaves, Jarnkrok + cond 3rd/2nd

Posted by wings4thecup06 on 06 March 2014 - 02:31 PM


Like I said for me its not about Legwand I like him but I'm getting sick of Holland and his mojo:

- we are only making hockey deals --> this was highway robbery by Poile so the opposite from a hockeydeal

- throwing kids under the bus to make himself look better or like a genius for no good reason

- says you can't fix one of the teams biggest problems toughness, grit well Burke, Mactavish fixed it within weeks

- he now likes our youth and what is he doing ? Trades away our best center prospect yeah Jarnkrok needs to bulk up and put on some serious muscle but the kid is 20 plenty of time to do that


Still wanna get rid of the kid? Fine package him for some much needed defensive help you know someone like Ehrhoff, Myers or use Vancouvers firesale to your advantage a get a guy like Hamhuis or Bieksa (maybe both) here.


This is not the mastermind we are used to. Between 2009 and 2014 something has changed. Thanks for all the great work Holland but now I'm wishing you would have retired with Lidström and made room for another guy.


Holland bashing aside (and the 22 consecutive years of playoff hockey - I honestly wonder if most of us here actually appreciate that and how incredible that is) here's why I disagree with you:


  • This is a hockey deal if Legwand re-signs (which seems more likely - read Khan's article as to how excited DL is to be playing in Detroit http://www.mlive.com..._to_retur.html)
  • The playoff streak aside, the question then becomes 'do you want to make the playoffs or not?' To which the answer should always be a resounding 'yes'. Make it a double yes when you factor in a relatively weak and wide open Eastern Conference. If that isn't the answer every single year then the organisation is doing something wrong
  • How is KH throwing kids under the bus? He had to make a move due to our injuries. By not making a move, it's suicidal for our playoff chances. 
  • Can you reference where he has implicitly stated our biggest weakness is lack of toughness or grit? 
  • And he likes our youth - Jurco, Sheahan, Nyqvist, Tatar, DeKeyser, and maybe a few others who are in the pipeline like Mantha, Athanasiou, Pulkkinen, Almquist etc etc. The whole point of having a deep prospect pool aside from replenishing your lineup is to use them as assets to upgrade your team. I see nothing wrong with doing so here. Legwand fills a need right now and one that makes this team better going forward. Jarnkrok does not and KH made it clear that he's behind lots of guys. Would you rather have one prospect who's 2/3 years away from making an impact be the reason you didn't make the push to make the playoffs? (streak or no streak)
  • And there have been various reports that have stated Canucks ownership nixed them trading Kesler/Edler etc (http://vansunsportsb...trade-deadline/)
  • And as for everyone else, it was most likely that we'd have to pay a hell of alot more for one those aforementioned D men - which would have created uproar here. Oh and there's also a salary cap to deal with. 

#2483210 NHL players will not participate in 2018 Olympics (Mod Post #99)

Posted by LeftWinger on 10 February 2014 - 02:59 PM

No "All-Star" game will ever have the same impact on Hockey that the 1980 Olympics.  I don't care about the game that went into overtime last time.  It was just an all star game.  It no affect on the fans in the USA, which is where the TV revenue comes from, so there is where you want to ratings and the fan interest in order to grow your sport.  Think about the NHL before 1980 in the states, then think about where it has come since then in the States.  Hockey has ALWAYS been near the top of the list in countries around the globe like Russia, Sweden, Czech and Finland.  It will always be tops in Canada no matter what.  If you want your sport to grow again by leaps and bounds again in the States, where I will mention again because it is very important to my point, where the TV revenue is, you have to have miracle type stories.  Around the world the USA is known for MLB, NFL and NBA, then the NHL and hockey in general falls way down the list right now.  Sure, current NHL fans will watch the "pros" play in the Olympics, and enjoy the tourney, but they will also watch a regular all star game and enjoy it, but you want to attract MORE than just the NHL fans.  You want to attract fans in Alabama who do have a college hockey team, but when it comes to the NHL, they don't know too much. But put our College kids against the CHL, SEL, etc... and now we have more interest from all over the states.  It still may not get you a franchise in Alabama, but if a kid out of UAH has a pretty good college career and but shines in the Olympic tourney and perhaps earns himself a draft by an NHL team, you now have a few more fans in that state who might turn on ESPN to watch their hometown kid skate for the Canadiens... right now, you can be guaranteed that Olympic fans in Alabama or Mississippi are not going to watch the Ice Hockey tournament just because NHL players are there, but if they have a kid from UAH there, that maybe wouldn't normally have a shot at the Olympics, you can be sure they will tune in...although looking at UAH's roster, there isn't any kids from Alabama on it, but that could change with the Olympics selecting College kids because maybe a young boy sees a UAH player going to the Olympics it may intrigue him to start playing.  Right now that young boy just strives to play football and having the NHL players over there won't change that and it won't turn on the TV's in non-NHL cities...


1980 was to USA hockey is what the Beatles were to Rock N Roll...it's time to go back to investing in our kids to promote this sport, not a bunch of well (some over) paid athletes...

#2483090 NHL players will not participate in 2018 Olympics (Mod Post #99)

Posted by TheCaptain19 on 09 February 2014 - 09:21 PM

amidst the cluster F that is sochi.. this doesn't surprise. 

#2482377 Next Seasons Needs/Team Future

Posted by joesuffP on 07 February 2014 - 04:12 PM

If we paid that much for Vanek we're still not going anywhere in the playoffs if we don't get a capable top 4 defensemen. This team can find the goals we need. We don't need to pay 1M dollars for 4.5 goals if he can somehow reach his career highs again

#2480549 The NHL reffing affecting the game

Posted by DickieDunn on 03 February 2014 - 11:05 AM


The Wings were 2/3 on the PP, the fact they didn't kill their penalties is why they lost. Washington was 3 for 6. That last call was brutal, and I think OT penalties should be limited only to automatic calls like slashing or delay of game, with few exceptions. The way Washington was flopping all over the place is where my issue lies, the refs call what they see and more and more players and diving and flopping to the ice so they get the call. I've also seen some players dive into the boards for the sake of getting the call. It sickens me, and I can't blame the refs, it's the players finding every tiny advantage they can get. If Refs started to catch on, they would be calling more dives and hopefully that fixes the issue. 


So you want a different set of rules.  Which will benefit the teams that are more likely to throw cheap shots.  IMO, that attitude is stupid.  The rules are the rules.  If something is a call in the first 2 minutes, it should be a call in the last 2 minutes.  Either way the ref's decision affects the game.  If he makes the call, it benefits the team that should get a PP.  If he lets it go, it gives the team that committed the penalty an advantage where the other team was probably called for a similar penalty and had to kill a PP earlier in the game.  As a player I want consistency above all.  If you're going to call everything.  Fine, I'll know that.  If you're going to let things go, fine, I'll adjust my game accordingly.  But if you're going to let 6 blatant trips go and then call someone for tripping when a guy falls on his own, that's when I get pissed.